|
On November 28 2014 03:15 Sn0_Man wrote:
well for one thing both of them have strange ideas about me being scum based on the literal nothings
asserting that ur play is godlike day 1 is questionable regardless of veracity. see: geripts earlier claims
I'm pretty sure HF's recent performances, note the plural, speak for themselves.
|
On November 28 2014 03:15 Holyflare wrote:
I want to discuss what you think is wrong with my list. Quite clearly disagreeing about yourself is irrelevant. You are shutting down talking about the rest of my reads because you are bitter about earlier and i called it childish.
You asked me what was wrong about your list and I answered. There was no shutting down. If I had a big problem with any other read of yours I would have said so obviously.
|
On November 28 2014 03:15 Sn0_Man wrote:
well for one thing both of them have strange ideas about me being scum based on the literal nothings
asserting that ur play is godlike day 1 is questionable regardless of veracity. see: geripts earlier claims
I don't remember calling my play godlike.
On November 28 2014 03:15 Holyflare wrote:
Who is scum jat?
If I knew I would probably tell, don't you think?
|
On November 28 2014 03:15 Sn0_Man wrote:
well for one thing both of them have strange ideas about me being scum based on the literal nothings
asserting that ur play is godlike day 1 is questionable regardless of veracity. see: geripts earlier claims
Like saying you're town and therefore we're way off base is ridiculous. Show us that you're town and show ushow and where else we've gone wrong then. Like all you're doing right now is shitting on people
|
On November 28 2014 03:20 geript wrote:Show nested quote +On November 28 2014 03:15 Sn0_Man wrote:
well for one thing both of them have strange ideas about me being scum based on the literal nothings
asserting that ur play is godlike day 1 is questionable regardless of veracity. see: geripts earlier claims Like saying you're town and therefore we're way off base is ridiculous. Show us that you're town and show ushow and where else we've gone wrong then. Like all you're doing right now is shitting on people
see now ur putting words into my mouth too
|
On November 28 2014 03:21 Sn0_Man wrote:Show nested quote +On November 28 2014 03:20 geript wrote:On November 28 2014 03:15 Sn0_Man wrote:
well for one thing both of them have strange ideas about me being scum based on the literal nothings
asserting that ur play is godlike day 1 is questionable regardless of veracity. see: geripts earlier claims Like saying you're town and therefore we're way off base is ridiculous. Show us that you're town and show ushow and where else we've gone wrong then. Like all you're doing right now is shitting on people see now ur putting words into my mouth too
Well, do you or do you not disagree with anything they said besides their read on you?
|
On November 28 2014 03:21 Sn0_Man wrote:Show nested quote +On November 28 2014 03:20 geript wrote:On November 28 2014 03:15 Sn0_Man wrote:
well for one thing both of them have strange ideas about me being scum based on the literal nothings
asserting that ur play is godlike day 1 is questionable regardless of veracity. see: geripts earlier claims Like saying you're town and therefore we're way off base is ridiculous. Show us that you're town and show ushow and where else we've gone wrong then. Like all you're doing right now is shitting on people see now ur putting words into my mouth too
Is there a different way to take" neither big G nor HF have a good grasp on this game" than that we're both town and both pretty wrong in our suspects?
|
On November 28 2014 03:25 geript wrote:Show nested quote +On November 28 2014 03:21 Sn0_Man wrote:On November 28 2014 03:20 geript wrote:On November 28 2014 03:15 Sn0_Man wrote:
well for one thing both of them have strange ideas about me being scum based on the literal nothings
asserting that ur play is godlike day 1 is questionable regardless of veracity. see: geripts earlier claims Like saying you're town and therefore we're way off base is ridiculous. Show us that you're town and show ushow and where else we've gone wrong then. Like all you're doing right now is shitting on people see now ur putting words into my mouth too Is there a different way to take" neither big G nor HF have a good grasp on this game" than that we're both town and both pretty wrong in our suspects?
There's no assertion that either of you are town in my statement. Feel free to try re-reading what I said.
both of you started this game by being unreasonably rude to me without any particular reason and seem to believe that I'm scum because I had no desire to interact with you at game start when all you wanted to do was be offensive.
I don't see how any of that would be alignment indicative but it definitely means that at least one of your reads is bad and based on bullshit. Technically if you were scum you'd have perfect reads, but w/e.
If I had particular reason to believe that you are any given alignment that would probably make it into the thread
|
What did you mean when you said we don't "have a good grasp of the game?"
|
On November 28 2014 03:31 Sn0_Man wrote:
it definitely means that at least one of your reads is bad and based on bullshit.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On November 28 2014 03:31 Sn0_Man wrote:Show nested quote +On November 28 2014 03:25 geript wrote:On November 28 2014 03:21 Sn0_Man wrote:On November 28 2014 03:20 geript wrote:On November 28 2014 03:15 Sn0_Man wrote:
well for one thing both of them have strange ideas about me being scum based on the literal nothings
asserting that ur play is godlike day 1 is questionable regardless of veracity. see: geripts earlier claims Like saying you're town and therefore we're way off base is ridiculous. Show us that you're town and show ushow and where else we've gone wrong then. Like all you're doing right now is shitting on people see now ur putting words into my mouth too Is there a different way to take" neither big G nor HF have a good grasp on this game" than that we're both town and both pretty wrong in our suspects? There's no assertion that either of you are town in my statement. Feel free to try re-reading what I said. both of you started this game by being unreasonably rude to me without any particular reason and seem to believe that I'm scum because I had no desire to interact with you at game start when all you wanted to do was be offensive. I don't see how any of that would be alignment indicative but it definitely means that at least one of your reads is bad and based on bullshit. Technically if you were scum you'd have perfect reads, but w/e. If I had particular reason to believe that you are any given alignment that would probably make it into the thread
I don't see how I was rude when all i wanted to do was talk about a read in the game and you quite clearly said no and left
|
you made up a read and offered to attack me if I didn't either vote with you or attack your read, neither of which provide any value to the game
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
I didn't make up a read i made a valuable case thati wanted you to comment on. Of course it's valuable to the game because it starts discussion.
|
On November 28 2014 03:37 Sn0_Man wrote:Show nested quote +On November 28 2014 03:31 Sn0_Man wrote:
it definitely means that at least one of your reads is bad and based on bullshit.
Except that being wrong doesn't equal being bad. Having one wrong read doesn't invalidate all reads. Am I wrong about you generally liking to mix it up early on and have fun joking around? Like having a scum read on you isn't being rude. Pressuring you to take a stance isn't rude.
Like I still don't get how your stance makes any sense whatsoever.
|
##unvote
##vote Wave
I'll give you some rope. Try not to hang yourself with it.
|
On November 28 2014 03:45 Holyflare wrote:
I didn't make up a read i made a valuable case thati wanted you to comment on. Of course it's valuable to the game because it starts discussion.
hi everybody vote the person with 0 posts 1 hour into day 1
thats my exact definition of useless
On November 28 2014 03:46 geript wrote:Show nested quote +On November 28 2014 03:37 Sn0_Man wrote:On November 28 2014 03:31 Sn0_Man wrote:
it definitely means that at least one of your reads is bad and based on bullshit. Except that being wrong doesn't equal being bad. Having one wrong read doesn't invalidate all reads. Am I wrong about you generally liking to mix it up early on and have fun joking around? Like having a scum read on you isn't being rude. Pressuring you to take a stance isn't rude. Like I still don't get how your stance makes any sense whatsoever.
talk to me about how ur opening posts involve pressuring me to take a stance
keep in mind this is as some other retard is also voting me for no reason and everybody's busily being goddam wrong about russian politics.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
Then why couldn't you just say that in the first place??????
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
Saying "i don't vote ppl 1 hour into the game" is completely different from saying "it's based on nothing i don't agree, it's a useless case"
|
On November 28 2014 03:53 Holyflare wrote:
Then why couldn't you just say that in the first place??????
On November 27 2014 09:08 Sn0_Man wrote:Show nested quote +On November 27 2014 09:07 Holyflare wrote:
everyone should be voting jat or telling me why they aren't voting
chop chop i dont particularly subscribe to the "vote 60 mins into day 1" plan personally
|
On November 28 2014 03:50 Sn0_Man wrote:Show nested quote +On November 28 2014 03:45 Holyflare wrote:
I didn't make up a read i made a valuable case thati wanted you to comment on. Of course it's valuable to the game because it starts discussion. hi everybody vote the person with 0 posts 1 hour into day 1 thats my exact definition of useless Show nested quote +On November 28 2014 03:46 geript wrote:On November 28 2014 03:37 Sn0_Man wrote:On November 28 2014 03:31 Sn0_Man wrote:
it definitely means that at least one of your reads is bad and based on bullshit. Except that being wrong doesn't equal being bad. Having one wrong read doesn't invalidate all reads. Am I wrong about you generally liking to mix it up early on and have fun joking around? Like having a scum read on you isn't being rude. Pressuring you to take a stance isn't rude. Like I still don't get how your stance makes any sense whatsoever. talk to me about how ur opening posts involve pressuring me to take a stance keep in mind this is as some other retard is also voting me for no reason and everybody's busily being goddam wrong about russian politics.
I didn't say my posts made you take a stance. You were lumping HF and me together so I did the same. HF and I had scum reads on you for different reasons.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
