|
On September 30 2014 19:57 Ramiz1989 wrote: Again with Corruptors. This is interesting, I am pretty sure that Dark has tested this already. He wouldn't be testing things like this in the tournament.
It's interesting to see the reoccur.
|
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51436 Posts
People still not getting the point xD Writing it and speaking it are different, the way i write it is just because of how i type i don't think i just type how i would say it. Most (not all) of people in England say "would of" our "wudda" in phonetic sense when they say "would have" thus i type it like that .
i suggest you people watch an episode of an English soap opera and understand where i am coming from xD
|
Cool ling/bane/corruptor style. We've seen this in the past but it never became popular.
Looks like Dark has this game secured.
|
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51436 Posts
On September 30 2014 19:51 Big J wrote:Show nested quote +On September 30 2014 19:46 Pandemona wrote:On September 30 2014 19:45 Telon Petrides wrote: The corrupters were interesting and seemed to work until the engagement below Bbyong's 4th. If Dark pulled back instead I'd be interested to see how that played out Well he needed Blords quicker. Making the corrupters were interesting and also not wrong. Never morphing them into Blords was very wrong though. He was barely hanging onto his bases. How would he afford infestation pit-->hive-->greater spire while banking money to use for Blords?
Hmm he was sat 4 base though. He also then hit a nice engagement with the corrupters and pushed Bbyong all the way back to his natural. Then he should of been morphing his hive. Is what i thought he could HAVE done.
|
Czech Republic12125 Posts
On September 30 2014 19:54 Shellshock wrote:Show nested quote +On September 30 2014 19:52 graNite wrote:On September 30 2014 19:51 Shellshock wrote: it's because would've and would of are phonetically similar ok, but would of never occurs in the english language I'm not disagreeing. I'm just saying why a lot of people probably use it. They hear would've and it sounds like would of so it doesn't seem wrong to them even though it is Germany -> rules are there to follow, not to break them
Hmm, If Dark manages to advance, I can think about a premade scenario that Parting is more comfortable in PvT so Dark will advance 1st sniping one T and then P advances by sniping 2 T... damn, am I too paranoid? oO
|
On September 30 2014 19:58 Pandemona wrote: People still not getting the point xD Writing it and speaking it are different, the way i write it is just because of how i type i don't think i just type how i would say it. Most (not all) of people in England say "would of" our "wudda" in phonetic sense when they say "would have" thus i type it like that .
i suggest you people watch an episode of an English soap opera and understand where i am coming from xD
but it's the only thing where you type like you speak. For everything else you use the normal written language
|
Lorning
Belgica34432 Posts
Bbyong should of gone mech
|
On September 30 2014 20:01 Lorning wrote: Bbyong should of gone mech
Or he just should'f stopped building thors, no point vs no mutas.
+ Show Spoiler +Not making fun of you Pande, just the discussion ♥
|
Poll: Recommend Winners' Match Game 2?★★★★★- One of the best games this season (0) 0% ★★★★- Highly recommended game (4) 80% ★★★- Good game (1) 20% ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (0) 0% ★- Do not see this game no matter what (0) 0% 5 total votes Your vote: Recommend Winners' Match Game 2? (Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what
|
Good stuff Dark! Gogo win one more game!
|
marines are too bad vs ultras... thats the problem when you have too many reactored barracks in the late game
|
United States97274 Posts
Do corruptors make a difference? I think using mutas like normal would of been fine
|
On September 30 2014 20:03 Shellshock wrote: Do corruptors make a difference? I think using mutas like normal would of been fine the corruptor's arcance point of life: to snipe CCs
|
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51436 Posts
On September 30 2014 20:01 Yello wrote:Show nested quote +On September 30 2014 19:58 Pandemona wrote: People still not getting the point xD Writing it and speaking it are different, the way i write it is just because of how i type i don't think i just type how i would say it. Most (not all) of people in England say "would of" our "wudda" in phonetic sense when they say "would have" thus i type it like that .
i suggest you people watch an episode of an English soap opera and understand where i am coming from xD but it's the only thing where you type like you speak. For everything else you use the normal written language
This is correct i think, however i cannot think of any other ways in which anything is similar to cudda wudda and shudda. Mainly like i said because of stupid accents we have in England even though we are a very small island.
|
On September 30 2014 20:02 DJHelium wrote:Or he just should'f stopped building thors, no point vs no mutas. + Show Spoiler +Just making fun of you Pande♥
He definitely shouldfn't let them in that splash mode, the other won does way more damage.
|
Austria24416 Posts
Damn, sounds like I missed something cool
|
On September 30 2014 20:04 Pandemona wrote:Show nested quote +On September 30 2014 20:01 Yello wrote:On September 30 2014 19:58 Pandemona wrote: People still not getting the point xD Writing it and speaking it are different, the way i write it is just because of how i type i don't think i just type how i would say it. Most (not all) of people in England say "would of" our "wudda" in phonetic sense when they say "would have" thus i type it like that .
i suggest you people watch an episode of an English soap opera and understand where i am coming from xD but it's the only thing where you type like you speak. For everything else you use the normal written language This is correct i think, however i cannot think of any other ways in which anything is similar to cudda wudda and shudda. Mainly like i said because of stupid accents we have in England even though we are a very small island. people will often use to instead of too e.g.
|
On September 30 2014 20:03 Shellshock wrote: Do corruptors make a difference? I think using mutas like normal would of been fine Point is he is making a lot less Corruptors than Mutas.
He is using like ~10 Corruptors at best, while without ~20 Mutas you can't really do much. That means he can get a lot faster upgrades/hive and a lot more Banelings and those just crush Terran army with proper control and without dying to the mines.
He is losing harass potential with Mutas, but he constantly doing run-by with Lings and Banes.
Can't say which style is better, but it seems that this one works.
|
Czech Republic12125 Posts
On September 30 2014 20:04 Pandemona wrote:Show nested quote +On September 30 2014 20:01 Yello wrote:On September 30 2014 19:58 Pandemona wrote: People still not getting the point xD Writing it and speaking it are different, the way i write it is just because of how i type i don't think i just type how i would say it. Most (not all) of people in England say "would of" our "wudda" in phonetic sense when they say "would have" thus i type it like that .
i suggest you people watch an episode of an English soap opera and understand where i am coming from xD but it's the only thing where you type like you speak. For everything else you use the normal written language This is correct i think, however i cannot think of any other ways in which anything is similar to cudda wudda and shudda. Mainly like i said because of stupid accents we have in England even though we are a very small island. It's everywhere the same.
|
On September 30 2014 20:05 DarkLordOlli wrote: Damn, sounds like I missed something cool
Going speed roach-bane into ~10 corruptors, skipping mutas completely. Gives a ton have more gas for banelings/hive.
|
|
|
|