EPT[WECG] Korean Finals - Ro16 Group A - Page 5
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
AWalker9
United Kingdom7229 Posts
| ||
|
graNite
Germany4434 Posts
On September 30 2014 19:42 sparklyresidue wrote: it's the kind of english that happens when you hear a phrase instead of read it. Let's send pandemona some books  | ||
|
Yello
Germany7411 Posts
On September 30 2014 19:43 Yello wrote: Poll: Recommend Winners' Match Game 1? ★★★★★- One of the best games this season (0) ★★★★- Highly recommended game (3) ★★★- Good game (6) ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (0) ★- Do not see this game no matter what (0) 9 total votes Your vote: Recommend Winners' Match Game 1? (Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season | ||
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51479 Posts
It is English we use in England..............................It is not correct but it is what i have grown up SPEAKING. I write/type as i speak English, reason it is all not grammatically correct. Pretty sure in German there is ways you speak rather than the way it is grammatically correct to write it. | ||
|
Telon Petrides
Canada58 Posts
| ||
|
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51479 Posts
On September 30 2014 19:45 Telon Petrides wrote: The corrupters were interesting and seemed to work until the engagement below Bbyong's 4th. If Dark pulled back instead I'd be interested to see how that played out Well he needed Blords quicker. Making the corrupters were interesting and also not wrong. Never morphing them into Blords was very wrong though. | ||
|
Yello
Germany7411 Posts
On September 30 2014 19:44 Pandemona wrote: It is English we use in England..............................It is not correct but it is what i have grown up SPEAKING. I write/type as i speak English, reason it is all not grammatically correct. Pretty sure in German there is ways you speak rather than the way it is grammatically correct to write it. you are the only person I have ever seen use would of instead of would have. But you do it consistently | ||
|
juvenal
2448 Posts
On September 30 2014 19:47 Yello wrote: you are the only person I have ever seen use would of instead of would have. But you do it consistently it's a regular thing from what I've seen. | ||
|
AWalker9
United Kingdom7229 Posts
On September 30 2014 19:47 Yello wrote: you are the only person I have ever seen use would of instead of would have. But you do it consistently I've done it before. It's an English thing.  | ||
|
Keeemy
Finland7855 Posts
| ||
|
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51479 Posts
It wouldn't be as bad if the people who jumped on it where English but your German you don't speak English you speak German. I don't comment on Germany language for the reason i don't know German everyday speaking, just what i was taught. The same with you, you were taught that all England say "would have" and "could have" where in regular everyday conversations they dont  /rant On September 30 2014 19:49 AWalker9 wrote: I've done it before. It's an English thing. <3 ty walker | ||
|
juvenal
2448 Posts
On September 30 2014 19:49 Pandemona wrote: I could find many youtube clips of sports presenters and tv shows where people say "would of" and "could of" in speaking. I mean how else do you say that? It's how is sounds to me. | ||
Shellshock
United States97276 Posts
| ||
|
Big J
Austria16289 Posts
On September 30 2014 19:46 Pandemona wrote: Well he needed Blords quicker. Making the corrupters were interesting and also not wrong. Never morphing them into Blords was very wrong though. He was barely hanging onto his bases. How would he afford infestation pit-->hive-->greater spire while banking money to use for Blords? | ||
|
graNite
Germany4434 Posts
On September 30 2014 19:51 Shellshock wrote: it's because would've and would of are phonetically similar ok, but would of never occurs in the english language | ||
|
Shellshock
United States97276 Posts
On September 30 2014 19:52 graNite wrote: ok, but would of never occurs in the english language I'm not disagreeing. I'm just saying why a lot of people probably use it. They hear would've and it sounds like would of so it doesn't seem wrong to them even though it is | ||
|
royalroadweed
United States8301 Posts
On September 30 2014 19:49 Pandemona wrote: I could find many youtube clips of sports presenters and tv shows where people say "would of" and "could of" in speaking. Everywhere in England would of and could of are used. Like i said im not saying it isn't gramatically correct im just saying that the way people jump on it is quite alarming xD It wouldn't be as bad if the people who jumped on it where English but your German you don't speak English you speak German. I don't comment on Germany language for the reason i don't know German everyday speaking, just what i was taught. The same with you, you were taught that all England say "would have" and "could have" where in regular everyday conversations they dont /rant <3 ty walker Thats probably just because it sounds similar. "Would of" makes zero sense. I'm from a former british colony. I speak with an accent and butcher pronunciation all the time. However, you don't see me writing "Dem corruptas na had no use bhai." | ||
|
juvenal
2448 Posts
On September 30 2014 19:52 graNite wrote: ok, but would of never occurs in the english language it does tho /troll | ||
|
juvenal
2448 Posts
| ||
|
Ramiz1989
12124 Posts
| ||
| ||
