★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (1)
17%
★- Do not see this game no matter what (0)
0%
6 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Parting vs Dark Game 1?
(Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what
Poll: Recommend Parting vs Dark Game 2?
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (0)
0%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (1)
17%
★★★- Good game (1)
17%
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (3)
50%
★- Do not see this game no matter what (1)
17%
6 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Parting vs Dark Game 2?
(Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what
Poll: Recommend Parting vs Dark Game 3?
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (1)
14%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (0)
0%
★★★- Good game (0)
0%
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (4)
57%
★- Do not see this game no matter what (2)
29%
7 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Parting vs Dark Game 3?
(Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (0)
0%
★- Do not see this game no matter what (0)
0%
7 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Bbyong vs Hack Game 1?
(Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what
Poll: Recommend Bbyong vs Hack Game 2?
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (0)
0%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (0)
0%
★★★- Good game (2)
50%
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (2)
50%
★- Do not see this game no matter what (0)
0%
4 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Bbyong vs Hack Game 2?
(Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what
Poll: Recommend Bbyong vs Hack Game 3?
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (0)
0%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (0)
0%
★★★- Good game (3)
100%
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (0)
0%
★- Do not see this game no matter what (0)
0%
3 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Bbyong vs Hack Game 3?
(Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (0)
0%
★- Do not see this game no matter what (0)
0%
9 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Winners' Match Game 1?
(Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what
Poll: Recommend Winners' Match Game 2?
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (0)
0%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (4)
80%
★★★- Good game (1)
20%
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (0)
0%
★- Do not see this game no matter what (0)
0%
5 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Winners' Match Game 2?
(Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what
Poll: Recommend Winners' Match Game 3?
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (0)
0%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (0)
0%
★★★- Good game (7)
88%
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (0)
0%
★- Do not see this game no matter what (1)
13%
8 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Winners' Match Game 3?
(Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (1)
17%
★- Do not see this game no matter what (1)
17%
6 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Losers' Match Game 1?
(Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what
Poll: Recommend Losers' Match Game 2?
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (0)
0%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (0)
0%
★★★- Good game (2)
40%
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (1)
20%
★- Do not see this game no matter what (2)
40%
5 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Losers' Match Game 2?
(Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what
Poll: Recommend Losers' Match Game 3?
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (0)
0%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (1)
33%
★★★- Good game (1)
33%
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (1)
33%
★- Do not see this game no matter what (0)
0%
3 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Losers' Match Game 3?
(Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (0)
0%
★- Do not see this game no matter what (0)
0%
9 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Final Match Game 1?
(Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what
Poll: Recommend Final Match Game 2?
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (14)
78%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (1)
6%
★★★- Good game (3)
17%
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (0)
0%
★- Do not see this game no matter what (0)
0%
18 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Final Match Game 2?
(Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what
Poll: Recommend Final Match Game 3?
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (2)
29%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (2)
29%
★★★- Good game (2)
29%
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (0)
0%
★- Do not see this game no matter what (1)
14%
7 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Final Match Game 3?
(Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what
Having high hopes here for Dark. He is great Zerg and the only Zerg left in this tournament. Think that he can defeat Parting and Hack, Bbyong might be problematic.
On September 30 2014 17:44 Ramiz1989 wrote: Having high hopes here for Dark. He is great Zerg and the only Zerg left in this tournament. Think that he can defeat Parting and Hack, Bbyong might be problematic.
On September 30 2014 17:44 Ramiz1989 wrote: Having high hopes here for Dark. He is great Zerg and the only Zerg left in this tournament. Think that he can defeat Parting and Hack, Bbyong might be problematic.
Expecting good games!
is Soulkey confirmed to be retiring yet? I heard there are rumors but I thought he would still play in this as he is invited to the group stage
On September 30 2014 17:44 Ramiz1989 wrote: Having high hopes here for Dark. He is great Zerg and the only Zerg left in this tournament. Think that he can defeat Parting and Hack, Bbyong might be problematic.
Expecting good games!
Dark went 4-0 on Bbyong last summer! Believe!
I remember those games, but since then he was a bit inconsistent. He definitely was among the best ZvT players I've seen, and almost managed to beat Maru at his best. I just hope that now when a lot of players have left SKT, that he might get better and gets more showing.
On September 30 2014 17:44 Ramiz1989 wrote: Having high hopes here for Dark. He is great Zerg and the only Zerg left in this tournament. Think that he can defeat Parting and Hack, Bbyong might be problematic.
Expecting good games!
is Soulkey confirmed to be retiring yet? I heard there are rumors but I thought he would still play in this as he is invited to the group stage
Afaik he isn't retiring, he is going inactive for a bit. I don't know if he went inactive already, or will go after this tournament.
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (1)
17%
★- Do not see this game no matter what (0)
0%
6 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Parting vs Dark Game 1?
(Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (3)
50%
★- Do not see this game no matter what (1)
17%
6 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Parting vs Dark Game 2?
(Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (4)
57%
★- Do not see this game no matter what (2)
29%
7 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Parting vs Dark Game 3?
(Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what
Why do P players left in map pool this map is way beyond me... when you want to do Nexus first... what am I missing?
Edit:
On September 30 2014 18:43 DJHelium wrote: edit
pft I'm just bitter. Every time after watching a tournament with casters I like I get really annoyed by the ones I don't like.
Is it impossible to hold nexus first vs 14/14 on that map?
You have to manage to create a wall which can be defended by nexus cannon(hint, the huge ramp is way too far). If you do not block ramp to main, too many minerals too quick, IMO.
On September 30 2014 18:48 Ctesias wrote: I should stop underestimating Dark. He's really good.
SKT said that they have inhouse ranking when they are training and are playing against each other, and also said that Dark is #1 at those rankings. That was months ago when Rain, Soulkey and others were still in SKT.
the ping on the minimap for units loading into a medivac is pretty annoying. I mean it doesn't add anything to the viewer experience, does it? We then know that things got loaded into a medivac. We don't know if the medivac is flying out to drop or if it's staying there like in this game for hellbat-drops on the army or if it was just a misclick
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (0)
0%
★- Do not see this game no matter what (0)
0%
7 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Bbyong vs Hack Game 1?
(Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what
On September 30 2014 19:07 Pandemona wrote: Wow looks like all of Startale new sponsor team is there. RIP Hack not playing well so far in front of the sponsors ;o
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (2)
50%
★- Do not see this game no matter what (0)
0%
4 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Bbyong vs Hack Game 2?
(Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what
Poll: Recommend Bbyong vs Hack Game 3?
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (0)
0%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (0)
0%
★★★- Good game (3)
100%
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (0)
0%
★- Do not see this game no matter what (0)
0%
3 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Bbyong vs Hack Game 3?
(Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what
On September 30 2014 19:36 sparklyresidue wrote: Weird,,, ling.bane.corruptor
no other way to deal with banshees
mutas would have worked just fine. I think the reason for corruptors is that he doesn't need as many and also they don't die as much so he doesn't have to replace them all the time. Just look how much gas Dark is banking, makes the Hive-transition much easier for him. The problem is that he can't keep Bbyong back with harassment though
Corrupters were fine imo. Just needed to go hive like 10 minutes ago to go Blord quicker off the back of them. He had nice upgrades for his melee. Fast Blord would of worked wonders vs Bbyong army.
On September 30 2014 19:39 Pandemona wrote: Corrupters were fine imo. Just needed to go hive like 10 minutes ago to go Blord quicker off the back of them. He had nice upgrades for his melee. Fast Blord would of worked wonders vs Bbyong army.
fast hive would have definitely made more sense for this game, seems like a mistake (to not get a faster one) but who knows.
On September 30 2014 19:39 Pandemona wrote: Corrupters were fine imo. Just needed to go hive like 10 minutes ago to go Blord quicker off the back of them. He had nice upgrades for his melee. Fast Blord would of worked wonders vs Bbyong army.
On September 30 2014 19:39 Pandemona wrote: Corrupters were fine imo. Just needed to go hive like 10 minutes ago to go Blord quicker off the back of them. He had nice upgrades for his melee. Fast Blord would of worked wonders vs Bbyong army.
On September 30 2014 19:39 Pandemona wrote: Corrupters were fine imo. Just needed to go hive like 10 minutes ago to go Blord quicker off the back of them. He had nice upgrades for his melee. Fast Blord would of worked wonders vs Bbyong army.
Would of? What kind of english is that?
it's the kind of english that happens when you hear a phrase instead of read it.
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (0)
0%
★- Do not see this game no matter what (0)
0%
9 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Winners' Match Game 1?
(Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what
On September 30 2014 19:39 Pandemona wrote: Corrupters were fine imo. Just needed to go hive like 10 minutes ago to go Blord quicker off the back of them. He had nice upgrades for his melee. Fast Blord would of worked wonders vs Bbyong army.
Would of? What kind of english is that?
it's the kind of english that happens when you hear a phrase instead of read it.
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (0)
0%
★- Do not see this game no matter what (0)
0%
9 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Winners' Match Game 1?
(Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what
On September 30 2014 19:39 Pandemona wrote: Corrupters were fine imo. Just needed to go hive like 10 minutes ago to go Blord quicker off the back of them. He had nice upgrades for his melee. Fast Blord would of worked wonders vs Bbyong army.
Would of? What kind of english is that?
It is English we use in England..............................It is not correct but it is what i have grown up SPEAKING. I write/type as i speak English, reason it is all not grammatically correct. Pretty sure in German there is ways you speak rather than the way it is grammatically correct to write it.
The corrupters were interesting and seemed to work until the engagement below Bbyong's 4th. If Dark pulled back instead I'd be interested to see how that played out
On September 30 2014 19:45 Telon Petrides wrote: The corrupters were interesting and seemed to work until the engagement below Bbyong's 4th. If Dark pulled back instead I'd be interested to see how that played out
Well he needed Blords quicker. Making the corrupters were interesting and also not wrong. Never morphing them into Blords was very wrong though.
On September 30 2014 19:39 Pandemona wrote: Corrupters were fine imo. Just needed to go hive like 10 minutes ago to go Blord quicker off the back of them. He had nice upgrades for his melee. Fast Blord would of worked wonders vs Bbyong army.
Would of? What kind of english is that?
It is English we use in England..............................It is not correct but it is what i have grown up SPEAKING. I write/type as i speak English, reason it is all not grammatically correct. Pretty sure in German there is ways you speak rather than the way it is grammatically correct to write it.
you are the only person I have ever seen use would of instead of would have. But you do it consistently
On September 30 2014 19:39 Pandemona wrote: Corrupters were fine imo. Just needed to go hive like 10 minutes ago to go Blord quicker off the back of them. He had nice upgrades for his melee. Fast Blord would of worked wonders vs Bbyong army.
Would of? What kind of english is that?
It is English we use in England..............................It is not correct but it is what i have grown up SPEAKING. I write/type as i speak English, reason it is all not grammatically correct. Pretty sure in German there is ways you speak rather than the way it is grammatically correct to write it.
you are the only person I have ever seen use would of instead of would have. But you do it consistently
On September 30 2014 19:39 Pandemona wrote: Corrupters were fine imo. Just needed to go hive like 10 minutes ago to go Blord quicker off the back of them. He had nice upgrades for his melee. Fast Blord would of worked wonders vs Bbyong army.
Would of? What kind of english is that?
It is English we use in England..............................It is not correct but it is what i have grown up SPEAKING. I write/type as i speak English, reason it is all not grammatically correct. Pretty sure in German there is ways you speak rather than the way it is grammatically correct to write it.
you are the only person I have ever seen use would of instead of would have. But you do it consistently
I could find many youtube clips of sports presenters and tv shows where people say "would of" and "could of" in speaking. Everywhere in England would of and could of are used. Like i said im not saying it isn't gramatically correct im just saying that the way people jump on it is quite alarming xD It wouldn't be as bad if the people who jumped on it where English but your German you don't speak English you speak German. I don't comment on Germany language for the reason i don't know German everyday speaking, just what i was taught. The same with you, you were taught that all England say "would have" and "could have" where in regular everyday conversations they dont
On September 30 2014 19:39 Pandemona wrote: Corrupters were fine imo. Just needed to go hive like 10 minutes ago to go Blord quicker off the back of them. He had nice upgrades for his melee. Fast Blord would of worked wonders vs Bbyong army.
Would of? What kind of english is that?
It is English we use in England..............................It is not correct but it is what i have grown up SPEAKING. I write/type as i speak English, reason it is all not grammatically correct. Pretty sure in German there is ways you speak rather than the way it is grammatically correct to write it.
you are the only person I have ever seen use would of instead of would have. But you do it consistently
On September 30 2014 19:49 Pandemona wrote: I could find many youtube clips of sports presenters and tv shows where people say "would of" and "could of" in speaking.
I mean how else do you say that? It's how is sounds to me.
On September 30 2014 19:45 Telon Petrides wrote: The corrupters were interesting and seemed to work until the engagement below Bbyong's 4th. If Dark pulled back instead I'd be interested to see how that played out
Well he needed Blords quicker. Making the corrupters were interesting and also not wrong. Never morphing them into Blords was very wrong though.
He was barely hanging onto his bases. How would he afford infestation pit-->hive-->greater spire while banking money to use for Blords?
On September 30 2014 19:51 Shellshock wrote: it's because would've and would of are phonetically similar
ok, but would of never occurs in the english language
I'm not disagreeing. I'm just saying why a lot of people probably use it. They hear would've and it sounds like would of so it doesn't seem wrong to them even though it is
On September 30 2014 19:49 Pandemona wrote: I could find many youtube clips of sports presenters and tv shows where people say "would of" and "could of" in speaking. Everywhere in England would of and could of are used. Like i said im not saying it isn't gramatically correct im just saying that the way people jump on it is quite alarming xD It wouldn't be as bad if the people who jumped on it where English but your German you don't speak English you speak German. I don't comment on Germany language for the reason i don't know German everyday speaking, just what i was taught. The same with you, you were taught that all England say "would have" and "could have" where in regular everyday conversations they dont
On September 30 2014 19:39 Pandemona wrote: Corrupters were fine imo. Just needed to go hive like 10 minutes ago to go Blord quicker off the back of them. He had nice upgrades for his melee. Fast Blord would of worked wonders vs Bbyong army.
Would of? What kind of english is that?
It is English we use in England..............................It is not correct but it is what i have grown up SPEAKING. I write/type as i speak English, reason it is all not grammatically correct. Pretty sure in German there is ways you speak rather than the way it is grammatically correct to write it.
you are the only person I have ever seen use would of instead of would have. But you do it consistently
I've done it before. It's an English thing.
<3 ty walker
Thats probably just because it sounds similar. "Would of" makes zero sense. I'm from a former british colony. I speak with an accent and butcher pronunciation all the time. However, you don't see me writing "Dem corruptas na had no use bhai."
Again with Corruptors. This is interesting, I am pretty sure that Dark has tested this already. He wouldn't be testing things like this in the tournament.
On September 30 2014 19:57 Ramiz1989 wrote: Again with Corruptors. This is interesting, I am pretty sure that Dark has tested this already. He wouldn't be testing things like this in the tournament.
People still not getting the point xD Writing it and speaking it are different, the way i write it is just because of how i type i don't think i just type how i would say it. Most (not all) of people in England say "would of" our "wudda" in phonetic sense when they say "would have" thus i type it like that .
i suggest you people watch an episode of an English soap opera and understand where i am coming from xD
On September 30 2014 19:45 Telon Petrides wrote: The corrupters were interesting and seemed to work until the engagement below Bbyong's 4th. If Dark pulled back instead I'd be interested to see how that played out
Well he needed Blords quicker. Making the corrupters were interesting and also not wrong. Never morphing them into Blords was very wrong though.
He was barely hanging onto his bases. How would he afford infestation pit-->hive-->greater spire while banking money to use for Blords?
Hmm he was sat 4 base though. He also then hit a nice engagement with the corrupters and pushed Bbyong all the way back to his natural. Then he should of been morphing his hive. Is what i thought he could HAVE done.
On September 30 2014 19:51 Shellshock wrote: it's because would've and would of are phonetically similar
ok, but would of never occurs in the english language
I'm not disagreeing. I'm just saying why a lot of people probably use it. They hear would've and it sounds like would of so it doesn't seem wrong to them even though it is
Germany -> rules are there to follow, not to break them
Hmm, If Dark manages to advance, I can think about a premade scenario that Parting is more comfortable in PvT so Dark will advance 1st sniping one T and then P advances by sniping 2 T... damn, am I too paranoid? oO
On September 30 2014 19:58 Pandemona wrote: People still not getting the point xD Writing it and speaking it are different, the way i write it is just because of how i type i don't think i just type how i would say it. Most (not all) of people in England say "would of" our "wudda" in phonetic sense when they say "would have" thus i type it like that .
i suggest you people watch an episode of an English soap opera and understand where i am coming from xD
but it's the only thing where you type like you speak. For everything else you use the normal written language
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (0)
0%
★- Do not see this game no matter what (0)
0%
5 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Winners' Match Game 2?
(Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what
On September 30 2014 19:58 Pandemona wrote: People still not getting the point xD Writing it and speaking it are different, the way i write it is just because of how i type i don't think i just type how i would say it. Most (not all) of people in England say "would of" our "wudda" in phonetic sense when they say "would have" thus i type it like that .
i suggest you people watch an episode of an English soap opera and understand where i am coming from xD
but it's the only thing where you type like you speak. For everything else you use the normal written language
This is correct i think, however i cannot think of any other ways in which anything is similar to cudda wudda and shudda. Mainly like i said because of stupid accents we have in England even though we are a very small island.
On September 30 2014 19:58 Pandemona wrote: People still not getting the point xD Writing it and speaking it are different, the way i write it is just because of how i type i don't think i just type how i would say it. Most (not all) of people in England say "would of" our "wudda" in phonetic sense when they say "would have" thus i type it like that .
i suggest you people watch an episode of an English soap opera and understand where i am coming from xD
but it's the only thing where you type like you speak. For everything else you use the normal written language
This is correct i think, however i cannot think of any other ways in which anything is similar to cudda wudda and shudda. Mainly like i said because of stupid accents we have in England even though we are a very small island.
On September 30 2014 20:03 Shellshock wrote: Do corruptors make a difference? I think using mutas like normal would of been fine
Point is he is making a lot less Corruptors than Mutas.
He is using like ~10 Corruptors at best, while without ~20 Mutas you can't really do much. That means he can get a lot faster upgrades/hive and a lot more Banelings and those just crush Terran army with proper control and without dying to the mines.
He is losing harass potential with Mutas, but he constantly doing run-by with Lings and Banes.
Can't say which style is better, but it seems that this one works.
On September 30 2014 19:58 Pandemona wrote: People still not getting the point xD Writing it and speaking it are different, the way i write it is just because of how i type i don't think i just type how i would say it. Most (not all) of people in England say "would of" our "wudda" in phonetic sense when they say "would have" thus i type it like that .
i suggest you people watch an episode of an English soap opera and understand where i am coming from xD
but it's the only thing where you type like you speak. For everything else you use the normal written language
This is correct i think, however i cannot think of any other ways in which anything is similar to cudda wudda and shudda. Mainly like i said because of stupid accents we have in England even though we are a very small island.
On September 30 2014 20:08 DJHelium wrote: Hope we get to see mech here, it's so good on this map.
And there's the stim
I'm glad he's not going mech. In cross position it's the most boring turtle-fest. In close positions you can push pretty quickly but cross you can't ever move out
On September 30 2014 20:08 DJHelium wrote: Hope we get to see mech here, it's so good on this map.
And there's the stim
I'm glad he's not going mech. In cross position it's the most boring turtle-fest. In close positions you can push pretty quickly but cross you can't ever move out
Unless zerg doesn't scout you until 15 minute mark.
On September 30 2014 20:13 Tsubbi wrote: sacrificed mineral mining for early gases and spire but didnt do anything with the mutas so hes pretty far behind in economy now
On September 30 2014 19:51 Shellshock wrote: it's because would've and would of are phonetically similar
ok, but would of never occurs in the english language
I'm not disagreeing. I'm just saying why a lot of people probably use it. They hear would've and it sounds like would of so it doesn't seem wrong to them even though it is
Germany -> rules are there to follow, not to break them
Hmm, If Dark manages to advance, I can think about a premade scenario that Parting is more comfortable in PvT so Dark will advance 1st sniping one T and then P advances by sniping 2 T... damn, am I too paranoid? oO
did Dark overestimate his position there or just a mistake? He had been doing a decent job of making sure his banelings rolled past to marines but that time he ran like 20 into a thor right before the marines showed up
On September 30 2014 19:51 Shellshock wrote: it's because would've and would of are phonetically similar
ok, but would of never occurs in the english language
I'm not disagreeing. I'm just saying why a lot of people probably use it. They hear would've and it sounds like would of so it doesn't seem wrong to them even though it is
Germany -> rules are there to follow, not to break them
Hmm, If Dark manages to advance, I can think about a premade scenario that Parting is more comfortable in PvT so Dark will advance 1st sniping one T and then P advances by sniping 2 T... damn, am I too paranoid? oO
So basically some nonsensical matchfixing talk without any evidence?
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (0)
0%
★- Do not see this game no matter what (1)
13%
8 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Winners' Match Game 3?
(Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what
On September 30 2014 20:17 deacon.frost wrote: OMG! I am too paranoid, but it looks like I was right! I am scared now...
What are you talking about?
On September 30 2014 20:00 deacon.frost wrote:
On September 30 2014 19:54 Shellshock wrote:
On September 30 2014 19:52 graNite wrote:
On September 30 2014 19:51 Shellshock wrote: it's because would've and would of are phonetically similar
ok, but would of never occurs in the english language
I'm not disagreeing. I'm just saying why a lot of people probably use it. They hear would've and it sounds like would of so it doesn't seem wrong to them even though it is
Germany -> rules are there to follow, not to break them
Hmm, If Dark manages to advance, I can think about a premade scenario that Parting is more comfortable in PvT so Dark will advance 1st sniping one T and then P advances by sniping 2 T... damn, am I too paranoid? oO
So basically some nonsensical matchfixing talk without any evidence?
What an ugly word, it is called team strategy I think. But it depends on how good BigBoy will be...
On September 30 2014 20:17 deacon.frost wrote: OMG! I am too paranoid, but it looks like I was right! I am scared now...
What are you talking about?
On September 30 2014 20:00 deacon.frost wrote:
On September 30 2014 19:54 Shellshock wrote:
On September 30 2014 19:52 graNite wrote:
On September 30 2014 19:51 Shellshock wrote: it's because would've and would of are phonetically similar
ok, but would of never occurs in the english language
I'm not disagreeing. I'm just saying why a lot of people probably use it. They hear would've and it sounds like would of so it doesn't seem wrong to them even though it is
Germany -> rules are there to follow, not to break them
Hmm, If Dark manages to advance, I can think about a premade scenario that Parting is more comfortable in PvT so Dark will advance 1st sniping one T and then P advances by sniping 2 T... damn, am I too paranoid? oO
So basically some nonsensical matchfixing talk without any evidence?
You didn't hear SKT1 is fixing the GSL finals as well so both Soo and Innovation can go to Blizzcon?
On September 30 2014 20:17 deacon.frost wrote: OMG! I am too paranoid, but it looks like I was right! I am scared now...
What are you talking about?
On September 30 2014 20:00 deacon.frost wrote:
On September 30 2014 19:54 Shellshock wrote:
On September 30 2014 19:52 graNite wrote:
On September 30 2014 19:51 Shellshock wrote: it's because would've and would of are phonetically similar
ok, but would of never occurs in the english language
I'm not disagreeing. I'm just saying why a lot of people probably use it. They hear would've and it sounds like would of so it doesn't seem wrong to them even though it is
Germany -> rules are there to follow, not to break them
Hmm, If Dark manages to advance, I can think about a premade scenario that Parting is more comfortable in PvT so Dark will advance 1st sniping one T and then P advances by sniping 2 T... damn, am I too paranoid? oO
So basically some nonsensical matchfixing talk without any evidence?
What an ugly word, it is called team strategy I think. But it depends on how good BigBoy will be...
On September 30 2014 20:17 deacon.frost wrote: OMG! I am too paranoid, but it looks like I was right! I am scared now...
What are you talking about?
On September 30 2014 20:00 deacon.frost wrote:
On September 30 2014 19:54 Shellshock wrote:
On September 30 2014 19:52 graNite wrote:
On September 30 2014 19:51 Shellshock wrote: it's because would've and would of are phonetically similar
ok, but would of never occurs in the english language
I'm not disagreeing. I'm just saying why a lot of people probably use it. They hear would've and it sounds like would of so it doesn't seem wrong to them even though it is
Germany -> rules are there to follow, not to break them
Hmm, If Dark manages to advance, I can think about a premade scenario that Parting is more comfortable in PvT so Dark will advance 1st sniping one T and then P advances by sniping 2 T... damn, am I too paranoid? oO
So basically some nonsensical matchfixing talk without any evidence?
You didn't hear SKT1 is fixing the GSL finals as well so both Soo and Innovation can go to Blizzcon?
Dude, keep up!
Well, that's soO in the finals, Innovation got this, just give him the points and trophy already...
On September 30 2014 20:17 deacon.frost wrote: OMG! I am too paranoid, but it looks like I was right! I am scared now...
What are you talking about?
On September 30 2014 20:00 deacon.frost wrote:
On September 30 2014 19:54 Shellshock wrote:
On September 30 2014 19:52 graNite wrote:
On September 30 2014 19:51 Shellshock wrote: it's because would've and would of are phonetically similar
ok, but would of never occurs in the english language
I'm not disagreeing. I'm just saying why a lot of people probably use it. They hear would've and it sounds like would of so it doesn't seem wrong to them even though it is
Germany -> rules are there to follow, not to break them
Hmm, If Dark manages to advance, I can think about a premade scenario that Parting is more comfortable in PvT so Dark will advance 1st sniping one T and then P advances by sniping 2 T... damn, am I too paranoid? oO
So basically some nonsensical matchfixing talk without any evidence?
What an ugly word, it is called team strategy I think. But it depends on how good BigBoy will be...
On September 30 2014 20:03 Shellshock wrote: Do corruptors make a difference? I think using mutas like normal would of been fine
Point is he is making a lot less Corruptors than Mutas.
He is using like ~10 Corruptors at best, while without ~20 Mutas you can't really do much. That means he can get a lot faster upgrades/hive and a lot more Banelings and those just crush Terran army with proper control and without dying to the mines.
He is losing harass potential with Mutas, but he constantly doing run-by with Lings and Banes.
Can't say which style is better, but it seems that this one works.
Couldn't it also be that the corruptors snipe the medivacs automatically while marines don't shoot at the corruptors during the fight? Mutas shoot at marines if you don't take care, am I right?
So Dark has more apm for microing the rest of his army and becomes so much more effective with banelings. Also it shows how medivacs are important and how they should be sniped preferentially in general.
On September 30 2014 20:03 Shellshock wrote: Do corruptors make a difference? I think using mutas like normal would of been fine
Point is he is making a lot less Corruptors than Mutas.
He is using like ~10 Corruptors at best, while without ~20 Mutas you can't really do much. That means he can get a lot faster upgrades/hive and a lot more Banelings and those just crush Terran army with proper control and without dying to the mines.
He is losing harass potential with Mutas, but he constantly doing run-by with Lings and Banes.
Can't say which style is better, but it seems that this one works.
Couldn't it also be that the corruptors snipe the medivacs automatically while marines don't shoot at the corruptors during the fight? Mutas shoot at marines if you don't take care, am I right?
So Dark has more apm for microing the rest of his army and becomes so much more effective with banelings. Also it shows how medivacs are important and how they should be sniped preferentially in general.
Also Corruptor has base armor 2, mutalisk 0. Corruptor may live longer than Mutas with regen? (I hope these numbers are correct, my memory isn't very good at numbers)
On September 30 2014 20:17 deacon.frost wrote: OMG! I am too paranoid, but it looks like I was right! I am scared now...
What are you talking about?
On September 30 2014 20:00 deacon.frost wrote:
On September 30 2014 19:54 Shellshock wrote:
On September 30 2014 19:52 graNite wrote:
On September 30 2014 19:51 Shellshock wrote: it's because would've and would of are phonetically similar
ok, but would of never occurs in the english language
I'm not disagreeing. I'm just saying why a lot of people probably use it. They hear would've and it sounds like would of so it doesn't seem wrong to them even though it is
Germany -> rules are there to follow, not to break them
Hmm, If Dark manages to advance, I can think about a premade scenario that Parting is more comfortable in PvT so Dark will advance 1st sniping one T and then P advances by sniping 2 T... damn, am I too paranoid? oO
So basically some nonsensical matchfixing talk without any evidence?
What an ugly word, it is called team strategy I think. But it depends on how good BigBoy will be...
Wait, on second thought, Parting left SKT -,-
It's his last day, still on team.
They don't care, tomorrow he won't be so there is no gain for SKT going for a risk in matchfixing over that
On September 30 2014 20:03 Shellshock wrote: Do corruptors make a difference? I think using mutas like normal would of been fine
Point is he is making a lot less Corruptors than Mutas.
He is using like ~10 Corruptors at best, while without ~20 Mutas you can't really do much. That means he can get a lot faster upgrades/hive and a lot more Banelings and those just crush Terran army with proper control and without dying to the mines.
He is losing harass potential with Mutas, but he constantly doing run-by with Lings and Banes.
Can't say which style is better, but it seems that this one works.
Couldn't it also be that the corruptors snipe the medivacs automatically while marines don't shoot at the corruptors during the fight? Mutas shoot at marines if you don't take care, am I right?
So Dark has more apm for microing the rest of his army and becomes so much more effective with banelings. Also it shows how medivacs are important and how they should be sniped preferentially in general.
Firstly, Corruptors auto-target Medivacs, leaving APM for the Lings. Secondly, Corruptors are more resilient (2 base armor and 200 HP over 0 base armor and 125 HP, IIRC). Thirdly, Corruptors don't die to Mine shots. Fourthly, Corruptors can handle Thors. Fifthly, Corruptors seem more effective vs Medivacs as they have more range. This keeps the skies clean, actually allowing a decent Broodlord Transition as Terran will be air-less. Sixtly, You invest way less into corruptors, leaving extra gas for the banelings.
On September 30 2014 20:17 deacon.frost wrote: OMG! I am too paranoid, but it looks like I was right! I am scared now...
What are you talking about?
On September 30 2014 20:00 deacon.frost wrote:
On September 30 2014 19:54 Shellshock wrote:
On September 30 2014 19:52 graNite wrote:
On September 30 2014 19:51 Shellshock wrote: it's because would've and would of are phonetically similar
ok, but would of never occurs in the english language
I'm not disagreeing. I'm just saying why a lot of people probably use it. They hear would've and it sounds like would of so it doesn't seem wrong to them even though it is
Germany -> rules are there to follow, not to break them
Hmm, If Dark manages to advance, I can think about a premade scenario that Parting is more comfortable in PvT so Dark will advance 1st sniping one T and then P advances by sniping 2 T... damn, am I too paranoid? oO
So basically some nonsensical matchfixing talk without any evidence?
You didn't hear SKT1 is fixing the GSL finals as well so both Soo and Innovation can go to Blizzcon?
Dude, keep up!
Well, that's soO in the finals, Innovation got this, just give him the points and trophy already...
You don't understand bro. They've carefully been building Soo's final throwing image. They were planning ahead for this situation.
On September 30 2014 20:17 deacon.frost wrote: OMG! I am too paranoid, but it looks like I was right! I am scared now...
What are you talking about?
On September 30 2014 20:00 deacon.frost wrote:
On September 30 2014 19:54 Shellshock wrote:
On September 30 2014 19:52 graNite wrote:
On September 30 2014 19:51 Shellshock wrote: it's because would've and would of are phonetically similar
ok, but would of never occurs in the english language
I'm not disagreeing. I'm just saying why a lot of people probably use it. They hear would've and it sounds like would of so it doesn't seem wrong to them even though it is
Germany -> rules are there to follow, not to break them
Hmm, If Dark manages to advance, I can think about a premade scenario that Parting is more comfortable in PvT so Dark will advance 1st sniping one T and then P advances by sniping 2 T... damn, am I too paranoid? oO
So basically some nonsensical matchfixing talk without any evidence?
What an ugly word, it is called team strategy I think. But it depends on how good BigBoy will be...
Wait, on second thought, Parting left SKT -,-
It's his last day, still on team.
They don't care, tomorrow he won't be so there is no gain for SKT going for a risk in matchfixing over that
On September 30 2014 20:03 Shellshock wrote: Do corruptors make a difference? I think using mutas like normal would of been fine
Point is he is making a lot less Corruptors than Mutas.
He is using like ~10 Corruptors at best, while without ~20 Mutas you can't really do much. That means he can get a lot faster upgrades/hive and a lot more Banelings and those just crush Terran army with proper control and without dying to the mines.
He is losing harass potential with Mutas, but he constantly doing run-by with Lings and Banes.
Can't say which style is better, but it seems that this one works.
Couldn't it also be that the corruptors snipe the medivacs automatically while marines don't shoot at the corruptors during the fight? Mutas shoot at marines if you don't take care, am I right?
So Dark has more apm for microing the rest of his army and becomes so much more effective with banelings. Also it shows how medivacs are important and how they should be sniped preferentially in general.
Firstly, Corruptors auto-target Medivacs, leaving APM for the Lings. Secondly, Corruptors are more resilient (2 base armor and 200 HP over 0 base armor and 125 HP, IIRC). Thirdly, Corruptors don't die to Mine shots. Fourthly, Corruptors can handle Thors. Fifthly, Corruptors seem more effective vs Medivacs as they have more range. This keeps the skies clean, actually allowing a decent Broodlord Transition as Terran will be air-less. Sixtly, You invest way less into corruptors, leaving extra gas for the banelings.
This is what I could come up with.
Pff, with Parting's PvT I would lose as he to Dark and hope he could snipe BB and advance. I still don't understand the MGR nexus first against Dark... It doesn't have to be a "team strategy" per se
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (1)
17%
★- Do not see this game no matter what (1)
17%
6 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Losers' Match Game 1?
(Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (1)
17%
★- Do not see this game no matter what (1)
17%
6 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Losers' Match Game 1?
(Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (1)
20%
★- Do not see this game no matter what (2)
40%
5 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Losers' Match Game 2?
(Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what
Poll: Recommend Losers' Match Game 3?
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (0)
0%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (1)
33%
★★★- Good game (1)
33%
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (1)
33%
★- Do not see this game no matter what (0)
0%
3 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Losers' Match Game 3?
(Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what
On September 30 2014 20:54 mostevil wrote: I feel better about routinely dying to that daftness now.... but still more than a little bit disgusted that that works...
If Hack lifts his natural and tech stim before Concussive he holds that easily.
On September 30 2014 20:53 Ctesias wrote: I'm glad pretty much only Parting and Zest can make that work these days. Blink all ins are more annoying to watch than SCV pulls.
Parting is really going with the gimmicks today. Also someone please explain to me why you would ever go CC first on Merry go round were just about every protoss either goes one-base or two-base all-in
Cool to see Sora advance from his group, haven't seen much of him lately.
Also Dark's Muta-less ZvT sounds intriguing too, will definitely be checking them out later. Dark's pretty damn good so SKT are well served in the Zerg department for next PL
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (0)
0%
★- Do not see this game no matter what (0)
0%
9 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Final Match Game 1?
(Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what
Bbyong isn't even building Vikings. Does this actually work? I mean for now he's doing pretty damn well but Parting has like 6 Colossai and Charge, Archons and Templar now
On September 30 2014 21:32 Yello wrote: Bbyong isn't even building Vikings. Does this actually work? I mean for now he's doing pretty damn well but Parting has like 6 Colossai and Charge, Archons and Templar now
With the distance he doesn't fear any counter-push for some time, but he better has ~18 Vikings when it finally comes.
On September 30 2014 21:32 Yello wrote: Bbyong isn't even building Vikings. Does this actually work? I mean for now he's doing pretty damn well but Parting has like 6 Colossai and Charge, Archons and Templar now
With the distance he doesn't fear any counter-push for some time, but he better has ~18 Vikings when it finally comes.
or he just rapes him anyways. Holy crap man, Bbyong is just so much better than Parting here, he can do whatever and still win
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (0)
0%
★- Do not see this game no matter what (0)
0%
18 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Final Match Game 2?
(Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what
Poll: Recommend Final Match Game 3?
★★★★★- One of the best games this season (2)
29%
★★★★- Highly recommended game (2)
29%
★★★- Good game (2)
29%
★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (0)
0%
★- Do not see this game no matter what (1)
14%
7 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Final Match Game 3?
(Vote): ★★★★★- One of the best games this season (Vote): ★★★★- Highly recommended game (Vote): ★★★- Good game (Vote): ★★- Not recommended unless you have nothing better to do (Vote): ★- Do not see this game no matter what
I was hoping to pick up some PvT tips from PartinG in that last series but all that series did was add to my frustration about Terran currently. Bbyong played like a god in that series, deserved to go through for sure. Hope he shows that kind of form in the next ProLeague season, CJ can't keep leaning on herO.
On September 30 2014 21:06 Ghanburighan wrote: Parting is a good reminder why people hate Protoss.
On September 30 2014 21:12 Ghanburighan wrote: Byong is pretty damn good, guys.
They did the exact same thing, like play by play. PartinG didn't want to play macro on this terran favored map, so he used a gimmick, proxy oracle. Bbyong got far behind because he wasn't prepared for it. Because he was now at a disadvantage, Bbyong used a gimmick of his own, taking a hidden third. PartinG got far behind because he wasn't prepared for it.
And yet one is evil and one is good. That's the only reminder I see in there.
On September 30 2014 21:12 Ghanburighan wrote: Byong is pretty damn good, guys.
They did the exact same thing, like play by play. PartinG didn't want to play macro on this terran favored map, so he used a gimmick, proxy oracle. Bbyong got far behind because he wasn't prepared for it. Because he was now at a disadvantage, Bbyong used a gimmick of his own, taking a hidden third. PartinG got far behind because he wasn't prepared for it.
And yet one is evil and one is good. That's the only reminder I see in there.
You forgot "The Rules" of LR threads I think.
- Protoss = evil by default, because Protoss - Terran = righteous defender of justice and kittens and ice cream - Non-macro based gimmick = super evil nasty cheesy thing, player probably eats puppies - Macro based gimmick = smartest play ever, rightful winner even if it fails
Or Parting proxied, did consecutive blink builds and used oracle cheese, while Bbyong held so many pushes that would have killed a regular terran with amazing micro (like beating a 4 colossus army with no vikings by having the sickest surround). Watch the games, guys.
On September 30 2014 23:21 Ghanburighan wrote: Or Parting proxied, did consecutive blink builds and used oracle cheese, while Bbyong held so many pushes that would have killed a regular terran with amazing micro (like beating a 4 colossus army with no vikings by having the sickest surround). Watch the games, guys.
Oh, sorry, I'll watch the games next time, I was sure I had forgotten something today.
On September 30 2014 19:39 Pandemona wrote: Corrupters were fine imo. Just needed to go hive like 10 minutes ago to go Blord quicker off the back of them. He had nice upgrades for his melee. Fast Blord would of worked wonders vs Bbyong army.
Would of? What kind of english is that?
It is English we use in England..............................It is not correct but it is what i have grown up SPEAKING. I write/type as i speak English, reason it is all not grammatically correct. Pretty sure in German there is ways you speak rather than the way it is grammatically correct to write it.
you are the only person I have ever seen use would of instead of would have. But you do it consistently
I've done it before. It's an English thing.
I think it comes from hearing the contraction "would've" which sounds, out loud, like "would of" but is in fact a shortened version of "would have".
Dark looks so good, he had some really amazing counterattacks and harassment... really nice, subtle decisions (my favorite was the 4 banes to kill 2 turrets in the mineral line synced perfectly with the arrival of the muta flock, which then cleared the rest of the SCVs out).
EPT![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/zq6kqpo.png)
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/r9ZH0.png)
Twitch
Youtube![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/xYABn.png)
![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/images/players/2322.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/images/players/4729.jpg)
PartinG vs 
Dark ![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/images/players/638.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://www.teamliquid.net/tlpd/images/players/2096.jpg)
Bbyong vs ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/bv8Kw.png)
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/l5YZ8.png)
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/3wcCS.png)
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/WdLE8.png)
.
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/Y8BaX.jpg)
