|
On September 06 2014 13:05 Vivax wrote: Kita why didn't you answer to what Damdred wrote about you?
Read the case Kita made on me.
Tell me I'm not going insane because he changed his case mid interaction. I swore he did.
|
On September 06 2014 13:12 ObiWanShinobi wrote:Show nested quote +On September 06 2014 13:05 Vivax wrote: Kita why didn't you answer to what Damdred wrote about you? Read the case Kita made on me. Tell me I'm not going insane because he changed his case mid interaction. I swore he did.
Yeah I don't like how he's so hung up on your inactivity, he might as well have started bitching about mderg.
|
That's not even my main issue with him.
He's holding it against me that I don't have an ironclad case yet, votes me for it, has no interest in my response, and then changes his mind in that he only wants reads from me.
Then I don't give him those reads and he votes someone else.
|
Nevermind, he voted someone else beforehand.
Wharvez.
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On September 06 2014 13:27 Vivax wrote:Show nested quote +On September 06 2014 13:12 ObiWanShinobi wrote:On September 06 2014 13:05 Vivax wrote: Kita why didn't you answer to what Damdred wrote about you? Read the case Kita made on me. Tell me I'm not going insane because he changed his case mid interaction. I swore he did. Yeah I don't like how he's so hung up on your inactivity, he might as well have started bitching about mderg.
When you state that I'm so hung up on his inactivity, what are you inferring? I voted him hoping that he would be motivated to post and he never showed up so I moved on. He is probably 4th or 5th in line for the players I find the worst, so the fact that you make that bullying comment upsets me.
As for answering Damdred, there is nothing to answer there. He mentions that all 5 of the individuals that I brought up at different points today as "easy targets", which is nonsense. Out of all the players in this game, I've taken the most stances, so saying I haven't is also nonsense. The only thing I'm struggling with is that there are so many people that look scummy that I haven't decided which should die first. Can't win the game by lynching all 3 in one cycle.
I do admit that haven't pushed bunnies a ton, mostly due to people rubbing me the wrong way even worse and her absence from the thread when I've been around lately. I'll revisit her tomorrow, but I'm at batsnacks > damdred > bunnies currently.
On September 06 2014 13:31 ObiWanShinobi wrote: That's not even my main issue with him.
He's holding it against me that I don't have an ironclad case yet, votes me for it, has no interest in my response, and then changes his mind in that he only wants reads from me.
Then I don't give him those reads and he votes someone else.
You have your order of events mixed up. I was on Damdred when you showed up. So how could I vote someone else when you didn't give me the reads, when I wasn't on you to begin with?
You state that I have no interest in your response, yet I asked for those four reads 3 times and then you said you would deliver eventually. Why are we still going in circles?
When I unvoted you prior to you showing up, I stated that I was hoping you would show up with some content and that I never intended to vote for you at the end of the cycle. Since you've returned, your use of time has been really inefficient :/
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
Heh I shouldn't have read the thread before going to bed. Gnight again
|
Your use of time is inefficient.
|
On September 06 2014 13:53 kitaman27 wrote:Show nested quote +On September 06 2014 13:27 Vivax wrote:On September 06 2014 13:12 ObiWanShinobi wrote:On September 06 2014 13:05 Vivax wrote: Kita why didn't you answer to what Damdred wrote about you? Read the case Kita made on me. Tell me I'm not going insane because he changed his case mid interaction. I swore he did. Yeah I don't like how he's so hung up on your inactivity, he might as well have started bitching about mderg. When you state that I'm so hung up on his inactivity, what are you inferring? I voted him hoping that he would be motivated to post and he never showed up so I moved on. He is probably 4th or 5th in line for the players I find the worst, so the fact that you make that bullying comment upsets me. As for answering Damdred, there is nothing to answer there. He mentions that all 5 of the individuals that I brought up at different points today as "easy targets", which is nonsense. Out of all the players in this game, I've taken the most stances, so saying I haven't is also nonsense. The only thing I'm struggling with is that there are so many people that look scummy that I haven't decided which should die first. Can't win the game by lynching all 3 in one cycle. I do admit that haven't pushed bunnies a ton, mostly due to people rubbing me the wrong way even worse and her absence from the thread when I've been around lately. I'll revisit her tomorrow, but I'm at batsnacks > damdred > bunnies currently. Show nested quote +On September 06 2014 13:31 ObiWanShinobi wrote: That's not even my main issue with him.
He's holding it against me that I don't have an ironclad case yet, votes me for it, has no interest in my response, and then changes his mind in that he only wants reads from me.
Then I don't give him those reads and he votes someone else. You have your order of events mixed up. I was on Damdred when you showed up. So how could I vote someone else when you didn't give me the reads, when I wasn't on you to begin with? You state that I have no interest in your response, yet I asked for those four reads 3 times and then you said you would deliver eventually. Why are we still going in circles? When I unvoted you prior to you showing up, I stated that I was hoping you would show up with some content and that I never intended to vote for you at the end of the cycle. Since you've returned, your use of time has been really inefficient :/
I'm inferring that your motives for starting to talk about Obi over talking to your current scumread when it posts arguments against you aren't comprehensible. I don't like the focus you displayed there.
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
Do you have no opinion about batsnack's "I have a case against you in notepad but I can't show you it" ordeal?
|
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
I'm asking your opinion on the topic I feel most important.
Why is everything a struggle this game? Can't we just be civil and answer questions, rather than responding with statements like that?
|
There's way too many people I found questionable during the course of the game trying to move the attention towards batsnacks. It makes me reluctant to opt for his lynch today.
Kush/Damdred/bunnies/kita are today's best options
|
On September 06 2014 14:17 kitaman27 wrote: I'm asking your opinion on the topic I feel most important.
Why is everything a struggle this game? Can't we just be civil and answer questions, rather than responding with statements like that?
It's a struggle cause town wants to lynch scum and scum doesn't want to get lynched. Just business, nothing personal.
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
Well, even if you don't pay attention to him. Do you think he honestly has a case against me in notepad that he decided not to share, even though he wants to lynch me?
What do you think about my statement on kush earlier?
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
bah I really need to sleep. gnight for third time XD
|
Alright, let's see.
batsnacks - tentatively town Oatsmaster - town Tehpoofter - town Vivax - town ObiWanShinobi - town mderg - wanna say town but this guy doesn't play the game Micchan - ded The_Templar - ded 3d12 - tentatively town
kitaman27 - tentatively scum Damdred - scum kushm4sta - scum 27ninjabunnies - tentatively scum
I have no idea how many scum there are in this game, but with the missions considered it could be easily more than 3 since they are at risk of getting "modkilled" every day, and the mission aspect makes the game harder for them. So I'll opt for 4.
7 town 4 scum
If we ml we're at 5 town 4 scum, that'll be the last chance to kill one of them.
Right now the consensus doesn't seem very huge and that's why we need to get our shit together and decide between these guys I mentioned above.
If you're one of the guys I listed among the townies please tell me who you would agree on among the scummers and who you disagree on.
If you're among the scummers, well, do whatever you have to do.
|
Also worthy of consideration is that batsnacks is mafia's mission bitch.Let's say they get a mission and one of them has to carry it out.
D1, bats got the mission of posting that entrance post. Since he couldn't think of a reason or didn't give enough fucks about finding one, he just yoloed and posted it right away.
D2, they had to vote for every different person in a cycle, same pattern. Yolosnacks.
His team would obviously be aware of that and be bussing the fuck out of him all the time, painfully aware that he's super scummy, town doesn't have that awareness, which would explain why so many scummy people try to divert attention to him.
But then, one of the guys among the possible scummers would be town instead of snacks, will need a bit to figure out which one.
|
I will debate with you in 7 hours.
|
Kush is scum without question.
|
Would lynch in this order atm, I'm flexible on this cause it only represents how sure I am about each read. The first three all have a very good shot at flipping scum. However I'm mostly unsure between kita and nb, one of them is town.
Kush/Damdred/Bats>27nb>Kita
So yeah,I would appreciate if we could get a consensus on one of the first three.
|
|
|
|