Mission Mini Mafia - Page 62

Lurking=/=stopped fighting back.

On September 04 2014 02:42 Damdred wrote:


Out of everything posted this is generally the most scummy looking thing that I see. However I do not read this as scummy at all. To me it shows reasonable doubt about his vote and where it is going. Hes struggling with the idea of lynching someone who is making excuses and not playing. I think its a really towny thing to struggle with, is it to scummy to be scum.

On September 07 2014 00:26 Damdred wrote:
##Vote: 3d12

I think your scummy vivax, but 3d ignoring a ton of posts from poof and other people calling him scummy. Hes been doing it all game, with nb, with poof and with me. He has not interacted with the claims that hes scum hes just let people fight for his towniness without actually fighting himself.

On September 07 2014 00:33 Vivax wrote:


Another terrible post.

It's scummy looking but Damdred doesn't read it as scummy at all.

What's even the point of bringing it up? Like, you see something scummy, it catches your attention, then you post reasons for it being towny.

There's no town motivation behind posting something like this. You call out what you find scummy, you don't see something scummy, then look for reasons for why it's townie.

Answer us why you found it scummy in the first place if you deliver a town explanation??? You willingly chose to interpret something in a townie way you claimed to have found scummy.

On September 07 2014 00:34 3d12 wrote:


Well, good morning to you too!

I haven't been ignoring the posts. I actually think poofter is pretty scummy too, but I don't have my notes with me to type up my case. I could maybe reconstruct the case from his posts, but I would need coffee first.

As for right now, I'm still catching up. Might take a break to get coffee, ease the process along. If you have any opinions/answers you want, post. I'll respond to whatever relevant ones I find, but idk if you're looking for a particular repsonse over others.

On September 07 2014 00:35 Damdred wrote:


Why don't you actually put the post in context to what was going on in the thread instead of just grabbing one out and yelling about it?

On September 07 2014 00:36 Vivax wrote:


What a truckload of fluff.

On September 07 2014 00:38 Vivax wrote:


Yeah, the context was that batsnacks called it out and you felt compelled to first agree with him then post why you actually think the opposite.

On September 07 2014 00:43 Vivax wrote:
For some reason you felt that batsnacks had a point but for some reason you decided you had to read kita as town and found a reason that explained it from a town PoV.

What was the point of defending kita against it if you felt that what he posted was scummy?

You can't call one behaviour both scummy and town in the same post unless you're making up shit.
A townie answer would have been to plain and simply disagree with bats, a scummy answer is to first agree with him to kiss his ass and not look like you're disagreeing but then actually posting reasons for why you don't agree.