|
On July 11 2014 19:50 ExO_ wrote: Couldn't you make the same meaningless argument for bunnies posts though? Why is she getting a pass? Regardless, I'll be sure to tell Robik to post more idk, could you? expound please
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On July 11 2014 19:50 ExO_ wrote:Show nested quote +On July 11 2014 19:30 marvellosity wrote:On July 11 2014 19:25 ExO_ wrote: I liked marvs Day 1 in Order.
And Robik had a ton of posts before he decided to go to sleep, especially after he said he was going to let me do all the posting. I was actually asleep when he said that, but it's really ridiculous to be riding his ass for that comment when after he said it he proceeded to talk quite a bit. And Robik had a ton of *meaningless posts ftfy It's any town team's responsibility to be as transparent and readable as possible (same as if a townie is on his own). And it's a mafia team's job to be as unreadable as possible. There was a smurf game where I caught VE because he suggested that consolidating posts was a pro-town strategy, when it clearly wasn't. Anyways if Robik plays the game, nothing to worry about, right dear? - M&M Couldn't you make the same meaningless argument for bunnies posts though? Why is she getting a pass? Regardless, I'll be sure to tell Robik to post more Not really, I fully understood the argument she was pursuing re: Robik (indeed I made the same/similar one some posts back about readability).
Also she is on the unofficial DL team, gives her extra town points.
-M&M
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On July 11 2014 19:51 Eden1892 wrote: my good read on OK is that he's town, it's kind of a meta thing because we have pretty similar thought processes when we're town, so the fact that he's almost literally in my head at times in this thread points to him being town to me.
uh more generally i feel like the questions he asked bunnies during the back-and-forth we had about my VT claim were on-point, bunnies' questions didn't seem like they were going anywhere and he was asking specific questions about the direction of her questioning to figure out whether the questions were coming from the right place.
as for why me, i'm town because i'm vanilla townie, but even aside from that... idk same reasons OK is town tbh, like i said my thought process and his have been nearly identical this game. i've been asking pretty similar questions with the same intent (figure out what bunnies was doing, in particular) and so most of what i said about OK applies to me as well Alright, but you should understand that two people who are not me potentially sharing some sort of thought process isn't very compelling if I'm not you (or possibly him). Yes?
Mafia can ask "on point" questions. In fact it's extremely easy to. I've been doing it already.
-M&M
|
/confirm
Robik is going to be afk? But exo is a d1 non-poster too...
Meh
-WeDemandALawyer: Haru and GlowingBear
|
On July 11 2014 19:44 Eden1892 wrote:hey palmar! onceking really likes your play style and insights on the game and so i've heard good things about you but you're not posting anything yet and that's sad who do you most want to lynch right now and why I haven't actually read the thread.
|
On July 11 2014 19:48 marvellosity wrote: Palmar will sheep me to glory today or he will get lynched by me.
Evidence: pretty much all games we played together this year.
-M&M
It's so easy, I'm just waiting for you to make a case I can sheep, tbh.
|
Palmar can you read my filter and answer.
|
On July 11 2014 19:55 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On July 11 2014 19:51 Eden1892 wrote: my good read on OK is that he's town, it's kind of a meta thing because we have pretty similar thought processes when we're town, so the fact that he's almost literally in my head at times in this thread points to him being town to me.
uh more generally i feel like the questions he asked bunnies during the back-and-forth we had about my VT claim were on-point, bunnies' questions didn't seem like they were going anywhere and he was asking specific questions about the direction of her questioning to figure out whether the questions were coming from the right place.
as for why me, i'm town because i'm vanilla townie, but even aside from that... idk same reasons OK is town tbh, like i said my thought process and his have been nearly identical this game. i've been asking pretty similar questions with the same intent (figure out what bunnies was doing, in particular) and so most of what i said about OK applies to me as well Alright, but you should understand that two people who are not me potentially sharing some sort of thought process isn't very compelling if I'm not you (or possibly him). Yes? Mafia can ask "on point" questions. In fact it's extremely easy to. I've been doing it already.- M&M
Is that a slip?
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
no, it's me being playful.
|
|
On July 11 2014 20:39 ExO_ wrote:Show nested quote +On July 11 2014 19:55 marvellosity wrote:On July 11 2014 19:51 Eden1892 wrote: my good read on OK is that he's town, it's kind of a meta thing because we have pretty similar thought processes when we're town, so the fact that he's almost literally in my head at times in this thread points to him being town to me.
uh more generally i feel like the questions he asked bunnies during the back-and-forth we had about my VT claim were on-point, bunnies' questions didn't seem like they were going anywhere and he was asking specific questions about the direction of her questioning to figure out whether the questions were coming from the right place.
as for why me, i'm town because i'm vanilla townie, but even aside from that... idk same reasons OK is town tbh, like i said my thought process and his have been nearly identical this game. i've been asking pretty similar questions with the same intent (figure out what bunnies was doing, in particular) and so most of what i said about OK applies to me as well Alright, but you should understand that two people who are not me potentially sharing some sort of thought process isn't very compelling if I'm not you (or possibly him). Yes? Mafia can ask "on point" questions. In fact it's extremely easy to. I've been doing it already.- M&M Is that a slip?
I think it's a slip.
|
popquiz time: is Eden mafia?
|
On July 11 2014 15:12 raynpelikoneet wrote: No i am saying the part i bolded was dumb. I'll explain when i get off work, or maybe Palmar can explain? He shouldbe able to- Why are you trying to get me to explain something trivial? Do you want to think I'm town?
|
hey palmar.
what do you think of robik.
|
On July 11 2014 14:31 OnceKing wrote:Show nested quote +On July 11 2014 12:38 Stratiform wrote:On July 11 2014 12:28 27ninjabunnies wrote: Stratiform, I've never seen you before or played with you before.
Do you play here on TL often?
How familiar are you with the game mafia?
What is your take on the game so far? I've never played on TL, only irl and some facebook based games. I'm familiar with how mafia works. As for the game so far, I don't really see any information to cast more than suspicion on anyone. Fun question What merits casting more than suspicion then And who is your suspicion cast upon When there is some more info than in the first few hours of the game. If I have reason to accuse someone, I'll say it when it happens.
|
On July 11 2014 21:13 sinani206 wrote: hey palmar.
what do you think of robik. He's a dick, but I already knew that.
Honestly I'm trying to avoid reading his posts.
|
Actually, I'm going to do this:
##Unvote ##Vote Team WeDemandALawyer
The reasons:
1. They both seemed excited to play pre-game, but haven't posted anything of value.
2. This post
On July 11 2014 11:47 GlowingBear wrote: /confirm
Hello guys, it's my second game here. It seems that there is a ruckus going on already. Can someone explain me what Is the Kenpachi rule?
Also, I'll be signing every post of mine with a bolded "-WeDemandALawyer: Haru and GlowingBear" so it gets easier to identify the team.
-WeDemandALawyer: Haru and GlowingBear
Specifically the bolded sentence feels like massively useless fluff observation.
3. This post
On July 11 2014 12:38 GlowingBear wrote: Kenpachi rule doesn't sound as a winning plan to me. You may use it as a secondary argument but to get to the point you have a primary one there is so much game to be played. I think that if we keep discussing this topic it will just a waste of breath. Why do I think it's secondary: a scum can fake claim vt just so he can get townie to accuse him and get mislynched. More than that, a vt can simply try to pressure someone who claimed vt. Why not?
-WeDemandALawyer: Haru and Glowingbear
Talking about stuff that is really easy to talk about without giving any sort of an opinion on anyone in the game. I think it was sinani who pointed out that this post also came at a really awkward time, after people had mostly dropped the kenpachi thing.
3. This post
On July 11 2014 19:59 HaruRH wrote: /confirm
Robik is going to be afk? But exo is a d1 non-poster too...
Meh
-WeDemandALawyer: Haru and GlowingBear
I like the summary of his opinion on the issue. "Meh".
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On July 11 2014 21:28 Palmar wrote:Actually, I'm going to do this: ##Unvote ##Vote Team WeDemandALawyer3. This post Show nested quote +On July 11 2014 12:38 GlowingBear wrote: Kenpachi rule doesn't sound as a winning plan to me. You may use it as a secondary argument but to get to the point you have a primary one there is so much game to be played. I think that if we keep discussing this topic it will just a waste of breath. Why do I think it's secondary: a scum can fake claim vt just so he can get townie to accuse him and get mislynched. More than that, a vt can simply try to pressure someone who claimed vt. Why not?
-WeDemandALawyer: Haru and Glowingbear Talking about stuff that is really easy to talk about without giving any sort of an opinion on anyone in the game. I think it was sinani who pointed out that this post also came at a really awkward time, after people had mostly dropped the kenpachi thing. Yeah I don't mind this. I noted this too, and that I wasn't sure I believed the phone = behind excuse. Was also confused when bunnies said she liked this post, although I guess that was just because it was taking her side.
-M&M
|
On July 11 2014 21:28 Palmar wrote:Actually, I'm going to do this: ##Unvote ##Vote Team WeDemandALawyerThe reasons: 1. They both seemed excited to play pre-game, but haven't posted anything of value. 2. This post Show nested quote +On July 11 2014 11:47 GlowingBear wrote: /confirm
Hello guys, it's my second game here. It seems that there is a ruckus going on already. Can someone explain me what Is the Kenpachi rule?
Also, I'll be signing every post of mine with a bolded "-WeDemandALawyer: Haru and GlowingBear" so it gets easier to identify the team.
-WeDemandALawyer: Haru and GlowingBear Specifically the bolded sentence feels like massively useless fluff observation. 3. This post Show nested quote +On July 11 2014 12:38 GlowingBear wrote: Kenpachi rule doesn't sound as a winning plan to me. You may use it as a secondary argument but to get to the point you have a primary one there is so much game to be played. I think that if we keep discussing this topic it will just a waste of breath. Why do I think it's secondary: a scum can fake claim vt just so he can get townie to accuse him and get mislynched. More than that, a vt can simply try to pressure someone who claimed vt. Why not?
-WeDemandALawyer: Haru and Glowingbear Talking about stuff that is really easy to talk about without giving any sort of an opinion on anyone in the game. I think it was sinani who pointed out that this post also came at a really awkward time, after people had mostly dropped the kenpachi thing. 3. This post Show nested quote +On July 11 2014 19:59 HaruRH wrote: /confirm
Robik is going to be afk? But exo is a d1 non-poster too...
Meh
-WeDemandALawyer: Haru and GlowingBear
I like the summary of his opinion on the issue. "Meh".
1) we were excited to play yes. But not terribly excited to talk about kenpachi rule for 10 pages.
2) this means we won't see robik/exo team for a whole of d1. Meh.
3) fluff = scum?
UNICORNS AND DRAGONS WEEEEEE
|
On July 11 2014 21:34 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On July 11 2014 21:28 Palmar wrote:Actually, I'm going to do this: ##Unvote ##Vote Team WeDemandALawyer3. This post On July 11 2014 12:38 GlowingBear wrote: Kenpachi rule doesn't sound as a winning plan to me. You may use it as a secondary argument but to get to the point you have a primary one there is so much game to be played. I think that if we keep discussing this topic it will just a waste of breath. Why do I think it's secondary: a scum can fake claim vt just so he can get townie to accuse him and get mislynched. More than that, a vt can simply try to pressure someone who claimed vt. Why not?
-WeDemandALawyer: Haru and Glowingbear Talking about stuff that is really easy to talk about without giving any sort of an opinion on anyone in the game. I think it was sinani who pointed out that this post also came at a really awkward time, after people had mostly dropped the kenpachi thing. Yeah I don't mind this. I noted this too, and that I wasn't sure I believed the phone = behind excuse. Was also confused when bunnies said she liked this post, although I guess that was just because it was taking her side. - M&M
That response by bunnies is the single most confusing thing in the thread to me right now.
|
|
|
|