|
On March 21 2014 02:18 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On March 21 2014 01:45 Koshi wrote:On March 21 2014 01:41 Holyflare wrote: The point* is referring to your play in really small.
Also in regards to ve, i agreed with him about vivax's early game i thought it was towny, as did palmar as did a few others. Why is it only ve that takes the scum biscuit for that? I like the point he makes how VE is not showing any decent thought concerning his vote on GT but VE knows very well why Vivax is town. It's odd because Vivax being town was not "obvious". Wait what is this shit? I made a post specifically about GT okay, and if you didn't like it, you should have said something at the time. What is this? Magic. Also. This time you have catched up quickly.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
1) not really no
The fact of the matter is i am town and i would have placed vivax in the same bracket ve did based on his first post, i also agree with the point about you not addressing me further at all that ve made. None of those points make ve scum.
None of your points make me scum either and they are redundant so the fact of the natter is 1 of your reads is definitely wrong and the other one i don't agree on. So i wobder why it is you aren't finding mafia in this game and the only conclusion is that you are mafia because your reads aren't fluid and updating like a normal towny. It's case 1 talk about it case 2 of the same stuff with added extra. Not talk talk talk to scum read, check reactions, weigh up what reactions mean abd then case
|
We need coag's hydra back to poll about whether those pages are relatively legible. Would like to hear thoughts from others as to whether the scooby doo stuff on 61-63 reads easily/was productive (it eventually led to everyone going "oh, we are all misunderstanding each other" and rayn believing hopeless, but in those pages it was just the same points being tossed back and forth with no meeting in the middle, and the production comes after i say it's going nowhere, did not anticipate people realizing what they were doing)
Actions matter plenty, not just reactions. And your reaction to the vivax stuff is a reaction, weighed. Yes, towards the end of a D1 on which I've been very absent, my reads are not fluid and well-updated and I'm not checking in every 2 pages. If I continue to have like 2-3 reads, never update anything, 1000% lynch me.
But if it's still partway through D1 and I've been absent a bunch of the game, maybe my reads not being fluid is a natural thing. Time will tell. I won't argue that I look massively townie, but i will argue that you're mafia.
|
Vivax's initial contributions did look okay, they were sparse and he ended up disappearing after it, but it wasn't awful I thought at the time at least.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
It's a weighted reaction based on a past negative experience. Why is that scummy again? Oh wait it's not. Not to mention your original points on me way back in your first post wasn't even valid either. So in reality you have no points on me either. You think vivax is 95% certain to flip scum and make a crazy weak reference to an association despite me actually having conversations with vivax where he yells at me for not reading, nitpicking etc and the fact that i point out his defensive post for lurking was nothing like this games. You also suggest nobody gave a reason for vivaxs posting lie but if you read my filter you'd know that i in fact did. Everything points to you being mafia. You need to convince us you aren't.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
His defensive post for lurking was nothing like his last game*
|
On March 21 2014 02:32 Palmar wrote: Vivax's initial contributions did look okay, they were sparse and he ended up disappearing after it, but it wasn't awful I thought at the time at least. This. I just went and looked over rayn's point. Like, my only question: would scum do what Vivax did knowing that what he said was easily verifiable? Also try out this logic: sometimes as a townie if I'm not fully caught up yet, if I'm to a certain point and I think someone is mafia, I'll then open their filter to see the stuff they say - and sometimes some of the stuff they say occurs AFTER the point where I'm reading to because I can read a filter faster than I can read a thread. Like, I haven't seen Vivax explain this because I haven't looked, has he even tried?
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On March 21 2014 02:38 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On March 21 2014 02:32 Palmar wrote: Vivax's initial contributions did look okay, they were sparse and he ended up disappearing after it, but it wasn't awful I thought at the time at least. This. I just went and looked over rayn's point. Like, my only question: would scum do what Vivax did knowing that what he said was easily verifiable? Also try out this logic: sometimes as a townie if I'm not fully caught up yet, if I'm to a certain point and I think someone is mafia, I'll then open their filter to see the stuff they say - and sometimes some of the stuff they say occurs AFTER the point where I'm reading to because I can read a filter faster than I can read a thread. Like, I haven't seen Vivax explain this because I haven't looked, has he even tried?
He said they were mafia at page 40. Nothing he used as evidence was before page 40. That's the jist of it.
|
I dont think vivax has been back since the votes piled on
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On March 21 2014 02:41 Hopeless1der wrote: I dont think vivax has been back since the votes piled on
So who do you think is mafia?
|
On March 21 2014 02:42 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On March 21 2014 02:41 Hopeless1der wrote: I dont think vivax has been back since the votes piled on So who do you think is mafia? the guy i added my vote to the pile of.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On March 21 2014 02:43 Hopeless1der wrote:Show nested quote +On March 21 2014 02:42 Holyflare wrote:On March 21 2014 02:41 Hopeless1der wrote: I dont think vivax has been back since the votes piled on So who do you think is mafia? the guy i added my vote to the pile of.
So then there are 3 more if that's the case....? Or are you saying over the entire course of the game only rayn has swayed you to such an obvious mafia?
|
|
On March 21 2014 02:38 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On March 21 2014 02:32 Palmar wrote: Vivax's initial contributions did look okay, they were sparse and he ended up disappearing after it, but it wasn't awful I thought at the time at least. This. I just went and looked over rayn's point. Like, my only question: would scum do what Vivax did knowing that what he said was easily verifiable? Also try out this logic: sometimes as a townie if I'm not fully caught up yet, if I'm to a certain point and I think someone is mafia, I'll then open their filter to see the stuff they say - and sometimes some of the stuff they say occurs AFTER the point where I'm reading to because I can read a filter faster than I can read a thread. Like, I haven't seen Vivax explain this because I haven't looked, has he even tried? But that's kinda not the point. Vivax found time to do the following
a) read the thread well enough to have scumreads b) write a long post about his absence
but not time to
c) explain his scumreads.
He could easily have done c) instead of b), but he didn't.
|
I'm not really reading atm, will skim the thread occasionally until the lynch.
Would switch back to giggle if needed, maaaybe djodref. But vivax is a good lynch.
|
|
thread needs more ms paint
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
|
|
I have a funny game, give me a second.
|
|
|
|