|
This is all I need to stop this push:
On March 20 2014 23:03 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On March 20 2014 23:01 Oatsmaster wrote:
Explain how that makes Vivax scum please, im not following. Vivax said his scumreads were Hopeless/GT/thrawn and promised cases later. He made cases on Hopeless and thrawn. I asked him why no case on GT? He said GT had said good things after he left. I called that bullshit because GT had not posted after Vivax left. Vivax said when he made the post he had not been caught up and he was on page 40 when he wrote the original post where he called GT/Hopeless/thrawn mafia. The evidence he points out for thrawn/Hopeless being mafia starts after page 40. Therefore he can't possibly have thought they are scum for it because he has not read those pages.
I did read certain filters Rayn, especially thrawn after he +1d with his poop paint picture, and I already said why I was suspicious of hopeless previously.
GT followed up with a post with content at page 60, so my reasons for thinking he was scum for the way he was not contributing didn't stand on their own any more.
Seriously this wagon is bullshit and is sure to net us most if not all of scum. If there's anyone having genuine doubt about what happened there then ask me anything about it and don't blindly sheep Rayn based on a representation that isn't correct.
|
even so you're admitting to posting reads without having read the thread, only a few filters
|
imo that is scummier than lying or whatever
|
No, I read the thread coherently, ie in context until page 40 and some filters of people I found interesting at that point, ie you and hopeless and giggletummy.
|
well whatever. you said that your wagon is suer to catch scum, who are they?
|
Dunno yet, just came back and saw all this stuff, still gotta figure out who jumped on me and why, but wagon based on such "scumslips" raises scums appetite for a mislynch.
|
obviously you and me buddy
|
This game is called what would you do as town:
Scenario 1:
There is a big argument between two players in thread. You decide it's important regarding players alignments because you weigh in to the argument. What do you do?
1) Give your opinions on the players and tell which are good and bad. Say if someone looks scummy because of it or if it does not you point the thread to a different (right) direction.
2) Do not comment on the argumet at all, call one player out for it not really telling why or using some crap reasoning like "he should do something else". Call noone scum, give no better direction, throw a vote on someone, say "case later kthxye" and peace out.
Scenario 2:
You have a vote on your top scumread and people are waiting on your case. What do you do?
1) Make a case on your scumread, try to convince people on voting for him.
2) Make a case where you don't really call your scumread scum, continue discussing the scenario 1 matters, call another player out multiple times without calling calling him scum, defend/question a couple of other people on other things. peace out.
Scenario 3:
You have been out of the thread for a day. It's close to lynch, what do you do?
1) Make a case on your top scumread and try to convince people to vote for them, or weigh between the cases that are present and give resons why you sheep the best case.
2) Make a huge fucking case on someone who is not your top scumread. Then make another huge fucking case on your top scumread. In that case, say that this dude is definitely mafia regardless of this third guy's alignment. Proceed on voting for the third guy who you just said you are not even sure is mafia.
If you answered (1) more Giggletummy should be mafia.
If you answered (2) more you are mafia.
|
I like games but dude tl;dr
I'll maybe check it out later.
|
On March 21 2014 03:53 Vivax wrote:
Dunno yet, just came back and saw all this stuff, still gotta figure out who jumped on me and why, but wagon based on such "scumslips" raises scums appetite for a mislynch.
i want to point out that djodref popped in and said "the vivax lynch looks legit" and said he was going to check the timestamps and then vote for vivax if the timestamps check out. he hasn't done this. there is no mention of vivax in djo's filter prior to the post i'm referring to so djo's willingness to join this vivax wagon is COMPLETELY because of the "lie." except he didn't actually follow up and join the wagon so I do not know if he was being serious
so in other words i'm still strongly considering lynching djo
|
i wanna hear from vivax first and hopefully djodref
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/lUXda59.png)
|
On March 21 2014 03:58 thrawn2112 wrote:Show nested quote +On March 21 2014 03:53 Vivax wrote:
Dunno yet, just came back and saw all this stuff, still gotta figure out who jumped on me and why, but wagon based on such "scumslips" raises scums appetite for a mislynch. i want to point out that djodref popped in and said "the vivax lynch looks legit" and said he was going to check the timestamps and then vote for vivax if the timestamps check out. he hasn't done this. there is no mention of vivax in djo's filter prior to the post i'm referring to so djo's willingness to join this vivax wagon is COMPLETELY because of the "lie." except he didn't actually follow up and join the wagon so I do not know if he was being serious so in other words i'm still strongly considering lynching djo
Yes, not only that he did make 2 posts about something else when he was supposed to be reading the Vivax case and things about it. He's likely mafia, but Vivax is definitely mafia.
|
No thrawn stop. Vivax is scum.
|
lol rayn who exactly do you want to lynch? we have an hour left so you should focus on that
|
|
|
eh, vivax you are going to have to fight for this one. if you are town I know you can do it.
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/NB878IY.png)
|
I am not going to change my vote regardless of what anyone says at this point.
There has been 46 hours and Vivax has failed to do anything productive. He has only caused confusion and his posting is all over the place with no real direction and the biggest effort he has put in any of his posts is a real life schedule. On top of that he is either lying or causing a clusterfuck with not being clear with his posts.
|
Rayn, trying to throw any shit you can find on me after calling me scum doesn't make your main point more valid. It isn't.
It's this simple: I come home tired, I don't feel like reading much, I wanna sleep. Hopeless looked scummy to me at the start of the game for the way he was all serious about HF's points in the trolly stage.
Reason made before page 40. Check.
I see thrawn jumping on Coag with a poop paint picture after not posting much. Reading his filter cause I was suspicious of that I see he started posting a lot more after Coag confirmed himself as town.
Yes I saw more of the game in tiny bits while reading his filter.
I see Giggletummy posting more paint, complaining about spam and saying some nothing-saying stuff about HF. I think this dude could be scum.
At that point I feel I have enough, turn off the computer and go to sleep, at that point I was at page 40ish. No, I didn't just read that but I also read some filters, but not all filters. In fact I still didn't read most of the game cause no time.
So I come back next day, look at GT and actually notice he did follow up with a pretty huge post. I start posting about other stuff. You ask me why I didn't comment on him. I reply it's cause I didn't read his post made at page 60ish. I left the game before going to sleep in the belief that the bad stuff was all he posted at that point.
Yes, I was too lazy and tired to read everything, and I made it clear.
This is all I have to say in my defense regarding what you people are calling a scumslip. Now off to look at Poofters followup.
|
vivax have you read the thread up to here?
|
I don't care Vivax. Even if all that is legit here's what you have done:
Giggletummy was mafia. You drop the scumread for shit reasons. thrawn was mafia, i don't even know why he isn't any more. Hopeless was mafia. He didn't even answer you and you never followed it up. Instead you made a case on poofer based on semantics. That literally EVERYTHING you have even discussed in this game, besides defending yourself when the accusation was "make a case", which you failed to do at the same time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
