[S] Shadowed Mini Mafia - Page 13
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Oatsmaster
United States16627 Posts
| ||
Koshi
Belgium38797 Posts
I would like Jonny to explain his arguments against me though. I am actually upset about the fact my early posting is "shitposting" tbh. | ||
Oatsmaster
United States16627 Posts
| ||
Koshi
Belgium38797 Posts
| ||
Oatsmaster
United States16627 Posts
| ||
Koshi
Belgium38797 Posts
| ||
Oatsmaster
United States16627 Posts
Do you have a conclusion about what people said about your policy? Since you apparently did it to create discussion, you must have some kind of idea what you think about the people that commented on it either positively or negatively. | ||
Koshi
Belgium38797 Posts
| ||
Oatsmaster
United States16627 Posts
| ||
Koshi
Belgium38797 Posts
1) LM said he was not going to vote for something just based on filter size but on filter content. This shows future commitment to the game. This is a town answer. But in 24 hours we can also use this to pressure him to give reads, or at least his town answer looks bad when he doesn't follow up. But I trust he will. 2) Balla same story. Instantly said yay let's do this and was worried about other people low content spam and not himself. Good + follow up ensured. 3) Jonny was angry and is still angry. There is no reason for that at all and I put him scummy. I also read his post better and found previously quoted post that does not make sense at all. ↨ 4) Hopeless said something and then fucked off. This is scummy and it is not my fault that he did this. If we lynch somebody we lynch Hopeless. 5) Suki her post was actually a wtf moment. The underlined part of previous sentence was my confusion. I think the rest of the people made similar comments but that's what my post generated. But nothing on it's own was scummy. Also I wasn't in let's solve this game right now mode yesterday right before bed. | ||
Koshi
Belgium38797 Posts
JayB is making sense this game. Voice of Reason. That's all. | ||
Artanis[Xp]
Netherlands12968 Posts
On February 04 2014 19:44 LoneMeow wrote: Filter links to player list, pretty please? Done. | ||
Oatsmaster
United States16627 Posts
| ||
Koshi
Belgium38797 Posts
| ||
JonnyLaw
United States3482 Posts
On February 04 2014 22:50 Koshi wrote: I never said it was nonsense. It's a good policy but in the end I knew I wouldn't follow through with it anyway. And take away everything people said about my first post in the game and we would have a 6 page thread. So yeah, I am pretty happy with it. You're making the same point I made. You posted something stupid that you admittedly don't want to follow through with in the end. If we take away everyone talking about your first post then maybe we'd have better content instead of discussion about post counts. Did the discussion about that post tell you where the scum are at in this game Koshi? I don't think that discussion will ever point out scum. Why even go there when you don't want to follow through anyway? I'm trying to understand your motives here. I'm heading to work very soon. Just checking the thread before I go. | ||
Koshi
Belgium38797 Posts
As in "guys let's be nice to each other and post a lot" But I called it a policy to get things going. At least Jonny and Oats aren't scum together. I can't believe 2 scummers pushing the most dumb argument ever. | ||
Balla24
2322 Posts
On February 04 2014 15:47 Oatsmaster wrote: Its so bad, so if its town koshi, I assume he doesnt mean it seriously and has some reason for posting it. But no signs of that so far. Can you explain a bit more? 1. How does Koshi posting something "bad" make it bait for scum to jump on? Basically: what will scum do with it? 2. Did anybody jump on it? 3. Was this your first thought when you read it? On Koshi creating "shitposting": Policy discussion isn't shitposting, it forces people to take responsibility for what they say. If they don't follow through, then we can figure out what's up. I said I would easily be able to hit the benchmark, cool, if I dont reach anywhere close to that then WTF? These kind of things are good, not bad. Hopeless did a similar thing to me, saying he's motivated by it, but he bailed. On February 05 2014 00:38 JonnyLaw wrote: You're making the same point I made. You posted something stupid that you admittedly don't want to follow through with in the end. If we take away everyone talking about your first post then maybe we'd have better content instead of discussion about post counts. Did the discussion about that post tell you where the scum are at in this game Koshi? I don't think that discussion will ever point out scum. Why even go there when you don't want to follow through anyway? I'm trying to understand your motives here. If you're going to call one opening bad, then you should provide a counterpoint. You never did this. You seemed very eager to get past all the policy talk but never really provided any exit strategies until someone else moved in another direction. | ||
Oatsmaster
United States16627 Posts
2. yeah suki and some other dudes. 3. My first thought was why is koshi proposing such a useless policy. mannnn Koshi's shitposting is AFTER his first post. | ||
LoneMeow
Finland1396 Posts
On February 05 2014 00:49 Balla24 wrote: Policy discussion isn't shitposting, it forces people to take responsibility for what they say. If they don't follow through, then we can figure out what's up. I said I would easily be able to hit the benchmark, cool, if I dont reach anywhere close to that then WTF? These kind of things are good, not bad. Hopeless did a similar thing to me, saying he's motivated by it, but he bailed. Policy talk is a way to get the game started. I don't really see how it forces anyone to take responsibility of anything in itself. To be honest, to me Hopeless1der's "motivated" comment read more like sarcasm than being serious, given the rest of the content he's produced. | ||
LoneMeow
Finland1396 Posts
On February 05 2014 00:57 Oatsmaster wrote: mannnn Koshi's shitposting is AFTER his first post. Is there anything else in this game that you think is worth talking about than Koshi's "shitposting"? | ||
| ||