Here's his suspicions from the first few pages of Titanic:
Titanic MafiaIs justanothertownie a suspicious little townie?On July 27 2013 20:13 justanothertownie wrote:Hey guys, just caught up.
First impressions:
I don't like Paperscraps. First he joins the lurker discussion without adding any content, then he starts to jump on exarezee without any good reason (I'm not really convinced that it was just a joke) and when he gets a little heat for it he totally backs off. I really hate this:
Show nested quote +TLDR; Besides the first question on my first post, I haven't been serious at all.
So this is not serious at all?
Show nested quote +
Lurkers are liabilities later in the game. I don't have a problem with taking them out sooner, rather than later. If you are stuck in a potential mylo/lylo situation with a lurker, it is no fun. Of course, if some one is overly scummy we should lynch them first.
Add to this how he didn't post anything since he noticed people getting suspicious. To me he is the scummiest player so far.
Also I'm annoyed by CJS. Going through his filter I can't find anything valuable - he just didn't say anything until this point (apart from fluff).
This is jat's very first post. He already has a scumread on Paperscraps, and he's suspicious of CJS.
On July 28 2013 01:51 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On July 28 2013 01:42 hzflank wrote:On July 28 2013 01:39 exarezee wrote:
I'm really lost as to who's trolling. I've been trolled by captain sparrow, oatsmaster, and paper so far. Are you guys all just joking right now or can i take your posts seriously.
The thread got really shitty. Working out why would be an interesting exercise.
Oats is really doing his best in this regard...
So, oats which part of your case do you want me to adress?
As for scumreads:
Paper still looks scummy to me for the same reasons i mentioned before.
You start to look scummy to me because you are killing town atmosphere and keeping tunneling me with that joke of a case.
I don't have any other scumreads as of yet. There are plenty of people who didn't contribute nearly enough to really judge them based on their posts.
Paperscraps scummy, hz starting to be scummy.
On July 28 2013 01:57 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On July 28 2013 01:52 Oatsmaster wrote:On July 28 2013 01:51 justanothertownie wrote:On July 28 2013 01:42 hzflank wrote:On July 28 2013 01:39 exarezee wrote:
I'm really lost as to who's trolling. I've been trolled by captain sparrow, oatsmaster, and paper so far. Are you guys all just joking right now or can i take your posts seriously.
The thread got really shitty. Working out why would be an interesting exercise.
Oats is really doing his best in this regard...
So, oats which part of your case do you want me to adress?
As for scumreads:
Paper still looks scummy to me for the same reasons i mentioned before.
You start to look scummy to me because you are killing town atmosphere and keeping tunneling me with that joke of a case.
I don't have any other scumreads as of yet. There are plenty of people who didn't contribute nearly enough to really judge them based on their posts.
OMGUS?
nice response.
How is me tunneling you scummy?
Sigh. Because you try to make it look like you are really contributing and scumhunting while you just repeat the same things all over again without bringing any good points.
Let's just assume i was not in the game - who would you want to lynch?
Oats' tunnel on jat is scummy.
On July 28 2013 20:43 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On July 28 2013 15:35 FirmTofu wrote:
No, I didn't say JAT having a town read on me is a town tell. That's simply untrue. I said he has me as a town read. Now, scum usually have some town as town reads. That is not meaningful in itself, however, when it's coupled with the fact that he has a lot of posts that indicate that his town read on me is somewhat justifiable from a town perspective. If you would like, I'll quote them for you.
I'm not going to sheep you if you make a good case. I'll consider voting him if you make a good case. There's a big difference there.
Yes, my read on you was justifiable at that point but where do you see a lot of posts that would indicate this? Sounds weird to me.
I would love to lynch VA for his attitude towards the game but if he always plays like this then there is nothing about him that indicates any alignment. But I would like to know why Vayne thinks Oats voting Tofu is good?
Also I'm still not content with Koshis explanation of his reads. So you actually don't have any scumread anymore besides the troll and the lurkers?
For now I still think Paper is a good lynch. His reads do not impress me.
Show nested quote +Oats leaning town - I am really hoping Oats is town, his reads and post so far have been great. His comprehension of what is going on is probably the best so far.
What? Please explain this.
Show nested quote +Vayne leaning town - not sure what to think of vayne as of yet, he comes in every so often and drops some knowledge. I think his vote on clarity is pretty bad though. His filter strikes me as town though.
I don't know if we read the posts of the same person...
Show nested quote +
Koshi leaning town - Koshi is a odd ball so far. I like that he town reads me, haha. I mostly agree with the lists he has made so far.
Yeah, that's because you both don't have any real scumreads.... or do you really think Vivax is scum? Or that I am?
##Vote: Paperscraps Jat is also suspicious of Koshi.
On July 29 2013 09:19 justanothertownie wrote:
fml...
I really have to reevaluate most of my reads now. I will do so tomorrow.
Vivax doesn't look good for this unvote btw. Can't see a good town reason to do it but scum could try to get town cred.
Vivax is suspicous.
On July 29 2013 19:34 justanothertownie wrote:
But to answer your question:
gut-wise and without thinking it through very well the 4 persons I would probably lynch are:
koshi, hzflank, maybe stutters/vayne and you
Take this with a grain of salt.
Suspicious of lots of people.
On July 30 2013 08:23 justanothertownie wrote:
So, I thought about it and I came to the conclusion that you are absolutely right, hz. Koshi and you are not both scum - it's just you. If I had read Koshis case on you closely before I posted this 4 lynch candidates I wouldn't have put him in there. His case against you makes a shitton of sense and I can and will add content to that shortly. I underestimated Koshi because I read a game he played in where his play was extremely weird and because of his lazy play (lynch-lists with only lurkers) D1.
Koshi suspicious.
On July 31 2013 03:06 justanothertownie wrote:
First there is Tofu who I still don't like (still think he is scum) but to be fair I have to look into what happened last night again before I am 100% content saying he is scum. The same goes for hzflank (in his case there is even more new information to consider).
Besides there is this clarity thing. Depends totally on my idea to be correct though.
I also have to look into vayne again but currently I have no opinion on him.
Firm and hzflank suspicious.
Answer to question: yes, yes he is.TL Mafia LXIIis jat a suspicious little townie?On September 22 2013 00:07 justanothertownie wrote:
Hi guys...
Mocsta do you think Koshi is town or scum?
Btw. if anybody wants me to comment on something specific feel free to point me to it.
Included this just as a comparison to Titanic.
On September 23 2013 10:32 justanothertownie wrote:Ok, this is where I stand:
LoneMeow:
I can see him being discouraged town. The only thing I really don't like is how he just left after voting himself. He is definitely not dumb and knows that this is horrible. But I don't see how it really makes sense as scum either.
Ray:
I don't get this guy. His posting is extremely unintuitive but he obviously posted like this in his last game, too. I am struggling to form an opinion on him.
FirmTofu:
Show nested quote +On September 22 2013 19:10 FirmTofu wrote:On September 22 2013 19:00 DarthPunk wrote:On September 22 2013 18:58 FirmTofu wrote:On September 22 2013 18:50 DarthPunk wrote:On September 22 2013 18:47 Mocsta wrote:
DP.
Do you find FT backing down indicative of a townie prodding for information and diverting course as they are satisfied.
Or scum prodding around, and diverting as shits about to get started?
I find it odd that FT thought I was scummy for being defensive. And then when I am defensive towards him he thinks I am townie. There is a real inconsistency in his narrative IMO.
I think a scum Firm Tofu would ABSOLUTELY not want to get into it with me.
Further his originally thread summary was really really off. Actually I have had some thoughts. I may construct a longer post shortly about this if you'll give me some time.
I would like to clarify my intentions here.
The inconsistent narrative was deliberate. Why? You are active. Accusing you allows me to read you better. Think rayn's style of play. By posting an inconsistent narrative, I can gauge your response as being townie or scummy in a quick, direct, and efficient fashion.
Furthermore, I can assess the extent to which you are actually scumhunting. The fact that you noticed the inconsistency makes you look more town to me. You want to find scum. You're looking for inconsistencies.
I can assure you, scum FirmTofu would buddy you until you die. You'll just have to take my word on that bit.
So, what you are saying is that you accused me falsely based on some really bad meta read. and this whole time it was, in fact, a ploy in order to read me better? is that it?
No, I accused you on a legitimate meta read that I "flavored" with some inconsistencies about your prior defensive behavior.
This looks so unbelievable to me. There are 2 possibilities (I don't buy his explanation): (1) He is town and to proud to admit he made a mistake. (2) He is scum trying to cover up inconsistencies.
He had this weird discussion with DP and he walked us through him reading the thread for a while (a good way to seem active and invested without necessarily doing too much of value). Then he just disappeared.
If I was in his shoes and my time was limited I would try to catch up to the thread asap and not comment on things (without presenting some sort of critical information) that happened ages ago and I especially wouldn't try to discuss those comments with people instead of reading the rest of the thread.
Of those 3 people I like this lynch the most and I have to vote someone now because I have to sleep.
##Vote: FirmTofu This is halfway down the third page of jat's filter, and is the first time I can find marked suspicion on anybody. And it's because he needs to vote someone before he sleeps.
On September 24 2013 03:38 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On September 24 2013 03:13 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Btw JAT, if you are still here. Who are your scumreads?
I still don't have very strong reads. There are a few people I am relatively confident are town but noone I am sure is scum.
People that look bad and come to mind are FT (no improvement and the lynch doesn't make him look better), Risen (I have to admit I don't know this guy at all so maybe he is just a player who doesn't give a fuck at all? - really anti town though), kush (as you said he can do better we will see Day2). I am also slightly suspicious of Mocsta because of his voting behaviour yesterday and because he obviously has a quite strong townread on me (I mean there is nothing wrong with it but the last player who read me town strongly while nobody else did was scum). I wouldn't lynch him though.
Ok, still suspicious of FT, Risen for being "anti-town", kush "can do better", and Mocsta "although I wouldn't lynch him". Bear in mind this post was prompted by rayn, not given voluntarily.
On September 25 2013 09:17 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On September 25 2013 00:44 Mocsta wrote:@Rayn: Regarding - MattchewOP links are NOT updated. Mattchew filter
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=423071&user=Mattchew
Im just going to list things that stick out to me whether pro/con and then summarise
+ Show Spoiler +- Not sure why his first action is to filter dive 4 specific players
- Gut read on rayn is meh.. would have expected something more substatial
- Gives an odd read on Chariman Ray.. almost as if he knows he is town (this stuck out to me a while back).. could just be poor phrasing
- Where is outcome of his filter dive on 4 specific players?
- Cuddles Mocsta... via gut again.. none of his posts have any in-game substance
- Is OK with yam, based on others vote critera; but then later gives a wishywashy comment on yam that implies he only has a soft scum lean.. very odd
- Asks for opinions on Stutters multiple times, but doesn't flesh out why he is interested (very scummy)
- Rational of keeping voting on yam is odd... suggests he didnt have a scum read on him when he cast the vote in the first place....which is not consistent with prior comments
- later puts a scum team which includes stutters.... why the fuck did he not vote stutters instead of yam.. OR prove stutters himself.. (VERY SCUMMY)
- Really odd comments about marv.... not sure what it means
Overall. I have a few problems with him
(1) Tries to insinuate stutters is scum through others, but provides no insight of his own. In fact, he doesnt even probe stutters directly to ascertain his alignment.
Exacerbated when he confirms he didnt have a scum read on yamato when voting him... but lists stutters on his scum team (His vote should have been on stutters !!)
(2) When speaking about chariman_ray opener; the phrasing is really odd. Its almost as if he knows the guy is town.. i actually cant pinpoint my issue with it, its just really odd.
(3) I have played voice mafia with this guy twice now. As town, matt is easily able to establish himself. He speaks freely and with confidence, is to the point, and doesn't listen to bullshit. I'm not getting an iota of that this game.
I actually can't see how this guy can be town. His actions are very scummy/deceitful, and I can't picture the motive for a town to keep asking about stutters, without providing personal insight, or querying stutters directly.
Im actually really happy with this guy to be voted. And willing to vote him above anyone else I discussed prior this cycle.
##Unvote
##Vote: Mattchew Ok, I read his filter again and your case. Still the same feeling about it. Sounds logical - guy might be scum. Is it compelling enough to convince me 100%? No, it is not.
On the other hand Mattchews reaction to the case is pretty damning in my eyes. He doesn't even try to defend himself or present better targets.
Has to be shat on to give a scumread on Mattchew. Originally I read how he posted around here as town, but now, meh.
Answer to question: no, it really doesn't look like it.jat never attempts to engage or develop his read on his only other main scumread, Firm, either.