EPTIgnore his initial drama, did he look capable at playing this game?
Newbie Mini Mafia XLIV - Page 62
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Koshi
Belgium38797 Posts
Ignore his initial drama, did he look capable at playing this game? | ||
|
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
| ||
|
Onegu
United States9695 Posts
On July 15 2013 22:49 Koshi wrote: Onega, What is your opinion on StiMaDDict? Ignore his initial drama, did he look capable at playing this game? I would have wanted to lynch him, I really didnt like his filter. That being said he/ I am VT(which I hate that he claimed) Afterward after the lie he played ok, I do not know why he left though I was never told nor will I ask. | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17322 Posts
On July 15 2013 19:11 Onegu wrote: First thing I have already said hurricane should not get town cred for that post, I would be MORE likely to post that as scum. The second part you are correct the first time, there is no way that post of chromes is a scum tell. I have already said I think super is bad town, I think you and hurricane are starting to make sure the lynch wagons stay on 2 town. Again keep wagons the same, but you are also ok with a no lynch? Same things with wagons, give control to choose to hurricane and tell others to sheep him. I just hate this, when someone asks give your points. Didnt you already say you were ok with sheeping this game, And again yes they should make thier own reads, but if they are voteing on something I feel strongly about it isnt my job to force them, if you feel the other wagon is correct its your job. Do you really believe this? If I am dead I cannot find scum, cannot vote for scum. If I am alive as VT and playing a strong game I possibly force a KP on me instead of someone they think is a blue. Just lol, besides being wrong, remember that whole thing about being a jackass Why do we want this to happen? What good comes from his claim here it is so much worse that he lived and scum would know he was blue. You just blamed kirby for being a marytr why are you voteing yourself? Wait didnt you have a scum read on him for a long time so it obv wasnt the entire game... Really no reads? You let them have power and told people to sheep them. Earlier you say dont sheep, now sheep, which is it? It's funny, by morning light I don't like Koshi so much | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17322 Posts
| ||
|
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
| ||
|
Onegu
United States9695 Posts
On July 15 2013 23:28 Alakaslam wrote: Onegu why did Chrom lie as town? I don't get it! Huh he lied where? | ||
|
Nightcat99
United States239 Posts
Regardless that there is a mislynch, do you think the scum will kill one of the tribunal tonight to ensure that theres less voting power tonight, and if none of them die tonight does that make a the tribunal suspicious? | ||
|
hzflank
United Kingdom2991 Posts
Chrom and Super are not both scum. That's the only really solid association that I see. Chrom started to heavily defend Super 8 hours before the lynch, and that would never of happened if they were both scum. So to the people who are already making that association I suggest that you think along other lines. I do not like that whole council thing. It made it too easy to sheep. It was too early in the game for players to have such solid town reads on each other. I almost feel like people tried to put a reverse-sheep on me where I was told I that I should not move my vote (I will vote as I think best, I do not need other people to give me reasons to vote). First order of business is to be a play by play on the council thing. | ||
|
hzflank
United Kingdom2991 Posts
On July 15 2013 23:46 Nightcat99 wrote: I just woke up but i have a question i been thinking about. Regardless that there is a mislynch, do you think the scum will kill one of the tribunal tonight to ensure that theres less voting power tonight, and if none of them die tonight does that make a the tribunal suspicious? I suggest that we think of everyone as individuals and not units/teams. If we think of those 3 players as a team when they are not confirmed town then we risk giving the scum too much control over the game. | ||
|
Onegu
United States9695 Posts
On July 15 2013 07:24 Hurricane Sponge wrote: @ Umasi @ Rainbows We three control this lynch. I think everyone else is entrenched (via either conviction or inactivity). If you agree, we need to establish some things between the three of us. First, do we all agree that both of the current wagons are acceptable lynch candidates? If you want to look at the "tribunal" have a gander at where it started. If he is NK Ill eat my tablet and post the pics. | ||
|
Nightcat99
United States239 Posts
I would love a picture of someone eating their tablet :D j/k | ||
|
Onegu
United States9695 Posts
| ||
|
hzflank
United Kingdom2991 Posts
On July 16 2013 00:09 Onegu wrote: If you want to look at the "tribunal" have a gander at where it started. If he is NK Ill eat my tablet and post the pics. Actually I think it may have started when Rainbows makes his case against Gotard, as I will show shortly. | ||
|
hzflank
United Kingdom2991 Posts
| ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17322 Posts
On July 15 2013 15:14 Alakaslam wrote: Lie I thought you f-5ed Xzavier in his filter, back on page thirty-something, here you are on page fifty something claiming you haven't read it at all?!?!! I may now rest in peace as one having caught up and thinking he has probably caught scum. Ahhh...... Yeah. Goodnight, Umasi slam wakka wakka I'm tired | ||
|
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
| ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17322 Posts
On July 15 2013 23:52 hzflank wrote: Just caught up. Initial thoughts: Chrom and Super are not both scum. That's the only really solid association that I see. Chrom started to heavily defend Super 8 hours before the lynch, and that would never of happened if they were both scum. So to the people who are already making that association I suggest that you think along other lines. I do not like that whole council thing. It made it too easy to sheep. It was too early in the game for players to have such solid town reads on each other. I almost feel like people tried to put a reverse-sheep on me where I was told I that I should not move my vote (I will vote as I think best, I do not need other people to give me reasons to vote). First order of business is to be a play by play on the council thing. That whole council shpeil is based on too much NMM XLIII meta anyway. How the hell was that formed day 1... It like begging for Svengali play. Please google Svengali, outside of the context of mafia, if you don't get it. It's a French novel that I haven't read but that I know the gist of. Umasi where is the Chezzy post? Need it buried in a GOOD case | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17322 Posts
On July 15 2013 09:34 Koshi wrote: Super is scum? SUPER? The guy that you just defended? You weren't advocating that Kirby was a better lynch, you were advocating that Super wasn't scummy. What the fuck happened? On July 15 2013 09:39 Chromatically wrote: Kirby flipped town. I defended Super primarily to get Kirby lynched. I still think that people were voting him for bad reasons, and the reasons I put up against the case are valid. I'm not saying that he is scum, I haven't even read his filter since the flip. I am saying that it definitely deserves consideration now. That association made it look otherwise. You're right though. Why does it matter then? How is super at all scummy now, what in his filter has changed? XD that may be a case against him actually Whatever I'm obviously tunneling | ||
|
Chromatically
United States1700 Posts
| ||
| ||
