EPTOn February 26 2013 12:19 VisceraEyes wrote:
Prom how's that scum-read on WoS coming sir?
Prom how's that scum-read on WoS coming sir?
it's goner than gone.i thought I made that clear?
TL Mafia LX - Page 35
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Promethelax
Canada7089 Posts
it's goner than gone.i thought I made that clear? | ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
On February 26 2013 12:16 DoctorHelvetica wrote: +100 scum points for everyone ignoring a case against prom and instead talking about pardoner with WoS and everyone praising him for being a great townie instead of focusing on the scumhunt is this because of that bullshit about how your job as a townie is to prove you're a townie and scumhunting is somehow second to that? On February 26 2013 12:02 MilkSuckler wrote: I am going to sheep this. I think the role has to go to someone we trust. Hence we are back to voting the two pro-towniest pricks in the game. As far as I am concerned, a pardoner saving themselves from lynch is not alignment indicative. ======= @WoS: Whilst I applaud your confidence to stand before the experienced players present and declare you're love of town; it does little to earn my trust. You say you want to put Prome on the backburner and continue scum hunting: what make you of "Wade Fell" On February 26 2013 11:42 WaveofShadow wrote: Hence my post. If you're worried about scum getting the position, put me in it instead, and if people are absolutely paranoid that I'm not town then worst case scenario it's a mislynch on a role that you don't want that badly anyway, and best case scenario, you don't lynch me and you have town in the position you want. If you're commenting on the fact that it might be inherently more difficult to try and fix the runner up vote, then that's a different story, obviously. I really like the Dr.'s posting so far, but I'd just like to keep in mind that I don't think we should start bandwagoning so early. I think it's been established by a few people already that Prom looks scummy; thus we know not to put him up for mayor. Are we now, like the good Doctor suggests, looking for a mayor to lynch him flat-out, or do we continue the scumhunt while keeping Prom in the back of our minds? I lean towards the second option. I've only said 100 fucking times to drop it if people don't like it, consider it dropped. As for you, geript, you should know, ONCE AGAIN if you even looked at the game we recently played that if anything it's exactly like my town play from last game, in which I question everything I do because I suck. I'm just less afraid to suck now. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On February 26 2013 12:20 Promethelax wrote: Be pissy about it if you want. I'm Talking to VE about the opinion of a player we both talk to regularly and respect. Grush is town. I'm sure of it and I always will be, someone could get a red check on him this game and I'd still have him as town. Your name drop did nothing for me either Prom, just so we're on the same page. I don't care what marv has to say regarding grush' Starsenses. | ||
|
Promethelax
Canada7089 Posts
On February 26 2013 12:22 VisceraEyes wrote: Your name drop did nothing for me either Prom, just so we're on the same page. I don't care what marv has to say regarding grush' Starsenses. Do you care what I have to say o. The matter? | ||
|
DoctorHelvetica
United States15034 Posts
On February 26 2013 12:18 MilkSuckler wrote: DoctorHelvetica.. are you against me voting you for mayor? I don't want to be mayor, no. | ||
|
MilkSuckler
Swaziland597 Posts
On February 26 2013 12:21 geript wrote: Was referring to the "that post is likely generated by town" comment. My point is that I still don't like how his core fluctuates and it seems more like he's rewriting scripted posts and trying to blend under the newbie umbrella. hhhmmm, I must say the "read" - if you can call it that - on Wade Fell was weak at best and scummily deprived of stance at worst. And serves as stark contrast to the pardoner request post. I noticed in NMM37 some players were writing posts for the lurkers to contribute with; so could be a valid tactic going forward here. @Geript Can you please identify which components of his post read forced and scripted to you. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On February 26 2013 12:23 Promethelax wrote: Do you care what I have to say o. The matter? Not if it's "He said starsenses = modconfirmed town" no. LMAO That's the worst shit I've ever seen. | ||
|
VayeshMoru
201 Posts
| ||
|
randombum
United States2378 Posts
Here's a crazy idea. What if we try to get scum elected on purpose. The idea is the mayor will probably not last every long in this set-up anyways. My plan is basically we get a scummy person in the thread elected as mayor and get him to lynch the scummiest. Depending on what he does and how the flip goes we can gain a lot of good information. If the mayor is unwilling to lynch the scummiest then we can vig the mayor. If he turns red then we have caught two scum. If he does lynch him and he turns red then good, the scummiest looking player was scum. If the mayor lynches the scummiest and he turns green, then we have to seriously look at the mayor. If the mayor also turns out green, then the town really sucked. Basically we use this vote to choose our lynch target and put a scummy player in the spotlight by making him mayor. While normally having a scum mayor would really suck, the fact that there are no bodyguards make it far less risky because we can simply vig him if his play sucks. | ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
Essentially, good Doctor, I bring up the points about focusing on the scumhunt MYSELF, AND calling Prom scummy (which you conveniently ignore in your long post regarding how you don't yet view me as town, but rather, 'worrisome') and you somehow ignore that and instead take it as me shitting up the thread. As I said, drop the pardoner shit, we'll see what happens. Personally I'm wondering how the fuck geript seems to be 100% sure of Mocsta being who he says he is. | ||
|
Promethelax
Canada7089 Posts
Why not? | ||
|
ObviousOne
United States3704 Posts
| ||
|
MilkSuckler
Swaziland597 Posts
Thats a shame: I enjoyed reading the debate you had outside the game with everyone regarding establishing innocence. I like the direction you are providing thus far; but will respect your wishes and not reciprocate the <3 with a vote. With Wade Fell: do you dislike any more of his play (other than his suggestion with the pardoner?) | ||
|
DoctorHelvetica
United States15034 Posts
On February 26 2013 12:26 randombum wrote: Just caught up, some thoughts. The idea of setting up votes so the the pardoner is the lynch target seems ridiculous. Here's a crazy idea. What if we try to get scum elected on purpose. The idea is the mayor will probably not last every long in this set-up anyways. My plan is basically we get a scummy person in the thread elected as mayor and get him to lynch the scummiest. Depending on what he does and how the flip goes we can gain a lot of good information. If the mayor is unwilling to lynch the scummiest then we can vig the mayor. If he turns red then we have caught two scum. If he does lynch him and he turns red then good, the scummiest looking player was scum. If the mayor lynches the scummiest and he turns green, then we have to seriously look at the mayor. If the mayor also turns out green, then the town really sucked. Basically we use this vote to choose our lynch target and put a scummy player in the spotlight by making him mayor. While normally having a scum mayor would really suck, the fact that there are no bodyguards make it far less risky because we can simply vig him if his play sucks. I have a crazier idea, what if we instead just try to lynch scum because that's the whole point of this game if you're town. Hear me out, but I think if we lynched scum every day, we would win the game. | ||
|
TestSubject893
United States774 Posts
On February 26 2013 12:20 VayeshMoru wrote: A question appears. Does this lab rat have experience in worlds outside of the team liquid? If so why would the experiment feel the need to declare his inability to perform. wat I've played mafia in real life if that's what you're asking. I told him it was a noob question because I had to ask it twice to get it across, and well, I have less experience than most players in this game. I'm not really sure what you're looking for in a response, so please feel free to more directly clarify any questions you might still have. | ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
On February 26 2013 12:27 ObviousOne wrote: Prom is voting VE for mayor despite VE's intent to lynch into Prom/Vivax? Doesn't mean anything, could be a weak attempt to look town for all we know. Also Milksuckler, considering Wade Fells' filter at this point in the game, the best I can offer is null. Do you think you could do any better without it sounding forced? | ||
|
The Macho Man
171 Posts
On February 26 2013 12:26 randombum wrote: Just caught up, some thoughts. The idea of setting up votes so the the pardoner is the lynch target seems ridiculous. Here's a crazy idea. What if we try to get scum elected on purpose. The idea is the mayor will probably not last every long in this set-up anyways. My plan is basically we get a scummy person in the thread elected as mayor and get him to lynch the scummiest. Depending on what he does and how the flip goes we can gain a lot of good information. If the mayor is unwilling to lynch the scummiest then we can vig the mayor. If he turns red then we have caught two scum. If he does lynch him and he turns red then good, the scummiest looking player was scum. If the mayor lynches the scummiest and he turns green, then we have to seriously look at the mayor. If the mayor also turns out green, then the town really sucked. Basically we use this vote to choose our lynch target and put a scummy player in the spotlight by making him mayor. While normally having a scum mayor would really suck, the fact that there are no bodyguards make it far less risky because we can simply vig him if his play sucks. thats sounds retarded we want to lynch scum mayor gets to lynch we want town there so he lynches scum hopefully. are you scum? | ||
|
randombum
United States2378 Posts
| ||
|
geript
10024 Posts
| ||
|
The Macho Man
171 Posts
On February 26 2013 12:29 randombum wrote: Well obviously lynching scum is good. But the idea is we can use it to gain a lot of information that simply elected a town mayor who is likely to die does not. why are we trying to get information instead of lynching scum? | ||
| ||
