|
On January 05 2013 08:11 VisceraEyes wrote:
I am NOT willing to lynch just anyone. I wouldn't have lynched you today, for example, in spite of being a HUGE PRICK to me most of the time. I didn't want to lynch Palmar or Marv yesterday, and pushed BC, one of my idols, instead.
There's a HUGE list of people I wouldn't have lynched yesterday. You're just making shit up to make me look scummy now. Yes, I've been free with my vote. But no, I am not willing to lynch just anyone.
lynch all liars.
On January 04 2013 11:03 VisceraEyes wrote:
Er.....yeah, I can vote for Palmar. Are we sure we don't wanna lynch Toad guys?
On January 04 2013 11:25 VisceraEyes wrote:
PS, I was super interested to see where that little Palmar/Foolish dialogue was going. I was disappointed in both parties.
On January 05 2013 02:47 VisceraEyes wrote:
My push on Toad, my general activity, my insecurity about certain things...there are several things that should/would have tipped off a townMarv.
On January 04 2013 10:08 VisceraEyes wrote:
Foolishness - LOL
Palmar - /facepalm
supersoft - started out strong, puttered out.
MZ - Clearly not even trying. Null.
BC - ....hold me.
Marv - I'm sensing disappointment. Usually means scum.
VE - Townie town towningtons.
Toad - Is scum. Kill it.
|
On January 05 2013 08:17 VisceraEyes wrote:
Mindless?
MINDLESS?!
No, not mindless. But whatever, you've been tunneling me all game. That's a good skill to have.
LOL what?!!?
|
I'm sorry Bugs, was there some sort of point to all that?
Marv's explanation appeased me. Palmar's logs appeased me. I wasn't willing to lynch them anymore.
:OOOOOOOOOOOO
|
On January 05 2013 08:18 wherebugsgo wrote:Show nested quote +On January 05 2013 08:17 VisceraEyes wrote:
Mindless?
MINDLESS?!
No, not mindless. But whatever, you've been tunneling me all game. That's a good skill to have. LOL what?!!?
It was to Vivax, have you read that dude's filter?
|
please, find me the instance of him "tunneling" you. He didn't even vote you as far as I can remember.
|
On January 05 2013 08:19 VisceraEyes wrote:
I'm sorry Bugs, was there some sort of point to all that?
Marv's explanation appeased me. Palmar's logs appeased me. I wasn't willing to lynch them anymore.
:OOOOOOOOOOOO
yeah and you were willing to lynch me becaue foolish voted me although it had nothing to do with foolish's vote
|
I would have gladly lynched him. Maybe you can call that tunneling.
|
In order to move this class forward, can everyone claim which house they fall under. For instance, debear and Chezinu belong to the House of Brown. VE to the House of Purple...etc
PS: Why would you guys kill BC? If you are willing to kill him...then does that mean you are willing to kill me?
|
On January 05 2013 08:21 Toadesstern wrote:Show nested quote +On January 05 2013 08:19 VisceraEyes wrote:
I'm sorry Bugs, was there some sort of point to all that?
Marv's explanation appeased me. Palmar's logs appeased me. I wasn't willing to lynch them anymore.
:OOOOOOOOOOOO yeah and you were willing to lynch me becaue foolish voted me although it had nothing to do with foolish's vote
I'm still willing to lynch you Toad. STILL, not past tense.
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
If I ever host a mafia game I will enforce a rule that anyone with an archon for an icon is allowed a maximum of 5 posts a day.
|
I'll be well past archon by then Foolish. <3
|
On January 05 2013 08:21 Vivax wrote:
I would have gladly lynched him. Maybe you can call that tunneling.
This. It felt worse than it was apparently.
|
On January 05 2013 08:23 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On January 05 2013 08:21 Toadesstern wrote:On January 05 2013 08:19 VisceraEyes wrote:
I'm sorry Bugs, was there some sort of point to all that?
Marv's explanation appeased me. Palmar's logs appeased me. I wasn't willing to lynch them anymore.
:OOOOOOOOOOOO yeah and you were willing to lynch me becaue foolish voted me although it had nothing to do with foolish's vote I'm still willing to lynch you Toad. STILL, not past tense.
not exactly a good point if you're trying to tell people you're not willing to lynch everyone and their dog.
|
Whatever, this place is dead anyway.
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On January 05 2013 05:35 froggynoddy wrote:Show nested quote +On January 05 2013 05:29 Lazermonkey wrote:On January 05 2013 05:21 HiroPro wrote:On January 05 2013 05:05 Lazermonkey wrote:On January 05 2013 05:01 iamperfection wrote:On January 05 2013 04:56 Lazermonkey wrote:
Hi, I am back. Eating and posting at the same time FTW
I don't like BC lynch. His play is really truly strange, but there is one question I ask myself and cannot get answered: Why would scum BC put up a case on Palmar out of ALL players...?
I am getting more and more uncomfortable with Marv lynch. I'd actually much rather kill Hopeless at this point tho I'm not sure if we will be able to gather enough votes for that. will evaluate a bit more in a bit. Need to eat first lol.
Scum bc would put a case on palmar to look like he is contributing when he is in fact not. Yhea but why couldn't he just push someone else and not appear dumb like he is now. Especialy considering he was already under some fire even before his case. I doubt that his intention by voting for Palmar was to make it look like he was doing something. Despite his attitude, it shouldn't be very hard to see that Palmar is likely town. And BC is an excellent player, so the simplest explanation is simply that BC is mafia himself and is trying to discredit Palmar (assuming that marvellosity is actually town, which I think is right). But why discredit Palmar when basically everyone got him down as town? It just makes him look stupid. Unless of course both him and Marv were to be scum, which I guess would be possible but almost too good to be true. Yes BC marv scumteam does make sense. But no, targeting Palmar I think looks townie. Your not sheeping and you could argue that Palmar effed up the thread at the start and then waltzes in to clean the mess thus completely leading/ manipulating town and as such you could make a case that this is anti town (like WBG seems to be doing). However the argument goes both ways, either PAlmar is playing very good townie, or he is playing very good scum. I don't think Palmar that Palmar's play is really indicative of alignment... its just quite baffling IMHO. So to summarise, going after PAlmar seems pro-town, but theres minimal risk involved and doesnt really stand up to scrutiny.
lol just noticed this post. this is some epic waffle.
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
seriously, look at that waffle. it's drowning in syrup something chronic.
|
On January 05 2013 08:55 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On January 05 2013 05:35 froggynoddy wrote:On January 05 2013 05:29 Lazermonkey wrote:On January 05 2013 05:21 HiroPro wrote:On January 05 2013 05:05 Lazermonkey wrote:On January 05 2013 05:01 iamperfection wrote:On January 05 2013 04:56 Lazermonkey wrote:
Hi, I am back. Eating and posting at the same time FTW
I don't like BC lynch. His play is really truly strange, but there is one question I ask myself and cannot get answered: Why would scum BC put up a case on Palmar out of ALL players...?
I am getting more and more uncomfortable with Marv lynch. I'd actually much rather kill Hopeless at this point tho I'm not sure if we will be able to gather enough votes for that. will evaluate a bit more in a bit. Need to eat first lol.
Scum bc would put a case on palmar to look like he is contributing when he is in fact not. Yhea but why couldn't he just push someone else and not appear dumb like he is now. Especialy considering he was already under some fire even before his case. I doubt that his intention by voting for Palmar was to make it look like he was doing something. Despite his attitude, it shouldn't be very hard to see that Palmar is likely town. And BC is an excellent player, so the simplest explanation is simply that BC is mafia himself and is trying to discredit Palmar (assuming that marvellosity is actually town, which I think is right). But why discredit Palmar when basically everyone got him down as town? It just makes him look stupid. Unless of course both him and Marv were to be scum, which I guess would be possible but almost too good to be true. Yes BC marv scumteam does make sense. But no, targeting Palmar I think looks townie. Your not sheeping and you could argue that Palmar effed up the thread at the start and then waltzes in to clean the mess thus completely leading/ manipulating town and as such you could make a case that this is anti town (like WBG seems to be doing). However the argument goes both ways, either PAlmar is playing very good townie, or he is playing very good scum. I don't think Palmar that Palmar's play is really indicative of alignment... its just quite baffling IMHO. So to summarise, going after PAlmar seems pro-town, but theres minimal risk involved and doesnt really stand up to scrutiny. lol just noticed this post. this is some epic waffle.
want to try and explain why you told people to unvote everything and vote MZ 5 minutes prior to deadline?
|
11589 Posts
Marv you are good scum.
tomorrow I tunnel you npnp
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
because I was thinking about him in my drive home (<3) then I opened his filter and found what I put in my case a little earlier but didn't have time to write up. So I thought MZ was after all a better target than BC.
|
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On January 05 2013 08:59 yamato77 wrote:
Marv you are good scum.
tomorrow I tunnel you npnp
keeping up your epic streak sweetheart :>
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
