|
On October 24 2012 22:31 ACrow wrote:Show nested quote +On October 24 2012 22:28 Fragile51 wrote:On October 24 2012 22:27 Yello wrote:On October 24 2012 22:24 Waxangel wrote: this build, it needs a name call it 'The balancer' because it balances out the win-rate of PvZ. Without it, Zerg would have got 80% win against Toss ^.^ Truth. Weird how no zergs have actually devised a build that deals with it. This is because how Zerg players think: MUST.TAKE.GREEDY.THIRD.
I've seen Sen and TLO deal with it in 2 different ways, Day9's done a daily on the TLO version, Sen's is just the really old school Roach/Hydra into Corruptor for the inevitable Colossi transition
|
On October 24 2012 22:29 FuzzyJAM wrote:Show nested quote +On October 24 2012 22:27 Waxangel wrote: really needs a snappier name than "startale/parting immortal all-in" The Won/Won/Won. Won is the coach of Startale, so that's works quite well in many ways.
In fact -
1) Won - Startale coach 2) Won - winning 3) Won - $ (SK currency)
So I hereby endorse it being named the Won/Won/Won
|
On October 24 2012 22:31 poorcloud wrote:Show nested quote +On October 24 2012 22:30 X3GoldDot wrote:On October 24 2012 22:29 poorcloud wrote:On October 24 2012 22:28 ranjutan wrote: Because Keen and Byun have both beaten Shine and Parting, does that mean if Byun beats Keen then both Terrans will advance? But Byun > Parting Shine > Byun Parting > Shine Shouldn't it be a 3-way tie if Keen wins? no, because byun would be 2-3. I meant if Byun won. Keen makes it otherwise, so its left to the other 3. Edit: Sorry, Liquipedia fucked up.
|
On October 24 2012 22:31 ACrow wrote:Show nested quote +On October 24 2012 22:28 Fragile51 wrote:On October 24 2012 22:27 Yello wrote:On October 24 2012 22:24 Waxangel wrote: this build, it needs a name call it 'The balancer' because it balances out the win-rate of PvZ. Without it, Zerg would have got 80% win against Toss ^.^ Truth. Weird how no zergs have actually devised a build that deals with it. This is because how Zerg players think: MUST.TAKE.GREEDY.THIRD.
Problem if you DON'T. TAKE. GREEDY. THIRD. is that you kinda die to other all ins.
|
On October 24 2012 22:34 Mackus wrote:Show nested quote +On October 24 2012 22:31 ACrow wrote:On October 24 2012 22:28 Fragile51 wrote:On October 24 2012 22:27 Yello wrote:On October 24 2012 22:24 Waxangel wrote: this build, it needs a name call it 'The balancer' because it balances out the win-rate of PvZ. Without it, Zerg would have got 80% win against Toss ^.^ Truth. Weird how no zergs have actually devised a build that deals with it. This is because how Zerg players think: MUST.TAKE.GREEDY.THIRD. I've seen Sen and TLO deal with it in 2 different ways, Day9's done a daily on the TLO version, Sen's is just the really old school Roach/Hydra into Corruptor for the inevitable Colossi transition Was the tlo version the one with the nydus and a lot of spines in the main. The one he used it in bucharest.
|
On October 24 2012 22:36 Yorbon wrote:Show nested quote +On October 24 2012 22:34 Mackus wrote:On October 24 2012 22:31 ACrow wrote:On October 24 2012 22:28 Fragile51 wrote:On October 24 2012 22:27 Yello wrote:On October 24 2012 22:24 Waxangel wrote: this build, it needs a name call it 'The balancer' because it balances out the win-rate of PvZ. Without it, Zerg would have got 80% win against Toss ^.^ Truth. Weird how no zergs have actually devised a build that deals with it. This is because how Zerg players think: MUST.TAKE.GREEDY.THIRD. I've seen Sen and TLO deal with it in 2 different ways, Day9's done a daily on the TLO version, Sen's is just the really old school Roach/Hydra into Corruptor for the inevitable Colossi transition Was the tlo version the one with the nydus and a lot of spines in the main. The one he used it in bucharest.
Yes it is.
On topic, ByuN really is MarineKing's teammate!
|
On October 24 2012 22:35 EtherealDeath wrote:Show nested quote +On October 24 2012 22:29 FuzzyJAM wrote:On October 24 2012 22:27 Waxangel wrote: really needs a snappier name than "startale/parting immortal all-in" The Won/Won/Won. Won is the coach of Startale, so that's works quite well in many ways. In fact - 1) Won - Startale coach 2) Won - winning 3) Won - $ (SK currency) So I hereby endorse it being named the Won/Won/Won
Parting is named Won as well.
|
On October 24 2012 22:37 Kasaraki wrote:Show nested quote +On October 24 2012 22:35 EtherealDeath wrote:On October 24 2012 22:29 FuzzyJAM wrote:On October 24 2012 22:27 Waxangel wrote: really needs a snappier name than "startale/parting immortal all-in" The Won/Won/Won. Won is the coach of Startale, so that's works quite well in many ways. In fact - 1) Won - Startale coach 2) Won - winning 3) Won - $ (SK currency) So I hereby endorse it being named the Won/Won/Won Parting is named Won as well.
Then it's even better!
1) Won - Parting's name 2) Won - winning 3) Won - $ (SK currency)
|
come on poopypants, you got dis
|
So the wonwonwon is a perfect name !
|
On October 24 2012 22:37 Kasaraki wrote:Show nested quote +On October 24 2012 22:35 EtherealDeath wrote:On October 24 2012 22:29 FuzzyJAM wrote:On October 24 2012 22:27 Waxangel wrote: really needs a snappier name than "startale/parting immortal all-in" The Won/Won/Won. Won is the coach of Startale, so that's works quite well in many ways. In fact - 1) Won - Startale coach 2) Won - winning 3) Won - $ (SK currency) So I hereby endorse it being named the Won/Won/Won Parting is named Won as well.
how perfect, the wonwonwon it is
|
On October 24 2012 22:37 EtherealDeath wrote:Show nested quote +On October 24 2012 22:37 Kasaraki wrote:On October 24 2012 22:35 EtherealDeath wrote:On October 24 2012 22:29 FuzzyJAM wrote:On October 24 2012 22:27 Waxangel wrote: really needs a snappier name than "startale/parting immortal all-in" The Won/Won/Won. Won is the coach of Startale, so that's works quite well in many ways. In fact - 1) Won - Startale coach 2) Won - winning 3) Won - $ (SK currency) So I hereby endorse it being named the Won/Won/Won Parting is named Won as well. Then it's even better! 1) Won - Parting's name 2) Won - winning 3) Won - $ (SK currency) Make it Triple Won then.
|
On October 24 2012 22:35 TheBB wrote:Show nested quote +On October 24 2012 22:31 poorcloud wrote:On October 24 2012 22:30 X3GoldDot wrote:On October 24 2012 22:29 poorcloud wrote:On October 24 2012 22:28 ranjutan wrote: Because Keen and Byun have both beaten Shine and Parting, does that mean if Byun beats Keen then both Terrans will advance? But Byun > Parting Shine > Byun Parting > Shine Shouldn't it be a 3-way tie if Keen wins? no, because byun would be 2-3. I meant if Byun won. Keen makes it otherwise, so its left to the other 3. Edit: Sorry, Liquipedia fucked up. What? Keen > all 3 of them, so he's through regardless. Isn't Shine still in it? Shine > ByuN ByuN > Parting Parting > Shine
all 3 of them 3-2, isn't that a 3 way tie? If ByuN wins that is....
|
On October 24 2012 22:38 Dodgin wrote:Show nested quote +On October 24 2012 22:37 Kasaraki wrote:On October 24 2012 22:35 EtherealDeath wrote:On October 24 2012 22:29 FuzzyJAM wrote:On October 24 2012 22:27 Waxangel wrote: really needs a snappier name than "startale/parting immortal all-in" The Won/Won/Won. Won is the coach of Startale, so that's works quite well in many ways. In fact - 1) Won - Startale coach 2) Won - winning 3) Won - $ (SK currency) So I hereby endorse it being named the Won/Won/Won Parting is named Won as well. how perfect, the wonwonwon it is FuzzyJAM Won the thread!
|
Why is Byun's siege mode so late!?
|
Won (ST coach) won (past tense of win) Won (PartinG) won (money)
|
Byun still no siege mode, are you kidding me...
|
On October 24 2012 22:38 Yorbon wrote:Show nested quote +On October 24 2012 22:37 EtherealDeath wrote:On October 24 2012 22:37 Kasaraki wrote:On October 24 2012 22:35 EtherealDeath wrote:On October 24 2012 22:29 FuzzyJAM wrote:On October 24 2012 22:27 Waxangel wrote: really needs a snappier name than "startale/parting immortal all-in" The Won/Won/Won. Won is the coach of Startale, so that's works quite well in many ways. In fact - 1) Won - Startale coach 2) Won - winning 3) Won - $ (SK currency) So I hereby endorse it being named the Won/Won/Won Parting is named Won as well. Then it's even better! 1) Won - Parting's name 2) Won - winning 3) Won - $ (SK currency) Make it Triple Won then. Even though there are 3 immortals involved, the Triple Won just sounds gimp in comparison. Besides, it's the new 1/1/1 so....
|
United States32906 Posts
On October 24 2012 22:38 Dodgin wrote:Show nested quote +On October 24 2012 22:37 Kasaraki wrote:On October 24 2012 22:35 EtherealDeath wrote:On October 24 2012 22:29 FuzzyJAM wrote:On October 24 2012 22:27 Waxangel wrote: really needs a snappier name than "startale/parting immortal all-in" The Won/Won/Won. Won is the coach of Startale, so that's works quite well in many ways. In fact - 1) Won - Startale coach 2) Won - winning 3) Won - $ (SK currency) So I hereby endorse it being named the Won/Won/Won Parting is named Won as well. how perfect, the wonwonwon it is
but it has to sound different from 1/1/1 for when hipster LR culture finally reaches the masses and is used by casters
|
On October 24 2012 22:39 dainbramage wrote: Won (ST coach) won (past tense of win) Won (PartinG) won (money) Only evil parents give their children a 4 syllable name.
|
|
|
|