|
Thanks for the great tournament!
And also thanks for the great insights into the Korean progaming community Boss!
I'm hoping for HyuN to do really well, especially after hearing the guy play for 15 hours a day... plus, the guy always worked so damn hard for 6 years but never really had any success in SC1, which was always a pity to me.
|
I am excited for hyun also... Especially after my talk with coach Lee
|
Hoping for Leenock / Oz. But I can see MvPsC taking it
|
MKP v SaSe Ro32
|
Great line up cant wait for this tournement
|
3rd part of the bracket:
Let's see if you can guess the rest of the matchups!
|
Don't think MKP will have much trouble beating sase, it is ForGG/Leenock I am worried about him facing T.T
What about the emperor? Was he invited?
|
|
On January 13 2012 04:36 xi Tempest x wrote: What about the emperor? Was he invited?
Of course. He declined.
|
That is a seriously talented line-up, just forget everyone who isn't there and focus on the excellent players that is there.
The one player who wins this ought to feel pretty good about himself! Can't wait for this.
|
This tournament is actually so sick, just sad MC and the emperor aren't there. But gogo Oz!
|
What the shit! This is an awesome freaking line up !!
|
really sick player list for sure! so many koreans too! MKP will show his true skills here and just glide! SaSe/Jinro glgl
|
On January 13 2012 04:36 xi Tempest x wrote: Don't think MKP will have much trouble beating sase, it is ForGG/Leenock I am worried about him facing T.T
What about the emperor? Was he invited?
More like ForGG/Polt/Leenock/Keen. That side of bracket is really stacked.
|
This tournament looks sick. I'm an avid GSL fan and these are all my korean favorites pretty much
|
|
liquidpedia says this tournament starts tomorrow, but the topic lists it starts only next week. I'm guessing Liquidpedia is incorrect?
|
|
Thanks for the quick response
|
On January 14 2012 00:15 Ysellian wrote: liquidpedia says this tournament starts tomorrow, but the topic lists it starts only next week. I'm guessing Liquidpedia is incorrect?
It's because we changed the date, and whoever created the Liquipedia page had the first date. I've changed it now ^^
|
|
|
|