EPTOn November 17 2011 15:32 killa_robot wrote:
If you get over the moral side of it, its a very practical solution. No Homeless people = no homeless problem. And since we kill everyone who becomes homeless, added incentive to try harder!
But yea, I live in a town in BC and I see homeless people from time to time. It's annoying because although they may have had issues to get to where there are, they could easily get help from somewhere, they just choose not to.
However instead of killing them I say we put them in forced manual labour. Make them actually be useful to society.
If you get over the moral side of it, its a very practical solution. No Homeless people = no homeless problem. And since we kill everyone who becomes homeless, added incentive to try harder!
But yea, I live in a town in BC and I see homeless people from time to time. It's annoying because although they may have had issues to get to where there are, they could easily get help from somewhere, they just choose not to.
However instead of killing them I say we put them in forced manual labour. Make them actually be useful to society.
Now this is a good idea. I don't see the problem in forcing them to clean up their act. It gives them one last chance to not only be productive in society but to live a better life. Props to you good sir!
Just so I know, however, what jobs would you recommend? It would have to be a pretty low-skill job, like as a janitor or something I suppose, but are there really enough jobs to support all of these people?
