On July 10 2011 20:58 Markwerf wrote:
lol silly setup for an event. Last player is garanteed to play a single game for $100. 3rd last etc however have practically zero chance to win longest streak and need to win 3 games in a row to win last play standing.
Being first also sucks as there is a much higher chance the longest streak you set will be broken, if you are somewhere in the middle you can basically know for certain how many games are needed to have the longest streak (1 more then players left). As a result being in the middle or being last is definately favored moneywise over the other spots.
lol silly setup for an event. Last player is garanteed to play a single game for $100. 3rd last etc however have practically zero chance to win longest streak and need to win 3 games in a row to win last play standing.
Being first also sucks as there is a much higher chance the longest streak you set will be broken, if you are somewhere in the middle you can basically know for certain how many games are needed to have the longest streak (1 more then players left). As a result being in the middle or being last is definately favored moneywise over the other spots.
So what would be the point of going last if there was no chance to win anything?