|
|
|
On July 20 2016 22:03 Koshi wrote:I think Lunaticman has done everything a mafia does early game. Ask a simple question about the setup: + Show Spoiler +On July 20 2016 20:29 Lunaticman wrote:
Rels since no one else seems to be active right now maybe you could help me explain a bit about the roles.
"Mason and Parity Cop vs Godfather goon and roleblocker
cop and jailkeeper vs Godfather, strongarm and role blocker
Jailkeeper and vigilante vs Godfather, Goon, Strongarm"
I do not recognize the jailkeeper, strong arm and godfather.
Call somebody blue / bluehunted + is self-aware + Show Spoiler +On July 20 2016 21:41 Lunaticman wrote:
Well I think rels is blue based on his posts so far. One mafia usually goes active in the beginning but I dont really have any scum vibes yet.
There is probably a 50/50 red or green on both of you so far.
And what do you think about me so far? Do "serious" scumhunting on a matter that was put forward as a joke. Bit too hard-try + Show Spoiler +On July 20 2016 20:17 Lunaticman wrote:
I was expecting emperorchampion to be very active in the beginning since I spectated the last game played (the one with hilary and trump). Maybe he changed his playstyle or maybe he simply asleep.
What do you think Rels? And lastly it maybe seems like he is trusting people too much and tries to buddy them.
That all said I don't scumread you. It's just something I saw  . Game is young.
Is this the game koshi finally rolls mafia?
|
On July 20 2016 22:31 Grackaroni wrote:Show nested quote +On July 20 2016 22:10 Palmar wrote:On July 20 2016 22:03 Koshi wrote:I think Lunaticman has done everything a mafia does early game. Ask a simple question about the setup: + Show Spoiler +On July 20 2016 20:29 Lunaticman wrote:
Rels since no one else seems to be active right now maybe you could help me explain a bit about the roles.
"Mason and Parity Cop vs Godfather goon and roleblocker
cop and jailkeeper vs Godfather, strongarm and role blocker
Jailkeeper and vigilante vs Godfather, Goon, Strongarm"
I do not recognize the jailkeeper, strong arm and godfather.
Call somebody blue / bluehunted + is self-aware + Show Spoiler +On July 20 2016 21:41 Lunaticman wrote:
Well I think rels is blue based on his posts so far. One mafia usually goes active in the beginning but I dont really have any scum vibes yet.
There is probably a 50/50 red or green on both of you so far.
And what do you think about me so far? Do "serious" scumhunting on a matter that was put forward as a joke. Bit too hard-try + Show Spoiler +On July 20 2016 20:17 Lunaticman wrote:
I was expecting emperorchampion to be very active in the beginning since I spectated the last game played (the one with hilary and trump). Maybe he changed his playstyle or maybe he simply asleep.
What do you think Rels? And lastly it maybe seems like he is trusting people too much and tries to buddy them.
That all said I don't scumread you. It's just something I saw . Game is young. Is this the game koshi finally rolls mafia? A wild Palmar appears.
I'm in the game, right?
|
|
|
On July 21 2016 03:39 Skynx wrote:All super important content make sure to catchup 1 by 1
no actually just fuck it, if people are going to revert to the stupid spamming style of playing I'm not even gonna bother trying.
http://www.quicktopic.com/52/H/dnZQAJvqMFi4
gg
|
Now I assume Skynx is just trolling.
But it'd be 200% more awesome if Erogdan had blocked his youtube and thus saved him from Mr. Astley.
|
On July 21 2016 03:57 Lunaticman wrote:Show nested quote +On July 21 2016 03:53 emperorchampion wrote:On July 21 2016 03:45 Lunaticman wrote:On July 21 2016 03:34 Skynx wrote:On July 21 2016 03:27 Lunaticman wrote:On July 21 2016 03:23 Skynx wrote:On July 21 2016 03:20 Tumblewood wrote:
and I don't get how ec can be scum three games in a row, then act the exact same way the next game and notbe scumread Without ever rolling town he doesn't know how to be town its simple. Even he does exact opposite of what he did its forced and noticeable. Based on this I'm putting down my vote for now on EC. Even if he turns green you will be the next auto lynch. Or rather a blue should check you during the night to save a lynch target. I will change the vote if someone comes up with a better argument for a d1 lynch. What does emperors alignment has anything to do with mine? I haven't even read him yet. Also you say what i just said is convincing enough for you to vote on ec. But i didn't say anything new or something related to his specific behaviour here. So, thats kind of a shitty vote. Why is he mafia? I think it was a good argument, and votes generate friction, which generates more content. I am totally fine voting for someone if I think the argument is good enough especially on day 1. What I find confusing is why you would demote your own arugment, that is very strange. I actually think he is fighting for his life as a townie, but the day is far from over. I dunno if this makes sense. Why would you vote for a town person? Also I am far from fighting for my life. I am "defending" my self from tumble because his arguments are so weak, they are leading me to think that he might be scum. Voting for people is a common tactic this generates pressure which generates misstakes, you can switch your vote anytime unless I am missing something.
Go forth and make mistakes my friend
|
On July 21 2016 04:02 Lunaticman wrote:Show nested quote +On July 21 2016 04:01 Palmar wrote:On July 21 2016 03:57 Lunaticman wrote:On July 21 2016 03:53 emperorchampion wrote:On July 21 2016 03:45 Lunaticman wrote:On July 21 2016 03:34 Skynx wrote:On July 21 2016 03:27 Lunaticman wrote:On July 21 2016 03:23 Skynx wrote:On July 21 2016 03:20 Tumblewood wrote:
and I don't get how ec can be scum three games in a row, then act the exact same way the next game and notbe scumread Without ever rolling town he doesn't know how to be town its simple. Even he does exact opposite of what he did its forced and noticeable. Based on this I'm putting down my vote for now on EC. Even if he turns green you will be the next auto lynch. Or rather a blue should check you during the night to save a lynch target. I will change the vote if someone comes up with a better argument for a d1 lynch. What does emperors alignment has anything to do with mine? I haven't even read him yet. Also you say what i just said is convincing enough for you to vote on ec. But i didn't say anything new or something related to his specific behaviour here. So, thats kind of a shitty vote. Why is he mafia? I think it was a good argument, and votes generate friction, which generates more content. I am totally fine voting for someone if I think the argument is good enough especially on day 1. What I find confusing is why you would demote your own arugment, that is very strange. I actually think he is fighting for his life as a townie, but the day is far from over. I dunno if this makes sense. Why would you vote for a town person? Also I am far from fighting for my life. I am "defending" my self from tumble because his arguments are so weak, they are leading me to think that he might be scum. Voting for people is a common tactic this generates pressure which generates misstakes, you can switch your vote anytime unless I am missing something. Go forth and make mistakes my friend Maybe you should give us a list of our reads so far and some thoughts. You have been chilling far to much.
ok.
100% town - aka never lynching.
Prplhz
Skynx
Likely town:
Tumblewood
emperorchampion
Rels
Null, no reason to lynch but no real reason to townread
Palmar
DCWasabi
Koshi
Gracaroni
null, possibly scum because I haven't really noticed them
nnn_thekushmountains
Lunaticman
Scummy/possibly mafia
sicklucker
Kruppe the eel
|
Kruppe playing games, only confirms my strong scumread on him based on the extensive research I've done on this game.
|
On July 21 2016 04:31 Lunaticman wrote:
To be perfectly honest I think Palmer is acting super scummy, it feels like a desperate attempt to save EC. But I have a town read on EC which is kinda wierd.
Could it be possible both of them are scum?
It feels like such a rookie misstake to make.
I admit, am rookie.
|
On July 21 2016 04:32 emperorchampion wrote:Show nested quote +On July 21 2016 04:25 emperorchampion wrote:On July 21 2016 04:22 Lunaticman wrote:On July 21 2016 04:15 emperorchampion wrote:On July 21 2016 04:10 Lunaticman wrote:On July 21 2016 04:03 emperorchampion wrote:On July 21 2016 04:00 Lunaticman wrote:On July 21 2016 03:58 emperorchampion wrote:
Ugh tumble / lunatic feels just about right together but I don't want to tunnel on that. EC, tell me who would you vote for and why? Right now tumble because he feels exactly like a scum trying to go for an easy mislynch on me. Second you, since the last few posts you've made don't make any sense to me. And also, made me recall that tumble had a kinda ify case on you in the first place that was dropped immediately in favour of his case on me. Then you want to vote for me with some pretty tenuous logic. I'm close to starting to think about convincing other people that this is a real thing. Redirecting suspicion to the accuser is never a good call, it makes you look desperate. I am also by far the easiet lynch target. Tumble is playing well, I think he is doing a good job as a detective so far, he is generating content. I also find it intresting the way several people are defending you. Either way there are many constolations forming in the game which will benifit town in the future. Do you think that my arguments against tumble are only because he scum read me first? Genuine curiosity here actually. No but the timing is awful. In my mind your digging a deeper hole you should just have waited with that point. In IRL mafia where I play that would have been a fatal misstake. Waited with which point? I'm a little confused, you think that if someone makes a case against you can't be suspicious of them?
It's rock solid logic, mafia doesn't need to find mafia so they don't make cases so everyone that makes a case is 100% town all the time.
|
Also, I think Kush is very likely to be scum this game.
Again, based on extensive research.
|
On July 21 2016 04:34 Lunaticman wrote:Show nested quote +On July 21 2016 04:31 Palmar wrote:
Kruppe playing games, only confirms my strong scumread on him based on the extensive research I've done on this game. TBH, I have no idea how to even interpret (spelling?!?) his antics.
I think you must look very deep at the problem.
Has he found mafia?
No
Thus he is mafia.
QED
|
On July 21 2016 04:36 Skynx wrote:Show nested quote +On July 21 2016 04:31 Palmar wrote:
Kruppe playing games, only confirms my strong scumread on him based on the extensive research I've done on this game. How is your ratio of identifying Chez or Moosy?
I am actually really good at reading trolls and weird players. It's one of the things I do best in mafia.
|
On July 21 2016 04:40 Lunaticman wrote:Show nested quote +On July 21 2016 04:35 Palmar wrote:On July 21 2016 04:34 Lunaticman wrote:On July 21 2016 04:31 Palmar wrote:
Kruppe playing games, only confirms my strong scumread on him based on the extensive research I've done on this game. TBH, I have no idea how to even interpret (spelling?!?) his antics. I think you must look very deep at the problem. Has he found mafia? No Thus he is mafia. QED Yes but if he is town, we wasted so much time on his antics. I dont know it just feels super wierd.
But I wrote QED that means I'm right because it's proof....
|
On July 21 2016 04:38 Lunaticman wrote:Show nested quote +On July 21 2016 04:34 Palmar wrote:On July 21 2016 04:32 emperorchampion wrote:On July 21 2016 04:25 emperorchampion wrote:On July 21 2016 04:22 Lunaticman wrote:On July 21 2016 04:15 emperorchampion wrote:On July 21 2016 04:10 Lunaticman wrote:On July 21 2016 04:03 emperorchampion wrote:On July 21 2016 04:00 Lunaticman wrote:On July 21 2016 03:58 emperorchampion wrote:
Ugh tumble / lunatic feels just about right together but I don't want to tunnel on that. EC, tell me who would you vote for and why? Right now tumble because he feels exactly like a scum trying to go for an easy mislynch on me. Second you, since the last few posts you've made don't make any sense to me. And also, made me recall that tumble had a kinda ify case on you in the first place that was dropped immediately in favour of his case on me. Then you want to vote for me with some pretty tenuous logic. I'm close to starting to think about convincing other people that this is a real thing. Redirecting suspicion to the accuser is never a good call, it makes you look desperate. I am also by far the easiet lynch target. Tumble is playing well, I think he is doing a good job as a detective so far, he is generating content. I also find it intresting the way several people are defending you. Either way there are many constolations forming in the game which will benifit town in the future. Do you think that my arguments against tumble are only because he scum read me first? Genuine curiosity here actually. No but the timing is awful. In my mind your digging a deeper hole you should just have waited with that point. In IRL mafia where I play that would have been a fatal misstake. Waited with which point? I'm a little confused, you think that if someone makes a case against you can't be suspicious of them? It's rock solid logic, mafia doesn't need to find mafia so they don't make cases so everyone that makes a case is 100% town all the time. Good point, it however is usually made by rookie mafia which I believe EC not to be if he is one?
I appreciate it when I make good points and people acknowledge how logical and smart I am.
|
On July 21 2016 04:44 Lunaticman wrote:Show nested quote +On July 21 2016 04:43 Palmar wrote:On July 21 2016 04:40 Lunaticman wrote:On July 21 2016 04:35 Palmar wrote:On July 21 2016 04:34 Lunaticman wrote:On July 21 2016 04:31 Palmar wrote:
Kruppe playing games, only confirms my strong scumread on him based on the extensive research I've done on this game. TBH, I have no idea how to even interpret (spelling?!?) his antics. I think you must look very deep at the problem. Has he found mafia? No Thus he is mafia. QED Yes but if he is town, we wasted so much time on his antics. I dont know it just feels super wierd. But I wrote QED that means I'm right because it's proof.... What does QED mean?
quod erat demonstrandum
|
On July 21 2016 04:45 Lunaticman wrote:Show nested quote +On July 21 2016 04:44 Palmar wrote:On July 21 2016 04:38 Lunaticman wrote:On July 21 2016 04:34 Palmar wrote:On July 21 2016 04:32 emperorchampion wrote:On July 21 2016 04:25 emperorchampion wrote:On July 21 2016 04:22 Lunaticman wrote:On July 21 2016 04:15 emperorchampion wrote:On July 21 2016 04:10 Lunaticman wrote:On July 21 2016 04:03 emperorchampion wrote:
[quote]
Right now tumble because he feels exactly like a scum trying to go for an easy mislynch on me. Second you, since the last few posts you've made don't make any sense to me. And also, made me recall that tumble had a kinda ify case on you in the first place that was dropped immediately in favour of his case on me. Then you want to vote for me with some pretty tenuous logic. I'm close to starting to think about convincing other people that this is a real thing. Redirecting suspicion to the accuser is never a good call, it makes you look desperate. I am also by far the easiet lynch target. Tumble is playing well, I think he is doing a good job as a detective so far, he is generating content. I also find it intresting the way several people are defending you. Either way there are many constolations forming in the game which will benifit town in the future. Do you think that my arguments against tumble are only because he scum read me first? Genuine curiosity here actually. No but the timing is awful. In my mind your digging a deeper hole you should just have waited with that point. In IRL mafia where I play that would have been a fatal misstake. Waited with which point? I'm a little confused, you think that if someone makes a case against you can't be suspicious of them? It's rock solid logic, mafia doesn't need to find mafia so they don't make cases so everyone that makes a case is 100% town all the time. Good point, it however is usually made by rookie mafia which I believe EC not to be if he is one? I appreciate it when I make good points and people acknowledge how logical and smart I am. I want you to explain your reasoning so far for your extensive read.
I would, but I just forgot them, I'm really sorry. I'll let you know if I remember.
|
On July 21 2016 06:38 Koshi wrote:Show nested quote +On July 21 2016 05:45 prplhz wrote:
i am really having a hard time imagining Lunaticman playing mafia for 8 hours with people being 100% serious 100% of the time which is why i think it's odd he's being so serious and taking everything so serious all the time This is a good point.
The dude is literally agreeing with my trolling.
|
On July 21 2016 06:50 Koshi wrote:Show nested quote +On July 21 2016 06:47 Palmar wrote:On July 21 2016 06:38 Koshi wrote:On July 21 2016 05:45 prplhz wrote:
i am really having a hard time imagining Lunaticman playing mafia for 8 hours with people being 100% serious 100% of the time which is why i think it's odd he's being so serious and taking everything so serious all the time This is a good point. The dude is literally agreeing with my trolling. I don't understand what you are saying. Something is off on lunatic.
I'm pointing out he's completely unable to detect sarcasm/trolling (read our interactions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
