EPTAperture Mafia 4: This Time it's Personal
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
| ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
<3 | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
| ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
so much not knowing hmm ^^ | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
On March 26 2015 11:35 Ace1312 wrote: I've played a lot of WW, just never at TL. Due to this I signed up for the Newbie game thats about to start. But this one seems REALLY interesting. Is it ok if I sign up for this one as well? I've played a few games with Damdred and Rsoultin at another site, but most of my playing was with friends in real life. In case I am allowed to play this was as well. /in ace ace ace! hi! lolol | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
On March 28 2015 08:02 Snarfs wrote: Snarfs' Recommended General Strategy First, two general tips: 1. Lots of players = lots of confusion. Spam posts should be kept to a minimum as it will be VERY difficult to wade through all the distractions to determine alignment. 2. Role speculation on day 1 is spam. There is no point in trying to guess setup at this point, or talking about how wonderful the flavour text is. It is a distraction from finding mafia/3p. Now, onto day 1 strategy: Adventuring Party I believe our Adventuring Party should follow strict guidelines as to how they act. Everyone should either express their agreement or disagreement with these guidelines as soon as possible so that we can keep track of people's stances before they get voted in. Please let me know if you disagree, and why. Warrior - Our warrior should be someone who agrees to nominate a lynch based on a plurality vote. He/she should agree that it is important to get lots of opinions on the candidate before deciding on who to vote and SHOULD NOT be someone who will just pick their gut target. We need information from the day 1 lynch more than we need to hit mafia/3p. We need to know why people are for/against a certain lynch. A cowboy warrior will not give us that information. Rogue - Our rogue should be someone who agrees NOT to no lynch. There is one circumstance I see a no lynch being acceptable on day 1, and that is only if the warrior goes rogue and chooses a target of their preference without listening to town. The rogue should agree to this as the ONLY circumstance for no lynch. Not based on their own 'gut' feelings. I was trying to think of a way we can focus votes so that we guarantee we don't get a last minute swap of rogue/cleric. I think the only way this is possible is if we can find two candidates who agree to both of the above criteria and try to split our votes evenly to boost those two players. Normally, this is where I'd nominate myself, but I can guarantee I will NOT be online for the first deadline. Discuss! I like this plan, snarfs, and I like that you came up with it, too. lol all these candidates so eager to take control of the lynch  if there's a way to vote for the scum we want to lynch along with the warrior, that would be best, imo ^^ keeping everything neat and tidy and providing the information of a regular lynch at the end of the day | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
On March 28 2015 10:22 rsoultin wrote: I like this plan, snarfs, and I like that you came up with it, too. lol all these candidates so eager to take control of the lynch if there's a way to vote for the scum we want to lynch along with the warrior, that would be best, imo ^^ keeping everything neat and tidy and providing the information of a regular lynch at the end of the day EBWOP: To add on to why this is a good plan...even if for some reason we're obscenely wrong on the three top candidates, town still controls the lynch. Obviously the powers could be a concern, but town controlling the lynch is the most important thing. Having everyone voting for who they'd have the warrior lynch as scum forces a regular lynch scenario. If anyone has a good idea as to how to lock in the third slot please share. Snarfs gets a light townread from me for starting the conversation, especially while not attempting to get the votes for himself. | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
On March 28 2015 10:33 LightningStrike wrote: rsoultin I finding your entrance quite lackluster compared to XXX and other games you rolled town. i'm not being jokey, you mean xP it's hardly lackluster now what do you think of the plan, which is by far more important to me right now than the toneread you think you have on me lol | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
On March 28 2015 10:38 LightningStrike wrote: The plan is decent but it just seems to simple of a plan that might backfire. howso? and what parts do you think we should fix so it's less likely to backfire | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
On March 28 2015 10:41 Keirathi wrote: I feel like people are making this too difficult? Find 3 people that are very likely town (which should be very easy) and have them lynch someone who is scum. lol ^ the true example of overly simplistic i'd like people to commit to who they would lynch. obviously i can't force that, but if we can agree on that as a town, it will give us more information than simply voting for townies xP the mod already said that whoever wins the vote has to already have the lynch submitted | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
On March 28 2015 10:41 LightningStrike wrote: Mainly about the Rogue because the problem with Rouge is that anyone can No Lynch I mean unless we get Confirmed Town in the 2nd Slot scum will go for a no lynch easily. We need confirmed town on the 2nd highest votes. or we just commit to policy lynching the rogue if he no-lynches? xP kinda simple | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
you claiming vet and saying that confirms you town does not make me think you're town :/ it's actually a good way to explain why you're never nightkilled, especially if you do happen to be one of the top three voted which by definition would make you a. one of the most townie in the eyes of the thread and b. having unrevealed powers which would make you a very juicy target night 1 under normal circumstances and you'd need an excuse as to why you weren't dead your claim is probably the scummiest thing in the thread so far (also, no offense dude but you are never the person i'd want making decisions for all of us lololol ><) | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
On March 28 2015 10:50 VisceraEyes wrote: If I had to guess, I'd say that "preemptively explaining why you weren't nightkilled" falls under the "stuff he doesn't like" category... get out of my head xP | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
On March 28 2015 10:55 sicklucker wrote: Rsoutin im never nked ever. Like ever I been nked once ever and it was in your first newbie game. im not going to be nked in a 27 player game. Not ever so? xP that doesn't make your claim any less objectively scummy. you may not be scum, but don't be surprised when the thread doesn't jump to make you king of the world | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
On March 28 2015 11:02 LightningStrike wrote: Did I ever tell you how bad sicklucker is at playing blue? hn so i take it that you instantly believed his vet claim then? xP | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
On March 28 2015 11:12 LightningStrike wrote: She just not being herself on her entrance and it seems kinda forced. ;o; now that's just rude. ppl all have different ideas of what rsoultin is based on which game they've played with me and remember the most lol can't have it both ways, sweet cheeks. i spam the shit out of the thread when i joke around, and y'all bitch at me for it xP or i don't and you think that means i'm "not being [myself]" still, you're probably town for noticing + Show Spoiler + oh noes so scary ls has caught me! xP | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
On March 28 2015 11:19 LightningStrike wrote: Your being sarcastic about the spoiler. Also I had played plenty of games with you to know how you play as both alignments. i'm fully aware of how many games we've played together? so are you calling me scum based on "meta" or aren't you? | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
Why don't you explain what about what i'm doing is scummy then? What is the scum motivation in wanting a town-controlled lynch? And what exactly has you associating me with ExO_ o.0 I don't believe I've even spoken to him yet? | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
On March 28 2015 11:26 LightningStrike wrote: No her entrance alone making her scum and the type of interaction between her and ExO reminds of what [UoN]Sent and Superbia did in Campus Day 1 which seems very Mafia on Mafia interaction. -pokes at ls- what interaction? xP | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
On March 28 2015 11:32 LightningStrike wrote: The way you interacted with ExO's plan reminds me of the thing in Campus on this link: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/469857-campus-mafia-new-newish-players-welcome?page=8 ... are you talking about snarfs' plan? all ExO_ said was he didn't think it would work because we wouldn't lynch the warrior or rogue if they did something we didn't want them to do? i didn't feel that was necessary to comment on | ||
| ||
