EPTBasterd Mini Mafia
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Stutters695
2610 Posts
| ||
|
Stutters695
2610 Posts
 | ||
|
Stutters695
2610 Posts
| ||
|
Stutters695
2610 Posts
| ||
|
Stutters695
2610 Posts
On June 30 2013 06:08 raynpelikoneet wrote: Cool. If nobody counterclaims the next step is that the third party (if here) is going to protect you. Also there are two potential millers in the game. A counter-claim doesn't mean one is necessarily lying. | ||
|
Stutters695
2610 Posts
On June 30 2013 06:39 raynpelikoneet wrote: There is no way there are 2 millers in the game so cut talking about that as a possibility already. Know something we don't? The op lists two possible millers as roles. | ||
|
Stutters695
2610 Posts
On June 30 2013 06:46 raynpelikoneet wrote: Stutters what do you think about Lazer's post? Also what do you think about WoS' posts? I think he's lazy and didn't read the op/didn't comprehend, nbd. WoS I'm not sure. My French is really rusty so I haven't even really tried to read them but I don't like the fact he's typing in a way clearly everyone won't understand. Can't really judge it this early without just WIFOMing myself for ages. | ||
|
Stutters695
2610 Posts
| ||
|
Stutters695
2610 Posts
To answer the main question though, it was early d1. I wanted to see how he'd react to an accusation. I did find it weird he was so sure there was 1 miller and there is the possibility he could be scum and assume because he/his teammate got RB he accidentally slipped that town had to have better PRs than miller. Obviously since no one else claimed, it is impossible, but after the triple cop claim and double mason fiasco in Les Mis I'm a bit weary of people who "know"how the setup is supposed to be. With that said though his reaction and thought process makes him the towniest motherfucker here. Especially after themed, I really doubt he'd be scum. Now catching up. | ||
|
Stutters695
2610 Posts
I would like to hear his contradiction on WoS though. | ||
|
Stutters695
2610 Posts
| ||
|
Stutters695
2610 Posts
| ||
|
Stutters695
2610 Posts
| ||
|
Stutters695
2610 Posts
| ||
|
Stutters695
2610 Posts
| ||
|
Stutters695
2610 Posts
The miller stuff is eh (a lot more damming now with Vivax's post however). Like it isn't an unreasonable assumption and his reaction to my "scummiest post in the thread" was almost exactly how I'd react. I'd expect scum to be much more concerned with justifying their stance immediately rather than just laugh it off and not elaborate until pressure is on them. I reacted almost identically to an accusation from vivax in roulette that I felt was ridiculous. In addition to that, he's one of the most active players. I can pull specifics if you want but that's the rundown. | ||
|
Stutters695
2610 Posts
Although I do think accepting a miller claim isn't unreasonable. It essentially is just having someone say "hey, don't check me because you'll waste your power (pre-parity announcement) and cause a mislynch." It doesn't in any way confirm Marv, but ensures he is judged on the basis of his actual play. That he's so sure Marv is town is worrisome but I can see where he is coming from to a certain extent. I also don't like how many people are slipping by saying absolutely nothing. Even if we lynch him we should hear his reads and force these hardcore lurkers to post something. | ||
|
Stutters695
2610 Posts
| ||
|
Stutters695
2610 Posts
This is how I always play. My day 1 reads are notoriously bad. I find generating discussion to be a much better use of my time. | ||
|
Stutters695
2610 Posts
| ||
| ||
