EPTShan't be modkilled.
Fruity Mafia
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
Shan't be modkilled. | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On February 07 2013 00:12 Artanis[Xp] wrote: Time to remind myself why I don't like playing these games. /in I'll try to be nice :I | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On February 07 2013 10:43 layabout wrote: Whattup VE! has risk.nuke rolled scum yet? ![[image loading]](http://img192.imageshack.us/img192/7780/alwaystownie.png) | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On February 14 2013 07:57 Artanis[Xp] wrote: Clear scumtell, scum. Only scum would claim to be town while not actually town. You mind as well confess now. I like that logic, I wish liking it made it true. On February 14 2013 07:38 Zessionar wrote: ##vote: risk.nuke he has a 26,66 % chance to flip scum. You on the other hand, I don't like one bit, nor your scummy shenanigans. Why do you want to randomlynch me? Furthermore why me rather then somebody else? | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On February 14 2013 08:28 WeWinMafia wrote: Just a guess but I think the purpose of a random lynch is it being random. Why do you feel the need to even ask this when it's clearly bullshit he's doing right now? If you don't answer questions directed at other people you and I are going to get along. Zess, first of all. Nobody have ever called me decent scum. My major accomplishments as scum have been going temporarily unnoticed while some aggressive townies distracted the town with their pointy fingers and cries of omgus. He never claimed to have RNG'd me, he just stated the odds. What I find scummy is advocating lynching someone he doesn't suspect is scum and the fact his claimed reasons seems to be pulled out of his arse. | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
So it's not unusual at all that Syllogism would ask sandroba what he thinks of something in order to help get a read on him or just simply because he wants his respected second opinion. | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On February 14 2013 22:33 Artanis[Xp] wrote: I don't like Risk.nuke questioning posts that are obviously meant as a joke and taking them seriously (Zessioniar's initial vote), then defending himself by saying he's a poor scum player. What are you talking about, are we playing the same game? I questioned somebody who put their vote on me. How did you interpret his post as obviously a joke? Furthermore I didn't say I'm a poor scumplayer to defend myself. I used the empirical evidence that I hadn't performed well as scum to prove that his claimed reasoning was false or more to the point, made up. | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On February 15 2013 01:25 yamato77 wrote: Why don't you think Zess likes you, and why is his opinion of you alignment indicative at all? Read his posts and tell me if you reach a different conclusion otherwise I can't really be bothered to copying his posts and interpreting them for you.. It's not. However making up reasoning is. | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On February 15 2013 01:43 Zessionar wrote: ahm well... I already stated, that i am exagerating. Originally I wanted to vote for vivax, but i was afraid, he'd never stop his shitstorm if i vote him. I just wanted to start anything: Therefor i chose you, because you used to play slightly similar to vivax years ago. and to be honest, i didn't even think about if for more than 3 seconds... it's just not that important... Now I wrote like everything that went through my mind in this 3 seconds i decided to vote you... You might aswell call it random... Please let this be the last time i need to talk about this. We god better things going on. WeWinMafia, tell us who you are. I don't think you need to cover your identity in this game. you won't get shot anytime soon. Again, your words make no sense. If you're familiar with me my play was probably better years ago because while inexperienced I was still uncorrupted by my current lazy ways. And I don't believe you. You keep slightly contradicting yourself and changing your mind and you seem desperate to stop any discussion about you. | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
Hiro's reasoning is quite weak, and quite disappointing after he dropped his big vote now I'll explain later. The only one's reasoning that has a point is Layabout's. But even so I don't think the leap between bad and scum is that suspicious. I told myself that this morning I'd have figured out who I want to lynch but well. We have basically no performance from Obvious, Coag, Mattchew, Vivax, Grush. Pretty disappointing performances from Syllo, Sandroba and Marv who've done zero scumhunting. Are you still waiting for the game to start? | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
Earlier I felt like killing him and the only thing stopping me was the lurkers. My sentiment haven't changed. I will back a lynch on someone who've done jack this game. Otherwise ##Vote: Zessionar | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On February 16 2013 06:41 syllogism wrote: I'm not voting supersoft, even if it means no lynching. Just so you know This better be an empty threat or it's the most anti-town I've read all game. | ||
| ||
