EPTI'm in games. What, you wanna fight about it?
+ Show Spoiler +
No srsly, I can sit out - but normal minis are like my FAVS.
Wheel of Fortune Mini Mafia
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
I'm in games. What, you wanna fight about it? + Show Spoiler + | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
On April 21 2012 10:24 Radfield wrote: You didn't lose the game for town in Palmar's game. Dirkzor played a solid game, and left himself in a position where he had contributed more than either of the other two players alive at lylo. My challenge for you this game is to have zero 1 liners. If you are going to post, make sure it actually serves a purpose. Do some analysis and make sure that your opinions have actual reasoning behind them, and show that reasoning. Otherwise I hope you are a mason -_- <3 So manner. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + Yes, this is me soft-claiming town. I look forward to hearing from Ace - after his untimely demise in SSM I didn't expect him to be back in a game so quickly. ^^ | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
 No, it was just my entry into the game after drinking at my sister's bday party guys, nothing to see here. However, let's try that again with less alcohol in my bloodstream :D @Forumite So it is your opinion that MrZentor, as scum, voted for himself only to "get responses from people" and then, as scum, singled out prplhz? In the name of....what? Furthering his scum agenda? I don't know, I see it more as a townZentor move myself. That's why I disagree. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
Okay, whatever. I won't do it again. Good enough? | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
I think it looks a lot like your Hypothetical Situation 2. The only issue I have with it is that we don't know if there's a cop OR medic present, where your HS2 was assuming an open setup. Wanna walk me through how your plan works if there are no medics/cops present Ace? | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
HOLY VE WAGON! Votes off plx! I'm reading the thread now, but if anyone has any questions feel free to ask whilst I catch up. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
You want comment - your case is abysmal Toad, and it's based on how you think I want to play mafia. You'd better think again pal...I'm not scum. Now, scum. VisceraEyes Lynch-List of Lurking Lethargy Sbrubbles - Where the dicks is Sbrubbles anyway? Ace - Ace has shown decent activity this game, but very little actual scumhunting. Concerned about his plan for D2, but doesn't seem very interested in what's going on today, D1. Radfield - Radfield's really only here because not only was his vote for me not explained (verily, even when requested), but justifies it by my lack of response. Sounds like an excuse to park his vote and not scumhunt to me, and I don't like it. ##Vote: Ace Unless we decide that we'd rather lynch a lurker, in which case I prefer Sbrubbles. I wouldn't mind that actually, because between the two I think I prefer Sbrubbles...but I don't think I can get a wagon rolling on a lurker at this point. Based on the fact that my scumreads are weak as hell after rereading (those who know me will notice a distinct lack of red text), I think scum are putting in way less effort than most everyone who's posting. As an aside, if voting is done in this thread, could we trouble the hosts for periodic vote-counts? | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
On April 24 2012 02:39 SamuelLJackson wrote: @phagga You clearly have been here for the past couple hours. Any comments besides lol and vote count plx? @VE not really, I prefer optimal play specially day1 when evidence is flimsy. I actually would rather lynch rad then the other 2, but it's again non optimal. But optimal play was lynching me? Whatever mang. Here, let me entice you further. ##Unvote: Ace ##Vote: Sbrubbles I actually feel better about this. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
What do you guy suggest? One of MrZentor or Snarfs? They're the leading candidates with 2 votes, one of MrZentors being his own. I think Zentor is town, and I don't think he'll end up voting for himself, so I'd have to go with Snarfs...but Snarfs looks town to me too. There seems to be a consensus behind a Radfield lynch, would you guys join me in lynching him over an inactive I feel has a huge chance of flipping scum? Other than these options, it's looking like a No Lynch situation to me. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
Sbrubbles OMGUS of me is strange, considering the reason he's saying I'm suspicious is all the "good discussion town has had over suspicious behavior" and my penchant to "vote a lurker like him" in spite of it "usually being good town play". Like...it doesn't register. I'm good with my vote on him. If we're consolidating, I prefer it's on this guy. Someone needs to tell me why their candidate is better than mine. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
On April 24 2012 04:32 Sbrubbles wrote: Rad: + Show Spoiler + On April 23 2012 18:37 Radfield wrote: Correct. I'm not sure what you find suspicious about that. Someone making a weak case is certainly no indication of them being scum, especially when that case is made in the first half of day 1. I didn't think Zentor's case was strong, yet I also didn't see Zentor as scum. However, both of those things may change with time. Something about prplhz is tickling my senses, though I haven't reread the game yet. I started to last night, but was too tired to focus. So now I'm up early with the intention of putting in some time before work. Prplhz is simply a bit too quiet for my liking at any rate. My reasons are my own for voting VE, though they will materialize in the thread before the day is out. The short version is that I've played scum with VE lately, and so far this reminds me of that game. Your answers are mostly satisfactory, but I'd still like to understand better what your suspicions. Prplhz commented on you frequently keeping your reads to yourself, but I think we could profit from seeing you write them down for us. Still, whether you decide to enlighten us (and whether you've changed your mind or not after his posting), I've begun to agree with you in relation to VE. VE: + Show Spoiler + On April 22 2012 21:53 VisceraEyes wrote: It was mostly me disagreeing with Forumite's case. Zentor seems like a lurky-scum kinda player, and doubt as scum he'd enter the game voting for himself. That's kinda an advanced scum move and (no offense Zentor) not one I see MrZentor making. I could have just said "I don't agree with a MrZentor vote" but the way I said it gets more people to trust me faster...or so I thought. No, it was just my entry into the game after drinking at my sister's bday party guys, nothing to see here. However, let's try that again with less alcohol in my bloodstream :D @Forumite So it is your opinion that MrZentor, as scum, voted for himself only to "get responses from people" and then, as scum, singled out prplhz? In the name of....what? Furthering his scum agenda? I don't know, I see it more as a townZentor move myself. That's why I disagree. Your defense of Zentor, that you don't see him making such an advanced scum move, doesn't stick for me. It feels like scum fabricating defense on a townie to potentially gain cred with him or with the town if he's lynched. + Show Spoiler + On April 24 2012 01:57 VisceraEyes wrote: Now, scum. VisceraEyes Lynch-List of Lurking Lethargy Sbrubbles - Where the dicks is Sbrubbles anyway? Ace - Ace has shown decent activity this game, but very little actual scumhunting. Concerned about his plan for D2, but doesn't seem very interested in what's going on today, D1. Radfield - Radfield's really only here because not only was his vote for me not explained (verily, even when requested), but justifies it by my lack of response. Sounds like an excuse to park his vote and not scumhunt to me, and I don't like it. ##Vote: Ace Unless we decide that we'd rather lynch a lurker, in which case I prefer Sbrubbles. I wouldn't mind that actually, because between the two I think I prefer Sbrubbles...but I don't think I can get a wagon rolling on a lurker at this point. Based on the fact that my scumreads are weak as hell after rereading (those who know me will notice a distinct lack of red text), I think scum are putting in way less effort than most everyone who's posting. As an aside, if voting is done in this thread, could we trouble the hosts for periodic vote-counts? Your reasoning on Ace has already been adressed by himself and others here commenting on his meta. I'd be more than happy with giving him the benefit of a doubt. His setup discussion got things rolling in a good way and I don't see him play as scummy at all. Accusing someone who hasn't been active (in this case, myself) is usually good town play in order to get people to talk and remove from the game someone who isn't contributing to town. Still, trying to shift focus to lurkers when we've been having pretty good discussions is trying appear useful without having to actually having to take strong stances . And this is scummy behaviour to me. Lastly, between you and Rad, you've both accused the other, but looking at the game through "VE town lenses" and "Radfield town lenses", I think his play makes more sense. So I'm voting you. ##vote VisceraEyes a) If you can give me a good reason scum would want to enter the game voting for themselves, then you go ahead and chalk this one up to you. There's NO reason scum would do that, and that's why I call it an "advanced scum move"...because I would never think scum would do that. If Zentor is scum and doing that, then kudos to him...but I don't think that's the case. b) My problem with Ace has to do with the fact that he's not interested in helping out with TODAY'S LYNCH AT ALL. It has nothing to do with his setup speculation, it has to do with the fact that he's not trying to help find scum HERE, NOW. You and Radfield feel free to "give him the benefit of the doubt". I'm willing to not vote for him today too, but I think he's scum. It's just a matter of when town will get behind me. c) I'll admit your activity makes you look better now, but I wasn't trying to "shift focus" to lurkers - I was trying to FOCUS TOWN ON LURKERS because TOWN HAD NO FOCUS. d) Rad never accused me, I lightly accused Rad for this - which he's now responded to (sufficiently imo for D1). Anything I'm missing? Because you have literally no case on me, so I just wanted to make sure before you unvote that I answer any other suspicions you have. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
I'm willing to no-lynch in this situation. In my opinion a no-lynch is better than a mislynch in this situation and I'm not confident enough in any of the lurkers anymore - there has been a lot of activity here toward the end, and it's hard to tell if it's because there's a scum candidate or because no one wants a no-lynch or what. What do you think Toad? Do you think we should lynch a lurker or no-lynch? I'm okay with no-lynching to be frank. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
On April 24 2012 06:32 Forumite wrote: Back, still some reading to catch up on. Not sure about the exact votecount, but if we don´t have a candidate now, 30 minutes before the deadline, then I´d feel fine with not lynching at all. Late voteswitches never end well. "Never" is a strong word - sandro and I pwnz0rd scum with late-switches in C9++. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
On April 24 2012 06:46 Forumite wrote: At least a lot of players are here. I still want MrZentor to die, especially after his listpost, I don´t want him to go out and provide us with a lurker to lynch. Barring that, do we no-lynch, or lynch snarfs or marvel? Forumite WHY would scum enter the game voting for themselves? I get that you don't like my reasoning for thinking they wouldn't, but why WOULD scum do that? I can't make sense of it from a scum perspective. To be honest, I didn't like his "to-do list" post either, considering the late hour it comes off as scum trying to appear active...but I still can't make sense of that first action at all, help me out bro. Out of the options present, I prefer no-lynch... ##Unvote: Sbrubbles ##Vote: No Lynch | ||
| ||
