A Game of Thrones Mafia
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On March 21 2012 03:02 Oberyn wrote: If possible, I think it would probably be best if spoilers beyond the first book were put in spoiler tags. I would think it is possible to discuss the flavor of the characters in this game, without going into the events of the fifth book and spoiling it for everyone else. No, if people absolutely can't handle spoilers they should just out now. I don't want to feel forced to play this game while petting around with spoilers. | ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
Greymist come out and play! ##vote: GreYMisT | ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On March 22 2012 09:20 risk.nuke wrote: I want to kill greymist and gumshoe about equally much. just to clarify, my original vote for greymist was pressure and I want to lynch him now for other reasons. | ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On March 22 2012 09:38 sandroba wrote: What's in it for you? Use the right account, and what's in it for him doesn't matter. We're playing for what's in it for US. | ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
Untitled Reporter: Before we get to that, the day started of with a bunch of stupid stuff. Can you tell us a bit of what that was nuke? nuke: Yes naturally, so yes the day started of with wherebugsgo instantly deciding to do some initial trolling. My cameraman Mr.Wiggles caught some of the first responses. On March 21 2012 16:48 wherebugsgo wrote: + Show Spoiler [Xatalos] +hi I'm vanilla town But isn't he third party? DAFUQ + Show Spoiler [evantrees] + The city was in chaos for a brief moment untill Acrofales rolled in and said. + Show Spoiler + Acrofales wrote: I'mma specculate on littlefingers wincondition. The quality play continues with GreYMisT wanting to lynch modconfirmed unlynchable third party. Which brings us to one of our main-candidates for the evening. Ladies and Gentlemen I present to you. ReDMisT. On March 22 2012 01:20 GreYMisT wrote: Guys I say we lynch Wherebugsgo, just to be certain. Sand/Syllo can you guys sign you posts? It makes it a lot easier for the rest of us to keep track of who thinks what. Xatalos, I'm interested on what you think about Wherebugsgo/littlefinger. How do you think we should go about interacting with him now that we know he is 3rd party? Also i would like to assure everyone that even though I am hosting Aperture Mafia, the science will not keep me from being active here. After reciving a pressurevote at the start of the game GreYMist emerges. He doesn't say anything about the vote made against him which I don't actually hold against him too much, altough a "Go bugger yourself nuke" in response to my vote would had been nice. However he doesn't say anything else either to generate lynch-discussion. Instead he tries to lead the conversation onto third-party discussion. If you look through his filter here. GreYMist Filter. His continued posts are pretty worthless. He makes a few points like informing how a Mayor system works, shoots down a role-claim. Denying freepasses and punching Mattchews poor logic in the face. Whilst these are alright posts and by that I mean not straight out useless or fluff they aren't doing much to help town either. They are just the kind of replies someone was going to post and GreYMisT posted first. So in terms of "helpfull discussion" aka "lynch discussion" GreY still sits on a pretty solid nothing. On March 22 2012 03:44 GreYMisT wrote: If it wasnt already apparent that the "Guys we should lynch wherebugsgo, just to be sure" was a joke, me saying later that it was should have made it quite clear. But enough of that, At the moment I would much prefer lynching Gumshoe over anyone else at this point. Notice how he jumps on the easiest lynch he can find, and then later he turns into more of a "sympathetic townie" where he give Acro a way out of the lynch (ie. claiming). in this way a Scum Gumshoe would win both ways. He either gets a townie lynched, or gets his role. First. No, I did not see any sarcasm in your lets lynch littlefinger post. This is what you wrote. On March 22 2012 01:20 GreYMisT wrote: Guys I say we lynch Wherebugsgo, just to be certain. Tell me where is the sarcasm or how this clearly is a joke because I don't see it. Especially since the majority about that post is concerning what to do with littlefinger. GreYMisT dismiss it as sarcasm and a joke after the post BUT it wasn't sarcasm nor a joke. And that makes GreYMisT a L-I-A-R. Which is Scum in latin. I absolutely love the second part of this post If gumshoe is scum for jumping on the easiest lynch he can find, does the same go for you jumping on gumshoe? On March 22 2012 03:44 GreYMisT wrote: But enough of that, At the moment I would much prefer lynching Gumshoe over anyone else at this point. Notice how he jumps on the easiest lynch he can find, and then later he turns into more of a "sympathetic townie" where he give Acro a way out of the lynch (ie. claiming). in this way a Scum Gumshoe would win both ways. He either gets a townie lynched, or gets his role. My other candidate right now was gumshoe but the case on him has already been stated and I don't feel like beeing overly repetetive. Winner: ReDMisT! Close but keeps his head: gumshoe! That's all for now, stay tuned! | ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On March 23 2012 13:09 chaoser wrote: Risk.nuke's "big post" is scummy as fuck (happy SLJ?): Firstly, it's taking greymist's post about wanting to lynch WBG out of context and misrepresenting it. It also has this paragraph which makes no sense: Denying freepasses and arguing with mattchew's logic would fall under "helpful and lynch discussions". And greymist advocated lynching gumshoe so he's got a strong stance already and not just "sitting on a pretty solid nothing". And while you're leveling all this criticism at greymist, you yourself have not been doing much either. How is this worthless multiple paragraph post a case? It's just trash. Where was the pressure?! You literally vote for him and then post one liners about wanting to kill gumshoe. What pressure was there?!?!?! ##vote: risk.nuke Nicholas' big post: I don't understand this post. First you say that risk.nuke has posted the most scummy post (which I agree) but then you say both him and gumshoe are scum buddies? When risk.nuke has been saying gumshoe is scum since the start of the game? You're totally misrepresenting their relationship especially given the fact that in that post, risk.nuke even uses red lettering for gumshoe...Are you saying he's halfheartedly bussing or something? Can you explain how you arrived at that conclusion? And then instead of voting for him, you keep your vote on gumshoe...if you think risk.nuke has the most scummy post, why not vote for HIM? and then you ask for a replacement in thread with a shitty reason...I remember Curu modkilled DrH when he did this in lotr and DrH had a much better reason than you...I doubt you're going to get replaced so I suggest you keep playing and respond to my questions. That or you're getting modkilled. Oberyn, I asked you some questions in my previous post, Can you please answer them? And to answer yours, obviously something that I thought was pushing scum agenda. Usually this means misrepresentation. (cough cough, risk.nuke, Nicholas) Right now he's still a null read to me, especially since he's started to contribute/post more. gumshoe, I'm confused. Can you explain why you're voting for layabout and not someone else? Wtf is, "he might be aggressive scum or reckless town but he's dangerous as scum so let's lynch". Why not just go find someone else that you think is more likely to be scum?! Finally, Risen destroyed page 19...please don't do post-by-post analysis anymore, especially if you're going to marathon post like that...condense your ideas into one or two big posts...else it's hard to read Chaoser,First I love how you take a direct and full quote and call it out of context. then chaoser wrote: Denying freepasses and arguing with mattchew's logic would fall under "helpful and lynch discussions". And greymist advocated lynching gumshoe so he's got a strong stance already and not just "sitting on a pretty solid nothing". And while you're leveling all this criticism at greymist, you yourself have not been doing much either. How is this worthless multiple paragraph post a case? It's just trash. These kind of posts are helpfull sure, but they are the kind of posts that if greymist hadn't posted them there are probably atleast 4 other people in this thread that would had if grey hadn't been faster. I'm just trying to emphasize that these are the kind of posts that look helpfull and are a very easy way to make yourself look alot more helpfull and contributing then you actually are. And I wanted to make that clear so the town don't look at those posts and thinks they are more helpfull then they are. Posting these types of posts pose almost zero danger to the scumteam in the way that discussing lynches do. About pressuring grey. I voted for him, that IS pressure you... "insert disparaging intellectual comment here" I tried to make him come out and post, but it was completely ignored which was another thing that beeped on my scumradar. Gumshoe: He's close the top of my lynch list and people are calling me chainsaw defending him by attacking greymist. You need to get your heads examined. You can't say I haven't posted a case on him. He posted like a scum in the thread. My respons to that was saying I want to lynch him for those posts and I asked town who else wanted to lynch him with me (which if everyone would had been so kind as to answer could had been a great source of information). I could had made a case on him when I made one on Grey but all that would had led to would be getting comments from other players about how that had already been posted and how I only stole other peoples cases" This is day 1. The most important informationgain today is who wants to lynch who, not who could make the best damn lynchpost based on ONLY day 1 posts. Good lynchposts are just another currency for how hard you're trying to get someone lynched which translates into information. And go relook GreYMisT talking about wbg, he wasn't joking. And his post led to a bunch of useless wbg discussion just like he must have known that type of post would cause. And discussiong wbg instead of lynches are anti-townplay. After a few people raises their eyebrows at the post he tries to dismiss it as 'beeing sarcastic.' Note that he doesn't do that immediately. In his first reply to SLJ he doesn't say a thing about beeing sarcastic but rather asking him what else to discuss. Which one obvious answer to is lynchcandidates. | ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On March 24 2012 07:09 wherebugsgo wrote: Hey guys, look: all the scum are switching to evantrees now! Lololololol I don't feel to well about the evantress, too much late bandwagon on the lurker and it's going fast. Compared to how slow everyone has been to unite up untill now. | ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On March 24 2012 08:11 DoYouHas wrote: Am I correct in saying Layabout is currently set to be lynched? Yes and no. Layabout is on 5, greymist is on 4. But layabout is such a incredibly dumb lynch I can't see the town not changing from him shortly (just need some more activity). Altough to be fair layabout was still a better lynch then most previous candidates because it will atleast provide some information on the people voting. However it's still terrible and dumb as hell since the case on layabout was he was slightly lurking and mostly meta. aka not playing as well as he should. Which isn't even no longer the case because he's come back and posted some sensible stuff. | ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On March 24 2012 07:20 chaoser wrote: posting from hospital, on shift. addressing risk, just because there is a chance others might have posted it doesn't mean greymist posting it is noncontributing. I think I understand your "they are helpful but not TOO helpful" idea in that you think they're relatively "safe" helpful posts to make. Is that correct? But then what is the difference between greymist and any number of players in here making "safe helpful" posts. None, I'm just saying that when evaluating a person you must take this into consideration. Since I was attempting to get GreYMisT lynched I forsaw that those posts would make people less reluctant to lynching him if they misinterpreted the posts as more helpfull then they are. Even if Greymist wrote the first part sarcasticly it didn't sound sarcastic and either way. Looking at it now neutraly he comes in and uses his first post in the game to talk about wbg and his next thing in the post is to ask another player of their thoughts on wbg. Which is very undenisbly leading the discussion onto wbg. I could have understood if a townie wanted to do this if he just wanted to see what people would post about wbg and try to draw some information from that. But GreYMisT doesn't claim that that. From what I can read, his only goal and concern after that was to establish his own innocence by claiming it was a joke. Meaning it was not his intention to move the discussion to wbg which I also can't buy. In Greys early post he didn't want to discuss lynch-candidates. He choose to straight out ignore my vote on him, talked about other stuff and asked other people for their opinions. This supports the fact that greymist didn't want to talk lynch discussion. He names gumshoe but it's in truth just jumping on the easiest target, mafia or townie a person who messed up in the thread and that was the extent of the effort. | ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On March 24 2012 08:58 wherebugsgo wrote: ok guys, I have an idea. Let's all switch to someone else completely, other than layabout and GreYMisT. How does that sound? I'm sorry, while I want to save layabout I can't hear you over the sound of the two remaining minutes. | ||
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On March 24 2012 09:03 Risen wrote: I posted precisely why I feel like I do. You were playing human centipede with greymist. | ||
| ||