EPTElection Mafia
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On December 12 2011 06:15 Liquid`Sheth wrote: Wait I'm not GM?! oh.. you think I'm LiquidSheth?! I'm actually just his friend typing on his account. He doesn't really type much on TL ever, so he said I could use it.... I hope thats not a problem? He said because I like mafia so much that I could use it and that here would be an awesome place to play it. Was this not ok? Should I have said this from the start? :X  | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
You are Herkules. You spent your childhood beeing neglected by your father, the king. You hate hydras. Day 1 you may kill all the hydras. Also your unlynchable due to your half-god blood. You can choose to ignore democracy and lynch whoever you want cause you're crazy strong. In addition everything that the townies say must praise either your strenght, your intelligence or your unmatched sexual prowess. | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On December 12 2011 07:12 GreYMisT wrote: you need torches to stick in the hydra's severed heads. Thats how he did it. I'm recruiting gm's smurf army. they're in the torches & forkpitch business, | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On December 12 2011 07:47 Liquid`Sheth wrote: Hm, so question that is somewhat important, have any of you guys been to any live events and played mafia with TL there? o o I haven't gone to alot of event, I got friends in DHC so I was intending on going this winter but I got elsewhere occupied. I'll likely go next time and if I do mafia will be played and I'll prepare some sane and some slightly less sane roles. | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
Kita you messed up my role, I'm not hercules. | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
Also GiygaS is scummy bastard. | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On December 12 2011 22:42 Arctocod wrote: This is rather confusing; why are you voting for radfield and why are you leaning against us for office? While both are perfectly reasonable stances to take, I'm curious as to why you reached this conclusion. You like Radfield's "vote for veterans plan", but apparently he is the only "veteran" who is acceptable to you? What in radfield's one post specificially made you sure of him? Beause he spoke up first. I don't like hydras, curu said your scumplay was obvious which straight out isn't true and you prepared with this which I jusst didn't get a good feeling about. | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On December 13 2011 00:13 zeks wrote: Any pardoner who uses a pardon is to be auto-lynched the next day No exceptions Exception 1. mass last minute vote switch. Questionable Exception 2. Everyone agrees on lynching someone, then occurs a last hour voteswitch when some keyplayers are unavailable. I don't need to add that I also think hydras should sign their posts. On December 12 2011 22:55 Arctocod wrote: For the record, that was syllogism. I suppose we could start tagging our posts. I do not find your answer satisfactory as speaking up first says very little about his alignment. None of my answers for anything or just some of them? Furthermore I never said I liked Rafields plan, I liked the fact that he said something and everyone else mutualy agrees on it which indicates it was a pro-town action ergo pro-town play. Do you belive Deus-ex and TnTp hydras will be easy to get a read of? | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On December 13 2011 01:42 DEUS-ex-MAFIA wrote: i will be readable as always. i don't see a problem as long as hydras tag their posts. whats wrong with radfields electionplan? I never said there is something wrong with it either, If I would had it would had been very clear because I would had provided arguments, ergo you can conclude I did never in any way say there is something wrong with it. I merely didn't want words put in my mouth. Deus. what you said was an inch from basicly twisting that into claiming I said something is wrong with Radfields plan. FoS | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On December 13 2011 02:01 DEUS-ex-MAFIA wrote: risk, your fos on my is disturbing and stupid. new players read "fos" and put me on their lists. you said you never said that you like radfields plan. and i want to know why you dont say this. i say it: i like radfields plan. players like you lose games for town. fosing around without any reasons. why dont you use your brain before you post. i didnt attack you in the slightest. i didnt put words in your mouth. i only wanted that you tell me why you dont say that you like rads plan. its so simple. now take your incredibly stupid fos back stop derailing and answer my question: why are you talking with no content? If you're town then why are you forcing a disussion on this topic which is 100% useless and nothing but a distraction for town. my fos is valid and it's not the fos'd ones job to question it. It's funny how someone who tells me to "think" before "I" post doesn't have time to reread your own and mark it!! | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
The pardoner will have to decide himself if he is going to use it or not, and if he pardons it's at his own risk. Forbidding it is idiocy but we should warn him that by using the abillity chances are high we'll kill him. | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On December 13 2011 17:12 TotallyNotTwoPeople wrote: Having only two real candidates for mayor/pardoner makes me uneasy, but I even more dislike the half-assed mayoral campaign that promises activity and follows it up by being inactive. Can any player who has played with them (Curu/Erandorr) before give some insight as to how active they generally are as town versus scum? And to Curu/Erandorr, any particular reason for the lack of activity? And why did you run for mayor and then put no effort into it? About having only two candidates, quick glance it doesn't really mean much. If two good towncandidates gets selected fast enough it can be risky for mafia to push a third candidate without putting alot of mafia eggs in the basket. Altough honestly this time I feel it speaks in the favor of one of the candidates beeing mafia. Because if I were mafia and they were both town and someone else of the by radfield nominated veterans were mafia I would try to get that mafia veteran elected. While leaving other mafia out of it I would see if I can get townies to support it. Nothing to lose, everything to win. However nothing of that sort happend. There is also the possibilty that none of the listed veterans are mafia in which case the election would look pretty much like this but I deem that less likely. I think Arctocod is likely mafia but I'm not going to do anything about that now. He will have to play pro-town because I will watch him like a hawk. Todays lynches I would like one of these two. Graymist and GiygaS. Though there is a dilemma. I am more sure on Graymist then on Giygas and we'll learn more from Graymists flip then Giygas. Against Graymist probably beeing a more valuable townie then Giygas. | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
@Harbinger: I read: I might throw a stupid vote but it's because I let my newbie friend choose. | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
On December 14 2011 03:09 GiygaS wrote: So has the case on me been dropped? I just want to know if I should spend the time I have available right now defending myself or giving thoughs on wtf is going on right now. You should always defend yourself. I've dropped nothing. | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
Your defense is not that of a townie who isn't worried. What I find most interesting isn't the conclusion to how you became innocent in what you wrote. But rather you didn't dismiss it as nonsese because honestly, there have been no case presented against you. Just me saying I think you are scum and I gave no reasoning. The interesting part to me is how you reacted. I don't think a townie who haven't read any reasoning against him would write a defense against nothing. It makes perfect sense for a mafia though. Becuase you were afraid you had missed something. | ||
| ||
