EPT/in
Election Mafia
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Comprissent
United States314 Posts
/in | ||
|
Comprissent
United States314 Posts
| ||
|
Comprissent
United States314 Posts
On December 12 2011 06:15 Liquid`Sheth wrote: Wait I'm not GM?! oh.. you think I'm LiquidSheth?! I'm actually just his friend typing on his account. He doesn't really type much on TL ever, so he said I could use it.... I hope thats not a problem? He said because I like mafia so much that I could use it and that here would be an awesome place to play it. Was this not ok? Should I have said this from the start? :X My brain is full of fuck asdfasdf, let the games begin soon! | ||
|
Comprissent
United States314 Posts
On December 12 2011 09:02 Liquid`Sheth wrote: Hey guys what does the text like this mean if you get it in PM? Definitely detecting a troll here It means you die on day 1  | ||
|
Comprissent
United States314 Posts
Radfield's campaign makes the most sense to me so far. One question for all candidates; how do you plan on influencing blue roles to protect the townies? I'd like our mayor/pardoner to keep us well informed of how/what they are doing in order to direct a town victory. Whoever is clearest to me has my vote | ||
|
Comprissent
United States314 Posts
One of the reasons Radfield/Arcotod are running is because of the game experience they have; Having a highly active mayor/pardoner with good game experience from what i've read in earlier games can lead to some folk automatically trusting whoever is in office. Mayor role gives you advantage of showing up town during DT checks (am i right?), and it is a very powerful position, if held by mafia. | ||
|
Comprissent
United States314 Posts
On December 12 2011 14:31 Liquid`Sheth wrote: @prpthz I geuss the only thing I find kind of wrong with your post was this : You say you'd rather have ProfBA and Radfield/Arco in office for the reason if there scum, they'll obviously slip up, but if there town they'll find the scum for us. I think your missing the logic that if you want them in cuz there good at this game, then there probably good enough not to make such an easy slip up... So, If we put someone who is extremely good at the "Head" of our team even if it is just a metaphorical "Head" it'll be extremely tough if hes Scum. I could be wrong, but thats just my oppinion based on thought process alone not too much actual experience. So please tell me if my logic is wrong on this. I think I just got like... quadruple ninja'd lol I do think it is better to put a more active person into office anyways, it is up to town to catch a slipup This being said, it now makes more sense in my head to NOT vote for two extremely active players who are running for office, rather leaving one out of an office. If they are both scum, and experienced, town is in trouble. Leaving a lesser experienced person in office may be helpful, where if both offices turn out to be scum, we have a better chance of catching one. It's just like what was just said, On December 12 2011 14:25 prplhz wrote: Woopsidaisy, ninja'd. What do you mean "somewhat control the game"? Just because they win the elected doesn't mean that everybody has to follow them unconditionally for the rest of the game. How are those roles extremely powerful? An extra vote can be powerful, but it is very rare that we see a lynch that comes down to a single vote anyway, and the Pardoner can't pardon anybody for no reason or the mob will have him. I'd think that it would suck to have Arctocod and Radfield/ProfessorBadass out of office because they will find scum if they are town, and scum can't do anything about it. If they are scum then they will put themselves very much in the spot light and they'll slip up and we'll lynch them, and scum can't do anything about it. Sucks that we didn't get townies the protection, but it's a lot worse to elect a townie who can't find scum over a townie who can find scum. these positions don't really control the game so what's the biggie with leaving one office for someone not as experienced? | ||
|
Comprissent
United States314 Posts
On December 12 2011 14:51 GreYMisT wrote: Actually, upon thinking about this, i would like to alter something. Because the mayor has a hidden power, while the pardoner has an overt one, I would rather have the person i have the strongest town read on in the mayoral position than the pardoner one. this is because if the pardoner does use his power without good reason, he dies the next day. no questions asked. One thing that strikes me about radfield this game is how he immediately tied himself to arctocod in his election post. saying that you should vote for me, but his guy is also a good choice, so he will probally get pardoner anyway, but still vote for me. while an argument could be made that he is trying to show all the new players who to vote for, something sets me off about this. He should theorectically know he is town, and therefore should be pulling out all the stops to get people to vote for him, not endorsing other candidates he doesn't even know the aliengment of. Because of this, i am uncomfortable voting him for mayor at this time. If you are uneasy about him, then why don't you vote him for pardoner in order to keep better tabs on him? By your logic I would like to keep someone questionable in the pardoner office as it is easier to keep track of his/her actions | ||
|
Comprissent
United States314 Posts
Radfield seems the most organized and willing to work with town, even if I don't like his infrequent posting. I would also like Arc, as having two players is very nice to keep safe (as having double the chance for a slipup if he is scum) | ||
|
Comprissent
United States314 Posts
On December 13 2011 05:00 GiygaS wrote: [...] I'll be be putting my tentative lynch vote on Zeks. This will turn in to a real vote if I come back in 3 hours and no new info has really been unveilied/no info that's an easy analysis for a lynch. The points against him have been pointed out by Deus-Ex, he wanted to vote a hydra off for really no reason, other than what I can see that he's threatened by them (a mafia would be threatened!) He also dissappeared for a while, and when he returned, he just quickly answered a quesiton, and didn't either reference or defend his accusations. I would argue that Deus-ex seems the most threatened On December 13 2011 02:01 DEUS-ex-MAFIA wrote: [...] players like you lose games for town. fosing around without any reasons. why dont you use your brain before you post. i didnt attack you in the slightest. i didnt put words in your mouth. i only wanted that you tell me why you dont say that you like rads plan. its so simple. now take your incredibly stupid fos back stop derailing and answer my question: why are you talking with no content? This is a fairly personal attack, that seems suspicious to me | ||
|
Comprissent
United States314 Posts
On December 13 2011 09:09 Eiii wrote: I'm going to be voting Radfield for mayor/pardoner. He would be good to have in either role, and now that he's posted some more I'm pretty confident that he's legit. If anyone hasn't looked at the election voting thread yet, it's literally all rad/arc, so it looks like our candidates are decided unless anyone has some major objections. I'm not going to lie, I generally don't really have any clue what's going on day 1, and this game is no exception. I like prpl and Deus' posting. People have called out zeks a few times, and if you filter his posts it's clearly not without reason-- he went from not wanting a rad/arc office to, twelve hours later, voting for both of them. When questioned about it, he sidesteps the issue entirely. Trying to lay low like that after silently making such a big swing in his stance isn't something I'm comfortable seeing, so I'm throwing my lynch vote on him now. I want to see this guy under more pressure! If Zeks is scum he would have probably made up his mind right away who he wants in office. This makes him seem town as he is trying to feel out the candidates. Also, more have stepped up in this '12 hour' window you've talked about, so I can't blame anyone for changing their minds | ||
|
Comprissent
United States314 Posts
1. Lynch a lurker, guarantee losing a towny 2. Lynch someone active, either hit scum or lose an active towny. So far i think only greymist has the only analysis that is actually backed by logic Spackle, your analysis on Dropbear is 100% theory, and I would not like to lynch based off that MrZentor's reasoning behind going for Zeks explains nothing either, what does 'having the hydra only helps town' mean? This being said, I'd tentatively vote for Jistu. Worst case scenario, we lose a towny either way. But with the amount of active posters, i think it's worth the shot to try for hitting a red. | ||
|
Comprissent
United States314 Posts
On December 13 2011 19:59 Jitsu wrote: + Show Spoiler + Ahhh, just woke up. After seeing the events of the night, I thought i'd give my feeling on who might be someone to pay attention to. I felt worried Comprissent a few of his posts ago, and he recently really got it sparked in my mind that he might be scum. This being said, it now makes more sense in my head to NOT vote for two extremely active players who are running for office, rather leaving one out of an office. If they are both scum, and experienced, town is in trouble. Leaving a lesser experienced person in office may be helpful, where if both offices turn out to be scum, we have a better chance of catching one. This was a valid point. You said we shouldn't have had two people in office at once. Cool. In the next post, you even defend your stance that we shouldn't have those two experienced players in office, by saying have someone questionable in office as Pardoner. Ok, so assuming we stick to this play on No pardoning, no exceptions, the only advantage either of the offices gives is immunity on night 1 from getting hit. This just helps us keep the vets alive, am i right? Radfield seems the most organized and willing to work with town, even if I don't like his infrequent posting. I would also like Arc, as having two players is very nice to keep safe (as having double the chance for a slipup if he is scum) Than you 100% switch your stance to wanting both Arc and Radfield in office. Hmmmm, ok...I could see it, but you're calling *me* wishy-washy? Fine, fine.. If Zeks is scum he would have probably made up his mind right away who he wants in office. This makes him seem town as he is trying to feel out the candidates. Also, more have stepped up in this '12 hour' window you've talked about, so I can't blame anyone for changing their minds You stated if Zeks was scum, he would have voted right away who he wanted to vote for in office. It makes him seem town because he wants to try to feel out the candidates. I think that was exactly the same play I made early, trying to get a feeling for the mayoral candidates. According to that line, I should be pro-town. For the lynching scenario: 1. Lynch a lurker, guarantee losing a towny 2. Lynch someone active, either hit scum or lose an active towny. So far i think only greymist has the only analysis that is actually backed by logic Spackle, your analysis on Dropbear is 100% theory, and I would not like to lynch based off that MrZentor's reasoning behind going for Zeks explains nothing either, what does 'having the hydra only helps town' mean? This being said, I'd tentatively vote for Jistu. Worst case scenario, we lose a towny either way. But with the amount of active posters, i think it's worth the shot to try for hitting a red. but than you go ahead and say that the Anti-Jitsu analysis was backed by logic - logic that is counter-acting your own logic. Also, by my count, the following people (up to Comprissent's) to tentatively vote for me are GreyMist, Radfield, Nisani, and Comprissent, in that order. You also say that the lynching scenario is either Lynch a lurker, and guarantee losing a town (I don't see how you can guarantee to lose a town) or lynch an active player, with a chance of either way. How about we look at some post analysis instead of just picking out of a hat? Comprissent is pretty wavy in my eye. Like to see some thoughts from others. From what i've gathered from vets/reading other games, lynching a lurker is a guaranteed town hit, which I don't want. Yes, I would like more analysis to go on. What i said was greymist is the only one to use logic in his analysis, that being said you're the only one with any analysis on (at the point of that post). I don't think you've been scummy, I am just trying to put my vote somewhere early to help move discussion. I should also pay attention to the accusers in these scenarios, and others have agreed that MrZentor's analyses have made no sense and he does not seem to follow what is going on in this thread. He hasn't posted in several pages, so I want to see more from him. | ||
|
Comprissent
United States314 Posts
On December 14 2011 12:00 MrZentor wrote: I like how Comprissent comes in and votes one minute before it's too late. -.- -.- to you too I've got another final tomorrow morning, it didn't help i was up vomiting at 5am this morning before a final at 8:30 | ||
|
Comprissent
United States314 Posts
On December 14 2011 12:01 Refallen wrote: Also comprissent you formatted your vote wrongly. Yes I just woke, I don't know how strict the rules are on getting votes in on time so i just skipped formatting. I haven't had much time to read the recent gatherings, my vote doesn't matter anyways. From what I did gather my vote for MrZentor would be going for nothing anyways | ||
|
Comprissent
United States314 Posts
On December 14 2011 12:07 Liquid`Sheth wrote: Yea, refallen and Cascades and Comprissent do you have good reasons your voting late? Just bandwagoning perhaps ? read: + Show Spoiler + On December 14 2011 12:04 Comprissent wrote: Yes I just woke, I don't know how strict the rules are on getting votes in on time so i just skipped formatting. I haven't had much time to read the recent gatherings, my vote doesn't matter anyways. From what I did gather my vote for MrZentor would be going for nothing anyways Why is it different that i vote 2 minutes later than 5 other posts in the voting thread anyways? I'm exhausted from finals so i'm probably just going to lack activity and common sense until later tomorrow | ||
|
Comprissent
United States314 Posts
On December 14 2011 12:07 Liquid`Sheth wrote: Yea, refallen and Cascades and Comprissent do you have good reasons your voting late? Just bandwagoning perhaps ? It's bandwagoning in the sense that i just picked one of the candidates who were about to be lynched, but it was mostly so I could get my vote off of MrZentor | ||
|
Comprissent
United States314 Posts
On December 14 2011 12:16 prplhz wrote: Why did you want to get your vote off MrZentor? Because it was strongly suggested earlier that he may have blue/ get shot anyways | ||
|
Comprissent
United States314 Posts
Only comment I have for now is for Radfield, if you keep assuring us your first few days are never good, why should we listen to your opinions on lynching targets? | ||
|
Comprissent
United States314 Posts
It looks like discussion has stalled because we have decided our officer elections already. I'll be voting Gigyas, as I do think Arc will better be able to put to use whatever role the SoD may get. As for lynch targets, i'm having a look through filters now, will post again after lunch | ||
| ||
