Steamship Liquidia (TL Mafia 46)

On November 16 2011 21:29 Palmar wrote:
hey guys, I'm in a good mood today, so here's a great offer to you:

I will write an alignment analysis on the first three players people ask me to do. Each player can only select one person for me to analyse, and I will provide a post for each subject on what I currently think of their alignment.

Go!

On November 17 2011 00:30 Palmar wrote:


prplhz told me Drazerk is scum

Coag because he's always scum and he always lurks.

And yeah, that's actually the case, generally it doesn't matter whose posts you read. I am pretty sure no one in this game has gone through everyone's filters and formed an opinion. Most people are likely focusing on somewhere between 2-5 people and mostly ignoring the rest of the game. So as an experiment I allowed random townies to pick which people I should focus on, because that gives the additional benefit of me not entering the analysis biased.

I think it's working out well, again I am going to re-iterate:

http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=12303438

chaoser is scum

You all should be voting for him.

+ Show Spoiler +

On November 17 2011 06:01 Zephirdd wrote:
Huh, I just found this on our beautiful bot-induced vote system.


Now, looking through his filters, Lanaia has not made an statement on voting Kenpachi, except that he prefers to vote on sinani over him.

Which means that, either the system is bugged(unlikely), or Lanaia has the ability to anti-vote someone through PM. Looking through the roles, the closest I've found is "Double Voter", but I assume anti-voting is a variation of that.

Which means Lanaia is not green(assuming green = vanilla town)

So either Lanaia is scum or Lanaia is a blue to be killed. The question is: which one? And if he doesn't die next day, can we confirm he is scum or maybe the Mafia just want us to believe that? And why would he want Kenpachi to not die(anti-voting him)?

I'd like to have these questions clarified or at least discussed, I got really confused right now.

On November 16 2011 21:37 Palmar wrote:
okay, prplhz, tyrran and chaoser I'll do.

On November 17 2011 07:21 HarbingerOfDoom wrote:
I'm going to hold off voting on Lanaia for now. While double voting or anti-voting is certainly powerful for both scum and for town, it is a lot less useful for scum if it is prominently announced for all to see on the vote list. If Lanaia is town, presumably scum will eventually settle the issue. If Lanaia is scum, it will be hard for her to use her ability without blatantly giving things away later on. Also, unless she thought her anti-vote would be hidden, I find it hard to believe scum would be so brash on day 1.

That being said, I am going to vote for Drazerk. I said if he didn't give a good reason for his vote I'd be voting for him, and I intend to follow through on that. He seems to like trumpeting the fact that he has generally sucked as town, and overall I think his contributions have not exactly been helping to create a good town atmosphere. His repeated mentions of how much he has screwed up as town in the past combined with his plethora of 1 liners and votes with little reason behind them makes it seem like he is trying to play anti-town and get away with it because it's just his meta.
Vote: Drazerk

Now I'm going to reread the thread some and see if there is someone else I'd like to place a vote on as well.

Kenpachi (12): bumatlarge, DCLXVI, prplhz, Drazerk, Zephirdd, Lanaia (Anti-Vote), Palmar, GreYMisT, risk.nuke, Tyrran, Lemonwalrus, -Lanaia (Anti-Vote), Hiroruby, sinani206

On November 17 2011 09:09 chaoser wrote:


He's dead already so why would he lie...

On November 17 2011 10:32 Palmar wrote:
I forgot again about that alignment analysis on Tyrren, I'll do it tomorrow, sorry.

On November 16 2011 07:19 Coagulation wrote:
You guys still have yet to figure out that anything kenpachi says should be ignored.

If in doubt vote for Kenpachi

But dont run the town directive into the ground trying to figure out why he does what he does.
Just kill him If we have nothing solid to go on.

On November 17 2011 10:23 Coagulation wrote:
#vote Coagulation

placeholder vote while I read over thread

On November 17 2011 10:35 Coagulation wrote:
##Vote Kenpachi
LAL + hes pretty much distracting town completely.
He needs to die for town to progress

Im not sure about chaoser yet but im gonna keep reading up on him and his accusers.

Also Im starting to see why everyone hates you wherebugsgo.

On November 18 2011 01:28 Forumite wrote:

Yeah, I don´t think you are scum, I still want you active in the game. The original case was a gamble, scum have been caught by things like that. It didn´t work now, but I also have your word that you are going to contribute despite being a new player, so it´s still a win!

I´m agreeing with Palmar, we need another lynch, ONE by the way, not 5. I don´t want Chaoser or Lalala lynched.

I have to run now, but will be back several hours before the lynch.

On November 17 2011 19:53 Tyrran wrote:
* Hyshes :



With this in mind, the fact that he jumped extremely quickly on the Lanaia bandwagon with the only excuse "only scum would defend a lurker" is extremelly scummy. Not only that, but while this statement suggest that Kenpachi is also scum, he did not vote for him, focusing only on Lanaia. This is very suspect.

Note that he later 'said' that it would be weird if Lanaia did this as scum, but did not remove his vote!

You make a good point about lanaia. If she knew it would be public, it would be very weird that she did it as scum.

On November 18 2011 01:48 Sabin010 wrote:

im a native speaker and still havent figured that one out bro.