EPT/in
TL Mafia XXVIII
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Amber[LighT]
United States5078 Posts
/in | ||
|
Amber[LighT]
United States5078 Posts
| ||
|
Amber[LighT]
United States5078 Posts
| ||
|
Amber[LighT]
United States5078 Posts
On July 17 2010 19:41 XeliN wrote: This game has finally started, been checking for ages. So no-one seems to have suggested any plan of action or srs business. In fact most of the chatter reads like the ramblings of a girls coffee morning. I would put forward two suggestions, lynch the least active person (has it's weaknesses, specially as there is very little to talk about at this stage with no info to go on) or simply use a RNG to lynch someone and go from there. I'd prefer the latter, everytime i've played and the town does an impulsive whim first lynch a townie always dies, using a RNG then just simply going from there seems a nice way to get over the fact we have barely anything to go on. I agree with this... This is the plan we should be following. However I must admit that I'm going go be inactive until tomorrow night since I'm away on vacation. No one should be casting votes yet. Everyone should be posting plans and begin talking about how the game and today's vote should be carried out. And please know that we are not going to gain any knowledge through today's vote so we may as well just understand that there's a very slim chance we will land a mafioso. The mafia members would be retarded to allow us to carry out a mafia lynch on day 1 | ||
|
Amber[LighT]
United States5078 Posts
| ||
|
Amber[LighT]
United States5078 Posts
Haven't read the thread and won't ve able to Until later | ||
|
Amber[LighT]
United States5078 Posts
if I have to trust someone I trust xelin. I'm going to follow his decisions till the end of the day at least. Sorry got to the game early so I read some posts :D | ||
|
Amber[LighT]
United States5078 Posts
On July 19 2010 02:27 Misder wrote: Why exactly do you trust Xelin out of all the players here? As for the hyperbola bandwagon: I didn't really mean to actually start the bandwagon xD I just pointed out that his posts don't provide substance at all, and his defense is very poor. and I think this came a way too late. Why not say this when defending himself the first time? He's just asking to be lynched... Got a break for a minute. In every game xelin plays the most levelheaded and I know his opinions have taken serious consideration. I know it someone is going to ve good to follow it's xelin or opz | ||
|
Amber[LighT]
United States5078 Posts
You should not be playing to avoid a modkill, or even to avoid being slightly considered as a lynch target. Unless there's some crazy night we should focus on BrownBear. | ||
|
Amber[LighT]
United States5078 Posts
Up until about 12 hours ago (last time I checked the thread) he was nowhere to be found, and now that 1 person gave him something to run with, he's invaded about 2/3's of the last 2 pages with nonsense analysis about d3. What's even worse is that he wants our "other" veteran to roleclaim. ATTN OTHER VETERAN: DO NOT ROLECLAIM!!!! The goal of the veteran, as stated numerous times, is to be the meatshield. His vote is only worth 1, regardless of how long he is left in the game. His job is to soak damage up from night kills. By outing our veterans, we are pretty much giving the mafia enough information to say "don't hit these players." I'm against that plan completely, and I'm against BrownBear. Hopefully the DT's are working their magic from last night and getting in contact with the players they checked. The DT role is pretty black/white and very strong in this game, so we need to keep those guys alive. The DT's should form their own circles and use the players they checked as voice-boxes. The players who have been checked should, UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES, reveal to any other player who the DT is unless they are verified. The only way the DT circles should combine is if AND ONLY IF by chance a DT checks another DT. Please be smart about this guys. I'm sticking with the opinion of the previous night to lynch the most useless player: ##Vote: BrownBear I'll consider changing my vote if some of the more 'influential players' have a better suggestion. | ||
|
Amber[LighT]
United States5078 Posts
On July 21 2010 01:01 ~OpZ~ wrote: -_- You said everything I was about to say...Glad I read to end of thread. Another job interview today guys, but I should be back. I also don't like BrownBear's plan. ##Vote:BrownBear Dunno where this will lead, but I'm willing to change my vote. wtf dude where you getting all these job interviews from? Share the love... I only have about 1 month left before I'm officially unemployed  | ||
|
Amber[LighT]
United States5078 Posts
On July 21 2010 03:21 Misder wrote: I would also like to point out this post by citi.zen. + Show Spoiler + On July 20 2010 10:09 citi.zen wrote: I know you're not a bad player, so this attempt to cast doubts on me out of the blue strikes me as odd. Especially since you're grouping me with lakrismama - which makes zero sense, as you would know full well it if you were honestly searching for reds. Look at his posts: Transparent much? No mafia, in any game that I have seen, risks showing this "support" towards each other on day 1. You know this. And you Sir are now looking very red. Foolishness has been pointed out as having odd behavior. He may have been a future lynching target. Why would the mafia target someone who is suspicious of being red? Because then it puts the finger-pointers in a position when players, such as yourself, go back and analyze the posts. This is actually a common ruse to cause the town to run around in circles as townies battle townies. It's not to say your analysis is invalid, but it could just be a breadcrumb trail to no-wheres-ville setup and managed by the mafia. | ||
|
Amber[LighT]
United States5078 Posts
| ||
|
Amber[LighT]
United States5078 Posts
On July 21 2010 06:09 citi.zen wrote: I don't know... I am leaning with Pandain here. Subversion is a brand new player who does not know what to expect in these games. I can see him think... "How do you catch mafia? You watch for mistakes! Have we caught any? Nope. Ah - so thus far they aren't making too many mistakes." I see no huge red flag. That said, he does not strike me as someone useful for the town so I am OK losing him if there are no better candidates. Subversion isn't that new. He played in BM's Harry Potter mafia, not sure if he's played in others... don't discount someones skill because they haven't played mafia on these boards before. | ||
|
Amber[LighT]
United States5078 Posts
| ||
|
Amber[LighT]
United States5078 Posts
On July 21 2010 08:20 Bill Murray wrote: they picked. vote count: im on my buddy's shitty ass comp with poor wireless, so if i missed any votes, or vote changes, pm me. i will definitely do more concise counting when i get home. Opz voted BB too | ||
|
Amber[LighT]
United States5078 Posts
##Vote: Subversion Though I think BrownBear's analysis and plan is crappy, we can get more info is we lynch Subversion. Lynching BB just proves that we, as a town, aren't as organized as we would like to be. The Subversion discussion caught a lot of players, many more than the BB discussion. By determining Subversion's role we can pinpoint other key players who were pushing for and against the Subversion lynch. I'm willing to risk putting my name into the hat to get the town on a better path to victory. Depending on the flip, the DT's should try and look at key players involved in the Subversion dispute. | ||
|
Amber[LighT]
United States5078 Posts
hungover fml -_- | ||
|
Amber[LighT]
United States5078 Posts
On July 22 2010 03:00 LaXerCannon wrote: This post here, to me, was the most informative. I have never had the chance to play a red role before and such added perspective really helped me decide on a lynch target. I'm also quite intrigued by why DTA didn't die yet; he's a very strong player (not so much this game though) and should be a priority kill. ##vote: DarthThienAn If we play the game with this logic then BC should have been killed already, but he's still alive. Opz is still alive, he's a strong player too. What about Roffles, he's incredibly cunning and plays the part of mafioso and townie very well. Pyrr should have been killed based upon this logic as well. Infun should have probably been a good target. You're playing the game very counter-intuitively. You're insisting that strong players should die, not suspicious players. DTA is playing the Chezinu card, which is common play. There's always guaranteed to be one of those idiot players in the game. The host himself has played this card before in games... I can't believe the people that are coming forward insisting that killing subversion will gain no knowledge. Killing DTA just verifies his play-style. We can actually tie a connection between DTA and Subversion as well as the people who are trying to avoid talking about DTA at all, or those who are supporting one lynch target over another. I'm not going to sit here and say killing DTA is wrong, he is still a target due to his play-style this game, but he's going to give us less information than lynching Subversion. Do whatever you want but don't justify your lynch vote by saying DTA is a good player and I think other people's opinions are strong, so this must be a good choice. Sheep. | ||
|
Amber[LighT]
United States5078 Posts
| ||
| ||
