EPTWorld at War Mafia
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
XeliN
United Kingdom1755 Posts
| ||
|
XeliN
United Kingdom1755 Posts
As to the idea of retaliation against a player who has an itchy trigger finger, we have the perfect form of retaliation. We lynch them. Or to put it more bluntly Any player launching a nuke against another without at the very least providing coherent argument for doing so will be lynched. Furthermore the only instance whereby we would launch against a player who acts in this way would be if we already have a good candidate for lynching, then we will nuke or multiple nuke them (I am of the opinion that 2 ought to be enough) To get things started off in the voting section I am going to be Voting ~OpZ~ His post earlier on both seemed different in style to the way he posted in the last game and also was riddled with subtle "I am town" choice of wording, something I consciously made an effort to do in the last game I was mafia so guess I'll go along with my instinct here. | ||
|
XeliN
United Kingdom1755 Posts
On March 24 2010 02:04 XeliN wrote: As to the idea of retaliation against a player who has an itchy trigger finger, we have the perfect form of retaliation. We lynch them. Or to put it more bluntly Any player launching a nuke against another without at the very least providing coherent argument for doing so will be lynched. Furthermore the only instance whereby we would launch against a player who acts in this way would be if we already have a good candidate for lynching, then we will nuke or multiple nuke them Explain why this wouldn't work before you guys jump to a plan of nuking vigilante's. | ||
|
XeliN
United Kingdom1755 Posts
Thats why using the lynching system makes the most sense, we do not risk ruining the entire game and yet still punish people for launching Nukes spontaneously. In the example you outlined Anber, then yes, lynch the first and counter nuke the second, just as we would if we already have a confirmed mafia for lynch and yet still need to punish an idiot for randomly nuking. I think your idea that some people would have a way to mess with the lynch voting is wrong, can't see Ace implementing that personally.. | ||
|
XeliN
United Kingdom1755 Posts
| ||
|
XeliN
United Kingdom1755 Posts
| ||
|
XeliN
United Kingdom1755 Posts
On March 24 2010 03:30 Fishball wrote: To me, the tone OpZ used gives me the impression that he has the power to nuke. Doesn't feel scummy to me at this point of the game though. If you're Mafia, that would be a dumb way to get unwanted attention. You disagree with my observation on ~OpZ~ fine, i made it clear it was mostly intuitive based on how I tried to act when I was mafia, you then coming out and making what is essentially a slight accusation without actually doing so concerns me more. If I was mafia then yes it might be unintelligent to bring attention to myself early in this way, that is obvious. What concerns me more is did you type that just to state something obvious or did you just want to write the word "mafia" about another player? | ||
|
XeliN
United Kingdom1755 Posts
 | ||
|
XeliN
United Kingdom1755 Posts
screw it just to get this out of the way: + Show Spoiler + On March 24 2010 03:30 Fishball wrote: To me, the tone OpZ used gives me the impression that he has the power to nuke. Doesn't feel scummy to me at this point of the game though. If you're Mafia, that would be a dumb way to get unwanted attention. Firstly you are quoting me, so when you wrote "If you're Mafia", I took it to be me. Think the misinterpretation lies in the word "that", I took it to refer to the post you quoted of mine//my voting and reasoning in voting for OpZ and not to what OpZ wrote. If you still can't understand how I could misinterpret it then I'm just going to give up and call you an idiot ^^ | ||
|
XeliN
United Kingdom1755 Posts
Quit being a tard. | ||
|
XeliN
United Kingdom1755 Posts
Also as to this "Also, your lynch idea as being the perfect retaliation to nuking? Wrong." Firstly I don't think it is perfect, just better than the other option which seems to be Nuke a Nuker, but anyway, why is it wrong? | ||
|
XeliN
United Kingdom1755 Posts
Also I am not wrong he is, what he wrote can be correctly interpreted in either way, it was too ambiguous. | ||
|
XeliN
United Kingdom1755 Posts
| ||
|
XeliN
United Kingdom1755 Posts
On March 24 2010 12:32 Elemenope wrote: This is your one post, and you’re just going to leave it at that? Are you fucking serious? I change my vote to Abenson People CANNOT be allowed to get away with inactivity, especially if the one thing they do post is to vote kill someone. | ||
|
XeliN
United Kingdom1755 Posts
| ||
|
XeliN
United Kingdom1755 Posts
| ||
|
XeliN
United Kingdom1755 Posts
| ||
|
XeliN
United Kingdom1755 Posts
##Remove Vote (Abstain) for now. | ||
|
XeliN
United Kingdom1755 Posts
On this hypothesis I think people who voted for OpZ might be more suspicious, people voting for Abenson was prodominantly due to his being inactive and useless, weras OpZ actuallly contributed. If he is innocent the first place to look for mafia might be people jumping on the vote OpZ bandwagon (which I started). I'm kinda typing as I think which is never that successful, I'll try to think through this more clearly but it seems like a good place to potentially start looking for mafia. All this is dependant on OpZ and Abenson being the roles they//OpZ have claimed but that seems likely to me. | ||
|
XeliN
United Kingdom1755 Posts
| ||
| ||
