+ Show Spoiler +
I like where our queen is at, and see no point in hastly capturing a pawn. So I suggest we develop our pieces and start this by unpinning our horse.
Forum Index > General Games |
timh
Netherlands47 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + I like where our queen is at, and see no point in hastly capturing a pawn. So I suggest we develop our pieces and start this by unpinning our horse. | ||
qrs
United States3637 Posts
On September 22 2011 03:24 Xog wrote: Responding to people's arguments is not repetition. It's not surprising that the difference escapes you, because you don't seem to know how to muster any argument better than, "Your move is losing, if you voted for it you're a shee-eep, na na, na na na". If this was first grade, I'm sure I'd be crying in a corner, but in real life, if you want people to listen to you, you need to have something to say. Try harder.Qxc6+ Just because you spent time analyzing Qxa7 doesn't make it any less losing. Stop trying to gather sheep with repetition. Like this guy: On September 22 2011 02:55 EvilNalu wrote: I don't think 11. 0-0 is a bad move; just unambitious. And sure, it's possible that I've been wrong about 11. Qxa7. It's hard doing all the analysis oneself--a person misses things. I haven't been trying to get people to follow me into something blindly--just to take all the possibilities seriously here. I'll look at your lines.I really think you guys should stop voting for 11.Qxa7. + Show Spoiler + It gets very complicated, and you guys have done lots of great analysis on black's weaker responses, but the most critical lines have been the least analyzed. I think black's best responses are 11...Bg4 and 11...Rb6. 11...Bg4, qrs has proposed 12. Qa4 (we do need to extricate the queen with haste). However, after the pretty much forced sequence 12...Bxf3 13. Qxc6 (white can save this move until later in the sequence, it will just transpose) 13...Qd7 14. Qxd7 Kxd7 15. gxf3 Nxd2 16. Bxd2 Bxd2 17. Kxd2 Rxb2 black will soon at least even up material in a rook ending where whites pawn weaknesses mean we will at best be grovelling for a draw. 11...Rb6 might be even stronger but it is hard to tell as it has received almost no analysis. It seems that 12. Qa4 is practically forced here otherwise white's queen will be all but trapped after Ba6. However, after 12...Ba6 our king will be stuck in the center and after something like 13. a3 Bxd2 14. Nxd2 Qh4 it is starting to look a little dicey. I think 11. 0-0 might be pretty decent here. Sure, he can play 11...Nxd2 12. Nxd2 Bxd2 13. Bxd2 Rxd2, but after 14. Bc3 we are still threatening both a7 and c6, and our game is much less hairy than the Qxa7 or Qxc6 lines. Therefore, I vote 11. 0-0 edit 1: Re your first line: I agree with you that the sequence you give is more or less forced, so where we disagree must be in our assessment of the position at the end. Here it is, for reference: + Show Spoiler [continued] + The position after 11. Qxa7 Bg4 12. Qa4 Bxf3 13. Qxc6 Qd7 14. Qxd7 Kxd7 15. gxf3 Nxd2 16. Bxd2 Bxd2 17. Kxd2 Rxb2 18. Kc3 (protecting f2 without getting in the way of the Rooks): ![]() Black to play Here you say that "Black soon will soon at least even up material"--but how? What's your plan for him? Right now, what it looks like to me is that we've reached an endgame and we're still a pawn up. Yes, the doubled f-pawn creates a slight weakness (we have three pawn groups to protect instead of two), but overall I'd still rather be the side with the extra pawn. Maybe I'm the one who's missing something. It's certainly possible, but then show me the plan. edit 2: Re your second line: You give an interesting line. The position at the end might lead to the following + Show Spoiler [continued] + 11. Qxa7 Rb6 12. Qa4 Ba6 13. a3 Bxd2+ 14. Nxd2 Qh4 15. Nxe4 Qxe4+ 16. Be3 Qxg2 17. O-O-O ![]() Black to play I'd call this an unclear position, certainly an interesting one and worth analyzing further. Black has temporarily regained the pawn, but he still has the weakness on c6, and we have the chance to put some strong pressure on him in return with moves like Rdg1. Dicey? Maybe, but for Black at least as much as for us. 11. Qxa7 Rb6 12. Qa4 Ba6 13. a3 Bxd2+ 14. Bxd2 [center] ![]() Black to play This works precisely because 12. Qa4 gains time by attacking the c6 pawn: when Black defends with the Rook, that's essentially an extra tempo Qa4 has gained, because the pawn will need to be defended again. White can afford to play a move like 14. Bxd2 and leave b2 undefended because if Black plays ...Rxb2, White can respond with Qxc6+. In this particular case, the Bishop on a6 means ...Rxb2 would actually be a losing move for Black. Frankly, I'm liking our position in the above diagram. I really appreciate that you've read what's been posted and posted analysis of your own in support of your own opinion--that's what we need to do if we're going to be a team--and you post some interesting lines. After looking at them, though, I still think that + Show Spoiler + 11. Qxa7 11. 0-0 | ||
Malinor
Germany4719 Posts
| ||
nitdkim
1264 Posts
| ||
wuBu
United States83 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + 11. 0-0 seems promising and I like EvilNalu's line of 11. 0-0 Nxd2 12. Nxd2 Bxd2 13. Bxd2 Rxb2 14. Bc3. Black has to worry about the attack on his rook and the a and c pawns are still hanging in this line. We can regain our pawn with a more favorable position. Based on the analysis done already (thank you guys for taking the time to do so) on Qxc6+, I don't like the fact that the queens are probably going to come off the board and/or that our position may potentially be weaker than black's looking through all the potential lines (uncoordinated pieces) even though we have a pawn as compensation. The Qxa7 seems like a less forcing pawn grab and may give black more options to respond how he chooses, hence why I don't like this move. If we were to grab a pawn, might as well be the c6 pawn with check. Edit in bold. | ||
qrs
United States3637 Posts
Move 11 My best attempt at a summary of the position and the discussion that's been posted on it. If you haven't been keen to read through lines and lines of analysis, you can just read this one post and it should bring you up to speed. These are the moves that have been voted for or suggested in this thread: 11. Qxc6+ + Show Spoiler [main line] + 11...Qd7 (otherwise, either we can win another pawn with 12. Qxd5 or Black loses his ability to castle by moving his King) 12. QxQ+ (just about forced. Otherwise 12. Qc2 Ba6 puts us in a world of trouble. [for more details, see this post]) 12...BxQ (the most straightforward recapture and probably the most flexible for Black, who retains his King's ability to castle and his Bishop's to go to either side of the board.) That brings us to the following situation: ![]() White to play and if we want to hold on to our extra pawn, we already have severe problems. Most of our pieces are tied up in one way or another. If we castle, for instance, Black can then trade off the minor pieces and then play Rxb2 after all, evening the material again, without his old weakness of doubled pawns. None of our options look promising:
+ Show Spoiler [Other possible 13th moves] +
11. Qxa7 + Show Spoiler [main lines] + Here it's harder to give a single main line, as this is a relatively less forcing move. Instead, here are Black's plausible alternatives along with possible White responses:
Most of the above analysis could do with double-checking and/or deepening. Some general points: - Many of the issues we face in these lines are similar to the ones we face after 11. Qxc6, with most of our men locked up for one reason or another. A key difference is that our Queen (as well as Black's is still on the board). This matters, because the Queen is one of the few pieces that we are relatively free to move here: thus having it on the board significantly increases our options. - One recurring theme here is that in many lines, playing 0-0 allows Black to recapture the pawn by playing ...Bxd2 and Nxd2 in some order (pulling our Bishop away from c1) followed by ...Rxb2. - In some lines we may be able to gain some time by playing Qa4, extricating the Queen while threatening Black's c6 pawn. - Another move that may be useful in several lines is b3, securing our b-pawn from Black's Rook and opening a diagonal for our dark-squared Bishop. On the other hand, we need to be very careful before relinquishing control of c3. One threat to watch out for in particular after playing b3 is ...Bc3, which often wins the exchange, as in the case of the 11. Qxc6 line. - A counter-intuitive move that may be worth considering in some lines, here as in the 11. Qxc6 line is Ke2?!, relieving the pin on our d2 Knight. - The bottom line is that 11. Qxa7 is much less forcing than 11. Qxc6, and therefore it's harder to predict what it will lead to. Speaking generally, it seems to keep the Queens on the board and allow a number of possibilities on both sides. More analysis on this move would certainly be useful. 11. 0-0 + Show Spoiler [main line] + 11...B/Nxd2 12. B/Nxd2 N/Bxd2 13. N/Bxd2 Rxb2 (Here Black is the first to win the pawn, but we ought to be able to win at least one of his back.). This looks relatively safe in the short term, but it abandons our material advantage before it starts, and it looks to give Black equality at the least.If you don't care to try to hold on to a material advantage, it's worth considering, although it's worth pointing out that if you don't care to try to hold on to a material advantage, then that opens up more possibilities in the 11. Qxc6 and 11. Qxa7 lines as well. Votes 11. Qxc6+: 15 (Raysalis, 11. Qxa7: 8 (qrs, 11. 0-0: 5 (EvilNalu, timh, Malinor, wuBu, Blazinghand) | ||
qrs
United States3637 Posts
On September 22 2011 05:13 wuBu wrote: The one thing I'd take issue with in your post is the part that I quoted. There are a lot of differences between the two lines: it's silly to say something like, + Show Spoiler +11. 0-0 + Show Spoiler + If we were to grab a pawn, might as well be the c6 pawn with check. If we were to grab a pawn, might as well be the c6 pawn with check. whether we get to say the word "check" I should probably stop responding so often in this thread: it's making me look like I'm trying to get people to blindly vote for a particular move when really what I want is for them not to blindly vote for moves. I'll try to start being more reticent. | ||
BaronFel
United States155 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + Qxc6+ will force a queen trade, which I don't think we want to do at this moment. (I'm not very excited about our position and trading down will only lead to bad position end game) | ||
wuBu
United States83 Posts
On September 22 2011 05:34 qrs wrote: Show nested quote + The one thing I'd take issue with in your post is the part that I quoted. There are a lot of differences between the two lines: it's silly to say something like, + Show Spoiler +On September 22 2011 05:13 wuBu wrote: 11. 0-0 + Show Spoiler + If we were to grab a pawn, might as well be the c6 pawn with check. If we were to grab a pawn, might as well be the c6 pawn with check. whether we get to say the word "check" edit: actually, a second thing (I had overlooked this in your post before): when you say Show nested quote + What makes you think that we can win a pawn in this line? At the point where you left it, we're down a pawn. No doubt we can win a pawn ourselves, bringing the material back to even, but I don't see any reason to expect to win two pawns here. Just for example, + Show Spoiler +On September 22 2011 05:13 wuBu wrote: 11. 0-0 + Show Spoiler + 11. 0-0 seems promising and I like EvilNalu's line of 11. 0-0 Nxd2 12. Nxd2 Bxd2 13. Bxd2 Rxb2 14. Bc3. Black has to worry about the attack on his rook and the a and c pawns are still hanging in this line. Seems like a safer way to be up a pawn to me. Black can take care of his Rook and protect one of the pawns at the same time with 14...Rb6 or 14...Rb7 I should probably stop responding so often in this thread: it's making me look like I'm trying to get people to blindly vote for a particular move when really what I want is for them not to blindly vote for moves. I'll try to start being more reticent. + Show Spoiler + Regarding your edit, I just caught my mistake and I'll edit to fix it. I meant to say we will regain a pawn back with more favorable position and the queens still on the board. Sorry if I meant we will be up a pawn. I meant we will regain our pawn, I'll go edit that now. Also yes, there are many differences between the Qc6+ and Qxa7 lines. I never said that the only difference is that one is with check. What I meant is that the Qxc6+ line is more forcing as it makes black respond a certain way (because he is in check). | ||
Blazinghand
![]()
United States25550 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + Someday we'll castle, I'm sure of it. <3 | ||
qrs
United States3637 Posts
On September 22 2011 06:47 wuBu wrote: + Show Spoiler +Show nested quote + On September 22 2011 05:34 qrs wrote: On September 22 2011 05:13 wuBu wrote: The one thing I'd take issue with in your post is the part that I quoted. There are a lot of differences between the two lines: it's silly to say something like, + Show Spoiler +11. 0-0 + Show Spoiler + If we were to grab a pawn, might as well be the c6 pawn with check. If we were to grab a pawn, might as well be the c6 pawn with check. whether we get to say the word "check" edit: actually, a second thing (I had overlooked this in your post before): when you say On September 22 2011 05:13 wuBu wrote: What makes you think that we can win a pawn in this line? At the point where you left it, we're down a pawn. No doubt we can win a pawn ourselves, bringing the material back to even, but I don't see any reason to expect to win two pawns here. Just for example, + Show Spoiler +11. 0-0 + Show Spoiler + 11. 0-0 seems promising and I like EvilNalu's line of 11. 0-0 Nxd2 12. Nxd2 Bxd2 13. Bxd2 Rxb2 14. Bc3. Black has to worry about the attack on his rook and the a and c pawns are still hanging in this line. Seems like a safer way to be up a pawn to me. Black can take care of his Rook and protect one of the pawns at the same time with 14...Rb6 or 14...Rb7 I should probably stop responding so often in this thread: it's making me look like I'm trying to get people to blindly vote for a particular move when really what I want is for them not to blindly vote for moves. I'll try to start being more reticent. + Show Spoiler + Regarding your edit, I just caught my mistake and I'll edit to fix it. I meant to say we will regain a pawn back with more favorable position and the queens still on the board. Sorry if I meant we will be up a pawn. I meant we will regain our pawn, I'll go edit that now. Also yes, there are many differences between the Qc6+ and Qxa7 lines. I never said that the only difference is that one is with check. What I meant is that the Qxc6+ line is more forcing as it makes black respond a certain way (because he is in check). OK. I edited the second thing back out, now that you've explained it was a misunderstanding. About "forcing" vs. "non-forcing", I'd say that a forcing line is only good for us if it's actually a good line for us. After analyzing Qc6+, I don't think that's the case there. That's why I think summing up a key decision like this one with "might as well go with the forcing line" oversimplifies matters--we should go with the better line (as far as we can tell), whether it's forcing or has many branches. That includes 11. 0-0 as well, of course, but I see that one as more of a play-it-safe line: relatively low risk of turning out to be a blunder, but also lower potential to reward us with an advantage. | ||
wuBu
United States83 Posts
I agree with you qrs, we should try to play the best line, forcing or not. I'll admit what I said does oversimplifies matters and is not good for key moves like these. I'll be more aware of my words in the future. | ||
EvilNalu
United States91 Posts
On September 22 2011 03:54 qrs wrote: Show nested quote + Responding to people's arguments is not repetition. It's not surprising that the difference escapes you, because you don't seem to know how to muster any argument better than, "Your move is losing, if you voted for it you're a shee-eep, na na, na na na". If this was first grade, I'm sure I'd be crying in a corner, but in real life, if you want people to listen to you, you need to have something to say. Try harder.On September 22 2011 03:24 Xog wrote: Qxc6+ Just because you spent time analyzing Qxa7 doesn't make it any less losing. Stop trying to gather sheep with repetition. Like this guy: Show nested quote + I don't think 11. 0-0 is a bad move; just unambitious. And sure, it's possible that I've been wrong about 11. Qxa7. It's hard doing all the analysis oneself--a person misses things. I haven't been trying to get people to follow me into something blindly--just to take all the possibilities seriously here. I'll look at your lines.On September 22 2011 02:55 EvilNalu wrote: I really think you guys should stop voting for 11.Qxa7. + Show Spoiler + It gets very complicated, and you guys have done lots of great analysis on black's weaker responses, but the most critical lines have been the least analyzed. I think black's best responses are 11...Bg4 and 11...Rb6. 11...Bg4, qrs has proposed 12. Qa4 (we do need to extricate the queen with haste). However, after the pretty much forced sequence 12...Bxf3 13. Qxc6 (white can save this move until later in the sequence, it will just transpose) 13...Qd7 14. Qxd7 Kxd7 15. gxf3 Nxd2 16. Bxd2 Bxd2 17. Kxd2 Rxb2 black will soon at least even up material in a rook ending where whites pawn weaknesses mean we will at best be grovelling for a draw. 11...Rb6 might be even stronger but it is hard to tell as it has received almost no analysis. It seems that 12. Qa4 is practically forced here otherwise white's queen will be all but trapped after Ba6. However, after 12...Ba6 our king will be stuck in the center and after something like 13. a3 Bxd2 14. Nxd2 Qh4 it is starting to look a little dicey. I think 11. 0-0 might be pretty decent here. Sure, he can play 11...Nxd2 12. Nxd2 Bxd2 13. Bxd2 Rxd2, but after 14. Bc3 we are still threatening both a7 and c6, and our game is much less hairy than the Qxa7 or Qxc6 lines. Therefore, I vote 11. 0-0 edit 1: Re your first line: I agree with you that the sequence you give is more or less forced, so where we disagree must be in our assessment of the position at the end. Here it is, for reference: + Show Spoiler [continued] + The position after 11. Qxa7 Bg4 12. Qa4 Bxf3 13. Qxc6 Qd7 14. Qxd7 Kxd7 15. gxf3 Nxd2 16. Bxd2 Bxd2 17. Kxd2 Rxb2 18. Kc3 (protecting f2 without getting in the way of the Rooks): ![]() Black to play Here you say that "Black soon will soon at least even up material"--but how? What's your plan for him? Right now, what it looks like to me is that we've reached an endgame and we're still a pawn up. Yes, the doubled f-pawn creates a slight weakness (we have three pawn groups to protect instead of two), but overall I'd still rather be the side with the extra pawn. Maybe I'm the one who's missing something. It's certainly possible, but then show me the plan. edit 2: Re your second line: You give an interesting line. The position at the end might lead to the following + Show Spoiler [continued] + 11. Qxa7 Rb6 12. Qa4 Ba6 13. a3 Bxd2+ 14. Nxd2 Qh4 15. Nxe4 Qxe4+ 16. Be3 Qxg2 17. O-O-O ![]() Black to play I'd call this an unclear position, certainly an interesting one and worth analyzing further. Black has temporarily regained the pawn, but he still has the weakness on c6, and we have the chance to put some strong pressure on him in return with moves like Rdg1. Dicey? Maybe, but for Black at least as much as for us. 11. Qxa7 Rb6 12. Qa4 Ba6 13. a3 Bxd2+ 14. Bxd2 ![]() Black to play This works precisely because 12. Qa4 gains time by attacking the c6 pawn: when Black defends with the Rook, that's essentially an extra tempo Qa4 has gained, because the pawn will need to be defended again. White can afford to play a move like 14. Bxd2 and leave b2 undefended because if Black plays ...Rxb2, White can respond with Qxc6+. In this particular case, the Bishop on a6 means ...Rxb2 would actually be a losing move for Black. Frankly, I'm liking our position in the above diagram. I really appreciate that you've read what's been posted and posted analysis of your own in support of your own opinion--that's what we need to do if we're going to be a team--and you post some interesting lines. After looking at them, though, I still think that + Show Spoiler + 11. Qxa7 11. 0-0 + Show Spoiler + First off, in the rook ending where you asked how black evens material: [center] ![]() Black to play It's actually pretty simple - he plays 18...Ra8 and if white moves the a pawn then Rb3. For example, 18...Ra8 19. a4 Rb3+ 20 Kf4/d2/e2 Ra4. I hope you can see how awkward it is getting for white here. The a pawn is doomed and the d pawn is weak. The h pawn is also isolated and the f pawns are doubled with no prospects. In the line: 11. Qxa7 Rb6 12. Qa4 Ba6 13. a3 Bxd2+ 14. Nxd2 Qh4 15. Nxe4 Qxe4+ 16. Be3 Qxg2 17. O-O-O I think black has a major improvement: 16...Qd3 17 Qd1[forced] Rxb2. Maybe white can draw here but winning is certainly a pipe dream - note that white can't take tactical advantage of 18. Qxd3 Bxd3 19. 0-0-0 because black has 19...Rc2+ 20.Kb1 Rd2+ and draw looks likely. However, I think you are right that 14.Bxd2 may be stronger for white. That being said, 13...Be7 is a possible improvement for black. 14. Nxe4 appears to turn against white after 14...dxe4 15. Nd2 Bb5, when black will next play Qxd4. This means white's pieces will be tied up for a while. I'm not sure I can come up with any specific line where black wins but you can't analyze everything and at some point have to go by a gut feel/evaluation. And I think here black has all the play, and the extra pawn that you are so fond of is not really worth much - white's a+b pawns in a position where black has both files open will not stand forever - it's sort of like the Benko gambit where you know the pressure you get on the open files means the pawns will not amount to anything even in the long run. Anywho, it looks like neither of our moves will be chosen so I guess I'll start analyzing Qxc6 (blech). | ||
qrs
United States3637 Posts
On September 22 2011 10:43 EvilNalu wrote: Show nested quote + On September 22 2011 03:54 qrs wrote: edit 1: Re your first line: I agree with you that the sequence you give is more or less forced, so where we disagree must be in our assessment of the position at the end. Here it is, for reference: + Show Spoiler [continued] + The position after 11. Qxa7 Bg4 12. Qa4 Bxf3 13. Qxc6 Qd7 14. Qxd7 Kxd7 15. gxf3 Nxd2 16. Bxd2 Bxd2 17. Kxd2 Rxb2 18. Kc3 (protecting f2 without getting in the way of the Rooks): ![]() Black to play Here you say that "Black soon will soon at least even up material"--but how? What's your plan for him? Right now, what it looks like to me is that we've reached an endgame and we're still a pawn up. Yes, the doubled f-pawn creates a slight weakness (we have three pawn groups to protect instead of two), but overall I'd still rather be the side with the extra pawn. Maybe I'm the one who's missing something. It's certainly possible, but then show me the plan. edit 2: Re your second line: You give an interesting line. The position at the end might lead to the following + Show Spoiler [continued] + 11. Qxa7 Rb6 12. Qa4 Ba6 13. a3 Bxd2+ 14. Nxd2 Qh4 15. Nxe4 Qxe4+ 16. Be3 Qxg2 17. O-O-O ![]() Black to play I'd call this an unclear position, certainly an interesting one and worth analyzing further. Black has temporarily regained the pawn, but he still has the weakness on c6, and we have the chance to put some strong pressure on him in return with moves like Rdg1. Dicey? Maybe, but for Black at least as much as for us. 11. Qxa7 Rb6 12. Qa4 Ba6 13. a3 Bxd2+ 14. Bxd2 ![]() Black to play This works precisely because 12. Qa4 gains time by attacking the c6 pawn: when Black defends with the Rook, that's essentially an extra tempo Qa4 has gained, because the pawn will need to be defended again. White can afford to play a move like 14. Bxd2 and leave b2 undefended because if Black plays ...Rxb2, White can respond with Qxc6+. In this particular case, the Bishop on a6 means ...Rxb2 would actually be a losing move for Black. Frankly, I'm liking our position in the above diagram. I really appreciate that you've read what's been posted and posted analysis of your own in support of your own opinion--that's what we need to do if we're going to be a team--and you post some interesting lines. After looking at them, though, I still think that + Show Spoiler + 11. Qxa7 11. 0-0 First off, in the rook ending where you asked how black evens material: [center] ![]() Black to play It's actually pretty simple - he plays 18...Ra8 and if white moves the a pawn then Rb3. For example, 18...Ra8 19. a4 Rb3+ 20 Kf4/d2/e2 Ra4. I hope you can see how awkward it is getting for white here. The a pawn is doomed and the d pawn is weak. The h pawn is also isolated and the f pawns are doubled with no prospects. You're right. I shouldn't have missed that. For now I'm going to call this an unclear endgame--can't our advanced pawns be an advantage on our side?--but definitely not one where we're clearly ahead, and unless I can find an improvement, you do seem to have shown that we can't keep the pawn even after 11. Qxa7. I'll have to look into this further. In the line: 11. Qxa7 Rb6 12. Qa4 Ba6 13. a3 Bxd2+ 14. Nxd2 Qh4 15. Nxe4 Qxe4+ 16. Be3 Qxg2 17. O-O-O I think black has a major improvement: 16...Qd3 17 Qd1[forced] Rxb2. Maybe white can draw here but winning is certainly a pipe dream - note that white can't take tactical advantage of 18. Qxd3 Bxd3 19. 0-0-0 because black has 19...Rc2+ 20.Kb1 Rd2+ and draw looks likely. I missed that as well. However, as you say, 14. Bxd2 may obviate this particular line.However, I think you are right that 14.Bxd2 may be stronger for white. Here I think my move would be the more or less thematic 14. Qc2, adding to our defense in general and making Nxe4 a threat in particular. At a glance, I like the look of White here.That being said, 13...Be7 is a possible improvement for black. 14. Nxe4 appears to turn against white after 14...dxe4 15. Nd2 Bb5, when black will next play Qxd4. This means white's pieces will be tied up for a while. I'm not sure I can come up with any specific line where black wins but you can't analyze everything and at some point have to go by a gut feel/evaluation. And I think here black has all the play, and the extra pawn that you are so fond of is not really worth much - white's a+b pawns in a position where black has both files open will not stand forever - it's sort of like the Benko gambit where you know the pressure you get on the open files means the pawns will not amount to anything even in the long run. Anywho, it looks like neither of our moves will be chosen so I guess I'll start analyzing Qxc6 (blech). Well, I spent quite a bit of time on that, so maybe my analysis can give you a leg up. There's still time for our moves to catch up, though--don't you think?--although I admit I've been a bit disappointed at how many people vote with just a quick glance at the position, without paying much attention to the analysis. You're one of the few people who actually addressed it. I wonder where jdseemoreglass is these days...Meanwhile, you've given me what to think about as far as 11. Qxa7 goes. At the moment, I'm still OK with how we're looking in your ...Rb6 line, but the ...Bg4 line clearly needs a little more work. | ||
qrs
United States3637 Posts
On September 22 2011 10:43 EvilNalu wrote: OK, I've looked at it, and I think you're right. This puts paid to my plan for dealing with + Show Spoiler +Show nested quote + On September 22 2011 03:54 qrs wrote: edit 1: Re your first line: I agree with you that the sequence you give is more or less forced, so where we disagree must be in our assessment of the position at the end. Here it is, for reference: + Show Spoiler [continued] + The position after 11. Qxa7 Bg4 12. Qa4 Bxf3 13. Qxc6 Qd7 14. Qxd7 Kxd7 15. gxf3 Nxd2 16. Bxd2 Bxd2 17. Kxd2 Rxb2 18. Kc3 (protecting f2 without getting in the way of the Rooks): ![]() Black to play Here you say that "Black soon will soon at least even up material"--but how? What's your plan for him? Right now, what it looks like to me is that we've reached an endgame and we're still a pawn up. Yes, the doubled f-pawn creates a slight weakness (we have three pawn groups to protect instead of two), but overall I'd still rather be the side with the extra pawn. Maybe I'm the one who's missing something. It's certainly possible, but then show me the plan. First off, in the rook ending where you asked how black evens material: ![]() Black to play It's actually pretty simple - he plays 18...Ra8 and if white moves the a pawn then Rb3. For example, 18...Ra8 19. a4 Rb3+ 20 Kf4/d2/e2 Ra4. I hope you can see how awkward it is getting for white here. The a pawn is doomed and the d pawn is weak. The h pawn is also isolated and the f pawns are doubled with no prospects. 11. Qxa7 Bg4 + Show Spoiler [new plan] + 11. Qxa7 Bg4 12. 0-0 Of course, this is the nice safe consolidating move that we've been dying to play all along--and that you're voting for--but so long as we were hoping to keep our pawn, we've been unable to play it--or so we'd assumed. Take a closer look, though: 12...B/Nxd2 13. Nxd2 N/Bxd2 14. Bxd2 Rxb2: this is the series of moves that we've been afraid of (unless we're willing to give back the pawn). However, 15. Ba5 bears down on c7, and unless I'm mistaken, we'll just win the pawn right back--and this time with what looks like a much more solid position. Position after 15. Ba5 ![]() Black to play This looks really nice for us, in my opinion. What do you think? | ||
LaXerCannon
Canada558 Posts
| ||
EvilNalu
United States91 Posts
On September 22 2011 13:12 qrs wrote: Show nested quote + OK, I've looked at it, and I think you're right. This puts paid to my plan for dealing with + Show Spoiler +On September 22 2011 10:43 EvilNalu wrote: On September 22 2011 03:54 qrs wrote: edit 1: Re your first line: I agree with you that the sequence you give is more or less forced, so where we disagree must be in our assessment of the position at the end. Here it is, for reference: + Show Spoiler [continued] + The position after 11. Qxa7 Bg4 12. Qa4 Bxf3 13. Qxc6 Qd7 14. Qxd7 Kxd7 15. gxf3 Nxd2 16. Bxd2 Bxd2 17. Kxd2 Rxb2 18. Kc3 (protecting f2 without getting in the way of the Rooks): ![]() Black to play Here you say that "Black soon will soon at least even up material"--but how? What's your plan for him? Right now, what it looks like to me is that we've reached an endgame and we're still a pawn up. Yes, the doubled f-pawn creates a slight weakness (we have three pawn groups to protect instead of two), but overall I'd still rather be the side with the extra pawn. Maybe I'm the one who's missing something. It's certainly possible, but then show me the plan. First off, in the rook ending where you asked how black evens material: ![]() Black to play It's actually pretty simple - he plays 18...Ra8 and if white moves the a pawn then Rb3. For example, 18...Ra8 19. a4 Rb3+ 20 Kf4/d2/e2 Ra4. I hope you can see how awkward it is getting for white here. The a pawn is doomed and the d pawn is weak. The h pawn is also isolated and the f pawns are doubled with no prospects. 11. Qxa7 Bg4 + Show Spoiler [new plan] + 11. Qxa7 Bg4 12. 0-0 Of course, this is the nice safe consolidating move that we've been dying to play all along--and that you're voting for--but so long as we were hoping to keep our pawn, we've been unable to play it--or so we'd assumed. Take a closer look, though: 12...B/Nxd2 13. Nxd2 N/Bxd2 14. Bxd2 Rxb2: this is the series of moves that we've been afraid of (unless we're willing to give back the pawn). However, 15. Ba5 bears down on c7, and unless I'm mistaken, we'll just win the pawn right back--and this time with what looks like a much more solid position. Position after 15. Ba5 ![]() Black to play This looks really nice for us, in my opinion. What do you think? + Show Spoiler + Yeah, I had analyzed all these lines (sorry for holding back, too much work to type them all out, especially when they likely will never be played anyway) and settled on 12.0-0 as white's best move. However, I think black can simply reply 12...0-0 and he has a great game. I think 13. Nxe4 turns out well for black after 13...dxe4 14. Nd2 Ra8 15. Qb7 Qxd4, so white has to play something like 13. Qa4 and black can play c5, removing his doubled pawns and securing a potentially troublesome passed d pawn (and white's e pawn may be in danger in some lines). You probably still think white is good here (extra pawn) but I really think that because of the a+b pawns combined with open files for black, the extra pawn does not confer any advantage in the long run. | ||
Bill Murray
United States9292 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + When we retreat, we will be able to put pressure on his forward knight, which will also carry forward once we clear that with what I want to do after we do Qc2. I want to do Nxe4 after. Wouldn't that win us another pawn? It looks like it would from my perspective. Once we clear that up, we will have a good angle on the h-pawn with our Queen. | ||
qrs
United States3637 Posts
On September 22 2011 14:17 Bill Murray wrote: + Show Spoiler +Qxc6+ + Show Spoiler + When we retreat, we will be able to put pressure on his forward knight, which will also carry forward once we clear that with what I want to do after we do Qc2. I want to do Nxe4 after. Wouldn't that win us another pawn? It looks like it would from my perspective. Once we clear that up, we will have a good angle on the h-pawn with our Queen. After 11. Qxc6 Qd7, 12. Qc2 is very, very problematic. My summary a few posts up links to a post that talks about it. Basically, Black plays 12...Ba6 locking us down completely and threatening the devastating 13...Qb5, among other things. We can't play Nxe4 because our Knight is pinned, and after 12...Ba6, it will stay that way forever. | ||
hype[NZ]
Japan412 Posts
On September 22 2011 14:17 Bill Murray wrote: Qxc6+ + Show Spoiler + When we retreat, we will be able to put pressure on his forward knight, which will also carry forward once we clear that with what I want to do after we do Qc2. I want to do Nxe4 after. Wouldn't that win us another pawn? It looks like it would from my perspective. Once we clear that up, we will have a good angle on the h-pawn with our Queen. + Show Spoiler + I'm not at a chessboard but I had a look at this last night. After 11.Qxc6 Qd7 12.Qc2? then black can play 12...Ba6! and we have a whole bunch of problems. One possible continuation could be 13.a3 Qb5! (threatening mate in 1) 14.Qd1 and black has so much pressure against our king that it is probably winning and we are in a position where we have no good moves. I think that if we play 11.Qxc6 Qd7 then 12.Qxd7 is pretty much forced edit: qrs is onto it double edit: woo 365 posts, I've been a member of TL for exactly 3 years lol | ||
| ||
![]() StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Stormgate Dota 2 Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Heroes of the Storm Other Games summit1g8707 FrodaN1873 Dendi1587 JuggernautJason1510 Beastyqt944 shahzam727 elazer486 Pyrionflax194 ViBE94 Trikslyr83 QueenE58 Skadoodle45 Organizations StarCraft 2 Other Games StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War
StarCraft 2 • Hupsaiya StarCraft: Brood War![]() • StrangeGG ![]() • musti20045 ![]() • davetesta26 • LaughNgamezSOOP • sooper7s • AfreecaTV YouTube • Migwel ![]() • intothetv ![]() • Laughngamez YouTube • Kozan • IndyKCrew ![]() Dota 2 League of Legends Other Games |
Replay Cast
SOOP
SKillous vs Spirit
Tenacious Turtle Tussle
PiG Sty Festival
Serral vs TriGGeR
Cure vs SHIN
The PondCast
Replay Cast
PiG Sty Festival
Clem vs Bunny
Solar vs Zoun
Replay Cast
Korean StarCraft League
PiG Sty Festival
herO vs Rogue
ByuN vs SKillous
[ Show More ] SC Evo Complete
[BSL 2025] Weekly
PiG Sty Festival
MaxPax vs Classic
Dark vs Maru
Sparkling Tuna Cup
|
|