• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 13:16
CET 19:16
KST 03:16
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Clem wins HomeStory Cup 285HomeStory Cup 28 - Info & Preview13Rongyi Cup S3 - Preview & Info3herO wins SC2 All-Star Invitational14SC2 All-Star Invitational: Tournament Preview5
Community News
Weekly Cups (Jan 26-Feb 1): herO, Clem, ByuN, Classic win2RSL Season 4 announced for March-April7Weekly Cups (Jan 19-25): Bunny, Trigger, MaxPax win3Weekly Cups (Jan 12-18): herO, MaxPax, Solar win0BSL Season 2025 - Full Overview and Conclusion8
StarCraft 2
General
Clem wins HomeStory Cup 28 HomeStory Cup 28 - Info & Preview Stellar Fest "01" Jersey Charity Auction StarCraft 2 Not at the Esports World Cup 2026 Weekly Cups (Jan 26-Feb 1): herO, Clem, ByuN, Classic win
Tourneys
HomeStory Cup 28 $5,000 WardiTV Winter Championship 2026 RSL Season 4 announced for March-April PIG STY FESTIVAL 7.0! (19 Feb - 1 Mar) StarCraft Evolution League (SC Evo Biweekly)
Strategy
Custom Maps
[A] Starcraft Sound Mod
External Content
Mutation # 511 Temple of Rebirth The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 510 Safety Violation Mutation # 509 Doomsday Report
Brood War
General
StarCraft player reflex TE scores [ASL21] Potential Map Candidates Can someone share very abbreviated BW cliffnotes? 2024 BoxeR's birthday message Liquipedia.net NEEDS editors for Brood War
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues Escore Tournament StarCraft Season 1 Small VOD Thread 2.0 KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 1
Strategy
Zealot bombing is no longer popular? Simple Questions, Simple Answers Current Meta Soma's 9 hatch build from ASL Game 2
Other Games
General Games
Diablo 2 thread Battle Aces/David Kim RTS Megathread EVE Corporation Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread YouTube Thread The Games Industry And ATVI Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine
Fan Clubs
The herO Fan Club! The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Quickbooks Payroll Service Official Guide Quickbooks Customer Service Official Guide
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Play, Watch, Drink: Esports …
TrAiDoS
My 2025 Magic: The Gathering…
DARKING
Life Update and thoughts.
FuDDx
How do archons sleep?
8882
James Bond movies ranking - pa…
Topin
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1431 users

Closed Casket Mafia - Page 64

Forum Index > TL Mafia
Post a Reply
Prev 1 62 63 64 65 66 73 Next
sandroba
Profile Joined April 2006
Canada4998 Posts
July 10 2011 11:59 GMT
#1261
I'm dissapointed that no one proved I'm scum and lynched me out of the blue =(
Ace
Profile Blog Joined October 2002
United States16096 Posts
July 10 2011 13:44 GMT
#1262
Everyone looked more "pro-town" than you did I guess. That being said you'd always end up being the first to be lynched in that scenario.
Math me up, scumboi. - Acrofales
Fishball
Profile Joined December 2005
Canada4788 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-07-10 14:44:16
July 10 2011 13:59 GMT
#1263
On July 10 2011 19:56 Radfield wrote:
Show nested quote +
Looking back, it's interesting to notice that the biggest supporters of "Lynch-the-DT-claimer-no-matter-what" plan, were GM, Radfield, and RoL, all whom are Mafia.


Actually, I spent several posts arguing that the dt should NOT be lynched first, and maybe not lynched at all. I don't think I actually posted after your claim as I went MIA.


I know you didn't post much after the first few days. I was mainly talking about the pre-Night 0 discussion. My comment on you was mainly based on this quote:

On June 25 2011 17:58 Radfield wrote:
Fully agree with GMarshal. The easiest way to deal with dt claims is simply to lynch both parties as otherwise there is no accountability for the dt. A one for one trade is a good trade for town, but frankly this means that dts should not be claiming their results in thread unless absolutely necessary, and should only do so if they feel trading their life for the mafia players life is worth it. Preferably they simply build a good case and push for a lynch.


From this post:
+ Show Spoiler +
On June 25 2011 17:58 Radfield wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +
On June 25 2011 13:14 GMarshal wrote:

Well, I'm bored, so its time for me to set out in my quest to spark discussion. ^_^

First of all, we need to establish two policies now, before they come back to bite us in the ass.

1.) We disbelieve all roleclaims. The game is no flip, so any claims are completely unconformable! I for one will ignore all claims. Since we can't prove them, then they have no bearing, ignore *all* claims.

2.) Since there is no flip there is no way to confirm dts. So we hang any dt who claims to have found mafia and then we lynch their claimed check. No questions asked, this is a good trade for the town 1:1 and a terrible trade for mafia. With this policy we keep the mafia from fake claiming to fuck with us.

I also have a lynch set out for day 1. I propose we lynch or shoot Chezinu. Now I <3 chez, he is a hilarious guy, but his post provide absolutely no bearing on his alignment! He plays super troll/scummy every game for fun, we have no way to analyze him, and I don't want to have to deal with him lategame and try to essentially guess his alignment. If we take him out early he won't be a problem later. Alternatively he could have a change of heart and post normally, but I don't see that happening.

Kurumi, a message to you. If you play the way you played XL I will personally make sure you die, post good, decent posts that are the proper length, with analysis, or we'll have no choice but to kill you. Random FoS' are not acceptable, trolling and random tunneling is not acceptable, I won't stand for it.

Also this is a majority lynch game. This means we need to agree on who to hang. To ensure activity I would like to have two or three people to form a voting platform with me so we can properly pressure people, Ace made an excellent point in PYP:I post game write up, which was that votes without backing give no pressure, hence we need to bring people up to at least L-3 to force activity and/or panic out of them. Anyone up to joining my platform for pressuring inactives/scum?

Come on people, more time to discuss is a benefit, we should be taking advantage of these hours to figure out what we are doing going into night 0/day 1.

So thoughts, plans, burning desires?

~The Reaper



I've been thinking about the exact same things for the last two days

Anyways, I agree with parts of your post, and disagree with others. First, I agree with a day one policy lynch of sorts, but certainly not a policy lynch of Chez, nor any other specific player. Chez is very good at this game(pegged my BP role last game based off a single day of posting) and it seems he's not playing brown this game anyways

Typically one's goal for a Day 1 Lynch is not necessarily to find scum, but rather to get everyone's opinion and vote down on paper. However, the no-flip aspect of the game means mafia need not fear pushing a green townie to their death, as we will not be able to ascertain alignment anyways, hence mafia will likely be able to blend into a lynch much easier than normal. Second, the Majority lynch aspect makes pulling off a successful lynch much more difficult than normal, and can very likely lead to a no-lynch on Day 1.

For these reasons I think we should consider an inactivity/lurker lynch for Day 1. However, the real reason we need to consider a Day 1 lurker lynch is this: The only way we can scum hunt in this game is through post-analysis, as it will be next to impossible to do vote analysis, and we cannot rely on investigative results at all(as Gmarshal pointed out). We need to eliminate lurkers and keep the active players around, as that allows us to effectively winnow through posts and find the mafia. Obviously this is not a policy to be carried past Day 1, as I feel an effective case(read: a majority case) will be able to be presented by Day 2. But for now, getting rid of non-posters is a good use of our lynch. In the event that all 16 players are active and contributing, a no-lynch is a viable option.

Keep in mind that with a KP of only 1, we have a ton of time in this game, and can afford either a no-lynch or a lurker lynch on Day 1.

Pro's:
* Clears out lurkers, allowing high-post players to stay around, which in turn gives more content to work with
* Forces mafia to be active in order to stay alive

Con's
* Gives mafia an even easier place to hide due to the semi-policy lynch

Either way, I think we all need to realize that our only two likely options on Day 1 are No-lynch or Lurker-lynch, as getting a majority to vote for an active poster will be unlikely. It will be even more unlikely to lynch an active mafia poster, as there will be three other players defending and redirecting. Which means if we do actually lynch an active poster Day 1, it will almost surely be an active townie.


Some important points on voting: There can be absolutely no throwing around of random votes, and no adding on of a ton of suspects. We need our Day cycles to be clear and focused, with only several candidates up for discussion. If no consensus can be reached on those few targets, then a no-lynch is probably ok. Remember, we have lots of time and no-flip, so lynching someone without a good case is extremely weak in this set-up.

Anyone who flops a vote down on someone and then disappears for the rest of the cycle should be vig-juice. Everyone NEEDS to be committed to pushing their target and/or being willing to switch their vote as new info comes in. In addition, everyone should be committing to at least attempt to be around for the deadline in case addition votes are needed. Majority voting takes wayyy more effort than a standard leader-gets-lynched voting set-up.

Regarding Claims:

Fully agree with GMarshal. The easiest way to deal with dt claims is simply to lynch both parties as otherwise there is no accountability for the dt. A one for one trade is a good trade for town, but frankly this means that dts should not be claiming their results in thread unless absolutely necessary, and should only do so if they feel trading their life for the mafia players life is worth it. Preferably they simply build a good case and push for a lynch.

This basically goes for all town investigative roles(or other) that they should not be claiming results in thread. Even if you are a list-check dt(unlikely), don't bother claiming in thread, since there is no way to verify that you are legit. The chances of bogus mafia claims are far higher in this setup, as they cant be disproven through a simple lynch.

Vigs can probably feel free to claim their kill, but only if there are two kills(or more) on the board. LIkewise vets and medic-recipients can claim their hits, but again only if there is a kill missing. This set-up encourages mafia interferance like crazy, so anything we can do to minimize it is a must.

Regarding Roles:

Coroner: It's likely we have some kind of coroner role in the game(reveals the flip), but we can't rely on it. In the event that we do however, it's extremely important for the coroner to save his flip for when a dt or some other comfirmable scenario presents itself. For instance, if a dt claims Qatol is red, and we lynch Qatol, the coroner should use his ability to show that Qatol was indeed red so that we can ascertain the alignment of the dt. A coroner saving his power also limits the ability of mafia to fake claim, as their fake claims can be outted.

There is a question in my mind that it may make sense for the coroner(s) to roleclaim immediately, but I haven't thought enough about it. Feel free to weigh in on it though.

Vigilante: Please please please vigs target inactives. We need this game to be as active as possible, so it is essential that you use your hits to kill off non-posting players. The only other possible time to shoot would be to clear up claims, but that is probably less effective than lynching. Remember, we have tons of time this game, and only 1 player dies per night, so you can always wait another night to gather more info before shooting. Keep in mind that shooting brings us closer to LYLO, and that you don't even get the results of your shot(the most satisfying part)

The rest of the roles don't really matter, and with only 1 KP we probably don't have alot of vets or medics anyways.

As a bonus tidbit of info: Assuming two deaths per cycle(One Lynch, One night kill, no other KP), LYLO is day 4. If we decide to no-lynch today, that pushes LYLO back to Day 5.


If you had changed your stance after that, I must confess I had not read it or missed it. I literally ignored most of the "DT lynch" discussions after glancing through a couple pages.
靈魂交響曲
Palmar
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Iceland22633 Posts
July 10 2011 14:07 GMT
#1264
On July 10 2011 20:59 sandroba wrote:
I'm dissapointed that no one proved I'm scum and lynched me out of the blue =(


As I said, I couldn't quite put my finger on it, so there was not pbp analysis. I just _knew_ you were scum.
Computer says mafia
Radfield
Profile Joined September 2009
Canada2720 Posts
July 10 2011 15:20 GMT
#1265
On July 10 2011 22:59 Fishball wrote:
If you had changed your stance after that, I must confess I had not read it or missed it. I literally ignored most of the "DT lynch" discussions after glancing through a couple pages.



As you should have
Fishball
Profile Joined December 2005
Canada4788 Posts
July 10 2011 15:26 GMT
#1266
On July 11 2011 00:20 Radfield wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 10 2011 22:59 Fishball wrote:
If you had changed your stance after that, I must confess I had not read it or missed it. I literally ignored most of the "DT lynch" discussions after glancing through a couple pages.



As you should have


Fixed. *cough*

Looking back, it's interesting to notice that the biggest supporters of "Lynch-the-DT-claimer-no-matter-what" plan, were GM, Radfield (although he changed his stance later), and RoL, all whom are Mafia.

靈魂交響曲
Qatol
Profile Blog Joined November 2006
United States3165 Posts
July 10 2011 16:37 GMT
#1267
On July 11 2011 00:26 Fishball wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 11 2011 00:20 Radfield wrote:
On July 10 2011 22:59 Fishball wrote:
If you had changed your stance after that, I must confess I had not read it or missed it. I literally ignored most of the "DT lynch" discussions after glancing through a couple pages.



As you should have


Fixed. *cough*

Show nested quote +
Looking back, it's interesting to notice that the biggest supporters of "Lynch-the-DT-claimer-no-matter-what" plan, were GM, Radfield (although he changed his stance later), and RoL, all whom are Mafia.


Side note - Lynch the DT no matter what is a terrible policy:

If the claim happens early in the game (the first few cycles), the correct move is to just ignore the DT claimant and their target altogether at least for the moment (do not medic protect, do not lynch). Let the mafia sort things out. If they decide not to hit the DT, then the DT can post check results every day and all of it can be verified later. If the mafia shoots the DT, then you kill the mafia. If the DT was a fakeclaim, the DT is forced to keep producing fake results and things will snowball pretty quickly. It isn't worth it to potentially lynch a DT that early in the game.

If the claim happens later in the game, you have a 50/50 scum situation and you do behavioral analysis on the 2 players to figure out which is scum and which is not. Also you can consider things like the skill levels/claimed roles of the 2 players to see if it might be a mafia play to try and trade one of their members for a strong townie.

Lynching one of them no matter what is never the correct move.
Uff Da
BloodyC0bbler
Profile Blog Joined September 2004
Canada7876 Posts
July 10 2011 20:42 GMT
#1268
On July 10 2011 10:58 citi.zen wrote:
To shift topics a bit. From our vantage point, me and Sandroba could not figure out why BC would lie, since we knew he was town. So I was pretty sure at one point that the whole thing was a misunderstanding of this exchange:

Show nested quote +
"I used my one bullet to shoot GMarshal." The response came back "true".


The tested statement really has two parts: one was true; one not so much, but could be interpreted as such, ex - one bullet that night. At any rate if Ace only provided a single true/false statement he may well have referred to the shooting of GM.

I think BC could and should have made the case for his innocence, especially with FB confirming him as town.

As I said in my initial post: don't freeze based on what you know happened (in this case, that you lied about the role). Start with the premise that you are clean, then look for ways to explain the world to fit that premise.

Edit: as a red, I was terrified at the prospect BC was telling the truth. You could simply ask for everyone to write "I am not red" in a post and essentially you'd have another DT. Talk about taunting the mafia! BC made an interesting claim and clearly his reads of Caller and FB as town were correct. He just got... overly fancy. Playing "straight" and backing up FB and Caller in the thread would have created a very hard to stop force.



My reasoning for it was this. I was 100% sure on fishball, and I was fairly certain caller was a vig or if not a third party role. What I had wanted to happen was the kind of cluster fuck that did in turn happen. However, when I then told caller "i could just be being an asshole" I was seriously hoping that he would realize I had in fact lied and was using the entire claim as cover. I wanted to set up a situation that 2-3 of the group of us would survive the night. In the case two of us survived (would have been most likely myself or caller) my "claim" would have become legit in terms of thread. I was then going to use this to get radfield lynched, and then let mafia waste a shot on a "confirmed blue". It was a huge gamble and played entirely on Callers ability to realize what I was doing. I talked to caller after I died and he basically said "i thought you were lying but I know you as red pull off insanely ballsy shit so couldn't take the chance" and shot me for that reason primarily.

Had what I wanted to happen however worked out, last few reds would have been steamrolled.
#3 Member of the Chill Fanclub / Rhaegar fought nobly. Rhaegar fought valiantly. Rhaegar fought honorably. And Rhaeger died. --Ser Jorah Mormont TL MAFIA FORUM http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/index.php?show_part=31 go go !
citi.zen
Profile Joined April 2009
2509 Posts
July 10 2011 20:49 GMT
#1269
Like I said, good reads but the gamble didn't seem necessary.

You bring up another interesting point that was lost on most players: there was no way Caller would be red at that point in the game. At most he could be 3rd party, but not red. We knew it and were thrilled to get him lynched in short order, before anybody asked questions (anybody other than Chez, that is).
Aut viam inveniam, aut faciam.
BloodyC0bbler
Profile Blog Joined September 2004
Canada7876 Posts
July 10 2011 21:07 GMT
#1270
On July 11 2011 05:49 citi.zen wrote:
Like I said, good reads but the gamble didn't seem necessary.

You bring up another interesting point that was lost on most players: there was no way Caller would be red at that point in the game. At most he could be 3rd party, but not red. We knew it and were thrilled to get him lynched in short order, before anybody asked questions (anybody other than Chez, that is).



The game maybe wasn't necessary, but It was a hope to set myself up as a target for a mafia hit before caller. Also, as horrible as it sounds, almost everyone was trolling at the point I fake claimed and honestly the only way to really get discussion going I figured was to do something insanely outlandish.
#3 Member of the Chill Fanclub / Rhaegar fought nobly. Rhaegar fought valiantly. Rhaegar fought honorably. And Rhaeger died. --Ser Jorah Mormont TL MAFIA FORUM http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/index.php?show_part=31 go go !
Amber[LighT]
Profile Blog Joined June 2005
United States5078 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-07-10 21:09:51
July 10 2011 21:09 GMT
#1271
On July 11 2011 06:07 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 11 2011 05:49 citi.zen wrote:
Like I said, good reads but the gamble didn't seem necessary.

You bring up another interesting point that was lost on most players: there was no way Caller would be red at that point in the game. At most he could be 3rd party, but not red. We knew it and were thrilled to get him lynched in short order, before anybody asked questions (anybody other than Chez, that is).



The game maybe wasn't necessary, but It was a hope to set myself up as a target for a mafia hit before caller. Also, as horrible as it sounds, almost everyone was trolling at the point I fake claimed and honestly the only way to really get discussion going I figured was to do something insanely outlandish.


And it worked, oddly enough.

Though I don't think anyone actually believed Caller to be scum. I couldn't see either of you actually being scum. It just looked like troll vs troll and a lucky guess.
"We have unfinished business, I and he."
BloodyC0bbler
Profile Blog Joined September 2004
Canada7876 Posts
July 10 2011 21:12 GMT
#1272
I do regret not posting my suspicions of radfield/citizen or sandroba though =(

I skyped sand almost the moment I died and called him out lol. I just honestly thought caller had caught on to my scheme and was onboard with it.
#3 Member of the Chill Fanclub / Rhaegar fought nobly. Rhaegar fought valiantly. Rhaegar fought honorably. And Rhaeger died. --Ser Jorah Mormont TL MAFIA FORUM http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/index.php?show_part=31 go go !
citi.zen
Profile Joined April 2009
2509 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-07-10 21:28:02
July 10 2011 21:25 GMT
#1273
On July 11 2011 06:09 Amber[LighT] wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 11 2011 06:07 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
On July 11 2011 05:49 citi.zen wrote:
Like I said, good reads but the gamble didn't seem necessary.

You bring up another interesting point that was lost on most players: there was no way Caller would be red at that point in the game. At most he could be 3rd party, but not red. We knew it and were thrilled to get him lynched in short order, before anybody asked questions (anybody other than Chez, that is).



The game maybe wasn't necessary, but It was a hope to set myself up as a target for a mafia hit before caller. Also, as horrible as it sounds, almost everyone was trolling at the point I fake claimed and honestly the only way to really get discussion going I figured was to do something insanely outlandish.


And it worked, oddly enough.

Though I don't think anyone actually believed Caller to be scum. I couldn't see either of you actually being scum. It just looked like troll vs troll and a lucky guess.

No, it didn't work. I also didn't see trolling. FB wasn't doing it, rol was dead, Chez was on point. Us two mafia were discrete, if anything. The entire game took under 50 pages - that's remarkable for 18 people. Look at waw or other games for a comparison. This is why I thought "fundamentals" were all that was needed at that point in my view.

And, if you go back, plenty of people did think Caller was red at the time. That vote was almost unanimous - see Chez's posts after the lynch.
Aut viam inveniam, aut faciam.
Caller
Profile Blog Joined September 2007
Poland8075 Posts
July 10 2011 22:10 GMT
#1274
<-- night 0 pro
<-- night 2 fail

i see a correlation
Watch me fail at Paradox: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=397564
GreYMisT
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
United States6736 Posts
September 05 2013 00:17 GMT
#1275
Aperture Mafia 2: Episode 2 Day 3

Fate: 0

[image loading]



randombum, Cephiro, Mr. Cheesecake, HiroPro, WaveofShadow, Onegu, and MrZentor have all been transported to the past!

They will all be playing in Closed Casket Mafia! Parallel mafia rules now apply for this day. This means: No quoting someone from another thread and no posting in a thread that is not yours. In addition, All mechanics of Closed Casket mafia come into effect for that world. This means there will be no flips for that day. At the conclusion of Day 3, all worlds will reunite in this thread for Night 3 and onwards.





Hassybaby has left the game


Oatsmaster has died!


Kitaman27 has died!


strongandbig has died!


Koshi has died!


VayneAuthority has died!





The Shattered Bell was rung

An Aperture Science Crusher was invented




with 7 alive in this game, it takes 4 to lynch! the day will end in
"life of lively to live to life of full life thx to shield battery" / Join TL Mafia! http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/index.php?show_part=31
WaveofShadow
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Canada31495 Posts
September 05 2013 00:23 GMT
#1276
Ok wait so we have to post in here if we were transported to the past?
twitch.tv/waveofshadow ||| Winner of AHGL's So You Think You Can Cast! ||| Juicy Dad for lyfe ||| 'idk i get a kick out of stupid things' - Jarms Yarng
HiroPro
Profile Joined March 2012
United States2624 Posts
September 05 2013 00:24 GMT
#1277
but how am I supposed to kill obviousone when im in here
Crossfire99
Profile Joined March 2011
United States1529 Posts
September 05 2013 00:25 GMT
#1278
On September 05 2013 09:23 WaveofShadow wrote:
Ok wait so we have to post in here if we were transported to the past?

Correct. All players transported to the past must post here. You cannot post in the other thread or quote anyone from it.
HiroPro
Profile Joined March 2012
United States2624 Posts
September 05 2013 00:25 GMT
#1279
oh well i'll settle for killing you.

##Vote randombum

Also, where do I vote? In this thread or in the aperture mafia voting thread?
GreYMisT
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
United States6736 Posts
September 05 2013 00:26 GMT
#1280
Vote in this thread
"life of lively to live to life of full life thx to shield battery" / Join TL Mafia! http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/index.php?show_part=31
Prev 1 62 63 64 65 66 73 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Big Brain Bouts
17:00
#105
goblin vs Kelazhur
TriGGeR vs Krystianer
RotterdaM904
TKL 231
IndyStarCraft 150
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
RotterdaM 904
TKL 231
IndyStarCraft 150
UpATreeSC 110
BRAT_OK 89
CosmosSc2 59
MindelVK 29
StarCraft: Brood War
Sea 3407
Rain 1524
Shuttle 314
Hyuk 151
Mong 81
Hyun 48
Snow 33
Free 26
JYJ 25
Yoon 25
[ Show more ]
yabsab 21
Rock 17
IntoTheRainbow 12
ivOry 10
Dota 2
qojqva2351
syndereN395
Fuzer 75
League of Legends
C9.Mang088
Counter-Strike
fl0m3367
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King103
Other Games
Grubby2820
FrodaN2114
singsing1532
hiko784
Beastyqt589
ToD163
crisheroes160
ArmadaUGS146
Liquid`Hasu144
Harstem144
KnowMe129
Trikslyr42
rubinoeu16
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick2039
BasetradeTV139
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 17 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• poizon28 45
• iHatsuTV 7
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• Migwel
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
StarCraft: Brood War
• Michael_bg 10
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
League of Legends
• TFBlade1817
• Stunt499
• imaqtpie482
• Shiphtur471
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
5h 45m
RongYI Cup
16h 45m
herO vs Maru
Replay Cast
1d 5h
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
1d 17h
Replay Cast
2 days
Wardi Open
2 days
Monday Night Weeklies
2 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
The PondCast
5 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-02-05
HSC XXVIII
Underdog Cup #3

Ongoing

CSL 2025 WINTER (S19)
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 1
Acropolis #4 - TS4
Escore Tournament S1: W7
Rongyi Cup S3
Nations Cup 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
eXTREMESLAND 2025
SL Budapest Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S1: W8
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
RSL Revival: Season 4
WardiTV Winter 2026
LiuLi Cup: 2025 Grand Finals
FISSURE Playground #3
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League Season 23
ESL Pro League Season 23
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.