EPTBasically sums him up pretty nicely, when I saw that Reddit thread I basically poked around what I could find and all social media of his I could find was basically that. I think he got his Twitter account suspended as well.
The Automated Ban List - Page 2005
| Forum Index > TL Community |
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil. NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ | ||
|
ThomasjServo
15244 Posts
Basically sums him up pretty nicely, when I saw that Reddit thread I basically poked around what I could find and all social media of his I could find was basically that. I think he got his Twitter account suspended as well. | ||
|
3FFA
United States3931 Posts
On July 30 2013 00:07 Plansix wrote: Ok, this is the weirdest thread I've seen on TL. I like how the OP got banned for the initial post because it was so weird. But the final page is the best part with the closing comment: Rofl... that is something I never expected to see on TL. | ||
|
andrewlt
United States7702 Posts
Those people are mostly harmless, though a bit weird and very infuriating to talk with in threads. Some of them just go into the deep end, like that guy. | ||
|
ThomasjServo
15244 Posts
On July 30 2013 01:42 andrewlt wrote: I don't know about that. We've had our share of amateur philosophers, economists, political scientists and the like over the years. They're normally college freshmen who are taking their introductory 101 classes, read a few books on the side and now think they have the answers to some of life's deepest questions already. Those people are mostly harmless, though a bit weird and very infuriating to talk with in threads. Some of them just go into the deep end, like that guy. Wait you mean my having seen Waking Life doesn't qualify me to teach a capstone philosophy course? | ||
|
dAPhREAk
Nauru12397 Posts
On July 29 2013 22:59 ThomasjServo wrote: ECHOZs comes pretty close, dAPhREAk trolled the ever loving shit out of him in his limit theory thread if memory serves. I found a reddit thread he posted to /r/starcraft at the time as well. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=394347 http://www.reddit.com/r/starcraft/comments/16y1l3/starcraft2esports_brainstorming_thread/ Really this is one of my favorite bans, just because of how adamant he was about some of this stuff. hmmmm. i dont remember this. but i am going to assume this is the context: aerisky tells me about a thread in #tl-abl, tl-abl squad decide to have some fun, shit gets weird, #tl-abl grand cyclops closes thread. edit: i just realized this is the thread where i quoted charlie sheen over and over again. | ||
|
Jerubaal
United States7684 Posts
On July 30 2013 01:42 andrewlt wrote: I don't know about that. We've had our share of amateur philosophers, economists, political scientists and the like over the years. They're normally college freshmen who are taking their introductory 101 classes, read a few books on the side and now think they have the answers to some of life's deepest questions already. Those people are mostly harmless, though a bit weird and very infuriating to talk with in threads. Some of them just go into the deep end, like that guy. This amateur philosopher and political scientist looks down upon you. | ||
|
Plansix
United States60190 Posts
On July 30 2013 03:14 dAPhREAk wrote: hmmmm. i dont remember this. but i am going to assume this is the context: aerisky tells me about a thread in #tl-abl, tl-abl squad decide to have some fun, shit gets weird, #tl-abl grand cyclops closes thread. edit: i just realized this is the thread where i quoted charlie sheen over and over again. You should look at the back end of the thread. I think that you were the only thing holding ECHOZ's mind together and once you bowed out, there was nothing holding him back from the pits of madness. | ||
|
sylverfyre
United States8298 Posts
On July 29 2013 22:59 ThomasjServo wrote: ECHOZs comes pretty close, dAPhREAk trolled the ever loving shit out of him in his limit theory thread if memory serves. I found a reddit thread he posted to /r/starcraft at the time as well. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=394347 http://www.reddit.com/r/starcraft/comments/16y1l3/starcraft2esports_brainstorming_thread/ Really this is one of my favorite bans, just because of how adamant he was about some of this stuff. I do believe he said constructive argument. | ||
|
ThomasjServo
15244 Posts
On July 30 2013 04:04 sylverfyre wrote: I do believe he said constructive argument. All relative, I am sure in ECHOZs's mind when he aimed to promote a free form discussion such threads very well could have been construed as constructive to him and his theory. Though to the broader population you are correct, it more closely resembles drivel. | ||
|
SilentchiLL
Germany1405 Posts
On July 30 2013 04:10 ThomasjServo wrote: All relative, I am sure in ECHOZs's mind when he aimed to promote a free form discussion such threads very well could have been construed as constructive to him and his theory. Though to the broader population you are correct, it more closely resembles drivel. What he means is that it makes a lot more sense when you're very, very high. | ||
|
ThomasjServo
15244 Posts
On July 30 2013 04:18 SilentchiLL wrote: What he means is that it makes a lot more sense when you're very, very high. In my head I always pictured that kid having a Bill and Ted quality to him. | ||
|
dAPhREAk
Nauru12397 Posts
On July 30 2013 04:04 sylverfyre wrote: I do believe he said constructive argument. yeah, he said constructive and echozs discussion was far from constructive. | ||
|
dAPhREAk
Nauru12397 Posts
On July 30 2013 04:40 dAPhREAk wrote: yeah, he said constructive and echozs discussion was far from constructive. well, what does "constructive" mean. if it helped echozs out in his life, wouldnt it be constructive? | ||
|
SilentchiLL
Germany1405 Posts
On July 30 2013 04:41 dAPhREAk wrote: well, what does "constructive" mean. if it helped echozs out in his life, wouldnt it be constructive? daphreak started argueing with himself about philosophy in the ABL thread. The end is near. | ||
|
3FFA
United States3931 Posts
On July 30 2013 04:53 SilentchiLL wrote: daphreak started argueing with himself about philosophy in the ABL thread. The end is near. But I like this thread...  Also, today is a slow one. It has been hours since the last ban that wasn't for advertising or something of similar boredom. >.> | ||
|
Deleted User 137586
7859 Posts
I'm the guy he was harassing. He behaves like a TL newbie, and all of his posts are from the HotS era. I'd say someone's old account has been hacked, or given to someone else. | ||
|
WombaT
Northern Ireland26322 Posts
| ||
|
Godwrath
Spain10138 Posts
On July 29 2013 22:59 ThomasjServo wrote: ECHOZs comes pretty close, dAPhREAk trolled the ever loving shit out of him in his limit theory thread if memory serves. I found a reddit thread he posted to /r/starcraft at the time as well. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=394347 http://www.reddit.com/r/starcraft/comments/16y1l3/starcraft2esports_brainstorming_thread/ Really this is one of my favorite bans, just because of how adamant he was about some of this stuff. That thread is pure gold. Ten minutes later and i am still laughing. | ||
|
docvoc
United States5491 Posts
On July 30 2013 04:53 SilentchiLL wrote: daphreak started argueing with himself about philosophy in the ABL thread. The end is near. The end came like 5 pages ago, we're in the afterlife now. GG | ||
|
DeepElemBlues
United States5079 Posts
On July 30 2013 14:46 docvoc wrote: The end came like 5 pages ago, we're in the afterlife now. GG Just wait until we hit page 2012. | ||
| ||
