|
This thread is for discussing recent bans. Don't discuss other topics here. Take it to website feedback if you disagree with a ban or want to raise an issue. Keep it civil.NOTE: For those of you who want to find the actual ABL thread where the bans are posted. Please look in here: https://tl.net/forum/closed-threads/ |
On December 11 2012 01:33 xDaunt wrote:Show nested quote +As a personal experience as far as lawyers go they are the most shallow and callous group of university educated people I ever met. But it might be just statistical anomaly, but considering how many people actually share the similar experience I am inclined to see something more at work here. I actually agree that lawyers tend to be defective people. In fact, female attorneys tend to be the worst.
Nothing even logical behind it, just stupidity.
|
On December 11 2012 06:11 kollin wrote:Show nested quote +As a personal experience as far as lawyers go they are the most shallow and callous group of university educated people I ever met. But it might be just statistical anomaly, but considering how many people actually share the similar experience I am inclined to see something more at work here. I actually agree that lawyers tend to be defective people. In fact, female attorneys tend to be the worst. Nothing even logical behind it, just stupidity.
Wow, I can't believe I missed that in my own thread lol. I'll admit that I know a fair number of women in law that are batshit insane, but I'm not particularly inclined to extrapolate further based on that limited information 
|
Aotearoa39261 Posts
On December 11 2012 04:14 dAPhREAk wrote:Show nested quote +On December 11 2012 02:04 dAPhREAk wrote:wtf (spoilered) On December 09 2012 03:45 sacuyan wrote:the face of the guy in the vid + Show Spoiler +User was warned for this post On December 09 2012 03:46 sacuyan wrote:+ Show Spoiler +http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XnaHY6q6MMk On December 11 2012 01:01 sacuyan wrote:+ Show Spoiler +http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XnaHY6q6MMk sacuyan was just temp banned for 2 days by micronesia.
That account was created on 2011-10-05 06:53:34 and had 7 posts.
Reason: I told you in the last warning to post pictures in this thread... not videos. Then you go ahead and post the exact same video? and the ban has been upped: Show nested quote +sacuyan was just temp banned for 30 days by Plexa.
That account was created on 2011-10-05 06:53:34 and had 7 posts.
Reason: Ban revised up. All you've done is post that stupid video. Last warning. curious whether it was independent of my post, or after i figured out he kept posting the same video. hmmmm...
Unrelated to your post.
|
On December 11 2012 06:19 Plexa wrote:Show nested quote +On December 11 2012 04:14 dAPhREAk wrote:On December 11 2012 02:04 dAPhREAk wrote:wtf (spoilered) On December 09 2012 03:45 sacuyan wrote:the face of the guy in the vid + Show Spoiler +http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XnaHY6q6MMk On December 09 2012 03:46 sacuyan wrote:+ Show Spoiler +http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XnaHY6q6MMk On December 11 2012 01:01 sacuyan wrote:+ Show Spoiler +http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XnaHY6q6MMk sacuyan was just temp banned for 2 days by micronesia.
That account was created on 2011-10-05 06:53:34 and had 7 posts.
Reason: I told you in the last warning to post pictures in this thread... not videos. Then you go ahead and post the exact same video? and the ban has been upped: sacuyan was just temp banned for 30 days by Plexa.
That account was created on 2011-10-05 06:53:34 and had 7 posts.
Reason: Ban revised up. All you've done is post that stupid video. Last warning. curious whether it was independent of my post, or after i figured out he kept posting the same video. hmmmm... Unrelated to your post.
thanks.
blood is not on my hands jdseemoreglass. ;-)
|
On December 11 2012 06:19 Plexa wrote:Show nested quote +On December 11 2012 04:14 dAPhREAk wrote:On December 11 2012 02:04 dAPhREAk wrote:wtf (spoilered) On December 09 2012 03:45 sacuyan wrote:the face of the guy in the vid + Show Spoiler +http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XnaHY6q6MMk On December 09 2012 03:46 sacuyan wrote:+ Show Spoiler +http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XnaHY6q6MMk On December 11 2012 01:01 sacuyan wrote:+ Show Spoiler +http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XnaHY6q6MMk sacuyan was just temp banned for 2 days by micronesia.
That account was created on 2011-10-05 06:53:34 and had 7 posts.
Reason: I told you in the last warning to post pictures in this thread... not videos. Then you go ahead and post the exact same video? and the ban has been upped: sacuyan was just temp banned for 30 days by Plexa.
That account was created on 2011-10-05 06:53:34 and had 7 posts.
Reason: Ban revised up. All you've done is post that stupid video. Last warning. curious whether it was independent of my post, or after i figured out he kept posting the same video. hmmmm... Unrelated to your post.
The staff has been extremely patient with this guy. Really can't help but wonder what isn't getting through.
|
On December 11 2012 06:08 farvacola wrote:lol xDaunt, what did you say this time  Show nested quote +xDaunt was just temp banned for 1 week by Plexa.
That account was created on 2010-03-05 03:09:59 and had 3827 posts.
Reason: Getting reaaaaaal tired of your sexism and annoying posting in general.
Found it.
Not all that sure if I want to rile up a storm about it in Feedback.... I don't think it's deserving personally, but gah, the effort, lol.
v @Prae:
|
On December 11 2012 02:35 xDaunt wrote:Show nested quote +On December 11 2012 02:30 mcc wrote:On December 11 2012 02:14 xDaunt wrote:On December 11 2012 02:13 mcc wrote:On December 11 2012 01:45 xDaunt wrote:On December 11 2012 01:41 kwizach wrote:On December 11 2012 01:33 xDaunt wrote:
More than any other profession, lawyers are better suited to being the type of jack-of-all-trades person that you want to be a politician. (citation needed) Name me one other profession that has the same potential for getting extensive experience in numerous disciplines and industries. Software developers seem much closer to that. But both have only cursory understanding of multiple fields. That is the reason there are specialized lawyers and programmers that concentrate on one specific field. So either they have completely unsatisfactory knowledge of many fields or good knowledge of few. But ignoring that, I still fail to see how lawyers with their inferior math/hard sciences education are supposedly superior compared to well anyone else actually. This presumption is wrong. There are a lot of lawyers who either have significant backgrounds in math/sciences in their educations or otherwise develop knowledge of those disciplines during their practice. Just take a look at my list of stuff. And the same goes for countless other occupations. Plus of course your education in math and hard sciences is still inferior compared to people in those fields. I said that lawyers are more likely be to jacks-of-all-trades -- not aces-of-all trades. Show nested quote +But that is beside the point. I would still love to know why should this shallow knowledge of multiple fields actually matter in politics. And I actually showed you occupation that has even better potential for that as they are required to often know the filed much more in-depth. But I would not claim they are in any way better suited to be politicians. The whole hypothesis is nonsense even from empirical viewpoint as I see no increase in quality of politicians-lawyers. The broad base of knowledge matters because politicians necessarily are going to be dealing with a broad base of issues. Obviously, you want someone who has at least a little bit of experience in each of these areas making decisions. Failing that, you want someone who is capable of learning on the fly and digesting information from multiple experts. All that I am saying is that lawyers are good at this because this is what they do. Show nested quote +As a personal experience as far as lawyers go they are the most shallow and callous group of university educated people I ever met. But it might be just statistical anomaly, but considering how many people actually share the similar experience I am inclined to see something more at work here. I actually agree that lawyers tend to be defective people. In fact, female attorneys tend to be the worst. User was temp banned for this post.
This post hurts my head. I can't understand why the heck anyone would write it.
Edit: ninja'd
|
On December 11 2012 06:31 Praetorial wrote:Show nested quote +On December 11 2012 02:35 xDaunt wrote:On December 11 2012 02:30 mcc wrote:On December 11 2012 02:14 xDaunt wrote:On December 11 2012 02:13 mcc wrote:On December 11 2012 01:45 xDaunt wrote:On December 11 2012 01:41 kwizach wrote:On December 11 2012 01:33 xDaunt wrote:
More than any other profession, lawyers are better suited to being the type of jack-of-all-trades person that you want to be a politician. (citation needed) Name me one other profession that has the same potential for getting extensive experience in numerous disciplines and industries. Software developers seem much closer to that. But both have only cursory understanding of multiple fields. That is the reason there are specialized lawyers and programmers that concentrate on one specific field. So either they have completely unsatisfactory knowledge of many fields or good knowledge of few. But ignoring that, I still fail to see how lawyers with their inferior math/hard sciences education are supposedly superior compared to well anyone else actually. This presumption is wrong. There are a lot of lawyers who either have significant backgrounds in math/sciences in their educations or otherwise develop knowledge of those disciplines during their practice. Just take a look at my list of stuff. And the same goes for countless other occupations. Plus of course your education in math and hard sciences is still inferior compared to people in those fields. I said that lawyers are more likely be to jacks-of-all-trades -- not aces-of-all trades. But that is beside the point. I would still love to know why should this shallow knowledge of multiple fields actually matter in politics. And I actually showed you occupation that has even better potential for that as they are required to often know the filed much more in-depth. But I would not claim they are in any way better suited to be politicians. The whole hypothesis is nonsense even from empirical viewpoint as I see no increase in quality of politicians-lawyers. The broad base of knowledge matters because politicians necessarily are going to be dealing with a broad base of issues. Obviously, you want someone who has at least a little bit of experience in each of these areas making decisions. Failing that, you want someone who is capable of learning on the fly and digesting information from multiple experts. All that I am saying is that lawyers are good at this because this is what they do. As a personal experience as far as lawyers go they are the most shallow and callous group of university educated people I ever met. But it might be just statistical anomaly, but considering how many people actually share the similar experience I am inclined to see something more at work here. I actually agree that lawyers tend to be defective people. In fact, female attorneys tend to be the worst. User was temp banned for this post. This post hurts my head. I can't understand why the heck anyone would write it. Edit: ninja'd
lawyers > everyone else. i can get behind this.
lawyers are defective. thats just mean, dude.
|
The defective comment is Extremely insulting or at the very least really demeaning. to follow it up with a sexist comment really hurt his case more.
|
I actually give xDaunt tons of credit for remaining mostly civil when he can have about 20 people at once attacking him. That thread and the election thread have had a little more leeway with regard to moderation, which can give a false sense of security regarding posting sometimes.
I thought xDaunt was involved in law, wasn't he? Or am I thinking of someone else.
On December 11 2012 06:25 dAPhREAk wrote:Show nested quote +On December 11 2012 06:19 Plexa wrote:On December 11 2012 04:14 dAPhREAk wrote:On December 11 2012 02:04 dAPhREAk wrote:wtf (spoilered) On December 09 2012 03:45 sacuyan wrote:the face of the guy in the vid + Show Spoiler +http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XnaHY6q6MMk On December 09 2012 03:46 sacuyan wrote:+ Show Spoiler +http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XnaHY6q6MMk On December 11 2012 01:01 sacuyan wrote:+ Show Spoiler +http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XnaHY6q6MMk sacuyan was just temp banned for 2 days by micronesia.
That account was created on 2011-10-05 06:53:34 and had 7 posts.
Reason: I told you in the last warning to post pictures in this thread... not videos. Then you go ahead and post the exact same video? and the ban has been upped: sacuyan was just temp banned for 30 days by Plexa.
That account was created on 2011-10-05 06:53:34 and had 7 posts.
Reason: Ban revised up. All you've done is post that stupid video. Last warning. curious whether it was independent of my post, or after i figured out he kept posting the same video. hmmmm... Unrelated to your post. thanks. blood is not on my hands jdseemoreglass. ;-)
What are you smiling about? You don't want bloody hands? I personally like to finger paint with my report victims.
|
On December 11 2012 07:21 jdseemoreglass wrote:
I actually give xDaunt tons of credit for remaining mostly civil when he can have about 20 people at once attacking him. That thread and the election thread have had a little more leeway with regard to moderation, which can give a false sense of security regarding posting sometimes.
I thought xDaunt was involved in law, wasn't he? Or am I thinking of someone else.
Based on this post, if what he says is true, then yes, he is.
|
Unless xDaunt was outright lying, which I am almost certain is not the case, he's a lawyer, which makes this all just a bit more entertaining 
|
On December 11 2012 03:52 KwarK wrote:
There's no hypocrisy in being intolerant of intolerance imo.
Let's not get all philosophical, eh?
|
The xDaunt ban (probably, I'm not a moderator) had to do with the fact that he said the same shit a few months back and recieved a warning for it. To say the exact same thing again after moderation was what probably got him the ban.
|
probably just some lingering resentment against an ex-daunt
|
TuElite was just temp banned for 30 days by LosingID8.
That account was created on 2010-03-04 16:29:16 and had 2108 posts.
Reason: you are really creepy. this is your last warning. change, or else the next time it'll be permanent.
KMD claims another victim... The post is in the spoiler:
+ Show Spoiler +On December 11 2012 09:05 TuElite wrote:I just thought of this but I think that Bora would be the idol that would look the best + Show Spoiler [Mature content] + Agreed ? I randomly thought of this upon stumbling on this picture. ![[image loading]](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/A9i27zkCUAAnlXc.jpg:large) User was temp banned for this post.
|
United States702 Posts
TuElite needs a Perm and help.
|
On December 11 2012 10:16 Cokefreak wrote:Show nested quote +TuElite was just temp banned for 30 days by LosingID8.
That account was created on 2010-03-04 16:29:16 and had 2108 posts.
Reason: you are really creepy. this is your last warning. change, or else the next time it'll be permanent. KMD claims another victim... The post is in the spoiler: + Show Spoiler +On December 11 2012 09:05 TuElite wrote:I just thought of this but I think that Bora would be the idol that would look the best + Show Spoiler [Mature content] + Agreed ? I randomly thought of this upon stumbling on this picture. User was temp banned for this post.
What in the actual fuck. Is the kmd always that creepy, or was that above and beyond?
|
On December 11 2012 10:45 Jaaaaasper wrote:Show nested quote +On December 11 2012 10:16 Cokefreak wrote:TuElite was just temp banned for 30 days by LosingID8.
That account was created on 2010-03-04 16:29:16 and had 2108 posts.
Reason: you are really creepy. this is your last warning. change, or else the next time it'll be permanent. KMD claims another victim... The post is in the spoiler: + Show Spoiler +On December 11 2012 09:05 TuElite wrote:I just thought of this but I think that Bora would be the idol that would look the best + Show Spoiler [Mature content] + Agreed ? I randomly thought of this upon stumbling on this picture. User was temp banned for this post. What in the actual fuck. Is the kmd always that creepy, or was that above and beyond?
Standard Tuelite for ya. obviously the banned users are gunna be creepier than the typical kmd'r. He's also a repeat offender, this is considered fairly mild compared to what got him banned like 2 bans ago.
Erryone else is harmless enough though.
|
On December 11 2012 10:45 Jaaaaasper wrote:Show nested quote +On December 11 2012 10:16 Cokefreak wrote:TuElite was just temp banned for 30 days by LosingID8.
That account was created on 2010-03-04 16:29:16 and had 2108 posts.
Reason: you are really creepy. this is your last warning. change, or else the next time it'll be permanent. KMD claims another victim... The post is in the spoiler: + Show Spoiler +On December 11 2012 09:05 TuElite wrote:I just thought of this but I think that Bora would be the idol that would look the best + Show Spoiler [Mature content] + Agreed ? I randomly thought of this upon stumbling on this picture. User was temp banned for this post. What in the actual fuck. Is the kmd always that creepy, or was that above and beyond?
its mostly picture of beautiful korean women and quite abit of music
that was also abit further then TuElite normally gets banned for as well
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
