|
On October 06 2010 12:05 mOnion wrote:
also there is a very annoying bug on the website
i submitted a bug report but I haven't gotten a confirmed reply and I know there was a bit of email switching around during earlier seasons, I just want to make sure it gets taken care of
Thanks, I know about it. All feedback is emailed to me directly, so I read it shortly thereafter. There is a large list of submitted bugs and feature requests that I haven't been able to get to due to prioritizing admin tools for the league.
It will be fixed, but I'm the only person working on the core right now!
|
On October 06 2010 12:27 hazelynut wrote:
on a serious note, we decided divisions this year mostly taking balance into consideration, so that california isn't stacked, mid-west doesn't get a bye into the playoffs, etc.
I don't mean to be overly critical here, but the midwest division last fall had a three way tie for second, with the team that ultimately made the playoffs from the tie (Waterloo) winning the whole CSL. Did you really need to pick on us like that? :X
|
On October 06 2010 23:15 TestSubject893 wrote:Show nested quote +On October 06 2010 12:27 hazelynut wrote:
on a serious note, we decided divisions this year mostly taking balance into consideration, so that california isn't stacked, mid-west doesn't get a bye into the playoffs, etc. I don't mean to be overly critical here, but the midwest division last fall had a three way tie for second, with the team that ultimately made the playoffs from the tie (Waterloo) winning the whole CSL. Did you really need to pick on us like that? :X
Sorry for any offense! It probably didn't come across too clearly, but those should all be in quotes "California isn't stacked, mid-west doesn't get a bye" -- there's some truth to California having many contenders, but I don't actually believe that California was too stacked for competition. I was referring to one of the divisions that were purely Big 10 schools out of respect for the traditional sports rivalry, and I believe one of the playoff contenders (Michigan?) actually mentioned that the division was probably not balanced well at all in terms of SC. Waterloo/Toronto's division, on the other hand, was stacked as hell.
|
On October 07 2010 01:12 hazelynut wrote:Show nested quote +On October 06 2010 23:15 TestSubject893 wrote:On October 06 2010 12:27 hazelynut wrote:
on a serious note, we decided divisions this year mostly taking balance into consideration, so that california isn't stacked, mid-west doesn't get a bye into the playoffs, etc. I don't mean to be overly critical here, but the midwest division last fall had a three way tie for second, with the team that ultimately made the playoffs from the tie (Waterloo) winning the whole CSL. Did you really need to pick on us like that? :X Sorry for any offense! It probably didn't come across too clearly, but those should all be in quotes "California isn't stacked, mid-west doesn't get a bye" -- there's some truth to California having many contenders, but I don't actually believe that California was too stacked for competition. I was referring to one of the divisions that were purely Big 10 schools out of respect for the traditional sports rivalry, and I believe one of the playoff contenders (Michigan?) actually mentioned that the division was probably not balanced well at all in terms of SC. Waterloo/Toronto's division, on the other hand, was stacked as hell.
Our group of death last time was awful D:
I just told everyone to cheese lol.
|
our division's been pathetic lol, this year should be more fun
|
On October 07 2010 01:12 hazelynut wrote:
Waterloo/Toronto's division, on the other hand, was stacked as hell.
So true... (Oberlin player :D )
|
u guys make me confused.... wtf is "stacked"
same coast? same geographic area?
WHY IS IT MATTER?
we should split division in skill/ranking level based on last season, new schools put into random mode => simple and clean
Its not like we have all the seeds in 1 division...
btw: from the waterloo's team respective, we find our division quite comfortable 
|
On October 07 2010 02:56 NB wrote:u guys make me confused.... wtf is "stacked" same coast? same geographic area? WHY IS IT MATTER? we should split division in skill/ranking level based on last season, new schools put into random mode => simple and clean Its not like we have all the seeds in 1 division... btw: from the waterloo's team respective, we find our division quite comfortable
It just happens that some geographic areas correlate with higher ranked SC2 college players. That's why it matters. Arranging by geographic region results in slightly unbalanced divisions. For example, if we put Toronto, Waterloo, and York together because they were all in Canada, we'd already be making some divisions easier to make into playoffs than others.
We split divisions randomly based on current SC2 skill/ranking levels (SC2ranks), with some exceptions for geographical region when we were either aware or notified.
|
Darn, should have told everyone on our team to choose a random gosu to temporarily be their account until group selections and then change everything....o well.
|
Any idea when the time poll will end/week 1 maps are posted?
|
On October 07 2010 13:03 ReketSomething wrote:
Darn, should have told everyone on our team to choose a random gosu to temporarily be their account until group selections and then change everything....o well.
LOL. Depending on how gosu of a player you pick, I'd notice if any of CSL's highest ranked players suddenly disappeared. =P.
|
so i heard UFlorida has a course on SC2.... do the prof. allow to play CSL? =)
|
uhh this is sc2 right?
Im at University of Illinois but it has no1 coordinating? what do i do?
|
On October 08 2010 13:11 dekuschrub wrote:
uhh this is sc2 right?
Im at University of Illinois but it has no1 coordinating? what do i do?
There are teams for both University of Illinois campuses, not sure what you mean. I'm at UIUC, let me know if you need any help getting signed up or anything
|
Only 1 school has submitted anything for the contest! Right now you have a 100% chance of winning something!
|
On October 08 2010 14:59 Xeris wrote:
Only 1 school has submitted anything for the contest! Right now you have a 100% chance of winning something!
thats bm yo
|
My division has UCF (Whiplash and Spades) Harvey Mudd College (qxc and co.) and McMaster (SUGGY). Thats one school from socal, one school from canada, one school from florida, in a division that I think was designed for mid atlantic coast.
x.x
I'm pretty sure our division has 3 of the highest ranked players in all of CSL outside of masterasia....faaaaaaaaaa*
PS: What is the confirmed map pool? I tried looking on the CSL website, couldn't find it.
|
On October 09 2010 05:42 ZlaSHeR wrote:
My division has UCF (Whiplash and Spades) Harvey Mudd College (qxc and co.) and McMaster (SUGGY). Thats one school from socal, one school from canada, one school from florida, in a division that I think was designed for mid atlantic coast.
x.x
I'm pretty sure our division has 3 of the highest ranked players in all of CSL outside of masterasia....faaaaaaaaaa*
PS: What is the confirmed map pool? I tried looking on the CSL website, couldn't find it.
the Harvey mud division is really doomed... but life happen desu desu  
|
Yeah I mean, my team isn't bad either, I think we could compete for a really low playoff seed in almost every division, but HMC, UCF, and McMaster all in one division? all three of those teams are semifinalist caliber teams.
|
On October 09 2010 06:42 ZlaSHeR wrote:
Yeah I mean, my team isn't bad either, I think we could compete for a really low playoff seed in almost every division, but HMC, UCF, and McMaster all in one division? all three of those teams are semifinalist caliber teams.
i believe thats where the 2v2 match come into place for ya
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
