EPTThe new voice of Kerrigan is... - Page 7
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Drium
United States888 Posts
| ||
|
w00tm0nger
United States20 Posts
| ||
|
Boertie
Netherlands98 Posts
But I am getting offtopic a bit, I don't mind the voice of this Kerrigan. | ||
|
lepape
Canada557 Posts
On August 18 2009 02:35 Boertie wrote: I might be an asshole, but most sounds I have heard I do not like. When Marines die, they die like pussies and not that cool as in SC1. Same goes for Zealots etc, etc. When it comes to soundeffects and voices SC1>SC2. But I am getting offtopic a bit, I don't mind the voice of this Kerrigan. Raynor's voice is perfect though. Kerrigan's new voice is... not very zergish. | ||
|
piratebay
United States399 Posts
| ||
|
StorrZerg
United States13919 Posts
On August 18 2009 02:42 lepape wrote: Raynor's voice is perfect though. Kerrigan's new voice is... not very zergish. I think they recasted raynor... lol as for kerry hopefully some sound effects will spice things up  | ||
|
nimbim
Germany984 Posts
| ||
|
StorrZerg
United States13919 Posts
On August 18 2009 03:36 Arikuna wrote: even if she's not that good, we're going to buy this game anyway and eventually get used to the new voice/be unaware of it... but i hope the rumors are wrong. shosh let us rage. | ||
|
Shade692003
Canada702 Posts
Well this is it... they changed the Kerrigan VA for the Zeratul/Kerrigan cinematic... Sounds so bad =/ Why the fuck haven't they rehired the old VA! Continuity Blizzard, continuity! Especially when the original material was good to start with. Edit : Also, that's with all the audio tinkering to match an infested Kerrigan. Still sounds like a B actor that tries to hard. Glynnis plz! | ||
|
teapot
United Kingdom266 Posts
| ||
Liquid`Jinro
Sweden33719 Posts
But then you go back and listen to the one done by Talken... It just feels more "right" - I don't understand why they wouldn't play to these nostalgic feelings. The quality is pretty much the same. | ||
|
lepape
Canada557 Posts
On August 18 2009 03:31 StorrZerg wrote: I think they recasted raynor... lol as for kerry hopefully some sound effects will spice things up That's interesting because one year ago, some news came out that Raynor's original actor would be replaced, and that the old Kerrigan voice would actually return. Now it's the exact opposite that's happening, as I'm fairly sure Robert Clotworthy is doing Raynor's voice again. On August 18 2009 04:17 Shade692003 wrote: Sounds so bad =/ Why the fuck haven't they rehired the old VA! Continuity Blizzard, continuity! Especially when the original material was good to start with. For the same reason they recasted the whole crew of Futurama : Money. Video game industry has grown quite a bit in 10 years, and voice acting in video games is now a hell lot more profitable than it was back in 1998, I'm sure the original SC actors are the first to know it. We can safely assume this would be Blizzard's main problem with taking the old actors again. | ||
|
blade55555
United States17423 Posts
| ||
|
Shade692003
Canada702 Posts
Video game industry has grown quite a bit in 10 years, and voice acting in video games is now a hell lot more profitable than it was back in 1998, I'm sure the original SC actors are the first to know it. We can safely assume this would be Blizzard's main problem with taking the old actors again. Yeah I bet that's the issue. I'd wager that the Jim Raynor VA actually negociated really hard to get his role back. The Jim Raynor voice looked like it would have stuck till retail, and suddenly without warning the old VA is back. | ||
|
Liquid`Jinro
Sweden33719 Posts
On August 18 2009 07:02 lepape wrote: That's interesting because one year ago, some news came out that Raynor's original actor would be replaced, and that the old Kerrigan voice would actually return. Now it's the exact opposite that's happening, as I'm fairly sure Robert Clotworthy is doing Raynor's voice again. For the same reason they recasted the whole crew of Futurama : Money. Video game industry has grown quite a bit in 10 years, and voice acting in video games is now a hell lot more profitable than it was back in 1998, I'm sure the original SC actors are the first to know it. We can safely assume this would be Blizzard's main problem with taking the old actors again. ... Wow, the Futurama part... I don't think I could watch that. I really like Futurama, but I don't think I'd be able to sit through even one episode with if they changed the voice actors :s | ||
|
Phyre
United States1288 Posts
http://www.gametrailers.com/video/blizzcon-2008-starcraft-ii/41395 http://www.gametrailers.com/video/blizzcon-09-starcraft-ii/54290 The new is as bad as it seemed originally but the Glynnis just feels right. Listen to them both with your eyes closed and give it a good listen. | ||
|
Oedi
Canada265 Posts
| ||
|
Gnaix
United States438 Posts
| ||
|
Gnaix
United States438 Posts
On August 12 2009 23:42 synapse wrote: o_o; well, not as good as the old one, but you can't really complain >.> Are you kidding, "She also speaks fluent French and uses a French accent for French characters"? Kerrigan's not French (I was originally going to use a stronger comment but that probably would've offended some people and got me banned). | ||
|
Spawkuring
United States755 Posts
Money is the only real conclusion I can gather from this. Maybe Glynnis was either asking for too much, or Blizzard didn't want to give too much. Hopefully BlizzCon will shed light on the issue. | ||
| ||
