|
On August 18 2009 15:21 Gnaix wrote:Show nested quote +On August 12 2009 23:42 synapse wrote:o_o; well, not as good as the old one, but you can't really complain >.> Are you kidding, "She also speaks fluent French and uses a French accent for French characters"? Kerrigan's not French (I was originally going to use a stronger comment but that probably would've offended some people and got me banned).
Huh... so what are you complaning about exactly? That she's able to voice french characters? By all means, explain yourself and let the anger out, I'd love to know how that can be a problem.
|
Let's just say that the French have a history of losing at war and leave it at that before this gets too out of hand.
|
On August 18 2009 15:29 Spawkuring wrote: I get the feeling that this decision is motivated by money as well. Blizzard is obviously aware that the fans want the original back, and there's really no reason not to bring her back as far as quality goes. While the new VA is talented, she doesn't completely overshadow Glynnis. When you take into account the nostalgia and experience factor, the odds are stacked in the original VA's favor.
Money is the only real conclusion I can gather from this. Maybe Glynnis was either asking for too much, or Blizzard didn't want to give too much. Hopefully BlizzCon will shed light on the issue.
lol I'm sorry but blizzard doesn't have to worry about money. I bet she either didn't want to do it, or maybe blizzard just doesn't think she would be good now. Who knows but I can almost guarantee its not because of money related.
|
i thought she did a good kerrigan impersonation, had just the right amount of arrogance.
|
On August 18 2009 15:47 Gnaix wrote: Let's just say that the French have a history of losing at war and leave it at that before this gets too out of hand.
How does it have anything to do with the voice actress, her ability to impersonate Kerrigan, or anything at all?
|
Sweden33719 Posts
On August 18 2009 15:47 Gnaix wrote: Let's just say that the French have a history of losing at war and leave it at that before this gets too out of hand. Also have a history of conquering half of europe and contributing greatly to the american revolution...
|
On August 18 2009 20:49 FrozenArbiter wrote: Also have a history of conquering half of europe and contributing greatly to the american revolution...
They cheated.
All your plantations are belong to us.

Wolf.
|
|
|
The old Kerrigan was more calm and sound much more intellectual and tactical. The new one sound like she is one of those people who is new at this whole 'taking over the universe' thing and is not confident enough to actually handle the job. But seriously, who wouldn't change their voice if they spend 4 years underground in a planet far, far away?
|
On August 18 2009 20:49 FrozenArbiter wrote:Show nested quote +On August 18 2009 15:47 Gnaix wrote: Let's just say that the French have a history of losing at war and leave it at that before this gets too out of hand. Also have a history of conquering half of europe and contributing greatly to the american revolution...
Pfffff What nation didnt conquer half of europe at one point or another :p
|
|
On August 18 2009 15:47 Gnaix wrote: Let's just say that the French have a history of losing at war and leave it at that before this gets too out of hand.
A complete load of rubbish. Throughout history the French have won more battles and wars than any other state.
|
They should be able to get the original. Just not the same and she is sort of a big deal lol.
|
On August 18 2009 16:25 blade55555 wrote:Show nested quote +On August 18 2009 15:29 Spawkuring wrote: I get the feeling that this decision is motivated by money as well. Blizzard is obviously aware that the fans want the original back, and there's really no reason not to bring her back as far as quality goes. While the new VA is talented, she doesn't completely overshadow Glynnis. When you take into account the nostalgia and experience factor, the odds are stacked in the original VA's favor.
Money is the only real conclusion I can gather from this. Maybe Glynnis was either asking for too much, or Blizzard didn't want to give too much. Hopefully BlizzCon will shed light on the issue. lol I'm sorry but blizzard doesn't have to worry about money. I bet she either didn't want to do it, or maybe blizzard just doesn't think she would be good now. Who knows but I can almost guarantee its not because of money related.
Multi-billion dollar companies are some of the greediest fuckers in the world. Having money doesn't make you less greedy.
That said, I really think they should stick with the original Voice Actress. She played the part so well and is so iconic that it's an insult to replace her.
|
The new chick's Glynnis impression is okay. But I don't want "okay." I want Glynnis. I want to bust a nut every time Kerrigan speaks. Doesn't look like that's going to happen.
|
she sis not sound good as kerrigan
|
|
wth, in her resume there's "Final fantasy 7 - Video game - Various characters" ... ?? Was there any voice acting in FF7? If my memory serves me right then no, there wasn't.
On August 18 2009 15:33 lepape wrote:Show nested quote +On August 18 2009 15:21 Gnaix wrote:On August 12 2009 23:42 synapse wrote:o_o; well, not as good as the old one, but you can't really complain >.> Are you kidding, "She also speaks fluent French and uses a French accent for French characters"? Kerrigan's not French (I was originally going to use a stronger comment but that probably would've offended some people and got me banned). Huh... so what are you complaning about exactly? That she's able to voice french characters? By all means, explain yourself and let the anger out, I'd love to know how that can be a problem.
haha you're such a sad human being Gnaix. Although I find Americans with a completely unreasonable hate for France quite hilarious. Go enjoy your freedom fries, lol
|
Sweden33719 Posts
Just a heads up, they said they'd make a bunch of voice actor announcements tomorrow... so I guess we'll know for sure by then.
|
|
|
|