• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 05:28
CEST 11:28
KST 18:28
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Code S RO8 Preview: Rogue, GuMiho, Solar, Maru3BGE Stara Zagora 2025: Info & Preview27Code S RO12 Preview: GuMiho, Bunny, SHIN, ByuN3The Memories We Share - Facing the Final(?) GSL47Code S RO12 Preview: Cure, Zoun, Solar, Creator4
Community News
BGE Stara Zagora 2025 - Replay Pack2Weekly Cups (June 2-8): herO doubles down1[BSL20] ProLeague: Bracket Stage & Dates9GSL Ro4 and Finals moved to Sunday June 15th13Weekly Cups (May 27-June 1): ByuN goes back-to-back0
StarCraft 2
General
Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing DreamHack Dallas 2025 - Official Replay Pack BGE Stara Zagora 2025 - Replay Pack Code S RO8 Preview: Rogue, GuMiho, Solar, Maru The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation
Tourneys
[GSL 2025] Code S:Season 2 - RO8 - Group A Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) Bellum Gens Elite: Stara Zagora 2025 $3,500 WardiTV European League 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
[G] Darkgrid Layout Simple Questions Simple Answers [G] PvT Cheese: 13 Gate Proxy Robo
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady Mutation # 476 Charnel House Mutation # 475 Hard Target Mutation # 474 Futile Resistance
Brood War
General
BGH auto balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion FlaSh Witnesses SCV Pull Off the Impossible vs Shu StarCraft & BroodWar Campaign Speedrun Quest Will foreigners ever be able to challenge Koreans?
Tourneys
[ASL19] Grand Finals [BSL20] GosuLeague RO16 - Tue & Wed 20:00+CET NA Team League 6/8/2025 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues
Strategy
I am doing this better than progamers do. [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games? Armies of Exigo - YesYes?
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
LiquidLegends to reintegrate into TL.net
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Vape Nation Thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
Maru Fan Club Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Korean Music Discussion [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
A Better Routine For Progame…
TrAiDoS
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
I was completely wrong ab…
jameswatts
Need Your Help/Advice
Glider
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 32688 users

StarCraft II Balance Update – May 15, 2018 - Page 7

Forum Index > SC2 General
155 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 5 6 7 8 Next All
Deleted User 132135
Profile Joined December 2010
702 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-05-21 19:29:47
May 21 2018 19:04 GMT
#121
On May 21 2018 14:42 washikie wrote:
dont get why people keep saying the game is in an awfull state, are there some problems with ballance, yes, are there some problems with the way some matchups generaly play out (tvz always being either kill them before they get there or some kind of turtle fest, PvT being in a prity bad state where terran needs to do allins before protoss gets all there tools, PVZ being very volitile with lots of very powerful allins from both sides) But despite these problems the game is fairly balanced right now. I think that its in a much better state than periods where things have realy been out of whack (1-1-1 era, BL infestor era, Blink stalker allin, 3:00 oracle) Things are alright right now, not ideal but ok, when I load into a game in any matchup as any race I think I have at least a reasonable chance of winning that game, theres no sense of an inevitable loss like there were during periods of intense imbalance in the past. Things still certainly need to be tuned (imo especially tvp) but the game is moving in an alright direction.


It was not about winrates and racial balance.

1. Game allows almost no creativity and variation. The timers you are set on if you vary are too short, comebacks are hardly ever possible.

2. Unit interaction. While sudden DTs in broodwar were able to turn a game (at least I saw a pro match like 1-2 years ago by chance where that happened) in SC2 they discuss blink for DT, as the unit is more or less useless.

3. Broodwar had the game evolve and rock scissors paper somehow worked better. Lets look at PvT as an example. Protoss in broodwar can decide to either go air (carrier) or try and overpower the tank push with ground for a longer period of time before going for air (or not have to go for air as successful). But carriers are not that much of a game ender. In fact a terran who notices carrier switch early enough can overcome it and the game then usually evolves back into ground units after a solid trade off of units (due to lack of gas). Early advantages do not scale as much into later stages of the game and can be made up for. In SC2 when you see carrier you already know if you are able to still win a normal game at all or if you have to all-in quickly as your only chance.

4. Game pace. SC2 feels a bit like a minigame these days. Matches can end very quickly and frequently do so. Early game doesn't exist anymore, game starts at midgame and at 2-3 bases. Saturation of bases with inject, mules and chronoboost is almost instant and it is almost impossible to make a difference there for better players compared to lower players (both on relatively high level).


Etc.

I still see that gas is not a limiting rescource for terrans in many situations. That alone is a deal-breaker in a game where all races have equal access to resources and gas is defined to be the scarce one. Its corrupt design.

How do you balance a game where a player kills the refinery of a terran which makes the terran use the 3 SCVs that were working there instead work on minerals, that eventually gives him an advantage? ...lol

Zergs inability to attack off creep and other races inability to be efficient on creep induces passive gameplay and reduces options. It at least should be reviewed. I don't say the basic idea is bad, but it seems randomly implemented and brought on and on without revision.

Why doesn't zerg have a unit type that walks same speed on and off creep?
Why do other races not have upgrades for certain units that grants speed bonus for them on creep? Could be a fun thing for e.g. Terran mech units (kerrigan brought the tech for that, if lore is important for you).

Just those 2 questions above show very well how basic the implementation of creep actually is and what is possible.

Why there isn't a Zerg spell - used on own units - which gives creep speed bonus off-creep for like 45 seconds?


And so on.
xTJx
Profile Joined May 2014
Brazil419 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-05-21 20:45:44
May 21 2018 20:45 GMT
#122
On May 22 2018 04:04 LSN wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 21 2018 14:42 washikie wrote:
dont get why people keep saying the game is in an awfull state, are there some problems with ballance, yes, are there some problems with the way some matchups generaly play out (tvz always being either kill them before they get there or some kind of turtle fest, PvT being in a prity bad state where terran needs to do allins before protoss gets all there tools, PVZ being very volitile with lots of very powerful allins from both sides) But despite these problems the game is fairly balanced right now. I think that its in a much better state than periods where things have realy been out of whack (1-1-1 era, BL infestor era, Blink stalker allin, 3:00 oracle) Things are alright right now, not ideal but ok, when I load into a game in any matchup as any race I think I have at least a reasonable chance of winning that game, theres no sense of an inevitable loss like there were during periods of intense imbalance in the past. Things still certainly need to be tuned (imo especially tvp) but the game is moving in an alright direction.


It was not about winrates and racial balance.

1. Game allows almost no creativity and variation. The timers you are set on if you vary are too short, comebacks are hardly ever possible.

2. Unit interaction. While sudden DTs in broodwar were able to turn a game (at least I saw a pro match like 1-2 years ago by chance where that happened) in SC2 they discuss blink for DT, as the unit is more or less useless.

3. Broodwar had the game evolve and rock scissors paper somehow worked better. Lets look at PvT as an example. Protoss in broodwar can decide to either go air (carrier) or try and overpower the tank push with ground for a longer period of time before going for air (or not have to go for air as successful). But carriers are not that much of a game ender. In fact a terran who notices carrier switch early enough can overcome it and the game then usually evolves back into ground units after a solid trade off of units (due to lack of gas). Early advantages do not scale as much into later stages of the game and can be made up for. In SC2 when you see carrier you already know if you are able to still win a normal game at all or if you have to all-in quickly as your only chance.

4. Game pace. SC2 feels a bit like a minigame these days. Matches can end very quickly and frequently do so. Early game doesn't exist anymore, game starts at midgame and at 2-3 bases. Saturation of bases with inject, mules and chronoboost is almost instant and it is almost impossible to make a difference there for better players compared to lower players (both on relatively high level).


Etc.

I still see that gas is not a limiting rescource for terrans in many situations. That alone is a deal-breaker in a game where all races have equal access to resources and gas is defined to be the scarce one. Its corrupt design.

How do you balance a game where a player kills the refinery of a terran which makes the terran use the 3 SCVs that were working there instead work on minerals, that eventually gives him an advantage? ...lol

Zergs inability to attack off creep and other races inability to be efficient on creep induces passive gameplay and reduces options. It at least should be reviewed. I don't say the basic idea is bad, but it seems randomly implemented and brought on and on without revision.

Why doesn't zerg have a unit type that walks same speed on and off creep?
Why do other races not have upgrades for certain units that grants speed bonus for them on creep? Could be a fun thing for e.g. Terran mech units (kerrigan brought the tech for that, if lore is important for you).

Just those 2 questions above show very well how basic the implementation of creep actually is and what is possible.

Why there isn't a Zerg spell - used on own units - which gives creep speed bonus off-creep for like 45 seconds?


And so on.


If that would happen and zerg could attack anytime during the game, people would demand nerfs again, just like they demanded nerfs for all lair units due to zerg being able to attack on previous patches.
No prejudices, i hate everyone equally.
Fango
Profile Joined July 2016
United Kingdom8987 Posts
May 21 2018 21:31 GMT
#123
On May 22 2018 04:04 LSN wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 21 2018 14:42 washikie wrote:
dont get why people keep saying the game is in an awfull state, are there some problems with ballance, yes, are there some problems with the way some matchups generaly play out (tvz always being either kill them before they get there or some kind of turtle fest, PvT being in a prity bad state where terran needs to do allins before protoss gets all there tools, PVZ being very volitile with lots of very powerful allins from both sides) But despite these problems the game is fairly balanced right now. I think that its in a much better state than periods where things have realy been out of whack (1-1-1 era, BL infestor era, Blink stalker allin, 3:00 oracle) Things are alright right now, not ideal but ok, when I load into a game in any matchup as any race I think I have at least a reasonable chance of winning that game, theres no sense of an inevitable loss like there were during periods of intense imbalance in the past. Things still certainly need to be tuned (imo especially tvp) but the game is moving in an alright direction.


It was not about winrates and racial balance.

1. Game allows almost no creativity and variation. The timers you are set on if you vary are too short, comebacks are hardly ever possible.

2. Unit interaction. While sudden DTs in broodwar were able to turn a game (at least I saw a pro match like 1-2 years ago by chance where that happened) in SC2 they discuss blink for DT, as the unit is more or less useless.

3. Broodwar had the game evolve and rock scissors paper somehow worked better. Lets look at PvT as an example. Protoss in broodwar can decide to either go air (carrier) or try and overpower the tank push with ground for a longer period of time before going for air (or not have to go for air as successful). But carriers are not that much of a game ender. In fact a terran who notices carrier switch early enough can overcome it and the game then usually evolves back into ground units after a solid trade off of units (due to lack of gas). Early advantages do not scale as much into later stages of the game and can be made up for. In SC2 when you see carrier you already know if you are able to still win a normal game at all or if you have to all-in quickly as your only chance.

4. Game pace. SC2 feels a bit like a minigame these days. Matches can end very quickly and frequently do so. Early game doesn't exist anymore, game starts at midgame and at 2-3 bases. Saturation of bases with inject, mules and chronoboost is almost instant and it is almost impossible to make a difference there for better players compared to lower players (both on relatively high level).


Etc.

I still see that gas is not a limiting rescource for terrans in many situations. That alone is a deal-breaker in a game where all races have equal access to resources and gas is defined to be the scarce one. Its corrupt design.

How do you balance a game where a player kills the refinery of a terran which makes the terran use the 3 SCVs that were working there instead work on minerals, that eventually gives him an advantage? ...lol

Zergs inability to attack off creep and other races inability to be efficient on creep induces passive gameplay and reduces options. It at least should be reviewed. I don't say the basic idea is bad, but it seems randomly implemented and brought on and on without revision.

Why doesn't zerg have a unit type that walks same speed on and off creep?
Why do other races not have upgrades for certain units that grants speed bonus for them on creep? Could be a fun thing for e.g. Terran mech units (kerrigan brought the tech for that, if lore is important for you).

Just those 2 questions above show very well how basic the implementation of creep actually is and what is possible.

Why there isn't a Zerg spell - used on own units - which gives creep speed bonus off-creep for like 45 seconds?


And so on.

I agree that the lack of early game is a bit dull. But everything else you've written here is nonsense.
Zest, sOs, PartinG, Dark, and Maru are the real champs. ROOT_herO is overrated. Snute, Serral, and Scarlett are the foreigner GOATs
Deleted User 132135
Profile Joined December 2010
702 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-05-21 22:05:41
May 21 2018 22:05 GMT
#124
I usually write nonsense!

E.g. I wrote about that the mine should become visible after having shot. Probably was complete nonsense to you back then.

If that would happen and zerg could attack anytime during the game, people would demand nerfs again, just like they demanded nerfs for all lair units due to zerg being able to attack on previous patches.

Are you refering to the game getting more creative and strategic instead of mostly mechanic?
Athenau
Profile Joined March 2015
569 Posts
May 21 2018 22:05 GMT
#125
I still see that gas is not a limiting rescource for terrans in many situations. That alone is a deal-breaker in a game where all races have equal access to resources and gas is defined to be the scarce one. Its corrupt design.

This hasn't been true since patch 4.0 and the ghost cost change. Any higher-tech Terran army now includes some combination of Liberators, Tanks, Ghosts, and Ravens. It isn't uncommon to see Terrans using all their gas and floating a thousand+ minerals in the late game.
Deleted User 132135
Profile Joined December 2010
702 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-05-21 22:21:15
May 21 2018 22:19 GMT
#126
1. I gave some kind of brainstorming, not any determined suggestion.

2. Idc if it is true not true. It was in the game and I bet it is still an issue. Even more now as the marauder has been promoted. Also just cause you can spend gas in endgame, it doesn mean gas is a limiting factor for terran power as much as it is for other races.

Hence, if you read carefully, I wrote:
"I still see that gas is not a limiting rescource for terrans in many situations"

Would you feel better if I changed that "many" into "some"?

As for other races "always a limiting factor of power" would have taken that place, it is still a factor to be considered and dealt with.
StarscreamG1
Profile Joined February 2011
Portugal1653 Posts
May 21 2018 22:28 GMT
#127
How are ultras dealing with marauders? o_o
Athenau
Profile Joined March 2015
569 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-05-21 22:57:36
May 21 2018 22:48 GMT
#128
On May 22 2018 07:19 LSN wrote:
1. I gave some kind of brainstorming, not any determined suggestion.

2. Idc if it is true not true. It was in the game and I bet it is still an issue. Even more now as the marauder has been promoted. Also just cause you can spend gas in endgame, it doesn mean gas is a limiting factor for terran power as much as it is for other races.

Hence, if you read carefully, I wrote:
"I still see that gas is not a limiting rescource for terrans in many situations"

Would you feel better if I changed that "many" into "some"?

As for other races "always a limiting factor of power" would have taken that place, it is still a factor to be considered and dealt with.

You're going to have to provide evidence that gas is "always" a limiting factor of power for other races. That's a pretty strong, and, IMO unsupportable, claim.

Edit: While you're at it, you should be more precise about what you mean by "gas is a limiting factor of power"--are you saying that spending gas allows you to build a more powerful composition, or are you making some sort of relative claim across races, i.e for a given level of power race x requires a lower ratio of gas to minerals than race y?
Deleted User 132135
Profile Joined December 2010
702 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-05-21 22:57:50
May 21 2018 22:54 GMT
#129
Its ok, I have to do nothing.

I left my brainstorming for the right people to extract ideas from it (or not) and not interested in your little skirmishes about your beloved terran race being so UP and I did it so wrong with what I said.

User was warned for this post.
Athenau
Profile Joined March 2015
569 Posts
May 21 2018 23:00 GMT
#130
On May 22 2018 07:54 LSN wrote:
Its ok, I have to do nothing.

I left my brainstorming for the right people to extract ideas from it (or not) and not interested in your little skirmishes about your beloved terran race being so UP and I did it so wrong with what I said.

I didn't mention balance at all in my post. Perhaps you're confusing me with someone else?
Fango
Profile Joined July 2016
United Kingdom8987 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-05-22 00:38:00
May 22 2018 00:37 GMT
#131
On May 22 2018 07:05 LSN wrote:
I usually write nonsense!

E.g. I wrote about that the mine should become visible after having shot. Probably was complete nonsense to you back then.

I always agreed that mines should be visable after shooting. It's much better from a design perspective that way even if terran became underpowered shortly following that patch.
Zest, sOs, PartinG, Dark, and Maru are the real champs. ROOT_herO is overrated. Snute, Serral, and Scarlett are the foreigner GOATs
deacon.frost
Profile Joined February 2013
Czech Republic12129 Posts
May 22 2018 01:02 GMT
#132
On May 21 2018 14:37 Thaniri wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 17 2018 16:48 Anoss wrote:So now you can change the map, to have some game with more late game, but that will never affect the casual player. Cause when you are outside of this game, when you don't play since 2, 3, 4 or 5 years, this game look not fun. Nothing is easy and despit of what the majority of the players think, this is no more an intellectual game, its 90% mechanics 10% strategy. Yes you need to think to find some new build, but let's be honest, you all watch the GSL and copy paste. This is not what a strategic player should do, he should improve and think, not copy paste.


I played 2 games vs a Diamond level 3 player today in TvZ. I beat him with a reaper expand both times.

Not a big timing attack with 2-2 bio. Or even a medivac with marines.

I killed him with a single reaper that would consistently get more than 5 drone kills before the 3:30 speed timing and fluster him enough that he had no creep spread or macro.

My MMR is 4800 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vQ5QnewXH5qatQBBUj8yAy6XglqSZrOsvBMaz7LlaN_Q44RnnDD26jhDD9b-1sxIq8ZaA9y6v-ut9wM/pubhtml

His MMR was somewhere in the mid 3000's. According to this graph, he would have less than 1% chance of beating me. Roughly two "orders of magnitude" below me. Strategy would not matter. We even played a game where I went fast 3 base hellion banshee and he went 2 base muta. He could not have hard countered me more, and he still lost.

Now here is the spooky thing. Serral has an MMR greater than 7000. I can wipe the floor with diamond players all day with a single reaper. I literally do not know the words to express how much better Serral would be than ME. In a simulation vs Serral, out of 1,000,000 games, I might expect to win ONCE. Where I'm 2 orders of magnitude above a diamond player. Serral is 6 orders of magnitude above a diamond player.

The level of difference that can be measured is staggering.

Now because of this, most people never get to play SC2 as a strategy game.

You can almost always out-macro and out-micro your opponent into submission. But what happens when we get two people who are masters of the game? (Not masters league, those people suck at the game). If you watch a GSL ro4 match, there are mindgames, build order swaps, feints, multi pronged attacks, traps, everything that makes RTS a compelling genre.

Just because you and I aren't good enough to play the game that way, doesn't mean that isn't the essence of the game.

---

As to the part of your post that talks about BW. The phenomenon is compounded 50x there. Savior or Flash in their respective primes were so much better than everyone else that it strategy didn't matter. I'm not a broodwar history buff but IIRC Flash would literally constantly play the same strats on the same maps and no matter what his opponents wouldn't be able to stop it.

---

Why this big rant post on some random balance update thing?

I think this is true for anything. A michelin starred chef. Michael Jordan. Aleksandr Karelin.

There are people who are such behemoths in their fields that mere men cannot compare.

However that does not belittle the strategy element in, for example, greco-roman wrestling during Karelin's prime. Strategy still existed. It just so happened to be that Karelin was stronger, faster, and smarter than all of his opponents for almost 10 years straight. I'm not gonna google it but I think there was a point at which he won 6 world championships without having a point scored on him.

Unfortunately my post has meandered since it is late in the night for me, but I hope I got my point across.

Git gud son.

+ Show Spoiler +
And this is the problem. If only top 100(and even that's questionable) of players can use the strategy, then we have a problem in a real time STRATEGY game. A huge problem. That's why people are leaving(and I am not saying this is the only reason, with my past experience I rather add this here), playing against someone who's a dumb player but he's so much mechanically advanced, that you don't have a chance - this isn't fun. I cannot count how many terrans won against me because they were just sending drop after drop until I finally crushed under the pressure(or their stutter stepping was so on point). But if I defended everything, they suddenly didn't know what to play. And believe me that such mechanically skilled players should be able to play TvP lategame on my level without balance whines, hell, if they understood the game I wouldn't be able to play against them(they would be leagues above me). But they weren't, they're whole "strategy" was to mechanically overwhelm the enemy. No strategy, no game sense, nothing. And while winning against such "beasts" feels good at the moment, these are not the games I remember.

And believe me I know how it looks from the other side, when I play my pathetic Terran(gold), I have no idea what to do. All I know about Terran - if I somehow survive cheeses and 2 base all-ins & I get into the late-game, I just build 30 marines at a time(on some maps even more), 10 medevacs at a time and I just stim a-move to victory. Sure, from time to time I meet a player who knows what a storm is, but generally speaking I win with the sheer power of my macro. The problem is - I have no idea how to play Terran. No. Clue. At. All. Ghosts? Nah, cannot stim bio ball. Marauders? Why? My mechanics are good enough to split on that level against banelings and I lose to storm anyway. Yeah, I build like 5 tanks so I don't have to worry about my home bases too much. If the enemy somehow builds one of the "dreaded" units(ultras/colossi) I just add liberators. Otherwise I just build marines and win. Is this a fair fight? It isn't. With my knowledge I should die to many of the players I'm facing but thanks to the game system I am not. And that's why I play Terran the least. I feel ashamed to play the race the way I play it. It's wrong, this is just wrong.


I put my rant into spoiler, but generally speaking I think the strategy portion should be bigger(imo 7(mechanics) : 3).

Git gud son doesn't help. It's offensive to many players, because you just admitted, that the player would have to get on a level of GSL RO4+ player. Think about that to let that sunk in. Even if we agree the strategy limit is around top 500 players(and we both know this number is much bigger than it's supposed to be), it's still not real to say to playrs git gud. They cannot get good to use strategy, there will be always someone so mechanically better that strategy won't matter.

We're talking about real time STRATEGY game where STRATEGY doesn't matter in most of the played games. (not streamed games, but played games)

Can this be fixed? I believe not(certainly not with balance patches).
I imagine France should be able to take this unless Lilbow is busy practicing for Starcraft III. | KadaverBB is my fairy ban mother.
JackONeill
Profile Joined September 2013
861 Posts
May 22 2018 01:42 GMT
#133
On May 22 2018 04:04 LSN wrote:
I still see that gas is not a limiting rescource for terrans in many situations. That alone is a deal-breaker in a game where all races have equal access to resources and gas is defined to be the scarce one. Its corrupt design.


Yeah sure, that's why there is no viable terran build order that's gazless. Because gaz isn't a limiting ressource, terran build orders all rely on gaz first/getting a lot of gaz fast to build those high gaz cost units to harass or survive the early game.

Makes sense.
xTJx
Profile Joined May 2014
Brazil419 Posts
May 22 2018 02:04 GMT
#134
On May 22 2018 07:05 LSN wrote:
I usually write nonsense!

E.g. I wrote about that the mine should become visible after having shot. Probably was complete nonsense to you back then.

Show nested quote +
If that would happen and zerg could attack anytime during the game, people would demand nerfs again, just like they demanded nerfs for all lair units due to zerg being able to attack on previous patches.

Are you refering to the game getting more creative and strategic instead of mostly mechanic?


Nerfing swarm hosts, infestors and hydras and buffing all counters to mutas made the game more creative? Maybe to other races, because as far as i know there's only one way to beat what your opponent is doing as Zerg.
No prejudices, i hate everyone equally.
xTJx
Profile Joined May 2014
Brazil419 Posts
May 22 2018 02:06 GMT
#135
On May 22 2018 07:28 StarscreamG1 wrote:
How are ultras dealing with marauders? o_o


No good zerg player attack bio with pure ultras, so it's the same as before.
No prejudices, i hate everyone equally.
FrkFrJss
Profile Joined April 2015
Canada1205 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-05-22 02:38:39
May 22 2018 02:37 GMT
#136
On May 22 2018 10:02 deacon.frost wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 21 2018 14:37 Thaniri wrote:
On May 17 2018 16:48 Anoss wrote:So now you can change the map, to have some game with more late game, but that will never affect the casual player. Cause when you are outside of this game, when you don't play since 2, 3, 4 or 5 years, this game look not fun. Nothing is easy and despit of what the majority of the players think, this is no more an intellectual game, its 90% mechanics 10% strategy. Yes you need to think to find some new build, but let's be honest, you all watch the GSL and copy paste. This is not what a strategic player should do, he should improve and think, not copy paste.


I played 2 games vs a Diamond level 3 player today in TvZ. I beat him with a reaper expand both times.

Not a big timing attack with 2-2 bio. Or even a medivac with marines.

I killed him with a single reaper that would consistently get more than 5 drone kills before the 3:30 speed timing and fluster him enough that he had no creep spread or macro.

My MMR is 4800 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vQ5QnewXH5qatQBBUj8yAy6XglqSZrOsvBMaz7LlaN_Q44RnnDD26jhDD9b-1sxIq8ZaA9y6v-ut9wM/pubhtml

His MMR was somewhere in the mid 3000's. According to this graph, he would have less than 1% chance of beating me. Roughly two "orders of magnitude" below me. Strategy would not matter. We even played a game where I went fast 3 base hellion banshee and he went 2 base muta. He could not have hard countered me more, and he still lost.

Now here is the spooky thing. Serral has an MMR greater than 7000. I can wipe the floor with diamond players all day with a single reaper. I literally do not know the words to express how much better Serral would be than ME. In a simulation vs Serral, out of 1,000,000 games, I might expect to win ONCE. Where I'm 2 orders of magnitude above a diamond player. Serral is 6 orders of magnitude above a diamond player.

The level of difference that can be measured is staggering.

Now because of this, most people never get to play SC2 as a strategy game.

You can almost always out-macro and out-micro your opponent into submission. But what happens when we get two people who are masters of the game? (Not masters league, those people suck at the game). If you watch a GSL ro4 match, there are mindgames, build order swaps, feints, multi pronged attacks, traps, everything that makes RTS a compelling genre.

Just because you and I aren't good enough to play the game that way, doesn't mean that isn't the essence of the game.

---

As to the part of your post that talks about BW. The phenomenon is compounded 50x there. Savior or Flash in their respective primes were so much better than everyone else that it strategy didn't matter. I'm not a broodwar history buff but IIRC Flash would literally constantly play the same strats on the same maps and no matter what his opponents wouldn't be able to stop it.

---

Why this big rant post on some random balance update thing?

I think this is true for anything. A michelin starred chef. Michael Jordan. Aleksandr Karelin.

There are people who are such behemoths in their fields that mere men cannot compare.

However that does not belittle the strategy element in, for example, greco-roman wrestling during Karelin's prime. Strategy still existed. It just so happened to be that Karelin was stronger, faster, and smarter than all of his opponents for almost 10 years straight. I'm not gonna google it but I think there was a point at which he won 6 world championships without having a point scored on him.

Unfortunately my post has meandered since it is late in the night for me, but I hope I got my point across.

Git gud son.

+ Show Spoiler +
And this is the problem. If only top 100(and even that's questionable) of players can use the strategy, then we have a problem in a real time STRATEGY game. A huge problem. That's why people are leaving(and I am not saying this is the only reason, with my past experience I rather add this here), playing against someone who's a dumb player but he's so much mechanically advanced, that you don't have a chance - this isn't fun. I cannot count how many terrans won against me because they were just sending drop after drop until I finally crushed under the pressure(or their stutter stepping was so on point). But if I defended everything, they suddenly didn't know what to play. And believe me that such mechanically skilled players should be able to play TvP lategame on my level without balance whines, hell, if they understood the game I wouldn't be able to play against them(they would be leagues above me). But they weren't, they're whole "strategy" was to mechanically overwhelm the enemy. No strategy, no game sense, nothing. And while winning against such "beasts" feels good at the moment, these are not the games I remember.

And believe me I know how it looks from the other side, when I play my pathetic Terran(gold), I have no idea what to do. All I know about Terran - if I somehow survive cheeses and 2 base all-ins & I get into the late-game, I just build 30 marines at a time(on some maps even more), 10 medevacs at a time and I just stim a-move to victory. Sure, from time to time I meet a player who knows what a storm is, but generally speaking I win with the sheer power of my macro. The problem is - I have no idea how to play Terran. No. Clue. At. All. Ghosts? Nah, cannot stim bio ball. Marauders? Why? My mechanics are good enough to split on that level against banelings and I lose to storm anyway. Yeah, I build like 5 tanks so I don't have to worry about my home bases too much. If the enemy somehow builds one of the "dreaded" units(ultras/colossi) I just add liberators. Otherwise I just build marines and win. Is this a fair fight? It isn't. With my knowledge I should die to many of the players I'm facing but thanks to the game system I am not. And that's why I play Terran the least. I feel ashamed to play the race the way I play it. It's wrong, this is just wrong.


I put my rant into spoiler, but generally speaking I think the strategy portion should be bigger(imo 7(mechanics) : 3).

Git gud son doesn't help. It's offensive to many players, because you just admitted, that the player would have to get on a level of GSL RO4+ player. Think about that to let that sunk in. Even if we agree the strategy limit is around top 500 players(and we both know this number is much bigger than it's supposed to be), it's still not real to say to playrs git gud. They cannot get good to use strategy, there will be always someone so mechanically better that strategy won't matter.

We're talking about real time STRATEGY game where STRATEGY doesn't matter in most of the played games. (not streamed games, but played games)

Can this be fixed? I believe not(certainly not with balance patches).


But the thing is, in any game or sport with a large mechanical aspect, the stronger mechanical player will generally win. If I play against an NHL player, it doesn't matter what strategy I use, because I will lose.

However, when faced with someone just a bit better or on my skill level, I can use strategy to make up for my mechanical errors. Similarly, in SC2, two equal mechanically skilled players will be left to tactics a strategy. Except for builds that are harder to stop than to play, the one player will have to outthink the other player. So a two bronze players of equal mechanics will have such poor mechanics, that it will be down to strategic situations like...I know I can't stop drops, so I will over build static defence. Here, one player is compensating for a mechanical lacking through a strategic decision.

It's just that mechanics often determine your ability to execute a strategy, and so we see it at the highest level that their mechanics are so good it's primarily strategy and tactics that determine the outcome.

And the thing is, cheese does still exist, and much weaker players have often taken games off of people who should be better players.
"Keep Moving Forward" - Walt Disney
washikie
Profile Joined February 2011
United States752 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-05-22 05:39:27
May 22 2018 05:38 GMT
#137
On May 22 2018 10:02 deacon.frost wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 21 2018 14:37 Thaniri wrote:
On May 17 2018 16:48 Anoss wrote:So now you can change the map, to have some game with more late game, but that will never affect the casual player. Cause when you are outside of this game, when you don't play since 2, 3, 4 or 5 years, this game look not fun. Nothing is easy and despit of what the majority of the players think, this is no more an intellectual game, its 90% mechanics 10% strategy. Yes you need to think to find some new build, but let's be honest, you all watch the GSL and copy paste. This is not what a strategic player should do, he should improve and think, not copy paste.


I played 2 games vs a Diamond level 3 player today in TvZ. I beat him with a reaper expand both times.

Not a big timing attack with 2-2 bio. Or even a medivac with marines.

I killed him with a single reaper that would consistently get more than 5 drone kills before the 3:30 speed timing and fluster him enough that he had no creep spread or macro.

My MMR is 4800 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vQ5QnewXH5qatQBBUj8yAy6XglqSZrOsvBMaz7LlaN_Q44RnnDD26jhDD9b-1sxIq8ZaA9y6v-ut9wM/pubhtml

His MMR was somewhere in the mid 3000's. According to this graph, he would have less than 1% chance of beating me. Roughly two "orders of magnitude" below me. Strategy would not matter. We even played a game where I went fast 3 base hellion banshee and he went 2 base muta. He could not have hard countered me more, and he still lost.

Now here is the spooky thing. Serral has an MMR greater than 7000. I can wipe the floor with diamond players all day with a single reaper. I literally do not know the words to express how much better Serral would be than ME. In a simulation vs Serral, out of 1,000,000 games, I might expect to win ONCE. Where I'm 2 orders of magnitude above a diamond player. Serral is 6 orders of magnitude above a diamond player.

The level of difference that can be measured is staggering.

Now because of this, most people never get to play SC2 as a strategy game.

You can almost always out-macro and out-micro your opponent into submission. But what happens when we get two people who are masters of the game? (Not masters league, those people suck at the game). If you watch a GSL ro4 match, there are mindgames, build order swaps, feints, multi pronged attacks, traps, everything that makes RTS a compelling genre.

Just because you and I aren't good enough to play the game that way, doesn't mean that isn't the essence of the game.

---

As to the part of your post that talks about BW. The phenomenon is compounded 50x there. Savior or Flash in their respective primes were so much better than everyone else that it strategy didn't matter. I'm not a broodwar history buff but IIRC Flash would literally constantly play the same strats on the same maps and no matter what his opponents wouldn't be able to stop it.

---

Why this big rant post on some random balance update thing?

I think this is true for anything. A michelin starred chef. Michael Jordan. Aleksandr Karelin.

There are people who are such behemoths in their fields that mere men cannot compare.

However that does not belittle the strategy element in, for example, greco-roman wrestling during Karelin's prime. Strategy still existed. It just so happened to be that Karelin was stronger, faster, and smarter than all of his opponents for almost 10 years straight. I'm not gonna google it but I think there was a point at which he won 6 world championships without having a point scored on him.

Unfortunately my post has meandered since it is late in the night for me, but I hope I got my point across.

Git gud son.

+ Show Spoiler +
And this is the problem. If only top 100(and even that's questionable) of players can use the strategy, then we have a problem in a real time STRATEGY game. A huge problem. That's why people are leaving(and I am not saying this is the only reason, with my past experience I rather add this here), playing against someone who's a dumb player but he's so much mechanically advanced, that you don't have a chance - this isn't fun. I cannot count how many terrans won against me because they were just sending drop after drop until I finally crushed under the pressure(or their stutter stepping was so on point). But if I defended everything, they suddenly didn't know what to play. And believe me that such mechanically skilled players should be able to play TvP lategame on my level without balance whines, hell, if they understood the game I wouldn't be able to play against them(they would be leagues above me). But they weren't, they're whole "strategy" was to mechanically overwhelm the enemy. No strategy, no game sense, nothing. And while winning against such "beasts" feels good at the moment, these are not the games I remember.

And believe me I know how it looks from the other side, when I play my pathetic Terran(gold), I have no idea what to do. All I know about Terran - if I somehow survive cheeses and 2 base all-ins & I get into the late-game, I just build 30 marines at a time(on some maps even more), 10 medevacs at a time and I just stim a-move to victory. Sure, from time to time I meet a player who knows what a storm is, but generally speaking I win with the sheer power of my macro. The problem is - I have no idea how to play Terran. No. Clue. At. All. Ghosts? Nah, cannot stim bio ball. Marauders? Why? My mechanics are good enough to split on that level against banelings and I lose to storm anyway. Yeah, I build like 5 tanks so I don't have to worry about my home bases too much. If the enemy somehow builds one of the "dreaded" units(ultras/colossi) I just add liberators. Otherwise I just build marines and win. Is this a fair fight? It isn't. With my knowledge I should die to many of the players I'm facing but thanks to the game system I am not. And that's why I play Terran the least. I feel ashamed to play the race the way I play it. It's wrong, this is just wrong.


I put my rant into spoiler, but generally speaking I think the strategy portion should be bigger(imo 7(mechanics) : 3).

Git gud son doesn't help. It's offensive to many players, because you just admitted, that the player would have to get on a level of GSL RO4+ player. Think about that to let that sunk in. Even if we agree the strategy limit is around top 500 players(and we both know this number is much bigger than it's supposed to be), it's still not real to say to playrs git gud. They cannot get good to use strategy, there will be always someone so mechanically better that strategy won't matter.

We're talking about real time STRATEGY game where STRATEGY doesn't matter in most of the played games. (not streamed games, but played games)

Can this be fixed? I believe not(certainly not with balance patches).


I mean Starcraft has always been about mechanics more than stratagey sure stratagey plays a role but if my opponent micros perfectly and has 1.5 times as much stuff as I do chances are he's gonna win. It's just the nature of the game if your looking for games where stratagey is the deciding factor go play a tbs or a card game. Sc2 is first and foremost a game of mechanics with some stratagey layered ontop.

I'm not sure having stratagey more than mechanics would nesisarily be a good thing. Take for example PVP. PvP is mostly decided by stratagey and not mechanics unlike the other matchups due to the deadlyness of allins in the mu and the fact that's at least in the early game of PvP both macro and micro tend to be trivial prior to the moment when players builds start giving them different sets of units. PvP can e fun but for most people it's considered one of the worst mu probably only zvz is considered to be less fun. Why? Because PvP is so dictated by stratagey that it feals coinflippy and poker like, it's low emphasis on mechanics makes the mu frustrating at times to play and not particularly exciting to watch.
"when life gives Hero lemons he makes carriers" -Artosis
Tyrhanius
Profile Joined April 2011
France947 Posts
May 22 2018 06:57 GMT
#138
On May 22 2018 14:38 washikie wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 22 2018 10:02 deacon.frost wrote:
On May 21 2018 14:37 Thaniri wrote:
On May 17 2018 16:48 Anoss wrote:So now you can change the map, to have some game with more late game, but that will never affect the casual player. Cause when you are outside of this game, when you don't play since 2, 3, 4 or 5 years, this game look not fun. Nothing is easy and despit of what the majority of the players think, this is no more an intellectual game, its 90% mechanics 10% strategy. Yes you need to think to find some new build, but let's be honest, you all watch the GSL and copy paste. This is not what a strategic player should do, he should improve and think, not copy paste.


I played 2 games vs a Diamond level 3 player today in TvZ. I beat him with a reaper expand both times.

Not a big timing attack with 2-2 bio. Or even a medivac with marines.

I killed him with a single reaper that would consistently get more than 5 drone kills before the 3:30 speed timing and fluster him enough that he had no creep spread or macro.

My MMR is 4800 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vQ5QnewXH5qatQBBUj8yAy6XglqSZrOsvBMaz7LlaN_Q44RnnDD26jhDD9b-1sxIq8ZaA9y6v-ut9wM/pubhtml

His MMR was somewhere in the mid 3000's. According to this graph, he would have less than 1% chance of beating me. Roughly two "orders of magnitude" below me. Strategy would not matter. We even played a game where I went fast 3 base hellion banshee and he went 2 base muta. He could not have hard countered me more, and he still lost.

Now here is the spooky thing. Serral has an MMR greater than 7000. I can wipe the floor with diamond players all day with a single reaper. I literally do not know the words to express how much better Serral would be than ME. In a simulation vs Serral, out of 1,000,000 games, I might expect to win ONCE. Where I'm 2 orders of magnitude above a diamond player. Serral is 6 orders of magnitude above a diamond player.

The level of difference that can be measured is staggering.

Now because of this, most people never get to play SC2 as a strategy game.

You can almost always out-macro and out-micro your opponent into submission. But what happens when we get two people who are masters of the game? (Not masters league, those people suck at the game). If you watch a GSL ro4 match, there are mindgames, build order swaps, feints, multi pronged attacks, traps, everything that makes RTS a compelling genre.

Just because you and I aren't good enough to play the game that way, doesn't mean that isn't the essence of the game.

---

As to the part of your post that talks about BW. The phenomenon is compounded 50x there. Savior or Flash in their respective primes were so much better than everyone else that it strategy didn't matter. I'm not a broodwar history buff but IIRC Flash would literally constantly play the same strats on the same maps and no matter what his opponents wouldn't be able to stop it.

---

Why this big rant post on some random balance update thing?

I think this is true for anything. A michelin starred chef. Michael Jordan. Aleksandr Karelin.

There are people who are such behemoths in their fields that mere men cannot compare.

However that does not belittle the strategy element in, for example, greco-roman wrestling during Karelin's prime. Strategy still existed. It just so happened to be that Karelin was stronger, faster, and smarter than all of his opponents for almost 10 years straight. I'm not gonna google it but I think there was a point at which he won 6 world championships without having a point scored on him.

Unfortunately my post has meandered since it is late in the night for me, but I hope I got my point across.

Git gud son.

+ Show Spoiler +
And this is the problem. If only top 100(and even that's questionable) of players can use the strategy, then we have a problem in a real time STRATEGY game. A huge problem. That's why people are leaving(and I am not saying this is the only reason, with my past experience I rather add this here), playing against someone who's a dumb player but he's so much mechanically advanced, that you don't have a chance - this isn't fun. I cannot count how many terrans won against me because they were just sending drop after drop until I finally crushed under the pressure(or their stutter stepping was so on point). But if I defended everything, they suddenly didn't know what to play. And believe me that such mechanically skilled players should be able to play TvP lategame on my level without balance whines, hell, if they understood the game I wouldn't be able to play against them(they would be leagues above me). But they weren't, they're whole "strategy" was to mechanically overwhelm the enemy. No strategy, no game sense, nothing. And while winning against such "beasts" feels good at the moment, these are not the games I remember.

And believe me I know how it looks from the other side, when I play my pathetic Terran(gold), I have no idea what to do. All I know about Terran - if I somehow survive cheeses and 2 base all-ins & I get into the late-game, I just build 30 marines at a time(on some maps even more), 10 medevacs at a time and I just stim a-move to victory. Sure, from time to time I meet a player who knows what a storm is, but generally speaking I win with the sheer power of my macro. The problem is - I have no idea how to play Terran. No. Clue. At. All. Ghosts? Nah, cannot stim bio ball. Marauders? Why? My mechanics are good enough to split on that level against banelings and I lose to storm anyway. Yeah, I build like 5 tanks so I don't have to worry about my home bases too much. If the enemy somehow builds one of the "dreaded" units(ultras/colossi) I just add liberators. Otherwise I just build marines and win. Is this a fair fight? It isn't. With my knowledge I should die to many of the players I'm facing but thanks to the game system I am not. And that's why I play Terran the least. I feel ashamed to play the race the way I play it. It's wrong, this is just wrong.


I put my rant into spoiler, but generally speaking I think the strategy portion should be bigger(imo 7(mechanics) : 3).

Git gud son doesn't help. It's offensive to many players, because you just admitted, that the player would have to get on a level of GSL RO4+ player. Think about that to let that sunk in. Even if we agree the strategy limit is around top 500 players(and we both know this number is much bigger than it's supposed to be), it's still not real to say to playrs git gud. They cannot get good to use strategy, there will be always someone so mechanically better that strategy won't matter.

We're talking about real time STRATEGY game where STRATEGY doesn't matter in most of the played games. (not streamed games, but played games)

Can this be fixed? I believe not(certainly not with balance patches).


I mean Starcraft has always been about mechanics more than stratagey sure stratagey plays a role but if my opponent micros perfectly and has 1.5 times as much stuff as I do chances are he's gonna win. It's just the nature of the game if your looking for games where stratagey is the deciding factor go play a tbs or a card game. Sc2 is first and foremost a game of mechanics with some stratagey layered ontop.

I'm not sure having stratagey more than mechanics would nesisarily be a good thing. Take for example PVP. PvP is mostly decided by stratagey and not mechanics unlike the other matchups due to the deadlyness of allins in the mu and the fact that's at least in the early game of PvP both macro and micro tend to be trivial prior to the moment when players builds start giving them different sets of units. PvP can e fun but for most people it's considered one of the worst mu probably only zvz is considered to be less fun. Why? Because PvP is so dictated by stratagey that it feals coinflippy and poker like, it's low emphasis on mechanics makes the mu frustrating at times to play and not particularly exciting to watch.

Well i disagree, while you need a minimal mecanism to enter some leagues, the difference between players is not really mecanism.

Knowledge is far more important, and knowing what you should do to stay ahead or identify if you're behind and need to do something.

And maybe you know PvP, but all MU are decided by strategy.

It's coin-flip when you decide not to scout or prepare for some strategy, and play creedy.

In ZvZ, i drone scout, my first worker is rallied directly to the natural of my opponent, and it will arrive in time on most map to block hatch first for a few seconds, or i will knows he is pool first, or all-in me.

Most pro never do that, and they prefer to identify the build with the timing of the lings and with overlord, and defend with their first lings + workers, it may work but if lings dodge overlord, or the build is slightly changed to look like a normal build you may die.

It's a choice, a strategy, i consider it's more likely i lose on a cheese at my level than because of the few mineral i've lost because i've scouted, and somehow i recover for this mineral lost because i block his hatch, or even if i don't i know he is macroing so i can full drone for a moment because i know what is doing.

At pro level, all pros know each other and prepare for strats based on the usual playstyle of some player, they rarely won because of "micro" or better mecanism, they all have nearly the same mecanism.
aish
Profile Joined March 2018
20 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-05-22 15:16:08
May 22 2018 15:15 GMT
#139
On May 22 2018 10:02 deacon.frost wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 21 2018 14:37 Thaniri wrote:
On May 17 2018 16:48 Anoss wrote:So now you can change the map, to have some game with more late game, but that will never affect the casual player. Cause when you are outside of this game, when you don't play since 2, 3, 4 or 5 years, this game look not fun. Nothing is easy and despit of what the majority of the players think, this is no more an intellectual game, its 90% mechanics 10% strategy. Yes you need to think to find some new build, but let's be honest, you all watch the GSL and copy paste. This is not what a strategic player should do, he should improve and think, not copy paste.


I played 2 games vs a Diamond level 3 player today in TvZ. I beat him with a reaper expand both times.

Not a big timing attack with 2-2 bio. Or even a medivac with marines.

I killed him with a single reaper that would consistently get more than 5 drone kills before the 3:30 speed timing and fluster him enough that he had no creep spread or macro.

My MMR is 4800 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vQ5QnewXH5qatQBBUj8yAy6XglqSZrOsvBMaz7LlaN_Q44RnnDD26jhDD9b-1sxIq8ZaA9y6v-ut9wM/pubhtml

His MMR was somewhere in the mid 3000's. According to this graph, he would have less than 1% chance of beating me. Roughly two "orders of magnitude" below me. Strategy would not matter. We even played a game where I went fast 3 base hellion banshee and he went 2 base muta. He could not have hard countered me more, and he still lost.

Now here is the spooky thing. Serral has an MMR greater than 7000. I can wipe the floor with diamond players all day with a single reaper. I literally do not know the words to express how much better Serral would be than ME. In a simulation vs Serral, out of 1,000,000 games, I might expect to win ONCE. Where I'm 2 orders of magnitude above a diamond player. Serral is 6 orders of magnitude above a diamond player.

The level of difference that can be measured is staggering.

Now because of this, most people never get to play SC2 as a strategy game.

You can almost always out-macro and out-micro your opponent into submission. But what happens when we get two people who are masters of the game? (Not masters league, those people suck at the game). If you watch a GSL ro4 match, there are mindgames, build order swaps, feints, multi pronged attacks, traps, everything that makes RTS a compelling genre.

Just because you and I aren't good enough to play the game that way, doesn't mean that isn't the essence of the game.

---

As to the part of your post that talks about BW. The phenomenon is compounded 50x there. Savior or Flash in their respective primes were so much better than everyone else that it strategy didn't matter. I'm not a broodwar history buff but IIRC Flash would literally constantly play the same strats on the same maps and no matter what his opponents wouldn't be able to stop it.

---

Why this big rant post on some random balance update thing?

I think this is true for anything. A michelin starred chef. Michael Jordan. Aleksandr Karelin.

There are people who are such behemoths in their fields that mere men cannot compare.

However that does not belittle the strategy element in, for example, greco-roman wrestling during Karelin's prime. Strategy still existed. It just so happened to be that Karelin was stronger, faster, and smarter than all of his opponents for almost 10 years straight. I'm not gonna google it but I think there was a point at which he won 6 world championships without having a point scored on him.

Unfortunately my post has meandered since it is late in the night for me, but I hope I got my point across.

Git gud son.

+ Show Spoiler +
And this is the problem. If only top 100(and even that's questionable) of players can use the strategy, then we have a problem in a real time STRATEGY game. A huge problem. That's why people are leaving(and I am not saying this is the only reason, with my past experience I rather add this here), playing against someone who's a dumb player but he's so much mechanically advanced, that you don't have a chance - this isn't fun. I cannot count how many terrans won against me because they were just sending drop after drop until I finally crushed under the pressure(or their stutter stepping was so on point). But if I defended everything, they suddenly didn't know what to play. And believe me that such mechanically skilled players should be able to play TvP lategame on my level without balance whines, hell, if they understood the game I wouldn't be able to play against them(they would be leagues above me). But they weren't, they're whole "strategy" was to mechanically overwhelm the enemy. No strategy, no game sense, nothing. And while winning against such "beasts" feels good at the moment, these are not the games I remember.

And believe me I know how it looks from the other side, when I play my pathetic Terran(gold), I have no idea what to do. All I know about Terran - if I somehow survive cheeses and 2 base all-ins & I get into the late-game, I just build 30 marines at a time(on some maps even more), 10 medevacs at a time and I just stim a-move to victory. Sure, from time to time I meet a player who knows what a storm is, but generally speaking I win with the sheer power of my macro. The problem is - I have no idea how to play Terran. No. Clue. At. All. Ghosts? Nah, cannot stim bio ball. Marauders? Why? My mechanics are good enough to split on that level against banelings and I lose to storm anyway. Yeah, I build like 5 tanks so I don't have to worry about my home bases too much. If the enemy somehow builds one of the "dreaded" units(ultras/colossi) I just add liberators. Otherwise I just build marines and win. Is this a fair fight? It isn't. With my knowledge I should die to many of the players I'm facing but thanks to the game system I am not. And that's why I play Terran the least. I feel ashamed to play the race the way I play it. It's wrong, this is just wrong.


I put my rant into spoiler, but generally speaking I think the strategy portion should be bigger(imo 7(mechanics) : 3).

Git gud son doesn't help. It's offensive to many players, because you just admitted, that the player would have to get on a level of GSL RO4+ player. Think about that to let that sunk in. Even if we agree the strategy limit is around top 500 players(and we both know this number is much bigger than it's supposed to be), it's still not real to say to playrs git gud. They cannot get good to use strategy, there will be always someone so mechanically better that strategy won't matter.

We're talking about real time STRATEGY game where STRATEGY doesn't matter in most of the played games. (not streamed games, but played games)

Can this be fixed? I believe not(certainly not with balance patches).


Maybe you shouldn't play a game like starcraft because it is mechanically difficult?

go play Warhammer 40,000 or chess or something lol.

maybe some other rts made by stardock games if you want some easy strategy wins. The thing is the skill caps on those games are nothing compared to mechanically difficult games.
deacon.frost
Profile Joined February 2013
Czech Republic12129 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-05-22 16:17:45
May 22 2018 16:05 GMT
#140
On May 23 2018 00:15 aish wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 22 2018 10:02 deacon.frost wrote:
On May 21 2018 14:37 Thaniri wrote:
On May 17 2018 16:48 Anoss wrote:So now you can change the map, to have some game with more late game, but that will never affect the casual player. Cause when you are outside of this game, when you don't play since 2, 3, 4 or 5 years, this game look not fun. Nothing is easy and despit of what the majority of the players think, this is no more an intellectual game, its 90% mechanics 10% strategy. Yes you need to think to find some new build, but let's be honest, you all watch the GSL and copy paste. This is not what a strategic player should do, he should improve and think, not copy paste.


I played 2 games vs a Diamond level 3 player today in TvZ. I beat him with a reaper expand both times.

Not a big timing attack with 2-2 bio. Or even a medivac with marines.

I killed him with a single reaper that would consistently get more than 5 drone kills before the 3:30 speed timing and fluster him enough that he had no creep spread or macro.

My MMR is 4800 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vQ5QnewXH5qatQBBUj8yAy6XglqSZrOsvBMaz7LlaN_Q44RnnDD26jhDD9b-1sxIq8ZaA9y6v-ut9wM/pubhtml

His MMR was somewhere in the mid 3000's. According to this graph, he would have less than 1% chance of beating me. Roughly two "orders of magnitude" below me. Strategy would not matter. We even played a game where I went fast 3 base hellion banshee and he went 2 base muta. He could not have hard countered me more, and he still lost.

Now here is the spooky thing. Serral has an MMR greater than 7000. I can wipe the floor with diamond players all day with a single reaper. I literally do not know the words to express how much better Serral would be than ME. In a simulation vs Serral, out of 1,000,000 games, I might expect to win ONCE. Where I'm 2 orders of magnitude above a diamond player. Serral is 6 orders of magnitude above a diamond player.

The level of difference that can be measured is staggering.

Now because of this, most people never get to play SC2 as a strategy game.

You can almost always out-macro and out-micro your opponent into submission. But what happens when we get two people who are masters of the game? (Not masters league, those people suck at the game). If you watch a GSL ro4 match, there are mindgames, build order swaps, feints, multi pronged attacks, traps, everything that makes RTS a compelling genre.

Just because you and I aren't good enough to play the game that way, doesn't mean that isn't the essence of the game.

---

As to the part of your post that talks about BW. The phenomenon is compounded 50x there. Savior or Flash in their respective primes were so much better than everyone else that it strategy didn't matter. I'm not a broodwar history buff but IIRC Flash would literally constantly play the same strats on the same maps and no matter what his opponents wouldn't be able to stop it.

---

Why this big rant post on some random balance update thing?

I think this is true for anything. A michelin starred chef. Michael Jordan. Aleksandr Karelin.

There are people who are such behemoths in their fields that mere men cannot compare.

However that does not belittle the strategy element in, for example, greco-roman wrestling during Karelin's prime. Strategy still existed. It just so happened to be that Karelin was stronger, faster, and smarter than all of his opponents for almost 10 years straight. I'm not gonna google it but I think there was a point at which he won 6 world championships without having a point scored on him.

Unfortunately my post has meandered since it is late in the night for me, but I hope I got my point across.

Git gud son.

+ Show Spoiler +
And this is the problem. If only top 100(and even that's questionable) of players can use the strategy, then we have a problem in a real time STRATEGY game. A huge problem. That's why people are leaving(and I am not saying this is the only reason, with my past experience I rather add this here), playing against someone who's a dumb player but he's so much mechanically advanced, that you don't have a chance - this isn't fun. I cannot count how many terrans won against me because they were just sending drop after drop until I finally crushed under the pressure(or their stutter stepping was so on point). But if I defended everything, they suddenly didn't know what to play. And believe me that such mechanically skilled players should be able to play TvP lategame on my level without balance whines, hell, if they understood the game I wouldn't be able to play against them(they would be leagues above me). But they weren't, they're whole "strategy" was to mechanically overwhelm the enemy. No strategy, no game sense, nothing. And while winning against such "beasts" feels good at the moment, these are not the games I remember.

And believe me I know how it looks from the other side, when I play my pathetic Terran(gold), I have no idea what to do. All I know about Terran - if I somehow survive cheeses and 2 base all-ins & I get into the late-game, I just build 30 marines at a time(on some maps even more), 10 medevacs at a time and I just stim a-move to victory. Sure, from time to time I meet a player who knows what a storm is, but generally speaking I win with the sheer power of my macro. The problem is - I have no idea how to play Terran. No. Clue. At. All. Ghosts? Nah, cannot stim bio ball. Marauders? Why? My mechanics are good enough to split on that level against banelings and I lose to storm anyway. Yeah, I build like 5 tanks so I don't have to worry about my home bases too much. If the enemy somehow builds one of the "dreaded" units(ultras/colossi) I just add liberators. Otherwise I just build marines and win. Is this a fair fight? It isn't. With my knowledge I should die to many of the players I'm facing but thanks to the game system I am not. And that's why I play Terran the least. I feel ashamed to play the race the way I play it. It's wrong, this is just wrong.


I put my rant into spoiler, but generally speaking I think the strategy portion should be bigger(imo 7(mechanics) : 3).

Git gud son doesn't help. It's offensive to many players, because you just admitted, that the player would have to get on a level of GSL RO4+ player. Think about that to let that sunk in. Even if we agree the strategy limit is around top 500 players(and we both know this number is much bigger than it's supposed to be), it's still not real to say to playrs git gud. They cannot get good to use strategy, there will be always someone so mechanically better that strategy won't matter.

We're talking about real time STRATEGY game where STRATEGY doesn't matter in most of the played games. (not streamed games, but played games)

Can this be fixed? I believe not(certainly not with balance patches).


Maybe you shouldn't play a game like starcraft because it is mechanically difficult?

go play Warhammer 40,000 or chess or something lol.

maybe some other rts made by stardock games if you want some easy strategy wins. The thing is the skill caps on those games are nothing compared to mechanically difficult games.

Yes,. this helps the population...

On May 22 2018 14:38 washikie wrote:
Show nested quote +
On May 22 2018 10:02 deacon.frost wrote:
On May 21 2018 14:37 Thaniri wrote:
On May 17 2018 16:48 Anoss wrote:So now you can change the map, to have some game with more late game, but that will never affect the casual player. Cause when you are outside of this game, when you don't play since 2, 3, 4 or 5 years, this game look not fun. Nothing is easy and despit of what the majority of the players think, this is no more an intellectual game, its 90% mechanics 10% strategy. Yes you need to think to find some new build, but let's be honest, you all watch the GSL and copy paste. This is not what a strategic player should do, he should improve and think, not copy paste.


I played 2 games vs a Diamond level 3 player today in TvZ. I beat him with a reaper expand both times.

Not a big timing attack with 2-2 bio. Or even a medivac with marines.

I killed him with a single reaper that would consistently get more than 5 drone kills before the 3:30 speed timing and fluster him enough that he had no creep spread or macro.

My MMR is 4800 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vQ5QnewXH5qatQBBUj8yAy6XglqSZrOsvBMaz7LlaN_Q44RnnDD26jhDD9b-1sxIq8ZaA9y6v-ut9wM/pubhtml

His MMR was somewhere in the mid 3000's. According to this graph, he would have less than 1% chance of beating me. Roughly two "orders of magnitude" below me. Strategy would not matter. We even played a game where I went fast 3 base hellion banshee and he went 2 base muta. He could not have hard countered me more, and he still lost.

Now here is the spooky thing. Serral has an MMR greater than 7000. I can wipe the floor with diamond players all day with a single reaper. I literally do not know the words to express how much better Serral would be than ME. In a simulation vs Serral, out of 1,000,000 games, I might expect to win ONCE. Where I'm 2 orders of magnitude above a diamond player. Serral is 6 orders of magnitude above a diamond player.

The level of difference that can be measured is staggering.

Now because of this, most people never get to play SC2 as a strategy game.

You can almost always out-macro and out-micro your opponent into submission. But what happens when we get two people who are masters of the game? (Not masters league, those people suck at the game). If you watch a GSL ro4 match, there are mindgames, build order swaps, feints, multi pronged attacks, traps, everything that makes RTS a compelling genre.

Just because you and I aren't good enough to play the game that way, doesn't mean that isn't the essence of the game.

---

As to the part of your post that talks about BW. The phenomenon is compounded 50x there. Savior or Flash in their respective primes were so much better than everyone else that it strategy didn't matter. I'm not a broodwar history buff but IIRC Flash would literally constantly play the same strats on the same maps and no matter what his opponents wouldn't be able to stop it.

---

Why this big rant post on some random balance update thing?

I think this is true for anything. A michelin starred chef. Michael Jordan. Aleksandr Karelin.

There are people who are such behemoths in their fields that mere men cannot compare.

However that does not belittle the strategy element in, for example, greco-roman wrestling during Karelin's prime. Strategy still existed. It just so happened to be that Karelin was stronger, faster, and smarter than all of his opponents for almost 10 years straight. I'm not gonna google it but I think there was a point at which he won 6 world championships without having a point scored on him.

Unfortunately my post has meandered since it is late in the night for me, but I hope I got my point across.

Git gud son.

+ Show Spoiler +
And this is the problem. If only top 100(and even that's questionable) of players can use the strategy, then we have a problem in a real time STRATEGY game. A huge problem. That's why people are leaving(and I am not saying this is the only reason, with my past experience I rather add this here), playing against someone who's a dumb player but he's so much mechanically advanced, that you don't have a chance - this isn't fun. I cannot count how many terrans won against me because they were just sending drop after drop until I finally crushed under the pressure(or their stutter stepping was so on point). But if I defended everything, they suddenly didn't know what to play. And believe me that such mechanically skilled players should be able to play TvP lategame on my level without balance whines, hell, if they understood the game I wouldn't be able to play against them(they would be leagues above me). But they weren't, they're whole "strategy" was to mechanically overwhelm the enemy. No strategy, no game sense, nothing. And while winning against such "beasts" feels good at the moment, these are not the games I remember.

And believe me I know how it looks from the other side, when I play my pathetic Terran(gold), I have no idea what to do. All I know about Terran - if I somehow survive cheeses and 2 base all-ins & I get into the late-game, I just build 30 marines at a time(on some maps even more), 10 medevacs at a time and I just stim a-move to victory. Sure, from time to time I meet a player who knows what a storm is, but generally speaking I win with the sheer power of my macro. The problem is - I have no idea how to play Terran. No. Clue. At. All. Ghosts? Nah, cannot stim bio ball. Marauders? Why? My mechanics are good enough to split on that level against banelings and I lose to storm anyway. Yeah, I build like 5 tanks so I don't have to worry about my home bases too much. If the enemy somehow builds one of the "dreaded" units(ultras/colossi) I just add liberators. Otherwise I just build marines and win. Is this a fair fight? It isn't. With my knowledge I should die to many of the players I'm facing but thanks to the game system I am not. And that's why I play Terran the least. I feel ashamed to play the race the way I play it. It's wrong, this is just wrong.


I put my rant into spoiler, but generally speaking I think the strategy portion should be bigger(imo 7(mechanics) : 3).

Git gud son doesn't help. It's offensive to many players, because you just admitted, that the player would have to get on a level of GSL RO4+ player. Think about that to let that sunk in. Even if we agree the strategy limit is around top 500 players(and we both know this number is much bigger than it's supposed to be), it's still not real to say to playrs git gud. They cannot get good to use strategy, there will be always someone so mechanically better that strategy won't matter.

We're talking about real time STRATEGY game where STRATEGY doesn't matter in most of the played games. (not streamed games, but played games)

Can this be fixed? I believe not(certainly not with balance patches).


I mean Starcraft has always been about mechanics more than stratagey sure stratagey plays a role but if my opponent micros perfectly and has 1.5 times as much stuff as I do chances are he's gonna win. It's just the nature of the game if your looking for games where stratagey is the deciding factor go play a tbs or a card game. Sc2 is first and foremost a game of mechanics with some stratagey layered ontop.

I'm not sure having stratagey more than mechanics would nesisarily be a good thing. Take for example PVP. PvP is mostly decided by stratagey and not mechanics unlike the other matchups due to the deadlyness of allins in the mu and the fact that's at least in the early game of PvP both macro and micro tend to be trivial prior to the moment when players builds start giving them different sets of units. PvP can e fun but for most people it's considered one of the worst mu probably only zvz is considered to be less fun. Why? Because PvP is so dictated by stratagey that it feals coinflippy and poker like, it's low emphasis on mechanics makes the mu frustrating at times to play and not particularly exciting to watch.


I did NOT write that. Read what I wrote again and then reply to what I wrote. I made it bold so you can see it.
(put in italics what i disagree with)
I imagine France should be able to take this unless Lilbow is busy practicing for Starcraft III. | KadaverBB is my fairy ban mother.
Prev 1 5 6 7 8 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 2m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
ProTech63
EnDerr 4
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 31646
Pusan 531
BeSt 331
ToSsGirL 312
TY 291
EffOrt 206
Aegong 129
Killer 128
PianO 97
Shine 86
[ Show more ]
Hyun 29
NaDa 28
Movie 25
NotJumperer 23
sorry 22
Sharp 21
[sc1f]eonzerg 17
Barracks 13
HiyA 12
Dota 2
XcaliburYe483
XaKoH 371
420jenkins334
BananaSlamJamma317
Fuzer 215
Counter-Strike
shoxiejesuss829
Stewie2K648
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor142
Other Games
singsing668
ceh9596
Happy388
crisheroes219
Pyrionflax157
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Secondary Stream6432
Other Games
gamesdonequick315
StarCraft: Brood War
UltimateBattle 60
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 10 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Upcoming Events
GSL Code S
2m
Rogue vs GuMiho
Maru vs Solar
Online Event
14h 32m
Replay Cast
16h 32m
GSL Code S
1d
herO vs Zoun
Classic vs Bunny
The PondCast
1d
Replay Cast
1d 14h
WardiTV Invitational
2 days
OSC
2 days
Korean StarCraft League
2 days
SOOP
2 days
[ Show More ]
CranKy Ducklings
3 days
WardiTV Invitational
3 days
Cheesadelphia
3 days
CSO Cup
3 days
GSL Code S
3 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Wardi Open
5 days
Replay Cast
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
RSL Revival
6 days
Cure vs Percival
ByuN vs Spirit
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Season 17: Qualifier 2
BGE Stara Zagora 2025
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
NPSL S3
Rose Open S1
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
2025 GSL S2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025
PGL Bucharest 2025
BLAST Open Spring 2025

Upcoming

Copa Latinoamericana 4
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
SEL Season 2 Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
HSC XXVII
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.