EPT[Translation] StarCraft 2 - Page 5
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Phyre
United States1288 Posts
| ||
thedeadhaji
39489 Posts
Just see how things develop, etc. | ||
mikeymoo
Canada7170 Posts
| ||
|
mikeymoo
Canada7170 Posts
On April 25 2007 13:52 MYM.Testie wrote: Blizzard should bring a Testie down who understands the depths of the game from a pace / just knowing games point of view from all races to keep BW awesome while still allowing people to attempt implementing new things. Where can we find a Testie? I have a Teste they can borrow... | ||
|
Zelniq
United States7166 Posts
| ||
CaucasianAsian
Korea (South)11591 Posts
there is no doubt that i will be sc2 and i will become the SC2 WCG champion of 2008 | ||
|
NaDazpwnz3r
United States111 Posts
| ||
|
oneofthem
Cayman Islands24199 Posts
| ||
|
useLess
United States4781 Posts
| ||
|
mikeymoo
Canada7170 Posts
On April 25 2007 22:29 useless wrote: What Im really looking forward to is the continuation (and end) of the current storyline, as well as an expansive map editor. | ||
|
zobz
Canada2175 Posts
it's true though that i think if this game does come out and be very different from starcraft one, there may never be a game that is macro based, nice and simple looking like chess, lacking in excessive variety of races and spells and units and features etc, like starcraft again for a very very long time. it will continue to be played on some level but if the pro scene did die that would be pretty sad. the game is good because it is old-great, and thus can never be replaced. the day needs to come at some point in history for the sake of e-gaming i think where progamers don't need to shift sports every 5 years to keep up with the times. ie some game has to stick around, and we have to be comfortable with something being old. the pros of starcraft i guess won't be that badly off. they can take some of their savings which they probably have anyway as they expect to get too old to hold onto their skill someday. and if worse comes to worst they'll have to go get their ged and live a normal life. also i wonder how non-buggy games will do to replace the quallity that selectively acceptable strategically useful bugs can bring. my hope is that people aren't actually so simple as the mbc game head guy says, and go and buy the game and with that just stop playing bw. if the community is split, we could have a problem. i dunno what he meant by war3 being hard to televise? | ||
|
NastyMarine
United States1252 Posts
On April 25 2007 22:29 useless wrote: What Im really looking forward to is the continuation (and end) of the current storyline, as well as an expansive map editor. i agree. But OFC multiplayer will be teh pwn | ||
|
gokai
United States812 Posts
| ||
|
PuertoRican
United States5709 Posts
| ||
|
gravity
Australia1988 Posts
| ||
GrandInquisitor
New York City13113 Posts
| ||
|
Dendra
Croatia801 Posts
| ||
|
KwarK
United States43567 Posts
| ||
|
niteReloaded
Croatia5282 Posts
If they fuck it up now, they deserve a medal. Im expecting at least a good game. | ||
|
humblegar
Norway883 Posts
What I am 100% sure of: - the final sc2 will be a success - it will have a unique "Blizzard" quality to it - sc2 will have a huge community - sc2 will be a best seller, award winning, and whatever game. - Blizzard puts 100% more effort into it than most people here seem to think. What I am 50% sure of - it will have major shift in direction midways through it (like roleplaying being downplayed in wc3, starcraft made from new after being called wacraft in space a.s.o). What I have no idea about: - bw addicts will "approve of it" - that I will play it more than bw. | ||
| ||
