GSL to host tournament showcasing new balance - Page 6
| Forum Index > SC2 General | 
| 
	 
							phodacbiet
							
							
						 
						
						United States1740 Posts
						 
					 | ||
| 
	 
							The_Red_Viper
							
							
						 
						
						19533 Posts
						 
					On November 01 2016 09:09 Elentos wrote: I wonder how many complaints about the player pool this would have gotten if I left out the part about the new balance patch. It would be bad no matter what. It being played on the balance changes makes it even worse though. I mean new content is great, but why is it so hard to do it the right way? It's hard to do it worse  | ||
| 
	 
							breaker1328
							
							
						 
						
						Canada296 Posts
						 
					On November 01 2016 03:45 Fran_ wrote: The patient is still breathing. The prognosis is still very negative though. Prognosis negative is a good thing.  | ||
| 
	 
							stuchiu
							
							
						 
						
						Fiddler's Green42661 Posts
						 
					On November 01 2016 08:27 SetGuitarsToKill wrote: Ya lol, he has to actually be successful in both games before he's Bo Jackson. given how he plays SC2, he doesnt need a lot of practice. He just needs to think. I wonder if 10 protoss is trying to tell us something about how GSL is predicting the future of the patch.  | ||
| 
	 
							TheWinks
							
							
						 
						
						United States572 Posts
						 
					It's a waste of time, effort, and money. I don't think many people will watch it either unless most of the non protoss go on a major run.  | ||
| 
	 
							-Archangel-
							
							
						 
						
						Croatia7457 Posts
						 
					On October 31 2016 20:56 Scrubwave wrote: Heehee, is the representation supposed to be some commentary? My guess is that if a non protoss manages to get through 10 toss, Blizzard will consider their balance job well done.  | ||
| 
	 
							Spect8rCraft
							
							
						 
						
						649 Posts
						 
					![]()  | ||
| 
	 
							proortoss
							
							
						 
						
						China14 Posts
						 
					 | ||
| 
	 
							Jett.Jack.Alvir
							
							
						 
						
						Canada2250 Posts
						 
					On November 01 2016 13:42 Spect8rCraft wrote: Blizzard got a shoe endorsement? ![]() lol I thought the same thing.  | ||
| 
	 
							WidowMineHero
							
							
						 
						
						New Zealand143 Posts
						 
					 | ||
| 
	 
							Scrubwave
							
							
						 
						
						Poland1786 Posts
						 
					 | ||
| 
	 
							papaz
							
							
						 
						
						Sweden4149 Posts
						 
					You should not have such an uneven distributed lineup for a "balance tournamen". Just have a lot of showmatches instead if you can't find enough zerg and terran players.  | ||
| 
	 
							Elentos
							
							
						 
						
						55555 Posts
						 
					On November 01 2016 09:25 The_Red_Viper wrote: It would be bad no matter what. It being played on the balance changes makes it even worse though. I mean new content is great, but why is it so hard to do it the right way? It's hard to do it worse Hey, maybe they'll do a second one some time with the other half of the Korean pro scene. (I mean this quite literally by the way, the active Korean pro scene is small enough that 16 might as well be half of it) The amount of people in this thread saying "Well I'd rather have no tournament at all than a tournament with bad racial distribution" is mind-boggling to me.  | ||
| 
	 
							otzowski
							
							
						 
						
						Germany26 Posts
						 
					User was warned for this post  | ||
| 
	 
							The_Red_Viper
							
							
						 
						
						19533 Posts
						 
					On November 01 2016 17:51 Elentos wrote: Hey, maybe they'll do a second one some time with the other half of the Korean pro scene. (I mean this quite literally by the way, the active Korean pro scene is small enough that 16 might as well be half of it) The amount of people in this thread saying "Well I'd rather have no tournament at all than a tournament with bad racial distribution" is mind-boggling to me. I like new content, a new tournament. But i also think that it should be reasonably easy to do it in a decent way. This racial balance isn't decent, it's horrible and quite frankly destroys hype. I simply cannot understand how they can come to the conclusion that this is ok. That's mind-boggling to me    I will still watch it ofc, but yeah i am hugely disappointed atm.  | ||
| 
	 
							BelgianSC
							
							
						 
						
						Belgium19 Posts
						 
					I do like that they're bringing out a new tournament, but I feel the racial distribution could have been better. That said, glad they are bringing content!  | ||
| 
	 
							Beelzebub1
							
							
						 
						
						1004 Posts
						 
					 | ||
| 
	 
							BaneRiders
							
							
						 
						
						Sweden3630 Posts
						 
					On November 01 2016 15:36 WidowMineHero wrote: Why are there 10 protoss players? I think they are compensating (possibly overcompensating) for the lack of foreigners in the tournament. ![]()  | ||
| 
	 
							Probe1
							
							
						 
						
						United States17920 Posts
						 
					Still, I feel like I'm always seeing a lot more zergs qualify for tournaments then get turfed out until there's only a handful left. I'll be surprised if there's PvP in the semi finals/finals.  | ||
| 
	 
							JimSocks
							
							
						 
						
						United States968 Posts
						 
					 | ||
  | ||
