|
Canada13379 Posts
On July 27 2015 03:13 NarutO wrote: I really like that.
Can they break out of jail?
If you buy a BTTV shirt and show up at a live event with it they will lift your ban its a single use get out of jail free card.
|
Obviously not really applicable to one day/recurring weekly cups, but a good idea for invitationals or longer running events.
|
On July 27 2015 02:56 Elentos wrote: Question since it wasn't mentioned in the OP. I guess this mostly concerns Olimoleague. What about players on Proleague teams? If they miss an event and later excuse themselves by saying something like "The coaching staff had me prepare a Proleague match with a teammate and didn't let me participate.", is this a valid excuse or a strike?
I would love it if things like this could in some cases lead to a strike against the entire team, player themselves should probably not be blamed for this as long as it was coordinated beforehand between player and the team before the sudden withdrawal occurred.
Just a thought I had when reading this.
Edit: I mean, in some cases the team/coach/whoever is obviously sabotaging either the players ability to join tournaments or the tournaments themselves. Not pointing any fingers, but I think something like this has happened before.
|
Will we see a list of who is in? The list of shame?
|
On July 27 2015 04:04 graNite wrote: Will we see a list of who is in? The list of shame?
The list is publicly read-only, it's linked on the front page.
|
Seems like a good idea, Hope it doesn't lead to a bunch of naniwa ish probe all ins
|
On July 27 2015 04:06 partouf wrote:Show nested quote +On July 27 2015 04:04 graNite wrote: Will we see a list of who is in? The list of shame? The list is publicly read-only, it's linked on the front page.
link pls? i dont see it.
will there be strikes for tournaments in the past?
|
On July 27 2015 04:21 graNite wrote:Show nested quote +On July 27 2015 04:06 partouf wrote:On July 27 2015 04:04 graNite wrote: Will we see a list of who is in? The list of shame? The list is publicly read-only, it's linked on the front page. link pls? i dont see it. will there be strikes for tournaments in the past? I believe not, since they didn't feel like it was fair.
|
On July 27 2015 04:21 graNite wrote:Show nested quote +On July 27 2015 04:06 partouf wrote:On July 27 2015 04:04 graNite wrote: Will we see a list of who is in? The list of shame? The list is publicly read-only, it's linked on the front page. link pls? i dont see it. will there be strikes for tournaments in the past?
On July 27 2015 01:34 feardragon wrote:Is this being applied retroactively to people who have broken the rules before this ruleset released No. We won't be holding players to a ruleset they had no way of knowing about until now. This ruleset will begin being enforced starting today though. Not that hard to find.
|
On July 27 2015 04:24 IntoTheheart wrote:Show nested quote +On July 27 2015 04:21 graNite wrote:On July 27 2015 04:06 partouf wrote:On July 27 2015 04:04 graNite wrote: Will we see a list of who is in? The list of shame? The list is publicly read-only, it's linked on the front page. link pls? i dont see it. will there be strikes for tournaments in the past? I believe not, since they didn't feel like it was fair.
so? it wasnt fair to sign up for a tournament and then dont show in the first place. as the organizers, its their tournament, their rules.
|
I knew it, SomeNaughtyPlayer 1 honestly had it coming!
Good thing to see (:
|
Too bad Shoutcraft CW "died" because of this. But it's a really good initiative.
|
On July 27 2015 04:10 kanada wrote: Seems like a good idea, Hope it doesn't lead to a bunch of naniwa ish probe all ins
This is a good point, though most players would probably feel that showing up to a tournament just to do two of these will hurt their reputation more than finding some excuse to not show up at all.
|
This is your solution? What a joke. And the naming of it only makes it worse... At least you could have thought a little about the signal you send.
Why not just put more effort into a healthy approach? Such as Creating events that players really want to attend and participate in so bad, that they don't want to drop out unless of a legitimate reason (last minute visa issues, transport problems etc.). Putting them in foreigner *host* stupid name *host* jail is such a victimising "solution". Also the perfect way to split the community and player-caster-organiser relationships.
|
On July 27 2015 04:36 Jones313 wrote:Show nested quote +On July 27 2015 04:10 kanada wrote: Seems like a good idea, Hope it doesn't lead to a bunch of naniwa ish probe all ins This is a good point, though most players would probably feel that showing up to a tournament just to do two of these will hurt their reputation more than finding some excuse to not show up at all. Screw them if they do stuff like that. There are plenty of replacements for pro players.
|
On July 27 2015 04:39 thewhiskey wrote: This is your solution? What a joke. And the naming of it only makes it worse... At least you could have thought a little about the signal you send.
Why not just put more effort into a healthy approach? Such as Creating events that players really want to attend and participate in so bad, that they don't want to drop out unless of a legitimate reason (last minute visa issues, transport problems etc.). Putting them in foreigner *host* stupid name *host* jail is such a victimising "solution". Also the perfect way to split the community and player-caster-organiser relationships.
You speak the truth my man, also you are a gentleman and a scholar.
|
|
On July 27 2015 02:55 stuchiu wrote:Show nested quote +On July 27 2015 02:38 Ej_ wrote: I hope that 1 day, there will be more players in the jail than out of it and the scene collapses in some hilarious anti-utopian scenario. Byunorak + Show Spoiler +
|
|
On July 27 2015 04:39 thewhiskey wrote: Why not just put more effort into a healthy approach? Such as Creating events that players really want to attend and participate in so bad, that they don't want to drop out unless of a legitimate reason
A lot of these events are or have in the past been funded out of pocket by the organizers so that these people can get paid to play a game, if they dont think that's enough motivation then what is?
|
|
|
|