| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Freakling
Germany1529 Posts
On May 12 2015 14:10 Barrin wrote: I'm inclined to agree. What would you suggest as an alternative? Something like the voting system we used for map contests back in the day at broodwarmaps.net would be great, where you could give 5, 3 and 1 (I think) points respectively to up to 3 different maps. | ||
|
sixfour
England11061 Posts
edit - just checked the other thread and it is. can't anyone make a 2+ player map anymore? | ||
The_Templar
your Country52797 Posts
On May 12 2015 20:57 ejozl wrote: I have a real hard time deciding what to vote for here, they all look pretty cool and different. It looks like Noah's Ark have super annoying lighting, making it harder to see stuff, can anyone confirm? I watched a game or two on it, didn't seem that bad. | ||
|
Ej_
47656 Posts
On May 12 2015 21:58 The_Templar wrote: I watched a game or two on it, didn't seem that bad. it's fine, but don't vote it! | ||
|
The_Templar
your Country52797 Posts
Yeah, vote Mutiny instead.  | ||
|
Randomaccount#77123
United States5003 Posts
| ||
|
Obsi
87 Posts
| ||
|
[PkF] Wire
France24237 Posts
PS : who the hell turned that contest in a backdoors festival ? | ||
|
Psychotikah
Canada101 Posts
 .They are nice looking and I am sure the makers did put a lot of effort into them but they seem very silly. Terraform is decent though. It gets my vote. Maybe it's a blast to play on. The natural choke is pretty wide though. Oh well. Good luck! | ||
|
Dingodile
4137 Posts
On May 12 2015 22:32 Obsi wrote: Where is the "All suck" option? They're all pretty retarded tbh. The current map pool showed us what backrocks in your main and gold bases are good for. Stupid games and even more stupid all ins. Hardcounter units and FF are the main reasons why all maps since 2011 are pretty similar. The biggest difference begins the position at 4th base but however most are the same again. I feel bad for mapmakers and blizzard did a very horrible job around this. Great example is Cloud Kingdom and Daybreak, first 3 bases are on the most boring places, the 4th are on most interesting places. Another thing is the biggest stalement begins shortly before you take the 4th base (on all maps), thats why many ppl think the position of 4th base isnt important because the stalement is superior (less superior on Cloud kingdom and Daybreak). | ||
|
Salteador Neo
Andorra5591 Posts
| ||
|
Ej_
47656 Posts
On May 12 2015 22:08 Barrin wrote: I can't bring myself to vote for Noah's Ark until I see some ZvP's or ZvT's on it. a ZvT starts here around 1h 25min http://www.twitch.tv/basetradetv/v/4892173 | ||
|
Superouman
France2195 Posts
On May 12 2015 21:49 Freakling wrote: Something like the voting system we used for map contests back in the day at broodwarmaps.net would be great, where you could give 5, 3 and 1 (I think) points respectively to up to 3 different maps. Oh hi freakling, nice to see you around! Nyu, why you lobby against it Vote for terraform, it will win anywayThe lighting is standard, check your screen options. Barrin, go play some games with the right mu  | ||
|
Cricketer12
United States13990 Posts
| ||
|
Cricketer12
United States13990 Posts
Lets just vote for Cactus Valley again. Because it is that hype. | ||
|
Ej_
47656 Posts
| ||
|
NasusAndDraven
359 Posts
| ||
|
zerge
Germany162 Posts
I can not understand why Noah's Ark would ever make it into the voting, the 3rd and 4th base are so easily defendable and the narrow path in the middle is easily abusable against zerg. | ||
|
Pyloss
Germany1515 Posts
| ||
|
KalWarkov
Germany4126 Posts
Noah's Ark is probably the better map of both, but Terraform is a bit more innovative, so it gets my vote. expansions / defending them is very awkward or even impossible on some maps unfortionally - allins way too strong | ||
| ||
|
|
StarCraft2.fi
PiGosaur Monday
Wardi Open
StarCraft2.fi
Replay Cast
The PondCast
Replay Cast
Korean StarCraft League
CranKy Ducklings
SC Evo League
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
