EPTNew WCS 2015 Season 1 maps - Page 15
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
PharaphobiaSC2
Czech Republic85 Posts
| ||
|
IeZaeL
Italy991 Posts
| ||
|
NetterMizuno
Finland17 Posts
Only map i liked on the new maps i expedition lost, the rocks kind of make it intence if you forget to watch them. but yea, community maps all the way *nods* | ||
|
MorDka
Poland543 Posts
| ||
|
GreenMash
Norway1746 Posts
| ||
|
GTPGlitch
5061 Posts
On January 12 2015 21:32 algue wrote: Blizzard maps are so terrible than every tournament use them and pros never really bothered complaining about them (except when the map was terribly broken like Daedalus point). You are just hating on blizzard because it's cool. I feel like a lot of people overestimate how the maps impact the game. Sure some are aweful/imbalanced, some are correct and some are good but a map won't make the game suddenly awesome and save #esports. Can't do much about the maps of you want to give wcs points | ||
|
SetGuitarsToKill
Canada28396 Posts
| ||
|
algue
France1436 Posts
On January 12 2015 23:49 GTPGlitch wrote: Can't do much about the maps of you want to give wcs points They didn't care before WCS points were a thing. Also, the GSL uses Iron Fortress which isn't a ladder map but they still give WCS points so it seems that WCS points aren't an excuse to use ladder maps only. On January 12 2015 22:44 PharaphobiaSC2 wrote: I will just ask right here, whats to point to be StarCraft 2 community mapmaker? It's like drawing but instead you are making maps. -- Imo the main problem with these maps (including mine obviously) is that if there's an obvious imbalance, Blizzard won't move a finger to try to fix it or at least reduce it (remember how long it took to decrease the size of Daedalus Point ramp in front of the natural). Lowering or increasing the HP of a rock, Increasing or lowering the size of a ramp, changing a gold base into a blue base ou vice versa, placing a destructible plate on a base (especially golds) to nerf the gangnam terran strat etc. can totally change the way a map is played but Blizzard never does that (Valve does on CS:GO and it's awesome). | ||
|
InfCereal
Canada1759 Posts
| ||
|
Psychobabas
2531 Posts
Why the fuck did they add the backdoor rocks? Vetoed immediately lol | ||
|
helius788
New Zealand74 Posts
Secret Spring could be playable in a TvZ, but TvP? no way And Inferno pools depends so much on the spawning position, it's crazy! Horizontal it's great for Terran. The other spawns are good for Zergs. Vaani and Expedition are good/okay so far, I think. | ||
|
Pontius Pirate
United States1557 Posts
| ||
|
Aocowns
Norway6070 Posts
| ||
The_Templar
your Country52798 Posts
On January 13 2015 00:41 Psychobabas wrote: Expedition Lost: Why the fuck did they add the backdoor rocks? Vetoed immediately lol Ask the mapmaker, he was the one who put the rocks in the original version. | ||
|
mCon.Hephaistas
Netherlands891 Posts
Thanks for that help David Kim | ||
|
SC2Toastie
Netherlands5725 Posts
On January 13 2015 01:32 mCon.Hephaistas wrote: Gonna be another season of awful zerg maps... Thanks for that help David Kim Awful as in imba against Z? I see some pretty redeeming factors! So many people are always so quick to jump to conclusions. How can you determine in one day of play that a map is shit and sucks and fucked up and Zerg so underpowered never gonna win etc blalalal? | ||
Phaenoman
568 Posts
On January 13 2015 01:37 SC2Toastie wrote: How can you determine in one day of play that a map is shit and sucks and fucked up [...]? It's much easier than u think: Some maps are so bad that u just have to look at them. I call these "honest maps". At least they don't try to hide how "fucked up" they are. They just say: "Hey, look! I am just horrible! I don't recommend playing on me." | ||
|
The_Templar
your Country52798 Posts
On January 13 2015 01:55 Phaenoman wrote: It's much easier than u think: Some maps are so bad that u just have to look at them. I call these "honest maps". At least they don't try to hide how "fucked up" they are. They just say: "Hey, look! I am just horrible! I don't recommend playing on me." Just like Entombed Valley and Antiga Shipyard were? | ||
|
plgElwood
Germany518 Posts
I always prefer smaller main bases as terran, although my buildingplacement sucks. + Show Spoiler + 1. Drops in the mineral line are better ! Protoss will struggle to reach their own mineral line, because they block with own buildings, army will block itself ! 2. DoubleD" Doom Drops" getting worse, some of the catallena drops could not even unload on the new maps, also they get spotted easily and early. 3. Less Turrets to build 4. Less room for the Blinkball to run around ! Also the maps feature "I will Blink in here" ledges which is quite comfortable + Ultras have a nice day without so much interfering ramps and sh*t | ||
|
mCon.Hephaistas
Netherlands891 Posts
On January 13 2015 01:37 SC2Toastie wrote: Awful as in imba against Z? I see some pretty redeeming factors! So many people are always so quick to jump to conclusions. How can you determine in one day of play that a map is shit and sucks and fucked up and Zerg so underpowered never gonna win etc blalalal? Inbase expo's? plz... Inferno and secret springs are just horrid, you dont even have to play on them to see that. | ||
| ||
