• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 08:15
CEST 14:15
KST 21:15
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Serral wins Maestros of the Game 238ByuL, and the Limitations of Standard Play3Team Liquid Map Contest #22: Results and Winners7Code S Season 2 (2026): RO4 and Finals Preview12TL.net Map Contest #22 - Voting & Ladder Map Selection7
Community News
BSL Season 22 Full Overview & Conclusion5BSL Season 22 Full Overview & Conclusion5Weekly Cups (June 29-July 5): Solar Doubles0MC vs IdrA, Boxer vs Nal_rA to be Legacy Matches @ BlizzCon445.0.16 Hotfix (June 30) - Balance + Bug Fixes40
StarCraft 2
General
Most successful SC2 players of Q2 2026 Serral wins Maestros of the Game 2 MC vs IdrA, Boxer vs Nal_rA to be Legacy Matches @ BlizzCon Is the larve respawn broken? 5.0.16 patch for SC2 goes live (8 worker start)
Tourneys
GSL CK #5 Race War RSL Revival: Season 6 - Qualifiers and Main Event HomeStory Cup 29 Vespene Cup #1 — $300+ USD, July 10 Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond)
Strategy
[G] Having the right mentality to improve
Custom Maps
New Map Maker - Looking for Advice - Love or Hate Work In Progress Melee Maps [D]RTS in all its shapes and glory <3
External Content
Mutation # 533 Die Together The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 532 Nuclear Family Mutation # 531 Experimental Artillery
Brood War
General
ASL 22 Proposed Map Pool ASL22 General Discussion BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BSL Season 22 Full Overview & Conclusion
Tourneys
[ASL22] Wildcard Qualifier [Megathread] Daily Proleagues IPSL Spring 2026 Top 4! CSLAN 4 is Coming!
Strategy
Fighting Spirit mining rates Simple Questions, Simple Answers Creating a full chart of Zerg builds Relatively freeroll strategies
Other Games
General Games
Summer Games Done Quick 2026! General RTS Discussion Thread Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Dawn of War IV
Dota 2
Looking for a Dota Mentor Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
NeO.D_StephenKing vs This Guy From 1 Million Dance TL Mafia Community Thread TL Mafia Power Rank Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread UK Politics Mega-thread YouTube Thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club The HerO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! Series you have seen recently...
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread McBoner: A hockey love story Tennis[sport] Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
FPS when play League Of Legend on laptop How to clean a TTe Thermaltake keyboard? Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Major Shifts in the Gaming I…
TrAiDoS
An Exploration of th…
waywardstrategy
Gauntlet SC2: A Retrospectiv…
Ctone23
ramps on octagon
StaticNine
Funny Nicknames
LUCKY_NOOB
Evil Gacha Games and the…
ffswowsucks
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 6725 users

Legacy of the Void: Multiplayer Development Update - Page 16

Forum Index > SC2 General
395 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 14 15 16 17 18 20 Next All
SuperYo1000
Profile Joined July 2008
United States880 Posts
November 21 2014 17:41 GMT
#301
On November 22 2014 02:31 TedCruz2016 wrote:
P has already had great AoEs. There's really no need for another.


as a P player I dont understand their thinking on this. Do we need another ground splash damage unit. We pretty much reign supreme in that area already. I was hoping for a new ground to air unit. Nothing fancy, no spells, just a protoss Goliath
TedCruz2016
Profile Joined November 2014
Hong Kong271 Posts
November 21 2014 17:49 GMT
#302
On November 22 2014 02:41 BaronVonOwn wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 22 2014 02:31 TedCruz2016 wrote:
P has already had great AoEs. There's really no need for another.

A lot of people hate the colossus and want it replaced.


Colossus can be replaced, the fancy-schmancy lasers can't!
Make DC listen!
Whitewing
Profile Joined October 2010
United States7483 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-11-21 20:29:46
November 21 2014 20:25 GMT
#303
On November 21 2014 22:53 clickrush wrote:
who else thinks that...

...the cyclone would be way more cooler if it dealt much more damage but had to stand still to do so instead of being able to kite, while having the kite mode for free (without the charging up time) but it would then deal much less damage? That would emphasize micro much more while still being very different from the siege tank because it would have a way different application and skillset.

...the disruptor being scrapped and his overload (without the invicibility) was a DT upgrade. It would leave the DT uncloaked for a short period after the overload or right before it hits. You still had the utility to close in from cloak but it would be counterplayable.

..the shuttle should have a visible animation (mb a beam) when it loads in units from range.


If the cyclone can kite units, the damage is mostly irrelevant in the early game. It could do the low low DPS of a stalker and still murder everything, because it simply cannot be caught. It's already not going to be used TvZ because the hellion is superior for the same objectives in that matchup, it might be used in TvT, but it's role is in TvP, and nothing protoss has can catch it until blink is done.

I can see a variety of alternative design functions for it however. Taking away the attacking while moving function, but giving it a sort of root mode of its own where it can only hit air, like a mobile missile turret, would be cool. Or leaving its kiting function the same but make it so it only works on air units, and cannot hit ground, would make it fine.
Strategy"You know I fucking hate the way you play, right?" ~SC2John
Freeborn
Profile Joined July 2010
Germany421 Posts
November 21 2014 20:35 GMT
#304
On November 22 2014 02:12 BaronVonOwn wrote:
I'd like the disruptor a lot more if it had a detonate command similar to banelings. As it is right now, it seems way too easy to dodge and pretty weak. If this unit costs 200-300 gas (equivalent to 8-12 banelings) shouldn't it at least have some semireliable damage like banelings?



It was said that the disruptor has a speed of like 5 or something when triggered which would make it really hard to dodge. Plus it does 150 dmg which makes it vastly superior to a colossus in the regard that even one disruptor will kill most units with one hit.
Could be great to defend against drops, and will probably force splits or liftoffs from terran bio. Plus it is not vulnerable to air and - very important - if you send a few disruptors at a terran bio ball, they will have to run, split or die. if they run or split they take dmg from the rest of your army.
Whitewing
Profile Joined October 2010
United States7483 Posts
November 21 2014 23:18 GMT
#305
On November 22 2014 05:35 Freeborn wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 22 2014 02:12 BaronVonOwn wrote:
I'd like the disruptor a lot more if it had a detonate command similar to banelings. As it is right now, it seems way too easy to dodge and pretty weak. If this unit costs 200-300 gas (equivalent to 8-12 banelings) shouldn't it at least have some semireliable damage like banelings?



It was said that the disruptor has a speed of like 5 or something when triggered which would make it really hard to dodge. Plus it does 150 dmg which makes it vastly superior to a colossus in the regard that even one disruptor will kill most units with one hit.
Could be great to defend against drops, and will probably force splits or liftoffs from terran bio. Plus it is not vulnerable to air and - very important - if you send a few disruptors at a terran bio ball, they will have to run, split or die. if they run or split they take dmg from the rest of your army.


Storms already accomplish those goals. The disruptor, as designed, is unnecessary and doesn't add anything.
Strategy"You know I fucking hate the way you play, right?" ~SC2John
VArsovskiSC
Profile Joined July 2010
Macedonia563 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-11-21 23:42:58
November 21 2014 23:40 GMT
#306
On November 22 2014 08:18 Whitewing wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 22 2014 05:35 Freeborn wrote:
On November 22 2014 02:12 BaronVonOwn wrote:
I'd like the disruptor a lot more if it had a detonate command similar to banelings. As it is right now, it seems way too easy to dodge and pretty weak. If this unit costs 200-300 gas (equivalent to 8-12 banelings) shouldn't it at least have some semireliable damage like banelings?



It was said that the disruptor has a speed of like 5 or something when triggered which would make it really hard to dodge. Plus it does 150 dmg which makes it vastly superior to a colossus in the regard that even one disruptor will kill most units with one hit.
Could be great to defend against drops, and will probably force splits or liftoffs from terran bio. Plus it is not vulnerable to air and - very important - if you send a few disruptors at a terran bio ball, they will have to run, split or die. if they run or split they take dmg from the rest of your army.


Storms already accomplish those goals. The disruptor, as designed, is unnecessary and doesn't add anything.

Disruptor is David Kim's way to bring back Reaver micro.. BUT it's cost is too damn high to even try that

Basically the Disruptor is meant to be paired with the Warp-Prism and it's brand new 6 pickup range.. Well - the difference is - it's gonna be even harder cause now you don't drop, target and pick up, but instead drop, Activate, MOVE, and THEN pick up after it has been detonated

I seriously doubt that even Bisu himself would be able to effectively do that, yet that being done by a random ladder-er

On the bright side however - it seems well paired with the new Stasis Trap ability of Oracle - see when the stasis expires - activate the Disruptor to do the AoE

That's what I basically get from that
Another world, another place, another universe, won the race.. :) ;) :P
Freeborn
Profile Joined July 2010
Germany421 Posts
November 21 2014 23:56 GMT
#307
On November 22 2014 08:18 Whitewing wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 22 2014 05:35 Freeborn wrote:
On November 22 2014 02:12 BaronVonOwn wrote:
I'd like the disruptor a lot more if it had a detonate command similar to banelings. As it is right now, it seems way too easy to dodge and pretty weak. If this unit costs 200-300 gas (equivalent to 8-12 banelings) shouldn't it at least have some semireliable damage like banelings?



It was said that the disruptor has a speed of like 5 or something when triggered which would make it really hard to dodge. Plus it does 150 dmg which makes it vastly superior to a colossus in the regard that even one disruptor will kill most units with one hit.
Could be great to defend against drops, and will probably force splits or liftoffs from terran bio. Plus it is not vulnerable to air and - very important - if you send a few disruptors at a terran bio ball, they will have to run, split or die. if they run or split they take dmg from the rest of your army.


Storms already accomplish those goals. The disruptor, as designed, is unnecessary and doesn't add anything.



Not really, the disruptor actually kills stuff, storms only kill stuff if it doesn't move for 2-3 secs. Plus templars run out of energy after max two storms and usually get fused to archons. And yet even more importantly - disruptor will give a damn about EMP.
Oh and yes stasis followed by a disruptor, should be cool.

I think the basic idea is not terribly bad, but I agree that it's not the best possible new unit for protoss.
Freeborn
Profile Joined July 2010
Germany421 Posts
November 21 2014 23:58 GMT
#308
Actually psi storm does 80 damage over 4 seconds - now imagine 150 damage instant... probably indeed like 1-2 reaver hits.
KrOmander
Profile Joined August 2014
United Kingdom78 Posts
November 21 2014 23:59 GMT
#309
Well still seems like they have a lot of work to do with LotV. Here is hoping that more design decisions can be really worked on as this is the last expansion.
Zanzabarr
Profile Joined October 2010
Canada217 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-11-22 00:23:33
November 22 2014 00:21 GMT
#310
Protoss doesn't need another AoE unit coming from T3 tech costing ridiculous amounts of gas. The race is forced to tech up faster than any other already, has good T3 splash, and is gas starved as it is. I'd rather they get a lower cost lower damage T1.5-T2 splash unit. This would allow protoss to compete with other races lower tech options with equal level of tech units, allow the race to split its forces more successfully, and allow protoss to compete in small army vs small army engagements without having to commit significantly more gas / tech units than the opponent to do so.

Terran has helions / hellbats / widowmines/ tanks. Zerg has banelings and now the ravager. Protoss needs a mid tier aoe unit. This would allow a-move deathball units like the colossus to be reworked / replaced with something else, and even possibly enable a nerf / rework to forcefields / warpgate.

As it stands now, the proposed changes for the economy in LOTV are going to be very hard to balance if protoss isn't able to compete with the other races tech for tech and cost for cost. If they expect to have the game revolve around more small skirmishes in several spread out locations, the addition of a lower tier aoe unit, or stronger gateway unit is pretty necessary. Without such things, I expect toss in LOTV to do nothing but 1-3 base all-ins every game, as they are forced to move around in a deathball out of necessity. The mothership core overcharge and recall were band-aids to help protoss deal with being a deathbally immobile race that is weak to multi-pronged attacks and counter-attacks. If 3-4 bases suddenly becomes 5-6 at the same game time, such band-aids will no longer be sufficient.
Foxxan
Profile Joined October 2004
Sweden3427 Posts
November 22 2014 00:29 GMT
#311
On November 22 2014 05:25 Whitewing wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 21 2014 22:53 clickrush wrote:
who else thinks that...

...the cyclone would be way more cooler if it dealt much more damage but had to stand still to do so instead of being able to kite, while having the kite mode for free (without the charging up time) but it would then deal much less damage? That would emphasize micro much more while still being very different from the siege tank because it would have a way different application and skillset.

...the disruptor being scrapped and his overload (without the invicibility) was a DT upgrade. It would leave the DT uncloaked for a short period after the overload or right before it hits. You still had the utility to close in from cloak but it would be counterplayable.

..the shuttle should have a visible animation (mb a beam) when it loads in units from range.


If the cyclone can kite units, the damage is mostly irrelevant in the early game. It could do the low low DPS of a stalker and still murder everything, because it simply cannot be caught. It's already not going to be used TvZ because the hellion is superior for the same objectives in that matchup, it might be used in TvT, but it's role is in TvP, and nothing protoss has can catch it until blink is done.

I can see a variety of alternative design functions for it however. Taking away the attacking while moving function, but giving it a sort of root mode of its own where it can only hit air, like a mobile missile turret, would be cool. Or leaving its kiting function the same but make it so it only works on air units, and cannot hit ground, would make it fine.

The game will be redesigned. Will be a new game in beta.
Why do you draw conclusions like this?

Protoss might have an easier access to blink. Getting it alot faster since it will not break any mu.
Hell, stalkers might start with a weaker blink and then able to upgrade it to a better blink on the citadel.
There is still forcefield involved. Zealots might get a redesign with faster speed. Wouldnt be surprised if the unit will perhaps move faster than a stalker in Lotv. Then it can catch cyclones...
They might get a more fun micro-skill ability to to catch cyclones. Or atleast be used against cyclones when cooldown is off or if they get energy or something else.

Hellions initself dont cut it, they are terrible throughout the entire game. Their only role is versus zerglings.
And the interaction is usually boring with this unit.

Cyclone can change this. Much better interactions, more fun ones.
Kill static defence, attack armored units. Might open up mech in a whole different level.
If we look at broodwar real fast, the vulture were terrible against armored units. Yet, it opened up a lot of play for mech.


If we compare 2cyclones vs 2hellions. I see alot of times the hellions dont kill a single worker while the 2cyclones might.

Protoss might need to go new opening completely vs terran.
Warpgate might get chagned even further.
Why cant 1fast robotic be standard? Immortals might get a new role, behave differently etc.

Cyclone might get tweaked so it has less range when locked on.
Lots of things will change, its kinda pointless drawing conclusions.
Foxxan
Profile Joined October 2004
Sweden3427 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-11-22 00:38:22
November 22 2014 00:32 GMT
#312
On November 22 2014 08:18 Whitewing wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 22 2014 05:35 Freeborn wrote:
On November 22 2014 02:12 BaronVonOwn wrote:
I'd like the disruptor a lot more if it had a detonate command similar to banelings. As it is right now, it seems way too easy to dodge and pretty weak. If this unit costs 200-300 gas (equivalent to 8-12 banelings) shouldn't it at least have some semireliable damage like banelings?



It was said that the disruptor has a speed of like 5 or something when triggered which would make it really hard to dodge. Plus it does 150 dmg which makes it vastly superior to a colossus in the regard that even one disruptor will kill most units with one hit.
Could be great to defend against drops, and will probably force splits or liftoffs from terran bio. Plus it is not vulnerable to air and - very important - if you send a few disruptors at a terran bio ball, they will have to run, split or die. if they run or split they take dmg from the rest of your army.


Storms already accomplish those goals. The disruptor, as designed, is unnecessary and doesn't add anything.

It atleast adds micro for the aoe unit.
Hell, its even possible to flank with this unit, i think this is like the first time i see a heavy cost unit able to flank.

Great synergy with warpprism.
Imo, this unit has potential to be really fun.
And why cant blizzard tweak/redeisgn/remove colossus? It has never been fun in thefirst place, its about time they do something to this unit.

The boring part with the disruptor is the immune part. I dont know, maybe its not fun to play against that sort of thing but we will see..
More hp, more passive speed, remove the immune part might work.

Maybe hellion or any other support unit can speed up singletarget units->adds synergy to disruptor.
Lots of things will change in Lotv. Blizzard just said so themself.

EDIT:
Oops saw you wrote about storm.
Well, protoss has always had 2big aoe units.

The disruptor seems different. I think it can open up agressive play with this unit like i have never seen a unit this costly do before. Early midgame etc, without going all-in.
Not even the reaver in broodwar did this since that unit needs alot of support.
Foxxan
Profile Joined October 2004
Sweden3427 Posts
November 22 2014 00:34 GMT
#313
Can people stop draw conclusions???
Blizzard are aware units are overlapping with each other. Things will change. Probably alot.

Its better to talk about design of the units. What to add. How to make better interactions(I see like no ppl trying to imrpove the interactions).
Hider
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Denmark9447 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-11-22 01:36:37
November 22 2014 01:29 GMT
#314
On November 22 2014 08:18 Whitewing wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 22 2014 05:35 Freeborn wrote:
On November 22 2014 02:12 BaronVonOwn wrote:
I'd like the disruptor a lot more if it had a detonate command similar to banelings. As it is right now, it seems way too easy to dodge and pretty weak. If this unit costs 200-300 gas (equivalent to 8-12 banelings) shouldn't it at least have some semireliable damage like banelings?



It was said that the disruptor has a speed of like 5 or something when triggered which would make it really hard to dodge. Plus it does 150 dmg which makes it vastly superior to a colossus in the regard that even one disruptor will kill most units with one hit.
Could be great to defend against drops, and will probably force splits or liftoffs from terran bio. Plus it is not vulnerable to air and - very important - if you send a few disruptors at a terran bio ball, they will have to run, split or die. if they run or split they take dmg from the rest of your army.


Storms already accomplish those goals. The disruptor, as designed, is unnecessary and doesn't add anything.


Yeh, I mostly agree with you here. I am really a bit curious to see how Blizzard will seperate the roles of Collosus vs Disruptor vs HT.

It atleast adds micro for the aoe unit.
Hell, its even possible to flank with this unit, i think this is like the first time i see a heavy cost unit able to flank.


What worries me about the Disruptor is that I think terrans will micro against it like they micro against HT's: By spreading out/splitting. In my opinion, it's better if each unit add a unique form of micro interaction.

Can people stop draw conclusions???
Blizzard are aware units are overlapping with each other. Things will change. Probably alot.


Blizzard just has a really bad track-record when it comes to being right where the community had concerns. Based on that, I think it's far that we remain very sceptical with regards to whether Blizzard are capable of making these 3 units feel unique and fun.
Axxis
Profile Joined May 2010
United States133 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-11-22 01:34:18
November 22 2014 01:33 GMT
#315
My few odd cents

Remove collossus, buff gateway units for early game and make air-toss viable for late game. Make pylons have an upgrade that lets them be able to warp-in. prewarpgate tech you just produce normally, afterward you have to have an upgraded pylon if you morph your gateways. (would be a strategical target)

Just get rid of hellions/hellbats and bring back the firebat! Increase siege tank damage in siege mode. Make herc into a mech style unit from factory. Increase medivac capacity and reduce it's movespeed.

Revert Fungal! Toss has tempest now(or did and still may) for Blords, such a great unit reduced to mediocrity. Increase health/armor of nydus. Increase creep tumor cast range and effect range. Give overseer a morph into leviathan dropship.
What we obtain too cheaply; we esteem too lightly. It is in dearness only that gives everything it's value.
Blizzkrieg
Profile Joined March 2014
95 Posts
November 22 2014 01:50 GMT
#316
On November 20 2014 04:42 SetGuitarsToKill wrote:
I hope to god 12 starting workers is gone. 6 was fine, I like the first couple minutes of generally relaxed time. If they want to up it, make it 8-10.


I agree 110%. Lowering the minerals per patch is fine... but leave the beginning of the game the same. It's just part of the triad of an RTS: acquire resources, construct a base, build units. 12 starting workers just seems to do too much of the work for us. Just seeing 12 workers automatically start mining at the beginning of the game would feel too cheap... like "well that easy".
Man is equally incapable of seeing the nothingness from which he emerges and the infinity in which he is engulfed. -Blaise Pascal
Whitewing
Profile Joined October 2010
United States7483 Posts
November 22 2014 01:52 GMT
#317
On November 22 2014 09:34 Foxxan wrote:
Can people stop draw conclusions???
Blizzard are aware units are overlapping with each other. Things will change. Probably alot.

Its better to talk about design of the units. What to add. How to make better interactions(I see like no ppl trying to imrpove the interactions).


We're discussing design. Our conclusions are based on current design choices and noting that they should be changed, which is kind of the point of a constructive discussion. You'll note that on my comments regarding the cyclone, I indicated several alternative options for it that would make it functional and not overpowered, such as limiting it to anti-air attacks with it's kiting ability.
Strategy"You know I fucking hate the way you play, right?" ~SC2John
mishimaBeef
Profile Blog Joined January 2010
Canada2259 Posts
November 22 2014 03:59 GMT
#318
They are not removing medivac speedboost. On the contrary, they are trying to give every race such harassment options.
Dare to live the life you have dreamed for yourself. Go forward and make your dreams come true. - Ralph Waldo Emerson
TedCruz2016
Profile Joined November 2014
Hong Kong271 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-11-22 05:04:39
November 22 2014 04:54 GMT
#319
On November 22 2014 09:29 Foxxan wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 22 2014 05:25 Whitewing wrote:
On November 21 2014 22:53 clickrush wrote:
who else thinks that...

...the cyclone would be way more cooler if it dealt much more damage but had to stand still to do so instead of being able to kite, while having the kite mode for free (without the charging up time) but it would then deal much less damage? That would emphasize micro much more while still being very different from the siege tank because it would have a way different application and skillset.

...the disruptor being scrapped and his overload (without the invicibility) was a DT upgrade. It would leave the DT uncloaked for a short period after the overload or right before it hits. You still had the utility to close in from cloak but it would be counterplayable.

..the shuttle should have a visible animation (mb a beam) when it loads in units from range.


If the cyclone can kite units, the damage is mostly irrelevant in the early game. It could do the low low DPS of a stalker and still murder everything, because it simply cannot be caught. It's already not going to be used TvZ because the hellion is superior for the same objectives in that matchup, it might be used in TvT, but it's role is in TvP, and nothing protoss has can catch it until blink is done.

I can see a variety of alternative design functions for it however. Taking away the attacking while moving function, but giving it a sort of root mode of its own where it can only hit air, like a mobile missile turret, would be cool. Or leaving its kiting function the same but make it so it only works on air units, and cannot hit ground, would make it fine.

The game will be redesigned. Will be a new game in beta.
Why do you draw conclusions like this?

Protoss might have an easier access to blink. Getting it alot faster since it will not break any mu.
Hell, stalkers might start with a weaker blink and then able to upgrade it to a better blink on the citadel.
There is still forcefield involved. Zealots might get a redesign with faster speed. Wouldnt be surprised if the unit will perhaps move faster than a stalker in Lotv. Then it can catch cyclones...
They might get a more fun micro-skill ability to to catch cyclones. Or atleast be used against cyclones when cooldown is off or if they get energy or something else.

Hellions initself dont cut it, they are terrible throughout the entire game. Their only role is versus zerglings.
And the interaction is usually boring with this unit.

Cyclone can change this. Much better interactions, more fun ones.
Kill static defence, attack armored units. Might open up mech in a whole different level.
If we look at broodwar real fast, the vulture were terrible against armored units. Yet, it opened up a lot of play for mech.


How about removing cyclone's anti-air targeting ability? Then either blink or phenix even oracles can deal with cyclones.

On November 22 2014 09:29 Foxxan wrote:If we compare 2cyclones vs 2hellions. I see alot of times the hellions dont kill a single worker while the 2cyclones might.

Protoss might need to go new opening completely vs terran.
Warpgate might get chagned even further.
Why cant 1fast robotic be standard? Immortals might get a new role, behave differently etc.

Cyclone might get tweaked so it has less range when locked on.
Lots of things will change, its kinda pointless drawing conclusions.


Cyclone and hellion are totally incomparable regarding to the cost and build time. You need a tech lab to produce cyclone, which means it's on the same tech level of tank, so just imagine what your opponent may have had when you have two tanks.
Make DC listen!
Yiome
Profile Joined February 2014
China1687 Posts
November 22 2014 07:15 GMT
#320
So basically it said that it's too early to call anything
An idea I can get behind
can't wait for the beta
Prev 1 14 15 16 17 18 20 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Sparkling Tuna Cup
10:00
Weekly #137
herO vs PercivalLIVE!
TBD vs ByuN
CranKy Ducklings304
CranKy Ducklings SOOP19
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Ryung 776
Rex 153
MindelVK 16
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 43005
Calm 7854
Shuttle 1101
Hyuk 894
Jaedong 731
Soma 381
firebathero 354
EffOrt 297
Mini 297
BeSt 287
[ Show more ]
Last 199
actioN 193
Stork 192
Light 166
Mong 121
Soulkey 118
ZerO 96
ggaemo 72
hero 60
Sharp 53
ToSsGirL 49
scan(afreeca) 33
soO 31
Aegong 28
Free 27
HiyA 25
Killer 22
sorry 22
Sea.KH 14
Sacsri 13
Hm[arnc] 12
ajuk12(nOOB) 12
Sexy 10
Noble 10
JulyZerg 9
zelot 7
Purpose 7
Dota 2
Gorgc4943
Dendi717
Counter-Strike
x6flipin314
Sick173
kRYSTAL_59
Other Games
FrodaN4634
B2W.Neo493
DeMusliM347
Happy332
KnowMe286
crisheroes279
Pyrionflax261
Livibee113
ZerO(Twitch)7
Organizations
StarCraft: Brood War
lovetv 15
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
[ Show 12 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• StrangeGG 31
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Jankos1871
Upcoming Events
IPSL
3h 45m
Bonyth vs Hawk
OSC
11h 45m
GSL
22h 45m
Monday Night Weeklies
1d 3h
Replay Cast
1d 11h
WardiTV Weekly
1d 22h
The PondCast
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
CrankTV Team League
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
[ Show More ]
CrankTV Team League
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
RSL Revival
5 days
Clem vs Lambo
Scarlett vs Cure
CranKy Ducklings
5 days
RSL Revival
6 days
Classic vs Trap
herO vs SHIN
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

ASL Season 22: Wild Card Qualifier
HSC XXIX
Eternal Conflict S2 E1

Ongoing

IPSL Spring 2026
Acropolis #4
YSL S3
CSL 2026 Summer (S21)
RSL Revival: Season 6
CranK Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League
SCTL 2026 Spring
Eternal Conflict S2 E2
XSE Pro League 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S3: W3
ASL S22 SEASON OPEN Day 1
Escore Tournament S3: W4
ASL S22 SEASON OPEN Day 2
Escore Tournament S3: W5
CSLAN 4
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
HSC XXX
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
Light Tournament 2026
Eternal Conflict S2 Finale
Eternal Conflict S2 E3
Logitech G Connect 2026
StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #5
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.