EPTLegacy of the Void Announced - Page 80
| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
LongShot27
United States2084 Posts
| ||
|
Zephyp
238 Posts
 | ||
|
[PkF] Wire
France24239 Posts
On November 09 2014 03:15 Jevity wrote: OBVIOUSLY, the cyclone is not going to appear in LotV anywhere near its current form. Of course. This is retarded, I'd be ashamed to show such a thing and to have progamers actually play such shit. Even a toddler could tell you why this unit is broken in its current state (broken in every sense, plain interesting and imbalanced). | ||
|
Sabu113
United States11112 Posts
On November 09 2014 03:18 [PkF] Wire wrote: Of course. This is retarded, I'd be ashamed to show such a thing and to have progamers actually play such shit. Even a toddler could tell you why this unit is broken in its current state (broken in every sense, plain interesting and imbalanced). Wait for Terran reavers. | ||
|
[PkF] Wire
France24239 Posts
On November 09 2014 03:17 LongShot27 wrote: The people who are excited about these changes really make me wonder about this community Man, they just have a positive attitude. Hakuna matata ! More seriously yeah, we should not get blinded by novelty. New things can be great and maybe SC2 needs them, but don't throw everything away just for change's sake. | ||
|
LongShot27
United States2084 Posts
On November 09 2014 03:19 [PkF] Wire wrote: Man, they just have a positive attitude. Hakuna matata ! More seriously yeah, we should not get blinded by novelty. New things can be great and maybe SC2 needs them, but don't throw everything away just for change's sake. The point is they haven't actually changed anything to address real issues. They changed things for the sake of changing them and people see shiny things and are excited | ||
|
[PkF] Wire
France24239 Posts
On November 09 2014 03:21 LongShot27 wrote: The point is they haven't actually changed anything to address real issues. I kinda agree, though you can't deny they're trying to make BCs/carriers/nydus/corruptors more interesting (in good or retarded ways, time will tell) and seem to have addressed the SH problem. Otherwise yeah, most of the units introduced don't seem to fulfill any needed role. | ||
|
Hider
Denmark9448 Posts
On November 09 2014 03:18 [PkF] Wire wrote: Of course. This is retarded, I'd be ashamed to show such a thing and to have progamers actually play such !@#$%^&*. Even a toddler could tell you why this unit is broken in its current state (broken in every sense, plain interesting and imbalanced). Right now everyone in twitch joke are going "Legacy of the Joke". I can't say this is positive advertisement. The point is they haven't actually changed anything to address real issues. They changed things for the sake of changing them and people see shiny things and are excited Yeh, that's my impression of 80% of the changes as well. It's just to make the community happy, while it tbh looks like they barely spent time on making the game more fun to play. | ||
|
KeksX
Germany3634 Posts
On November 09 2014 03:19 [PkF] Wire wrote: Man, they just have a positive attitude. Hakuna matata ! More seriously yeah, we should not get blinded by novelty. New things can be great and maybe SC2 needs them, but don't throw everything away just for change's sake. People just need to realize that this shit is not freaking black and white. These changes aren't the great big awesome resuce that will make everrything awesome and they will not kill the RTS genre either. Just chill the fuck out and wait. (This part is not directed to you, Wire, just saying that to that thread in general). | ||
|
Tresher
Germany404 Posts
On November 09 2014 03:07 HEADD wrote: Not having played with it but judging it early. Great idea. It looks stupid after watching the final showmatch but Blizzard better not make the same mistake they did with the Warhound: removing it instead of redesigning or balancing it. Just make it a generic vehicle that shoots air without lock on. Just make it a reliable Mech anti-air cause thats what Terran lacks with Mech. An Anti- Air Unit that shoots fast and is mobile. Hell even if they remove it bring back the Warhound that shoots Air without that Anti Mechanical crap. | ||
|
[PkF] Wire
France24239 Posts
On November 09 2014 03:24 Hider wrote: Right now everyone in twitch joke are going "Legacy of the Joke". I can't say this is positive advertisement. Honestly I can't help thinking they rushed the presentation because they needed to give the community a bone to chew on. But I fear this will have the opposite effect to what is researched. I won't say I fear the expansion, Blizzard know how to make a solid game and LotV won't look like that, but what would I think if I was say a LoL fan passing by and catching those games ? I'm pretty sure I'd laugh, say "wow, SC2 players even more retarded than I thought" and never return again. | ||
|
FFW_Rude
France10201 Posts
On November 09 2014 03:26 Tresher wrote: Not having played with it but judging it early. Great idea. It looks stupid after watching the final showmatch but Blizzard better not make the same mistake they did with the Warhound: removing it instead of redesigning or balancing it. Just make it a generic vehicle that shoots air without lock on. Just make it a reliable Mech anti-air cause thats what Terran lacks with Mech. An Anti- Air Unit that shoots fast and is mobile. Hell even if they remove it bring back the Warhound that shoots Air without that Anti Mechanical crap. You know that viking is an anti air unit ? | ||
|
Hider
Denmark9448 Posts
On November 09 2014 03:27 [PkF] Wire wrote: Honestly I can't help thinking they rushed the presentation because they needed to give the community a bone to chew on. But I fear this will have the opposite effect to what is researched. I won't say I fear the expansion, Blizzard know how to make a solid game and LotV won't look like that, but what would I think if I was say a LoL fan passing by and catching those games ? I'm pretty sure I'd laugh, say "wow, SC2 players even more retarded than I thought" and never return again. Agree. I think the end-product probably will be decent. Both WOL and HOTS wasn't that terrible afterall, but alot of the stuff the they have in the game here looks like something they first put in early friday 1 hour before blizzcon started becasue they had been busy working on Heroes of the Storm. | ||
|
Maniak_
France305 Posts
On November 09 2014 03:24 Hider wrote: Right now everyone in twitch joke are going "Legacy of the Joke". I can't say this is positive advertisement. And the twitch chat is known to be the place where the most reasonable and clever people gather. This is alpha, in a few showmatches, 24 hours after the initial announcement. If it's still the same when the beta starts, sure, whine about it. Right now it's just stupid (both the cyclone and the whining). | ||
|
Sabu113
United States11112 Posts
On November 09 2014 03:30 Hider wrote: Agree. I think the end-product probably will be decent. Both WOL and HOTS wasn't that terrible afterall, but alot of the stuff the they have in the game here looks like something they first put in early friday 1 hour before blizzcon started becasue they had been busy working on Heroes of the Storm. Neither were BW either though. At least the campaign should be fun. | ||
|
Big J
Austria16289 Posts
On November 09 2014 03:32 Maniak_ wrote: And the twitch chat is known to be the place where the most reasonable and clever people gather. This is alpha, in a few showmatches, 24 hours after the initial announcement. If it's still the same when the beta starts, sure, whine about it. Right now it's just stupid (both the cyclone and the whining). OK that's true. But if everybody can see that this is terrible, how the fuck can the developers miss that fact? It's like going to your boss with a shit presentation and then asking him to trust your project. | ||
|
Hider
Denmark9448 Posts
On November 09 2014 03:32 Maniak_ wrote: And the twitch chat is known to be the place where the most reasonable and clever people gather. This is alpha, in a few showmatches, 24 hours after the initial announcement. If it's still the same when the beta starts, sure, whine about it. Right now it's just stupid (both the cyclone and the whining). Blizzcon function as advertisement for new products, and if you give the audience the impression that your product is bad, then it's not optimal at all. | ||
|
KeksX
Germany3634 Posts
On November 09 2014 03:30 Hider wrote: Agree. I think the end-product probably will be decent. Both WOL and HOTS wasn't that terrible afterall, but alot of the stuff the they have in the game here looks like something they first put in early friday 1 hour before blizzcon started becasue they had been busy working on Heroes of the Storm. Thats a great point, though I think not showing LotV multiplayer at all would've been even worse. | ||
|
Garmer
1286 Posts
NEVERMIND was already posted, sry | ||
|
TheDwf
France19747 Posts
On November 09 2014 03:26 Tresher wrote: Not having played with it but judging it early. Great idea. It looks stupid after watching the final showmatch but Blizzard better not make the same mistake they did with the Warhound: removing it instead of redesigning or balancing it. Just make it a generic vehicle that shoots air without lock on. Just make it a reliable Mech anti-air cause thats what Terran lacks with Mech. An Anti- Air Unit that shoots fast and is mobile. Hell even if they remove it bring back the Warhound that shoots Air without that Anti Mechanical crap. If people aren't allowed to voice their opinions/concerns about the concepts, then what's the point in showcasing LotV at all? | ||
| ||
