| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
mikumegurine
Canada3145 Posts
On November 09 2014 02:51 cutler wrote: oh my god...lurker is back. Zerg looks extremly powerful at least from my Terran perspective. just mass cyclones lol | ||
|
pajoondies
United States316 Posts
| ||
|
Myrkskog
Canada481 Posts
On November 09 2014 02:48 Jevity wrote: What is the change to mining you/people are looking for? Changing the stale 3.25 base cap to something more dynamic. Spreading the 3 base cap over a wider area is so unbelievably boring compared to actually making an effective 4th-5th base viable it hurts. | ||
|
Hider
Denmark9396 Posts
Which is why, I imagin, they are making all the races more mobile and given them ways to break turteling players. It's also not just about mobility, but also about army-size count in midgame. If they want to balance this game around spreading out more, then protoss needs a big buff in terms of its armysize in the midgame. But even if we assume that they manage to "balance" it, it's still a solution that will create snowball effects, and it's why I agree with Lalush comments on "choking out the opponent". If you get an advantage in midgame, then the enemy just can't fall back for 2-3 minutes and then get back. Instead, he will be signifciantly behind in economy and will slowly be killed. With the BW economy, if you was behind bases by like 2 to 4, but had equal worker count, you was maybe only at a 25% disadvantage. But with this LOTV economy, the enemy will have twice as much income as you. That is not the way you create a back-and-fourth game. Moreover, I also question whether it really can add diversity in playstyles. If all units have to be super mobile to function into this spread-out economy, is that really a desireable solution then? So an economy that forces players to constantly take new bases doesn't work. Instead, the economy must reward players for taking extra bases. | ||
|
Satiinifi
Finland192 Posts
 | ||
|
Tresher
Germany404 Posts
On November 09 2014 01:58 HEADD wrote: ZvP looks alot more better than ZvT. Btw is funny how they trying hit fast units with ravager without fungal.And corruptors looks very weak vs buidings.Not like on that video on first page. RIP Headphone users who opened that. Seriously who thought this was a good idea to override the english cast with a maxed out mic which blows my speakers away? | ||
|
SinO[Ob]
France897 Posts
On November 09 2014 02:54 pajoondies wrote: this just looks so amazing, i'm so damn excited i actually jumped around my house when i saw the announcement thread here on team liquid yesterday lol Haha was totally dancing on my chair :D! | ||
|
Sabu113
United States11053 Posts
On November 09 2014 02:54 ACrow wrote: This is the internet - do not expect reason nor patience. The warhound was utter trash. How the hell can you be so conceited to not see that. It was the most a movey of amovey units possible. Crazy. | ||
|
Grollicus
Germany287 Posts
| ||
|
raga4ka
Bulgaria5679 Posts
Also i don't know why blizzard is making the game faster then it already is , and i don't know why everyone including blizzard thinks that playing defensive and turtling is a bad thing . Players should be given options to play defensive or offensive , playing mindless aggression all the time is not fun , planning macro oriented builds has always been the standart winning strategy . Some units have a CnC taste to them . | ||
|
FeyFey
Germany10114 Posts
| ||
|
Tresher
Germany404 Posts
| ||
|
HEADD
Czech Republic611 Posts
| ||
|
VArsovskiSC
Macedonia563 Posts
| ||
|
TheDwf
France19747 Posts
On November 09 2014 02:59 Sabu113 wrote: The warhound was utter trash. How the hell can you be so conceited to not see that. It was the most a movey of amovey units possible. Crazy. If only you could rework units during beta instead of removing them | ||
|
Hider
Denmark9396 Posts
On November 09 2014 03:04 FeyFey wrote: hehe like people said if everything is op its balanced, just super hard to play, because its so easy to get someone off guard. But thats why bw was such a nice viewer experience. Weird Stuff happened all the time. Well if you kill the early game there can be less weird stuff heh. No BW worked because there was (almost) no units which had such an extreme advantage that it hardcountered enemy units. The Cyclone or Siege Tank drop doesn't fulfill that criteria. Honestly, this LOTV alpha is (besides the Lurker) almost as far away from BW as you can come. | ||
|
BernabusStarcraft2
Scotland112 Posts
| ||
|
Jevity
United States67 Posts
| ||
|
Sabu113
United States11053 Posts
More i watch the more convinced this game will end up like WoL. No no guys. Here's an a move unit that's super beefy and good against everything. Hmn That's causing issues and isn't interesting. What about a unit that you don't even have to stop moving :D The ultimate fast a move unit. MICRO man. MICRO. It's so bad it should never have made it into alpha. | ||
|
FuRRie
Belgium815 Posts
| ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Other Games |
|
RSL Revival
Maestros of the Game
ShoWTimE vs Classic
Clem vs herO
Serral vs Bunny
Reynor vs Zoun
Cosmonarchy
Bonyth vs Dewalt
[BSL 2025] Weekly
RSL Revival
Maestros of the Game
BSL Team Wars
Afreeca Starleague
Snow vs Sharp
Jaedong vs Mini
Wardi Open
Sparkling Tuna Cup
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
