• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 05:18
CET 10:18
KST 18:18
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
ByuL: The Forgotten Master of ZvT29Behind the Blue - Team Liquid History Book19Clem wins HomeStory Cup 289HomeStory Cup 28 - Info & Preview13Rongyi Cup S3 - Preview & Info8
Community News
Vitality ends partnership with ONSYDE14Team Liquid Map Contest - Preparation Notice6Weekly Cups (Feb 23-Mar 1): herO doubles, 2v2 bonanza1Weekly Cups (Feb 16-22): MaxPax doubles0Weekly Cups (Feb 9-15): herO doubles up2
StarCraft 2
General
Vitality ends partnership with ONSYDE How do you think the 5.0.15 balance patch (Oct 2025) for StarCraft II has affected the game? Team Liquid Map Contest - Preparation Notice ByuL: The Forgotten Master of ZvT Nexon's StarCraft game could be FPS, led by UMS maker
Tourneys
PIG STY FESTIVAL 7.0! (19 Feb - 1 Mar) RSL Season 4 announced for March-April Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament $5,000 WardiTV Winter Championship 2026 Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond)
Strategy
Custom Maps
Publishing has been re-enabled! [Feb 24th 2026] Map Editor closed ?
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 515 Together Forever Mutation # 514 Ulnar New Year Mutation # 513 Attrition Warfare
Brood War
General
BSL 22 Map Contest — Submissions OPEN to March 10 battle.net problems Are you ready for ASL 21? Hype VIDEO BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Flash's ASL S21 & Future Plans Announcement
Tourneys
ASL Season 21 Qualifiers March 7-8 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues BWCL Season 64 Announcement [BSL22] Open Qualifier #1 - Sunday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Soma's 9 hatch build from ASL Game 2 Fighting Spirit mining rates Simple Questions, Simple Answers Zealot bombing is no longer popular?
Other Games
General Games
No Man's Sky (PS4 and PC) Path of Exile PC Games Sales Thread Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion The Story of Wings Gaming
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas Vanilla Mini Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread Mexico's Drug War Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine YouTube Thread
Fan Clubs
The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2026 Football Thread TL MMA Pick'em Pool 2013
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Laptop capable of using Photoshop Lightroom?
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
FS++
Kraekkling
Shocked by a laser…
Spydermine0240
Gaming-Related Deaths
TrAiDoS
ONE GREAT AMERICAN MARINE…
XenOsky
Unintentional protectionism…
Uldridge
ASL S21 English Commentary…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1610 users

Krr, iAsonu and XY suspended from WCS in 2014 - Page 4

Forum Index > SC2 General
102 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next All
Socup
Profile Joined June 2014
190 Posts
July 11 2014 23:34 GMT
#61
On July 12 2014 08:27 Insane wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 12 2014 08:24 Socup wrote:
Listen, when I climbed up from silver in KR, there were some people who were what you'd expect. Bad macro, all in, no real skill after the deadly build order push. However there's another group of gold/low plat players. People who's macro is what you see in pro games, who's upgrades and decisions are "pro status".

You obviously don't play very much KR ladder.

If their macro, upgrades, and decisions are pro status, then why in the world would they be stuck in gold or platinum?!


You tell me when Zergs have 3-3 maxed armies with ultras at 18-20 minutes in gold.
There's no reason blizzard can't release new units or fixes to a game without creating another costly "expansion" you've already paid 100$ for, unless they want to treadmill the gambler with future promises of "it gets better"
coverpunch
Profile Joined December 2011
United States2093 Posts
July 11 2014 23:40 GMT
#62
On July 12 2014 06:43 chipmonklord17 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 12 2014 05:35 Dodgin wrote:
On July 12 2014 05:30 nkr wrote:
On July 12 2014 05:14 Dodgin wrote:
They're just going to ignore the Korean players who did this last season?


which korean players? is there any proof?


http://www.reddit.com/r/starcraft/comments/29ypsg/update_on_ig_win_trading_situation/

http://www.reddit.com/r/starcraft/comments/29ypsg/update_on_ig_win_trading_situation/cipslay

http://www.reddit.com/r/starcraft/comments/29ypsg/update_on_ig_win_trading_situation/ciq7g2l

http://www.reddit.com/r/starcraft/comments/29ypsg/update_on_ig_win_trading_situation/ciq5o36




I'm curious if this has even been brought to blizzard's attention

It would be nice to know the scale as well. "Win trading" by itself doesn't tell you how bad it is. Giving someone 2 wins like the screenshot is technically cheating but it's arguably not a significant number to reach 200 wins and someone could plausibly defend themselves that they had internet problems or something.

I could sort of see how Blizzard doesn't want to draw a bright line to encourage a certain amount of cheating, something like saying trading 8 wins is okay but 9 wins results in punishment. It is probably the case that iAsonu and XY traded a number over a short period of time that is indefensible.
Socup
Profile Joined June 2014
190 Posts
July 11 2014 23:52 GMT
#63
On July 12 2014 08:40 coverpunch wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 12 2014 06:43 chipmonklord17 wrote:
On July 12 2014 05:35 Dodgin wrote:
On July 12 2014 05:30 nkr wrote:
On July 12 2014 05:14 Dodgin wrote:
They're just going to ignore the Korean players who did this last season?


which korean players? is there any proof?


http://www.reddit.com/r/starcraft/comments/29ypsg/update_on_ig_win_trading_situation/

http://www.reddit.com/r/starcraft/comments/29ypsg/update_on_ig_win_trading_situation/cipslay

http://www.reddit.com/r/starcraft/comments/29ypsg/update_on_ig_win_trading_situation/ciq7g2l

http://www.reddit.com/r/starcraft/comments/29ypsg/update_on_ig_win_trading_situation/ciq5o36




I'm curious if this has even been brought to blizzard's attention

It would be nice to know the scale as well. "Win trading" by itself doesn't tell you how bad it is. Giving someone 2 wins like the screenshot is technically cheating but it's arguably not a significant number to reach 200 wins and someone could plausibly defend themselves that they had internet problems or something.

I could sort of see how Blizzard doesn't want to draw a bright line to encourage a certain amount of cheating, something like saying trading 8 wins is okay but 9 wins results in punishment. It is probably the case that iAsonu and XY traded a number over a short period of time that is indefensible.


Common sense would say the bright line is at one, but unless people are watching players for their intent, disconnects would be very ambiguous.
There's no reason blizzard can't release new units or fixes to a game without creating another costly "expansion" you've already paid 100$ for, unless they want to treadmill the gambler with future promises of "it gets better"
Faust852
Profile Joined February 2012
Luxembourg4004 Posts
July 11 2014 23:55 GMT
#64
On July 12 2014 08:34 Socup wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 12 2014 08:27 Insane wrote:
On July 12 2014 08:24 Socup wrote:
Listen, when I climbed up from silver in KR, there were some people who were what you'd expect. Bad macro, all in, no real skill after the deadly build order push. However there's another group of gold/low plat players. People who's macro is what you see in pro games, who's upgrades and decisions are "pro status".

You obviously don't play very much KR ladder.

If their macro, upgrades, and decisions are pro status, then why in the world would they be stuck in gold or platinum?!


You tell me when Zergs have 3-3 maxed armies with ultras at 18-20 minutes in gold.


Happens too on EU.
coverpunch
Profile Joined December 2011
United States2093 Posts
July 12 2014 00:22 GMT
#65
On July 12 2014 08:52 Socup wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 12 2014 08:40 coverpunch wrote:
On July 12 2014 06:43 chipmonklord17 wrote:
On July 12 2014 05:35 Dodgin wrote:
On July 12 2014 05:30 nkr wrote:
On July 12 2014 05:14 Dodgin wrote:
They're just going to ignore the Korean players who did this last season?


which korean players? is there any proof?


http://www.reddit.com/r/starcraft/comments/29ypsg/update_on_ig_win_trading_situation/

http://www.reddit.com/r/starcraft/comments/29ypsg/update_on_ig_win_trading_situation/cipslay

http://www.reddit.com/r/starcraft/comments/29ypsg/update_on_ig_win_trading_situation/ciq7g2l

http://www.reddit.com/r/starcraft/comments/29ypsg/update_on_ig_win_trading_situation/ciq5o36




I'm curious if this has even been brought to blizzard's attention

It would be nice to know the scale as well. "Win trading" by itself doesn't tell you how bad it is. Giving someone 2 wins like the screenshot is technically cheating but it's arguably not a significant number to reach 200 wins and someone could plausibly defend themselves that they had internet problems or something.

I could sort of see how Blizzard doesn't want to draw a bright line to encourage a certain amount of cheating, something like saying trading 8 wins is okay but 9 wins results in punishment. It is probably the case that iAsonu and XY traded a number over a short period of time that is indefensible.


Common sense would say the bright line is at one, but unless people are watching players for their intent, disconnects would be very ambiguous.

Yeah, you can't tell the difference between a disconnect and win trading from any given game, unless people are dumb enough to chat "hey give me a win" and the other person promptly loses a game. Even if the same two players play 2, 3, even arguably 5 or 7 times and one player insta-disconnects and loses the games, that could be a gray area. Like I said, there's a number where it's indefensible. If someone loses 30 games to the same player where they are all insta-wins, obviously they're cheating.
LingBlingBling
Profile Joined December 2012
United States353 Posts
July 12 2014 00:27 GMT
#66
On July 12 2014 04:34 lantz wrote:
wow Blizzard woke up ?? Good news they will ban all maphackers tomorrow !!


Blizzard has not been able to ban map hackers for 5 years, I doubt they are going to start now, they can't even get rid of the external map hacks that been out on sc2 for 3 years, they tried sueing the hack creators but failed hard. lol.

Blizzard going after WCS chinese players and EU players now. Glad they are catching minor stuff like this but yeah.....They won't stop the mass hackers unless they hire a engineer to play cat and mouse with them, Blizzard to cheap to do that tho, they have the money and power to stop map hackers, they simply don't do it.

Even the hackers said Blizzard can get rid of them easily with a security engineer.
Remember our motto: We ain't got it.
Dangermousecatdog
Profile Joined December 2010
United Kingdom7084 Posts
July 12 2014 00:43 GMT
#67
This seems rather inconsistent. When they go after the Koreans or more well known players for win trading in order to qualify for the absurd requirement of 200 wins 2 weeks beforehand then Blizzard is serious about it.
geokilla
Profile Joined May 2011
Canada8245 Posts
July 12 2014 01:03 GMT
#68
On July 12 2014 05:35 Dodgin wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 12 2014 05:30 nkr wrote:
On July 12 2014 05:14 Dodgin wrote:
They're just going to ignore the Korean players who did this last season?


which korean players? is there any proof?


http://www.reddit.com/r/starcraft/comments/29ypsg/update_on_ig_win_trading_situation/

http://www.reddit.com/r/starcraft/comments/29ypsg/update_on_ig_win_trading_situation/cipslay

http://www.reddit.com/r/starcraft/comments/29ypsg/update_on_ig_win_trading_situation/ciq7g2l

http://www.reddit.com/r/starcraft/comments/29ypsg/update_on_ig_win_trading_situation/ciq5o36


Lol Blizzard... I guess the Korean market is more important?
JustPassingBy
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
10776 Posts
July 12 2014 06:13 GMT
#69
On July 12 2014 10:03 geokilla wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 12 2014 05:35 Dodgin wrote:
On July 12 2014 05:30 nkr wrote:
On July 12 2014 05:14 Dodgin wrote:
They're just going to ignore the Korean players who did this last season?


which korean players? is there any proof?


http://www.reddit.com/r/starcraft/comments/29ypsg/update_on_ig_win_trading_situation/

http://www.reddit.com/r/starcraft/comments/29ypsg/update_on_ig_win_trading_situation/cipslay

http://www.reddit.com/r/starcraft/comments/29ypsg/update_on_ig_win_trading_situation/ciq7g2l

http://www.reddit.com/r/starcraft/comments/29ypsg/update_on_ig_win_trading_situation/ciq5o36


Lol Blizzard... I guess the Korean market is more important?


Well, technically there is no proof since none of the players admitted doing it and the extend of game trading is also unkown, however I do think that Blizz should investigate it. :-/
Drake
Profile Joined October 2010
Germany6146 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-07-12 08:07:49
July 12 2014 08:06 GMT
#70
huge for ty and iasonu

On July 12 2014 15:13 JustPassingBy wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 12 2014 10:03 geokilla wrote:
On July 12 2014 05:35 Dodgin wrote:
On July 12 2014 05:30 nkr wrote:
On July 12 2014 05:14 Dodgin wrote:
They're just going to ignore the Korean players who did this last season?


which korean players? is there any proof?


http://www.reddit.com/r/starcraft/comments/29ypsg/update_on_ig_win_trading_situation/

http://www.reddit.com/r/starcraft/comments/29ypsg/update_on_ig_win_trading_situation/cipslay

http://www.reddit.com/r/starcraft/comments/29ypsg/update_on_ig_win_trading_situation/ciq7g2l

http://www.reddit.com/r/starcraft/comments/29ypsg/update_on_ig_win_trading_situation/ciq5o36


Lol Blizzard... I guess the Korean market is more important?


Well, technically there is no proof since none of the players admitted doing it and the extend of game trading is also unkown, however I do think that Blizz should investigate it. :-/


perhaps they already do or did but yet not enough proofs
Nb.Drake / CoL_Drake / Original Joined TL.net Tuesday, 15th of March 2005
Wardi
Profile Blog Joined November 2011
England898 Posts
July 12 2014 08:26 GMT
#71
On July 12 2014 06:04 superpanda27 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 12 2014 05:51 xYc wrote:
On July 12 2014 05:12 Paljas wrote:
On July 12 2014 04:58 Zenbrez wrote:
On July 12 2014 04:48 Paljas wrote:
On July 12 2014 04:44 Zenbrez wrote:
On July 12 2014 04:41 xYc wrote:
Don't really understand, what SC2I has to do with WCS. Not that I like matchfixing, but can the rules be applied to unrelated competitions? Could they be applied to ... don't know ... Hearthstone cheating as well?

You don't understand what sc2 has to do with WCS?

try to read more carefully
he said sc2l

I saw that, I assumed it was a typo or the l stood was "ladder", either way I don't know what it means. Whether it's a typo, ladder or league, it still doesn't make sense.

it probably stands for SC2 Improve Team League

but you are right, the rest of his post is dubious as best. the rules are clear


I guess they are referring to this rule:

Collusion and Match Fixing
–
Players are not allowed to intentionally alter the results of any match. If the organizer determines that a player is colluding or match fix ing, the player will be immediately disqualified and removed from the tournament and may be restricted from participating in future events.


I still don't understand where it says that the rules apply to competition that is not within the WCS system.


Krr is a participant of WCS, so I'm guessing in ANY competition he is part of, he is being kept to the WCS player code of conduct. And I'm also guessing that SC2ITL is a Blizzard sanctioned event so it can also fall under Blizzard's jurisdiction when the offender is a WCS participant. SC2ITL will likely also be handing out a punishment to Krr in terms of partaking in the SC2ITL.

edit: Blizzard is making, I think is making a clear statement, that any cheating found in any other competition will also hinder that participants chance's in WCS.


I banned both Krr and KensShow (the player he was playing as for another team) from all future SC2Improve events (SC2ITL & our individual leagues). Had no idea it would blow up to be this big and he would be punished in WCS too. It was pretty serious though - he had been playing for this other player and I assume being paid for it for numerous months in numerous competitions/cups. It was a lot more than just a one off.

At least he will be able to recover from a one season ban, though it is bad timing for him as he just had his best performance yet last season.
CommentatorOwner of WardiTV. Streamer, caster & event organizer. / / www.wardi.tv
JustPassingBy
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
10776 Posts
July 12 2014 09:06 GMT
#72
On July 12 2014 17:06 Drake wrote:
huge for ty and iasonu

Show nested quote +
On July 12 2014 15:13 JustPassingBy wrote:
On July 12 2014 10:03 geokilla wrote:
On July 12 2014 05:35 Dodgin wrote:
On July 12 2014 05:30 nkr wrote:
On July 12 2014 05:14 Dodgin wrote:
They're just going to ignore the Korean players who did this last season?


which korean players? is there any proof?


http://www.reddit.com/r/starcraft/comments/29ypsg/update_on_ig_win_trading_situation/

http://www.reddit.com/r/starcraft/comments/29ypsg/update_on_ig_win_trading_situation/cipslay

http://www.reddit.com/r/starcraft/comments/29ypsg/update_on_ig_win_trading_situation/ciq7g2l

http://www.reddit.com/r/starcraft/comments/29ypsg/update_on_ig_win_trading_situation/ciq5o36


Lol Blizzard... I guess the Korean market is more important?


Well, technically there is no proof since none of the players admitted doing it and the extend of game trading is also unkown, however I do think that Blizz should investigate it. :-/


perhaps they already do or did but yet not enough proofs


Then they should release a statement like, "oh that one screenshot was most likely just an unlucky dc, we checked their match history and could not find any hints of win trading".
TAMinator
Profile Joined February 2011
Australia2706 Posts
July 12 2014 09:13 GMT
#73
Kim Phan please be my waifu :3
AyaaLa
Profile Joined February 2012
Spain629 Posts
July 12 2014 10:01 GMT
#74
yeah ban the win traders and not the maphackers.
this shit is making me more sure that i will never play sc2 again.

goodbye
i balance whine all the time.
MagnuMizer
Profile Blog Joined February 2012
Denmark384 Posts
July 12 2014 10:16 GMT
#75
On July 12 2014 19:01 AyaaLa wrote:
yeah ban the win traders and not the maphackers.
this shit is making me more sure that i will never play sc2 again.

goodbye


they dont fix any of the issues at hand...

the entire ladder is fucked, the new maps are fucked, the widow mine buff is fucked, hackers everywhere.. everything is fucked...

Blizzard are necrophiliacs, they are FUCKING a DEAD GAME

User was warned for this post
tar
Profile Joined October 2010
Germany991 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-07-12 10:27:52
July 12 2014 10:27 GMT
#76
On July 12 2014 19:01 AyaaLa wrote:
yeah ban the win traders and not the maphackers.
this shit is making me more sure that i will never play sc2 again.

goodbye


Even if you think Blizzard should do more about maphacking, why would it be okay to let win trading go unpunished? Especially, when the incident concerns WCS players. This kind of argument does not make any sense to me.
whoever I pick for my anti team turns gosu
Sakkreth
Profile Joined February 2011
Lithuania1096 Posts
July 12 2014 10:45 GMT
#77
Be real here. Many many players do such stuff, those just happened to be caught.
WhiteRa, NaNiWa, Creator, sOs, Krr, ForGG, MMA, Zest ||
Sakkreth
Profile Joined February 2011
Lithuania1096 Posts
July 12 2014 10:48 GMT
#78
On July 12 2014 17:26 Wardi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 12 2014 06:04 superpanda27 wrote:
On July 12 2014 05:51 xYc wrote:
On July 12 2014 05:12 Paljas wrote:
On July 12 2014 04:58 Zenbrez wrote:
On July 12 2014 04:48 Paljas wrote:
On July 12 2014 04:44 Zenbrez wrote:
On July 12 2014 04:41 xYc wrote:
Don't really understand, what SC2I has to do with WCS. Not that I like matchfixing, but can the rules be applied to unrelated competitions? Could they be applied to ... don't know ... Hearthstone cheating as well?

You don't understand what sc2 has to do with WCS?

try to read more carefully
he said sc2l

I saw that, I assumed it was a typo or the l stood was "ladder", either way I don't know what it means. Whether it's a typo, ladder or league, it still doesn't make sense.

it probably stands for SC2 Improve Team League

but you are right, the rest of his post is dubious as best. the rules are clear


I guess they are referring to this rule:

Collusion and Match Fixing
–
Players are not allowed to intentionally alter the results of any match. If the organizer determines that a player is colluding or match fix ing, the player will be immediately disqualified and removed from the tournament and may be restricted from participating in future events.


I still don't understand where it says that the rules apply to competition that is not within the WCS system.


Krr is a participant of WCS, so I'm guessing in ANY competition he is part of, he is being kept to the WCS player code of conduct. And I'm also guessing that SC2ITL is a Blizzard sanctioned event so it can also fall under Blizzard's jurisdiction when the offender is a WCS participant. SC2ITL will likely also be handing out a punishment to Krr in terms of partaking in the SC2ITL.

edit: Blizzard is making, I think is making a clear statement, that any cheating found in any other competition will also hinder that participants chance's in WCS.


I banned both Krr and KensShow (the player he was playing as for another team) from all future SC2Improve events (SC2ITL & our individual leagues). Had no idea it would blow up to be this big and he would be punished in WCS too. It was pretty serious though - he had been playing for this other player and I assume being paid for it for numerous months in numerous competitions/cups. It was a lot more than just a one off.

At least he will be able to recover from a one season ban, though it is bad timing for him as he just had his best performance yet last season.


You have no proof of that, and assumptions when talking about player's career is just ridiculous.
WhiteRa, NaNiWa, Creator, sOs, Krr, ForGG, MMA, Zest ||
Wardi
Profile Blog Joined November 2011
England898 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-07-12 11:27:23
July 12 2014 11:22 GMT
#79
On July 12 2014 19:48 Sakkreth wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 12 2014 17:26 Wardi wrote:
On July 12 2014 06:04 superpanda27 wrote:
On July 12 2014 05:51 xYc wrote:
On July 12 2014 05:12 Paljas wrote:
On July 12 2014 04:58 Zenbrez wrote:
On July 12 2014 04:48 Paljas wrote:
On July 12 2014 04:44 Zenbrez wrote:
On July 12 2014 04:41 xYc wrote:
Don't really understand, what SC2I has to do with WCS. Not that I like matchfixing, but can the rules be applied to unrelated competitions? Could they be applied to ... don't know ... Hearthstone cheating as well?

You don't understand what sc2 has to do with WCS?

try to read more carefully
he said sc2l

I saw that, I assumed it was a typo or the l stood was "ladder", either way I don't know what it means. Whether it's a typo, ladder or league, it still doesn't make sense.

it probably stands for SC2 Improve Team League

but you are right, the rest of his post is dubious as best. the rules are clear


I guess they are referring to this rule:

Collusion and Match Fixing
–
Players are not allowed to intentionally alter the results of any match. If the organizer determines that a player is colluding or match fix ing, the player will be immediately disqualified and removed from the tournament and may be restricted from participating in future events.


I still don't understand where it says that the rules apply to competition that is not within the WCS system.


Krr is a participant of WCS, so I'm guessing in ANY competition he is part of, he is being kept to the WCS player code of conduct. And I'm also guessing that SC2ITL is a Blizzard sanctioned event so it can also fall under Blizzard's jurisdiction when the offender is a WCS participant. SC2ITL will likely also be handing out a punishment to Krr in terms of partaking in the SC2ITL.

edit: Blizzard is making, I think is making a clear statement, that any cheating found in any other competition will also hinder that participants chance's in WCS.


I banned both Krr and KensShow (the player he was playing as for another team) from all future SC2Improve events (SC2ITL & our individual leagues). Had no idea it would blow up to be this big and he would be punished in WCS too. It was pretty serious though - he had been playing for this other player and I assume being paid for it for numerous months in numerous competitions/cups. It was a lot more than just a one off.

At least he will be able to recover from a one season ban, though it is bad timing for him as he just had his best performance yet last season.


You have no proof of that, and assumptions when talking about player's career is just ridiculous.


We do, we have replays over numerous tournaments showing the same hotkeys etc and he admitted to it afterwards.The assumption was that he was getting some portion of KensShows pay, which is pretty likely because why else would he do it?

Edit : My original phrasing was bad I should have said : He had been playing for this other player for numerous months in numerous competitions/cups and I assume he was taking a share of the other players salary from his team when playing in Clan Wars etc.
CommentatorOwner of WardiTV. Streamer, caster & event organizer. / / www.wardi.tv
Xoronius
Profile Joined July 2011
Germany6362 Posts
July 12 2014 12:43 GMT
#80
On July 12 2014 19:01 AyaaLa wrote:
yeah ban the win traders and not the maphackers.
this shit is making me more sure that i will never play sc2 again.

goodbye

There ware no maphackers in WCS. I'm sure, if a WCS player would be map hacking, he would get a far more severe punishment. Or when was the last time, you heard of Spades or Daisuki?
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 42m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
SortOf 147
mcanning 115
StarCraft: Brood War
Sea 81969
Britney 27971
Horang2 21158
Jaedong 2341
actioN 297
Mong 270
ToSsGirL 117
Sharp 90
Shine 64
scan(afreeca) 37
Dota 2
XaKoH 501
NeuroSwarm113
League of Legends
JimRising 672
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox548
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor176
MindelVK13
Other Games
summit1g8634
C9.Mang0296
Happy232
Fuzer 113
Mew2King28
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream6203
PGL Dota 2 - Secondary Stream1179
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 12 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH248
• LUISG 24
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Upcoming Events
Sparkling Tuna Cup
42m
RSL Revival
42m
Classic vs TriGGeR
Cure vs Cham
WardiTV Winter Champion…
2h 42m
Solar vs Clem
Cure vs Bunny
herO vs MaxPax
OSC
3h 12m
BSL
10h 42m
Replay Cast
14h 42m
Replay Cast
23h 42m
Monday Night Weeklies
1d 7h
OSC
1d 14h
Replay Cast
3 days
[ Show More ]
The PondCast
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
CranKy Ducklings
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

ASL Season 21: Qualifier #1
PiG Sty Festival 7.0
Underdog Cup #3

Ongoing

KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 1
Jeongseon Sooper Cup
Spring Cup 2026
ASL Season 21: Qualifier #2
RSL Revival: Season 4
WardiTV Winter 2026
Nations Cup 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Stage 1&2
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual

Upcoming

ASL Season 21
Acropolis #4 - TS6
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
CSLAN 4
HSC XXIX
uThermal 2v2 2026 Main Event
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
NationLESS Cup
CS Asia Championships 2026
Asian Champions League 2026
IEM Atlanta 2026
PGL Astana 2026
BLAST Rivals Spring 2026
CCT Season 3 Global Finals
IEM Rio 2026
PGL Bucharest 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 1
BLAST Open Spring 2026
ESL Pro League S23 Finals
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.