| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Musicus
Germany23576 Posts
On July 12 2014 04:41 Picasso wrote: feel like catching maphackers are more urgent of an issue if Blizzard cared so much about justice They are trying, they made a post 2 days ago. http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/blog/14732379 | ||
|
nkr
Sweden5451 Posts
On July 12 2014 04:31 LongShot27 wrote: The worst part about this, is none of them needed to do it, All three of these players are easily challenger level players and possibly premier in their regions. Don't break the rules kids. idno, the worst part about this to me is that they all cheated in some way  | ||
|
Zenbrez
Canada5973 Posts
I saw that, I assumed it was a typo or the l stood was "ladder", either way I don't know what it means. Whether it's a typo, ladder or league, it still doesn't make sense. | ||
|
KingFool
Canada428 Posts
I think anyone who thought about running 2 accounts in a league to help a team out or try and make an extra buck, is going to now think otherwise. | ||
|
Musicus
Germany23576 Posts
| ||
|
Yakikorosu
1203 Posts
On July 12 2014 04:32 Josh_Video wrote: Yeah, and IAsonu and Krr's cheating had NOTHING to do with WCS. Krr was cheating in a teamleague and IAsonu did not need the wins anyway, since he won the chinese qualifier. If you read the post carefully, iAsonu was not suspended for getting himself wins but for helping XY get sufficient wins on NA server to participate in wildcard qualifier (XY is not currently qualified for Challenger). In other words, he was suspended for helping XY cheat, not for cheating for his own benefit: While iAsonu already held WCS Challenger status, he is not indemnified and was complicit in cheating. | ||
|
Kevn23
United States80 Posts
| ||
|
Josh_Video
Canada798 Posts
On July 12 2014 05:02 Yakikorosu wrote: If you read the post carefully, iAsonu was not suspended for getting himself wins but for helping XY get sufficient wins on NA server to participate in wildcard qualifier (XY is not currently qualified for Challenger). In other words, he was suspended for helping XY cheat, not for cheating for his own benefit: Sorry, what I meant to say was that neither of these players cheated to get into WCS, and were disqualified for other reasons. | ||
|
Paljas
Germany6926 Posts
On July 12 2014 04:58 Zenbrez wrote: I saw that, I assumed it was a typo or the l stood was "ladder", either way I don't know what it means. Whether it's a typo, ladder or league, it still doesn't make sense. it probably stands for SC2 Improve Team League but you are right, the rest of his post is dubious as best. the rules are clear | ||
|
DarkPlasmaBall
United States45223 Posts
Blizzard has found Krr to be in violation of the collusion and match fixing section ... iAsonu recently qualified for WCS America Season 3, and XY participated in the past WCS America events and the Americas server ladder. Players on the Americas server reported win trading between the two players Why are these guys only suspended and not entirely excommunicated? Or will the community pretty much take care of that anyway? This is despicable. | ||
|
Dodgin
Canada39254 Posts
| ||
|
JustPassingBy
10776 Posts
On July 12 2014 05:14 Dodgin wrote: They're just going to ignore the Korean players who did this last season? I second that question. They should at least make a statement about that. | ||
|
Paljas
Germany6926 Posts
On July 12 2014 05:14 DarkPlasmaBall wrote: Why are these guys only suspended and not entirely excommunicated? Or will the community pretty much take care of that anyway? This is despicable. what? they traded some wins, which is bad, and suspending them for one season is an appropriate punishment. demonizing them is not | ||
|
nkr
Sweden5451 Posts
On July 12 2014 05:14 Dodgin wrote: They're just going to ignore the Korean players who did this last season? which korean players? is there any proof? | ||
|
superpanda27
111 Posts
On July 12 2014 05:14 DarkPlasmaBall wrote: Why are these guys only suspended and not entirely excommunicated? Or will the community pretty much take care of that anyway? This is despicable. This the first instance of them doing this, they are being punished sufficiently for now. The second time they get caught doing this will be and should be a different story. | ||
|
Dodgin
Canada39254 Posts
http://www.reddit.com/r/starcraft/comments/29ypsg/update_on_ig_win_trading_situation/ http://www.reddit.com/r/starcraft/comments/29ypsg/update_on_ig_win_trading_situation/cipslay http://www.reddit.com/r/starcraft/comments/29ypsg/update_on_ig_win_trading_situation/ciq7g2l http://www.reddit.com/r/starcraft/comments/29ypsg/update_on_ig_win_trading_situation/ciq5o36 | ||
|
Circumstance
United States11403 Posts
On July 12 2014 04:34 Rehio wrote: Can it really be considered "Drama" when it's a professional response from a ruling authority about a violation of rules? Seems pretty standard, to me, nothing to be dramatic about. Kinda curious about the spot being freed up in WCS EU. Why add it to the wildcard qualifier and not one of the EU Qualifiers? Standard policy for every other time someone forfeits a spot in their WCS region - the extra spot always comes from the Wildcard. Did the same with Naniwa, Hack, Byul, and the Duckdeok retirement. | ||
Zealously
East Gorteau22261 Posts
On July 12 2014 04:25 Cokefreak wrote: Can't have a week without drama... Fortunately, this isn't really dramatic. Three people broke the rules and were punished accordingly. While sad and disappointing for the fans, it's hardly dramatic. I think Blizzard handled this well. | ||
|
xYc
Austria75 Posts
On July 12 2014 05:12 Paljas wrote: it probably stands for SC2 Improve Team League but you are right, the rest of his post is dubious as best. the rules are clear I guess they are referring to this rule: Collusion and Match Fixing – Players are not allowed to intentionally alter the results of any match. If the organizer determines that a player is colluding or match fix ing, the player will be immediately disqualified and removed from the tournament and may be restricted from participating in future events. I still don't understand where it says that the rules apply to competition that is not within the WCS system. | ||
|
Zealously
East Gorteau22261 Posts
On July 12 2014 05:51 xYc wrote: I guess they are referring to this rule: I still don't understand where it says that the rules apply to competition that is not within the WCS system. Semantics, but "any match" could be seen as implying it, though I don't know if there is anything in the rulebook that says the rules only apply to WCS events unless stated otherwise. | ||
| ||
|
|
OSC
Shameless vs MaNa
Nicoract vs Percival
Krystianer vs TBD
Cure vs SHIN
PiGosaur Monday
The PondCast
OSC
Big Brain Bouts
Serral vs TBD
BSL 21
BSL 21
Wardi Open
Monday Night Weeklies
|
|
|
EPT
