| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Big J
Austria16289 Posts
On May 06 2014 17:24 EatThePath wrote: I should probably say something of substance instead of just whining. The real disappointment here is that a TLMC designed to produce "multi spawn maps" gave us no 3- or 4-player maps. Biome is basically 3player, right? | ||
|
EatThePath
United States3943 Posts
Yeah, but...  | ||
|
xuanzue
Colombia1747 Posts
| ||
|
Big J
Austria16289 Posts
On May 06 2014 17:58 xuanzue wrote: this has been the most disappointing TLMC yet. Na, the last one was worse with a map winning that wasnt suited for any form of Starcraft. | ||
|
SatedSC2
England3012 Posts
| ||
|
Scarecrow
Korea (South)9175 Posts
On May 06 2014 17:58 xuanzue wrote: this has been the most disappointing TLMC yet. Well Blizzard's 'generous' donations of a souvenir and a headset/keyboard/mouse hardly encourage the best of the best. Despite, that I like the look of all the winners. Hopefully they get some play at pro-level before the theorycrafters trash them too much. | ||
|
ACrow
Germany6583 Posts
 | ||
|
Tuczniak
1561 Posts
| ||
|
xuanzue
Colombia1747 Posts
my vote was for kamala, mainly because is not that free the 3rd. still i have a problem that maps tend to bring 16 bases (with 8 patches) and make too long games. distances are so long, that most players don't care about to send a worker to explore, and then get blind countered by build orders. tournament organizers actually are heavy focused in a bo3/5/7 format, with group stages of double elimination that trend to make long sessions (ro 32/16 in wcs) and those maps bring longer games, than overall makes me bored. I mostly disappointed with the trend of huge maps + free expos, every contest bring bigger maps than the previous session. | ||
|
neobowman
Canada3324 Posts
| ||
|
Meavis
Netherlands1300 Posts
| ||
|
MilkmanSC
United Kingdom22 Posts
| ||
nimdil
Poland3775 Posts
On May 06 2014 18:02 Big J wrote: Na, the last one was worse with a map winning that wasnt suited for any form of Starcraft. But the runner up ended up as very solid addition to the map pool. This may be the case here: Biome has opportunity to proof itself, but if it will fail both 2nd and 3rd map look like good and very solid addition. | ||
|
IeZaeL
Italy991 Posts
 !Time to update the Signature. | ||
|
Edpayasugo
United Kingdom2223 Posts
| ||
|
Scarx
Germany49 Posts
| ||
|
[PkF] Wire
France24239 Posts
| ||
|
Zax19
Czech Republic1136 Posts
| ||
|
TotalBiscuit
United Kingdom5437 Posts
On May 06 2014 10:54 blacksheepwall wrote: These maps look awesome. Congrats to everyone. Hopefully TB will start using these maps so we can see some high level games on them. With most of them, probably not. They're far too standard. I don't see a reason to use CJ Biome over New Pompeii for instance, which is a more interesting map with the same 5 spawn idea. The TLMCs flagrant dismissal of "gimmicks" is also a turnoff. SHOUTcraft isn't interested in running a tournament with ladder maps, everyone else does that and frankly there's nothing wrong with a "gimmick" or two to liven things up. | ||
|
FlopTurnReaver
Switzerland1980 Posts
Cool contest. On May 06 2014 22:37 TotalBiscuit wrote: With most of them, probably not. They're far too standard. I don't see a reason to use CJ Biome over New Pompeii for instance, which is a more interesting map with the same 5 spawn idea. The TLMCs flagrant dismissal of "gimmicks" is also a turnoff. SHOUTcraft isn't interested in running a tournament with ladder maps, everyone else does that and frankly there's nothing wrong with a "gimmick" or two to liven things up. Why don't you host a contest then? :o | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 Counter-Strike Other Games |
|
Korean StarCraft League
Afreeca Starleague
Rush vs Soulkey
CranKy Ducklings
WardiTV Invitational
AI Arena Tournament
BSL Open Qualifier
Sparkling Tuna Cup
OSC
IPSL
BSL Open Qualifier
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
