| Forum Index > SC2 General |
|
Autotroph
United Kingdom940 Posts
On February 06 2014 07:28 Meerel wrote: prepare for shallow answers Yeah they are quite evasive. "Why is Starcraft 2 so much more deathball-y than Brood War?" ----> "we believe having to micro armies and their positioning correctly to win major battles is a good thing" ...okay? | ||
|
Nerevar
547 Posts
On February 06 2014 07:44 Glorfindel! wrote: This far the answers has been quite random - Mech on Korean GM vs Protoss? O.o - Capital ships are bad cause it is fun if they get randomly used every now and then WTF? :D I haven't been watching Korean ladder streams very often, but maybe the mech games in the GSL Challenger league are what's currently in mind. | ||
|
Glorfindel!
Sweden1815 Posts
| ||
|
GizmoPT
Portugal3040 Posts
On February 06 2014 07:46 Autotroph wrote: Yeah they are quite evasive. "Why is Starcraft 2 so much more deathball-y than Brood War?" ----> "we believe having to micro armies and their positioning correctly to win major battles is a good thing" ...okay? "We believe armies as a whole are easier to move around and control because of the better pathing and unlimited unit selection." stop being stupid. | ||
The_Templar
your Country52798 Posts
On February 06 2014 07:44 Glorfindel! wrote: This far the answers has been quite random - Mech on Korean GM vs Protoss? O.o - Capital ships are bad cause it is fun if they get randomly used every now and then WTF? :D Mech on Korean GM vs Protoss is would be awesome though, I don't see why that's random considering why they're trying to buff mech. | ||
|
Ragoo
Germany2773 Posts
Regardless of whether or not I would want BCs or Carrier to be redesigned, this has to be the fucking dumbest argument. Confuse SC2 players? Are SC2 players like 8 year olds or some facebook game playing casuals that they can't handle a unit being changed without getting confused and frustrated or what?! | ||
|
Pandain
United States12989 Posts
| ||
|
boxerfred
Germany8360 Posts
| ||
|
SC2Toastie
Netherlands5725 Posts
| ||
|
Glorfindel!
Sweden1815 Posts
On February 06 2014 07:49 The_Templar wrote: Mech on Korean GM vs Protoss is would be awesome though, I don't see why that's random considering why they're trying to buff mech. I just think it is hilarious how he can say that it is important for Terran players to keep trying to mech. If the whole pro scene has been playing 8 hours per day, for almost a year and hardly a single player actually finds mech to be better than bio in TvP it feels a bit.. Like harassment to be told to keep trying it out. If you have problem in PvT for an example and you keep getting told "It is important that you keep try to Tempest Rush from one base" it is hard to get atleast not a little insulted  | ||
|
ZAiNs
United Kingdom6525 Posts
David, What are your plans in order to make "forgotten" units such as Battlecruiser, Broodlord, Viper, etc. usable in high level matches? Thanks! Cheers! lol at this question. Vipers and Brood Lords are 'forgotten' units? I guess Carriers are so forgotten he forgot to mention them :D. | ||
|
Dingodile
4139 Posts
| ||
|
boxerfred
Germany8360 Posts
| ||
|
TheDwf
France19747 Posts
On February 06 2014 07:49 Ragoo wrote: "As I said earlier today, we prefer not to do design changes in a patch if we can, because changing how the unit functions completely will be very confusing to players." Regardless of whether or not I would want BCs or Carrier to be redesigned, this has to be the fucking dumbest argument. Confuse SC2 players? Are SC2 players like 8 year olds or some facebook game playing casuals that they can't handle a unit being changed without getting confused and frustrated or what?! Also known as "the casual argument". When you have no sensible reason not to do something, pretend "casuals won't understand". Problem solved. | ||
|
Foxxan
Sweden3427 Posts
We've talked about our stance on Force Fields in the past, and it still remains unchanged. We feel like we get a lot of feedback from forums saying there's no micro anyone can do against Force Fields. However, we just don't see this. For example, why do Zerglings or roaches try to bait out Force Fields if micro against them is not possible? Terran players picking off units on one side of Force Fields and dropping them on the more favorable side is another good example. We believe Force Fields are a very unique ability that sometimes feel there was nothing you could do, but that is okay because there are varying degrees of successes and failures. That is just StarCraft: If DTs come in when I have no detectors I'm dead, but that doesn't mean there was nothing I could have done. Seems lotv will not change alot. | ||
|
boxerfred
Germany8360 Posts
On February 06 2014 07:52 Dingodile wrote: someone should post on that thread why they like that there are only hardcounter units. Done, since you wear the Acer tag and I'm in a troll mode  . | ||
|
Pandain
United States12989 Posts
On February 06 2014 07:52 ZAiNs wrote: lol at this question. Vipers and Brood Lords are 'forgotten' units? I guess Carriers are so forgotten he forgot to mention them :D. Yeah, Broodlords aren't forgotten in late game and Vipers are a necessity in ZvP. | ||
|
The_Templar
your Country52798 Posts
On February 06 2014 07:54 boxerfred wrote: Done, since you wear the Acer tag and I'm in a troll mode . uh.. I did too lol | ||
|
boxerfred
Germany8360 Posts
And we used EXACTLY the same words Oo | ||
|
MagnuMizer
Denmark384 Posts
thank you for your answers! | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 League of Legends Counter-Strike Heroes of the Storm Other Games |
|
Sparkling Tuna Cup
Afreeca Starleague
Leta vs Soulkey
PiGosaur Cup
Kung Fu Cup
The PondCast
Replay Cast
CranKy Ducklings
Online Event
FEL
AI Arena Tournament
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
