|
On December 21 2013 20:13 RoccatDIMAGA wrote:I clicked 60 times right out of 60! after one hour of practice and its feel so hard to do more :D Thx its really nice game for precision  I will try more ^___^ Edit:after 1 more hour I clicked 64 times right out of 64! and its feels very very tuff to get more ^__^ Update: My wife clicked 52 times right out of 61! from first time :D
dimaga family OP!
|
I wonder, if you're going to change from a higher dpi to a lower one (say, 2000 to 1500), would it pay off to actually practice for a while at 1000? The theory behind it would be that if you're going to incrementally lower your mouse speed you'll keep all the habits from the faster speeds, while if you go significantly below that you can better relearn how to use the new speed. It's just a theory though.
|
On December 21 2013 22:02 Grumbels wrote:
I wonder, if you're going to change from a higher dpi to a lower one (say, 2000 to 1500), would it pay off to actually practice for a while at 1000? The theory behind it would be that if you're going to incrementally lower your mouse speed you'll keep all the habits from the faster speeds, while if you go significantly below that you can better relearn how to use the new speed. It's just a theory though.
I think overshooting it would only lengthen the time taken to get used to the new settings. Pick a DPI you think would be optimal to play at, 800 is probably a solid number even though I use 400 and either rip the bandaid off in one change or slowly lower your dpi every few days until you reach the goal.
It really sucks ass when you first are using a new sensitivity or hotkeys, especially in a competitive game as it makes you feel like you are being held back. To reduce temptation of quitting on a new setup Id suggest playing a less competitive game type until you are used to it. Be it marine split challenge, practicing build orders or team games, anything where you wont get frustrated when you lose is the best way to stick to the change. Mouse sensitivity changes are way easier than new hotkeys so you should be back to your peak pretty fast.
|
United Kingdom20343 Posts
I overshoot when i make any big change, but i've used everything from 3200 to 360dpi for periods of time. Might not be smart for someone who's not used to adjusting.. It takes me hours to get basic function good, days/weeks/months to get muscle memory up to be better with the sens than i have been with mouse before
|
good thing i play protoss so i dont really need this
|
On December 22 2013 02:59 QzYSc2 wrote:
good thing i play protoss so i dont really need this
Thats hilariously wrong. You dont think you need precision when microing your stalkers, placing those forcefields, microing 4 control groups of different units, splitting and targeting banelings, even as simple as warping in a crowded field?
|
On December 22 2013 02:59 QzYSc2 wrote:
good thing i play protoss so i dont really need this
protoss needs less speed, but just as much precision to play more - probably even a little more
|
69 out of 71, my record after about 20 times.
this is tiring my eyes so much, i cant believe it :D
I average about 2-3 faster using the standard background instead of the clouds btw, no idea why.
|
based snute can also MAKE games
I won't post my score because someone I actually know may see it and de-friend me =(
|
On December 22 2013 04:37 KalWarkov wrote:
69 out of 71, my record after about 20 times.
this is tiring my eyes so much, i cant believe it :D
I average about 2-3 faster using the standard background instead of the clouds btw, no idea why.
if you strain your eyes you are focusing too much and probably forgetting to breath. if you're conscious of this you can improve in these areas though
|
I clicked 48 times right out of 62!
woooo
|
Poland3772 Posts
It should be fairly use to reproduce it with HTML5/JS and just host it on TL. Nice idea.
|
Poland3772 Posts
Wrong topic - delete please.
|
On December 22 2013 04:21 Excludos wrote:Show nested quote +On December 22 2013 02:59 QzYSc2 wrote:
good thing i play protoss so i dont really need this Thats hilariously wrong. You dont think you need precision when microing your stalkers, placing those forcefields, microing 4 control groups of different units, splitting and targeting banelings, even as simple as warping in a crowded field?
yes, my OPINION is wrong. yours is correct. /sarcasm.
placing forcefields has a way bigger template and easier to do, then the accuracy required to click lets say a baneling.
yes this is only my opinion incase you didn't realize, and no my opinion cant be wrong.
edit: also, who the hell plays protoss with 4 control groups? warping in a crowded field you can just spam click, no accuracy required. feedback on medivac ghost you can spam click, because you can't actually cast it on marines/marauders. snipe on zealot instead of templar or zergling instead of baneling? oh sh-t.
|
On December 23 2013 09:43 QzYSc2 wrote:Show nested quote +On December 22 2013 04:21 Excludos wrote:On December 22 2013 02:59 QzYSc2 wrote:
good thing i play protoss so i dont really need this Thats hilariously wrong. You dont think you need precision when microing your stalkers, placing those forcefields, microing 4 control groups of different units, splitting and targeting banelings, even as simple as warping in a crowded field? yes, my OPINION is wrong. yours is correct. /sarcasm. placing forcefields has a way bigger template and easier to do, then the accuracy required to click lets say a baneling. yes this is only my opinion incase you didn't realize, and no my opinion cant be wrong. edit: also, who the hell plays protoss with 4 control groups? warping in a crowded field you can just spam click, no accuracy required. feedback on medivac ghost you can spam click, because you can't actually cast it on marines/marauders. snipe on zealot instead of templar or zergling instead of baneling? oh sh-t.
Yes. Your OPINION in this case is wrong /not sarcasm. If you come back as gm or do well in a major tournament you can opinionate as much as you want. Until then you are wrong about this subject.
Look up Dunner Kruger while youre at it if you wonder why this is.
|
68/72 :D Fun game Snute! <3
|
On December 23 2013 15:34 Excludos wrote:Show nested quote +On December 23 2013 09:43 QzYSc2 wrote:On December 22 2013 04:21 Excludos wrote:On December 22 2013 02:59 QzYSc2 wrote:
good thing i play protoss so i dont really need this Thats hilariously wrong. You dont think you need precision when microing your stalkers, placing those forcefields, microing 4 control groups of different units, splitting and targeting banelings, even as simple as warping in a crowded field? yes, my OPINION is wrong. yours is correct. /sarcasm. placing forcefields has a way bigger template and easier to do, then the accuracy required to click lets say a baneling. yes this is only my opinion incase you didn't realize, and no my opinion cant be wrong. edit: also, who the hell plays protoss with 4 control groups? warping in a crowded field you can just spam click, no accuracy required. feedback on medivac ghost you can spam click, because you can't actually cast it on marines/marauders. snipe on zealot instead of templar or zergling instead of baneling? oh sh-t. Yes. Your OPINION in this case is wrong /not sarcasm. If you come back as gm or do well in a major tournament you can opinionate as much as you want. Until then you are wrong about this subject. Look up Dunner Kruger while youre at it if you wonder why this is.
You are a massive wanker.
User was temp banned for this post.
|
Uh, my resolution on windows and in game is much lower. How different will this be for me, or can I even run it?
Also, just simply clicking unmoving targets is easy if that's all this is, try picking out a damaged ling in a group of them running on creep..
PS- someone port this to flash/browser.
|
On December 23 2013 16:53 MarlieChurphy wrote:
Uh, my resolution on windows and in game is much lower. How different will this be for me, or can I even run it?
Also, just simply clicking unmoving targets is easy if that's all this is, try picking out a damaged ling in a group of them running on creep..
PS- someone port this to flash/browser.
It's really fast to DL and unpack, go try yourself. It'll be faster than posting and waiting for reply, and give you better information.
imo, the boxes as so small that it doesn't feel really relevant for sc2. Make the boxes larger and make me press some keys on the keyboard every now and then, and I'll be all over it.
|
Poland3772 Posts
On December 23 2013 17:10 Cascade wrote:Show nested quote +On December 23 2013 16:53 MarlieChurphy wrote:
Uh, my resolution on windows and in game is much lower. How different will this be for me, or can I even run it?
Also, just simply clicking unmoving targets is easy if that's all this is, try picking out a damaged ling in a group of them running on creep..
PS- someone port this to flash/browser. It's really fast to DL and unpack, go try yourself. It'll be faster than posting and waiting for reply, and give you better information. imo, the boxes as so small that it doesn't feel really relevant for sc2. Make the boxes larger and make me press some keys on the keyboard every now and then, and I'll be all over it.
Obviously it's not about being 100% as SC2 but to improve precision clicking. Your argument is invalid - compare it to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skeet_shooting - would you argue that it doesn't help with - I don't know - duck hunting because ducks are bigger than 110mm in diameter?
EDIT: Also notice that both Snute and DIMAGA have high scores with up to 100% precision. Coincidence?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
